پیوندهای مفید
اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 161 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 6,533 |
| تعداد مقالات | 70,512 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 124,129,146 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 97,236,238 |
رتبه‌بندی شهرستان‌های استان گیلان ازلحاظ مدیریت پایدار تعاونی‌های پرة صید و صیادی با استفاده از تکنیک TOPSIS | ||
| پژوهش های روستائی | ||
| مقاله 5، دوره 5، شماره 4، بهمن 1393، صفحه 809-826 اصل مقاله (248.05 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22059/jrur.2015.53426 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| شهلا چوبچیان* 1؛ خلیل کلانتری2؛ علی اسدی2؛ سید امین الله تقوی مطلق3 | ||
| 1استادیار گروه ترویج و آموزش کشاورزی، دانشکدة کشاورزی، دانشگاه تربیت مدرس | ||
| 2استاد دانشکدة اقتصاد و توسعة کشاورزی، دانشگاه تهران | ||
| 3استادیار وزارت جهاد کشاورزی | ||
| چکیده | ||
| ماهی‌گیری یکی از زیربخش‌های مهم کشاورزی قلمداد می‌شود. در این زیربخش بیش از 100 میلیون تن از انواع آبزیان در هر سال تولید می‌شود که در تغذیه و رفاه نوع بشر نقش مؤثری دارد و وسیلة امرار معاش بیش از 200 میلیون نفر را فراهم می‌سازد. در زمان حاضر در صید ساحلی دریای خزر الگوی بهره‌برداری تعاونی وجود دارد که به تعاونی‌های پره مشهورند. استان گیلان با بیشترین شاغل در بخش صید ساحلی و کمترین میزان میانگین صید پنج‌ساله پرچالش‌ترین استان ازلحاظ عملکرد تعاونی‌های پره است. این مقاله درصدد است با اولویت‌بندی ابعاد مؤثر بر مدیریت صید ساحلی پایدار، دریابد که کدام بعد وضعیت بهتری ازلحاظ پایداری دارد و در ادامه با رتبه‌بندی شهرستان‌های استان دریابد که کدام‌یک از شهرستان‌ها ازلحاظ وضعیت ایده‌آل مدیریت صید ساحلی پایدار وضعیت بهتری دارند. وزن‌های محاسبه‌شده ازطریق تکنیک تحلیل مؤلفه‌های اصلی نشان می‌دهند که بعد سیاستی بالاترین وزن را در میان شاخص‌های مدیریت صید ساحلی پایدار تعاونی‌های پره دارد. با توجه به نتایج پژوهش، شهرستان لنگرود ازلحاظ مدیریت صید ساحلی پایدار کمترین فاصله را با وضعیت ایده‌آل دارد. شایان ذکر است که شهرستان‌های تالش و آستارا ناپایدارترین شهرستان‌های استان از نظر صید ساحلی هستند. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| استان گیلان؛ پرورش ماهی در قفس؛ تعاونی‌های پره؛ تکنیک تاپسیس؛ مدیریت صید ساحلی پایدار | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Ranking cities of Gilan province in terms of sustainable management of fishing PAREH cooperatives using TOPSIS technique | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| shahla choobchian1؛ Khalil Kalantari2؛ Ali Asadi2؛ Seyyed Aminolah Taghavi Motlagh3 | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| Abstract Introduction Fishing is one of the most important agricultural sub-sectors. In this sub-sector more than 100 million tons of fish is produced per year that is effective in human nutrition and well-being, so by providing livelihood to more than 200 million people. Southern part of Caspian Sea with very different characteristics, suffers from various coastal problems. This area is over-populated and its sensitive and unique habitats must be protected from destruction. Biodiversity is under threat in some areas and natural resources are deteriorating. In this area there is a pattern of cooperative utilization known as PAREH cooperatives. Each cooperative is comprised of 60 to 120 fishermen. In the Southern part of the Caspian Sea one governmental pattern is dominant and cooperatives have the right to exploit in a special range and in a specific time (second six months of the year). Since this pattern only pays attention to exploitation of fish stocks, management, conservation and recreation is neglected. Gilan Province with the highest employment in coastal fishing and the lowest five-year average catch is the most challenging province in terms of PAREH cooperatives functions. According to the previous and Field studies, the basic parameters and variables derived and Management model for sustainable coastal fishing of the coast of Northern provinces in general, And the Gilan province in particular, classified into the following four cases. 1) Sustainable coastal fishery, 2) Beach management, 3) Resources reconstruction management, 4) Conservation management. This paper tries to prioritize the aspects affecting the sustainable management of coastal fishing then find which dimension is better in terms of stability and then find out which of the cities of the province has better situation in terms of ideal conditions for sustainable management of coastal fishing. Methodology In this research for priorities and ranking cities of Gilan province in terms of sustainable management of fishing PAREH cooperatives TOPSIS technique has been used. TOPSIS is one of the most efficient methods of multiple criteria decision making approach for prioritizing