پیوندهای مفید
اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 161 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 6,532 |
| تعداد مقالات | 70,502 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 124,119,427 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 97,225,811 |
The Effect of Leadership Style and Organizational Climate on the Knowledge Management; The Role of Organizational Structure and Social Reaction (Survey about the Mellat Bank Headquarters) | ||
| Journal of Information Technology Management | ||
| مقاله 12، دوره 7، شماره 1، تیر 2015، صفحه 199-216 اصل مقاله (451.46 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: Research Paper | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22059/jitm.2015.53318 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| Hamidreza Yazdani1؛ Ali Hamidizadeh2؛ Alireza kameli* 3 | ||
| 1Assistant Prof., Faculty of Management & Accounting , pardis compus tehran university, Qom, Iran | ||
| 2Assistant Professor, Faculty of Management & Accounting , pardis compus tehran university, Qom, Iran | ||
| 3MSc. Student, Faculty of Management & Accounting, Farabi Campus University of Tehran, Iran | ||
| چکیده | ||
| Leadership style and organizational climate are considered as a substructure framework in successful performance of knowledge management. The purpose of this research is investigating both the effect of leadership style and organizational climate on knowledge management and the moderate role of organization structure and social interaction in affecting leadership style and organizational climate on knowledge management. This study has been done as a sample of 210 main employers of Tehran Mellat bank office. The descriptive- survey research is management type and used tool is questionnaire. We used modeling method of structural equations by Lisrel software data analysis. Research findings show leadership style doesn’t effect on knowledge management positively but organization climate has a positive effect on knowledge management. On other word, leadership style has a positive effect on organization structure and its own has a positive effect on social interaction. But, in this research, moderate variable couldn’t play an easy role in affecting leadership style over knowledge management. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| Knowledge Management؛ leadership style؛ Organizational climate؛ Organizational structure؛ social interaction | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| بررسی تأثیر سبک رهبری و جو سازمانی بر مدیریت دانش با توجه به نقش میانجی ساختار سازمانی و تعامل اجتماعی (پیمایشی پیرامون بخش ستادی بانک ملت) | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| حمیدرضا یزدانی1؛ علی حمیدی زاده2؛ علیرضا کاملی3 | ||
| 1استادیار مدیریت منابع انسانی، دانشکدۀ مدیریت و حسابداری، پردیس فارابی دانشگاه تهران، قم، ایران | ||
| 2استادیار مدیریت دولتی، دانشکدۀ مدیریت و حسابداری، پردیس فارابی دانشگاه تهران، قم، ایران | ||
| 3دانشجوی کارشناسی ارشد مدیریت منابع انسانی، پردیس فارابی دانشگاه تهران، قم، ایران | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| سبک رهبری و جو سازمانی را میتوان چارچوب زیرساختی در اجرای موفق مدیریت دانش دانست. این پژوهش ضمن بررسی تأثیرگذاری سبک رهبری و جو سازمانی بر مدیریت دانش، به ارزیابی نقش میانجی ساختار سازمانی و تعامل اجتماعی در تأثیرگذاری سبک رهبری و جو سازمانی بر مدیریت دانش پرداخته است. این مطالعه در نمونهای 210 نفری از کارکنان ستادی ادارۀ کل بانک ملت شهر تهران صورت پذیرفته است. روش پژوهش توصیفی از نوع پیمایشی ـ همبستگی است و برای جمعآوری داده‌ها از پرسشنامه استفاده شده است. تجزیه‌وتحلیل داده‌ها بهکمک روش مدل‌سازی معادلات ساختاری در نرم‌افزار لیزرل انجام گرفته است. یافتههای پژوهش نشان میدهد سبک رهبری تأثیر مثبت و معناداری بر مدیریت دانش ندارد، اما جو سازمانی تأثیر مثبت و معناداری بر مدیریت دانش گذاشته است. از سوی دیگر، سبک رهبری تأثیر مثبت و معناداری بر ساختار سازمانی و ساختار سازمانی تأثیر مثبت و معناداری بر تعامل اجتماعی دارد، اما متغیرهای میانجی در این پژوهش نتوانستهاند نقش تسهیل‌کننده‌ای در تأثیرگذاری سبک رهبری بر مدیریت دانش، داشته باشند. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| تعامل اجتماعی, جو سازمانی, ساختار سازمانی, سبک رهبری, مدیریت دانش | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Alavi, M.& Leidner, D. (2001). Review: KM and KM systems: conceptual foundations and research issues. MIS Quarterly, 25(1): 36-107. Bartol, K. M. & Srivastava, A. (2002). Encouraging knowledge sharing: The role of organizational reward systems. Journal of Leadership. 9(1): 64-76.
Bass, B. M. & Avoloo, B. J. (2000). Potential Biases in leadership Measures: How Prototypis. Leniency and General Satisfaction Relate Rating and Rankings of Transformational and Transactional Leadership Construct Educational and Psychological Measurement. 49(12): 112-132.
Bass, B. M. & Bass, R. (2008). The bass handbook of leadership: theory, research, and managerial applications, 4th. New York: Free Press.
Chen, C. J. & Huang, J. W. (2007). How organizational climate and structure affect knowledge management- social interaction perspective. international journal of information management, 27 (2): 104-118.
Chen, C. J., Huang, J.W. & Hsiao, Y.C. (2010). Knowledge management and innovativeness:the role of organizational climate and structure. international journal of manpowe. 31(8): 848-870.
Chen, C. & Lin, B. (2004). The effects of environment, knowledge attribute, organizational climate, and firm characteristics on knowledge sourcing decisions. R&D Management. 34(2): 137-146.
Ganesh, D. (2002). Management strategies for individual knowledge and organizational knowledge. journal of knowledge management. 6(1): 31-39.
