پیوندهای مفید
اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 161 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 6,532 |
| تعداد مقالات | 70,501 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 124,099,631 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 97,207,038 |
تأثیر شیوه‌های مختلف بهره‌برداری بر وضعیت مراتع زمستانه (مطالعة موردی: استان سمنان) | ||
| پژوهش های روستائی | ||
| مقاله 4، دوره 2، شماره 6 - شماره پیاپی 598432، مهر 1390، صفحه 95-110 اصل مقاله (423.53 K) | ||
| نویسنده | ||
| علی اکبر کریمیان | ||
| استادیار گروه مرتع و آبخیزداری، دانشکده منابع طبیعی، دانشگاه یزد | ||
| چکیده | ||
| تحقیق حاضر در سال 1388 در مراتع زمستانه استان سمنان، به منظور مقایسه تأثیر روش‌های مختلف و رایج بهره‌برداری در بین روستاییان و عشایر منطقه، بر وضعیت مراتع به اجرا گذاشته شد. جامعه آماری تحقیق براساس پروانه چرایی به سه گروه تقسیم‌بندی شد: تک‌پروانه به نام بهره‌بردار (افراز)، پروانه به‌نام شخص به عنوان نماینده بیش از 2 بهره‌بردار (مشاع)، و پروانه به نام شورای روستا. افزون بر اینها، روش نمونه‌گیری طبقه‌بندی شده تصادفی با تخصیص متناسب مورد استفاده قرار گرفت و با بهره‌گیری از فرمول، کوکران، در مجموع تعداد نمونه مورد نیاز 50 مرتع تعیین گردید. به منظور گردآوری داده‌های مورد نیاز از پرسشنامه و اندازه‌گیری‌های میدانی استفاده شد. نتایج آمار توصیفی نشان داد که 66 درصد از روستاییان به صورت مشاع، 20 درصد به صورت شورایی و 14 درصد به طریق افرازی از مراتع منطقه بهره‌برداری می‌کنند. نتایج آمار استنباطی نشان از آن داشت که بین انواع شیوه‌های بهره‌برداری با وضعیت پوشش گیاهی مراتع و میزان تخریب مراتع رابطه‌ای معنی‌دار وجود دارد (05/0P<). نتایج حاصل از آزمون t در زمینه بررسی وجود رابطه معنی‌دار بین عوامل مؤثر و میزان تخریب مرتع، نشان داد که وجود دامدار غیرمجاز و تجاوز به مرتع از ناحیه همسایگان در منطقه با میزان تخریب، رابطه معنی‌داری مشاهده نمی‌شود(05/0P>). ولی بین چرای زودرس و دام مازاد با تخریب مرتبع رابطه‌ای معنی‌دار وجود دارد (05/0P<). | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| استان سمنان؛ بهره‌برداری؛ تخریب مرتع؛ مراتع زمستانه؛ وضعیت مرتع | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| The Impacts of Diverse Cultivation Methods on the Winter Pastures Position (Case Study: Semnan Province) | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| ali akbar karimian | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| Introduction Ownership is an important element for sustainability development in natural resource management. Rangelands vegetations are important factor for produce in traditional herding therefore recognition of different utilization methods and management of this vegetation resource production for animal grazing and rangelands condition is very important. So this research carried out in 2009 in winter rangelands at Semnan province. The objective of this research is to comparison different utilization methods exist between rural and immigrant ranchers on rangelands condition. Ownership is an important element for sustainability development in natural resource management. Rangelands vegetations are important factor for produce in traditional herding therefore recognition of different utilization methods and management of this vegetation resource production for animal grazing and rangelands condition is very important. So this research carried out in 2009 in winter rangelands at Semnan province. The objective of this research is to comparison different utilization methods exist between rural and immigrant ranchers on rangelands condition. Ownership is an important element for sustainability development in natural resource management. Rangelands vegetations are important factor for produce in traditional herding therefore recognition of different utilization methods and management of this vegetation resource production for animal grazing and rangelands condition is very important. So this research carried out in 2009 in winter rangelands at Semnan province. The objective of this research is to comparison different utilization methods exist between rural and immigrant ranchers on rangelands condition. Ownership is an important element for sustainability development in natural resource management. Rangelands vegetations are important factor for produce in traditional herding therefore recognition of different utilization methods and management of this vegetation resource production for animal grazing and rangelands condition is very important. Methodology Reference population in this study according to the grazing license, was divided to private exploitation, collective exploitation and councilor exploitation. Based on stratified random sampling method and Cochran formula, the sample volumes 50 of Rangelands were estimated. For data collection we used questioner and field survey. Questioner was included multiple question and also interview forms. In general 93 people in order to completing questioner for private exploitation one person, for collective exploitation two people and for councilor exploitation at least two people were interviewed. For validity of questioner were used academic members (three people) specialist of executive department (two people) and specialist in social sciences (one people) and for reliability was used Cranach's alpha. Range condition evaluated based on recommended manner of American forest protection organization (four factors) Include soil protection, vegetation cover percentage, plant combination and plant healthy. Reference population in this study according to the grazing license, was divided to private exploitation, collective exploitation and councilor exploitation. Based on stratified random sampling method and Cochran formula, the sample volumes 50 of Rangelands were estimated. For data collection we used questioner and field survey. Questioner was included multiple question and also interview forms. In general 93 people in order to completing questioner for private exploitation one person, for collective exploitation two people and for councilor exploitation at least two people were interviewed. For validity of questioner were used academic members (three people) specialist of executive department (two people) and specialist in social sciences (one people) and for reliability was used Cranach's alpha. Range condition evaluated based on recommended manner of American forest protection organization (four factors) Include soil protection, vegetation cover percentage, plant combination and plant healthy. Results Descriptions result showed that in this area 66% of stockholders used rangeland as collective exploitation, 20% as councilor exploitation and 14% as private exploitation. So state that range management in this area is in critical situation. With increasing of stockholders in a rangeland will increase the number of animals in unit area and vegetation will destroyed. Appreciation result showed that there is significant differences between different utilization methods with rangeland condition and degradation (P<0.05). Result of T student analyze showed that there is not significant differences between range degradation with illegal livestock manager and invade to rangeland from neighbors (P>0.05), But there is significant difference between unseasonable and over grazing with range degradation (P<0.05). Conclusion It can conclude that whatever rangeland used as councilor exploitation because of irresponsibility of persons in grazing place and over grazing, range condition become poor. Finally we can say that in single utilization because of less exploitation, consolidate management and less competition, it has the best condition between different utilization methods in this area, where as in collective exploitation and councilor exploitation because of disturbance in rangelands management, severalty of exploiters, existence of several flock and competition between them in entrance time and grazing to rangelands have not good condition. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| Ranch condition, Ranch degradation, Semnan Province, Utilization, winter ranches | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 2,472 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 1,606 |
||