Ghani, K.A., Jayabalan, V. & Sugumar, M. (2002). Impact of advanced manufacturing technology on organizational structure. The Journal of High Technology Management Research,13 (2): 157-175.
Grant, R. (1996). Toward a knowledge- based theory of the firm, Strategy Management Journal, 17 (S2): 109-111.
Hoegl, M., Parboteeah, K. P. & Munson, C. L. (2003). Team-level antecedents of individuals’ knowledge networks. Decision Sciences. 34(4): 741-770.
Huang, J. W. & Li, Y. H. (2009). The mediating effect of knowledge management on social interaction and innovation performance. international journal of manpower. 30(3): 285-301.
Ibarra, H. (1993). Network centrality, power, and innovation involvement: Determinants of technical and administrative roles. Academy of Management Journal, 36(3): 471-501.
Janz, B. D. & Prasarnphanich, P. (2003). Understanding the antecedents of effective knowledge management: the importance of a knowledge-centered culture. Decision Sciences. 34(2): 351-384.
Koenig Michael, E. & Srikantaiah, T. (2007). KM: lesson learned, American Society for Information Science and Technology. Second printing. USA: information today inc.
Lee, C. C. & Grover, V. (2000). Exploring mediation between environmental and structural attributes: the penetration of communication technologies in manufacturing organizations. Journal Management Information System, 16(3): 187-317.
Liao, C., Chuang, S. & To, P. (2011). How KM mediates the relationship between environment and organizational structure. Journal of Business Research. 64 (7): 728-736.
Long, D. (2000). Diagnosing cultural barriers to knowledge management. The Academy of Management Executive. 14(4): 113-128.
Mahmoudsalehi, M., Dari, B. & Safari, K. (2012). Investigating role of mediator social interaction in the influence of organizational climate and structure on knowledge management (case study: iran's automobile industry). Journal of information technology management, 4(11): 69-92. (in Persian)
Mahmoudsalehi, M., Moradkhannejad, R. & Safari, K. (2012). How knowledge management is affected by organizational structure. The learning organization, 19(6): 518-528.
McGrath, R. G. (2001). Exploratory learning, innovative capacity, and managerial oversight. Academy of Management Journal, 44(1): 118-134.
Monavarian, A., Kheyrandish, M., Asgari., N. (2011). Developing structural dimensions in accordance with knowledge management. Journal of information technology management. 7(3): 133-150. (in Persian)
Nahapiet, J. & Ghoshal, S. (1998).Social capital, intellectual capital and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(2): 242-266.
Oliver, R. L. & Anderson, E. (1994). An empirical test of the consequences of behavior- and outcome-based sales control systems. Journal of Marketing, 58(4): 53-67.
Rastogi, P. (2000). Knowledge management and intellectual capital — the new virtuous reality. Human System Management, 19(1): 39-49
Robbins, S.P. (1990). Organization Theory: Structure Designs and Applications. Prentice-Hall ,Englewood Cliffs.
Rowold, J. (2009). Relationship Between Leadership Style and Followers Emotional Experience and Effectiveness in the Voluntary Sector. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 38(2): 270-289.
Schneider, B. (1990). The climate for service: An application of the climate construct. Organizational climate and culture, 383-412.
Scott, E. B. (2003). The role of transformational and transactional leadership in creatig,sharing and exploiting organizational knowledge. The journal of leadership and organizational studied. 9(4): 32.
Shoghi, B. & Shoghi, A. (2012). Leadership Styles (Concepts, Definitions,and Theories).Tehran: Raznahan Publications. (in Persian)
Shoghi, B., Asgarani, M. & Ashnagar, N. (2013). Mediating effect of structure on the relationship between manager's leadership style and employee's creativity (case study:metal industerial of kaveh induastrial city). International journal of learning& development. 3(3): 63-80.
Sivadas, E. & Dwyer, F. R. (2000). An examination of organizational factors influencing new product success in internal and alliance-based processes. Journal of Marketing. 61(4): 31-50.
Skakon, J., Nielsen, K., Borg, V. & Guzman, J. (2010). Are leaders wellbeing,behaviors and style associated with the affective wellbeing of their employees? A systematic review of three decades of research. Work & Stress. 24(2): 139-147
Slater, S. F. & Narver, J. C. (1995). Market orientation and the learning organization. Journal of Marketing, 59 (3): 63-74.
Sparrowe, R. T., Liden, R. C. & Kraimer, M. L. (2001). Social networks and the performance of individuals and groups. Academy of Management Journal, 44(2): 316-325.
Sveiby, K. E. & Simons, R. (2002). Collaborative climate and effectiveness of knowledge work—An empirical study. Journal of Knowledge Management. 6(5): 420-433.
Szulanski, G. (1996). Exploring internal stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm. Strategic Management journal. 17(10): 27-43.
Tian, J., Nakamon, Y. R. & Wierzbicky, A. (2009). Knowledge management and knowledge creation in academia: A study based on surveys in a japanes research university. journal of knowledge management, 13(2): 76-92.
Tsai, W. (2002). Social structure of coopetition within a multiunit organization: Coordination, competition, and intra-organizational knowledge sharing. Organization Science. 13(2): 179-190.
Tsai, W. & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital and value creation: The role of intrafirm networks. Academy of Management Journal. 41(4): 464-476.
Uzzi, B. & Lancaster, R. (2003). Relational embeddedness and learning: the case of bank loan managers and their clients. Management Science. 9(4): 383-399.
Zheng, W., Yang, B. & Mclean, G. (2010). Linking organizational culture, structure, strategy and organizational effectiveness: mediating role of km. journal of business research, 63 (7): 763-771.
| ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 4,854 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 3,739 |
||