alternatives based on similarities to ideal solution. TOPSIS is to prioritize ideas by measuring the degree of similarity with the ideal mode. This is based on the Euclidean distance between the case and ideal mode. The best solution is a solution with the minimum distance between the case and ideal solution and has the farthest distance with non-ideal solutions. The research populations are 1) the CEO or board of directors of PAREH cooperatives in Gilan; 2) experts of Fisheries Research Organization in Tehran and Gilan and experts in sustainable coastal fishery management. The first group was asked to assess the sustainability of cooperatives and the second group was asked to find options for sustainable management of coastal fishing and prioritization of sustainability indicators affecting coastal management in the province. The first sample size was calculated according to the Cochran sampling formula that obtained in 36 cases and second sample were 20 experts which Snowball method is the technique used for selecting them. As the first specialist in the field of sustainable coastal fishery management model was selected and then the next person identified and selected by previous expert. Results The weights are calculated using the Delphi technique shows that policy dimension has the maximum weight among Indices of sustainable management of coastal fishing PAREH cooperatives. The results also hunted coastal city Langerood in terms of sustainable coastal fishing management has the minimum distance with the ideal solution, also it should be mentioned that Talesh and Astara cities are unsustainable cities of the province in terms of coastal fishing Discussion and Conclusion The results showed that the city Langerood in term of sustainable management of coastal fishing has the minimum distance from the ideal solution. However, the other fishing cooperatives of Gilan province, especially cooperatives in the west of the province are far from ideal model and are less stable. It should be mentioned that Fishing in the East to the West coast of the Caspian Sea is deteriorated. as we move from Golestan province instability in coastal fishing is increased. This is also true for fishing cooperatives in the province so Unsustainable fishing in the cities of west much higher than in east of the province. According to the results and high ecological instability in the coastal area of the Gilan province, spatial, fishing tool and time policy should be considered strictly and fishing in other seasons should be deal seriously and fishing in the spawning season should be prevented. Additionally the reconstruction effort should be considered seriously in the fisheries organization agenda, and measures should be implemented to involve fishermen in controlling and monitoring process of fishing and fishery resources to economize Fishing in the Caspian Sea. Also fish culture in cages can prevent additional pressure on the sea. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| Sustainable management of coastal fishing, PAREH cooperatives, TOPSIS Technique, Gilan province, fish culture in cage | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
منابع ادارة کل شیلات استان تهران، 1387، دفتر اطلاعات، آمار و ارقام صید. ادارة کل شیلات استان گیلان، 1388، دفتر اطلاعات، آمار و ارقام صید. صادق دقیقی، لیلا، مطیعی لنگرودی، سیدحسن، 1388، نقش تعاونی‌های پرة صیادی در توسعة اقتصاد روستایی؛ مطالعة موردی دهستان دهکاء، مجلة تعاون، آبان و آذر، شمارة 208 و 209. عابدینی بی‌بالانی، مجتبی، 1388، مشکلات دام سنگین برای صیادان گیلانی، دنیای اقتصاد، چهارشنبه 23 دی، کد خبر: http://www.donya-e-eqtesad.com/Default_view.asp?@=191848 کلانتری، خلیل، 1391، مدل‌های کمی در برنامه‌ریزی (منطقه‌ای، شهری و روستایی)، فرهنگ صبا، مهندسین مشاور طرح و منظر، تهران. Adrianto, L., Matsuda, Y., Sakuma, Y., 2005, Assessing Local Sustainability of Fisheries System: a multi-criteria participatory approach with the case of Yoron Island, Kagoshima prefecture, Japan, Mar. Policy 29, PP. 9-23.
Allahyari, Mohammad Sadegh, 2010, Social Sustainability Assessment of Fishery Cooperatives in Guilan province, Iran, Journal of Fisheries and aquatic Science 5(3), PP. 216-222.
Charles, Anthony T., 2001, Sustainable Fishery System, Blackwell Science, UK.
Fisheries Centre of University of British Columbia, 2006, Evaluations of Compliance with the FAO (UN) Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries, University of British Columbia, Canada, Edited by Pitcher, Tony J., Kalikoski, Daniela and Ganapathiraju Pramod.
Garcia, S.M., Staples, D.J., Chesson, J., 2000, The FAO Guidelines for the Development and Use of Indicators for Sustainable Development of Marine Capture Sheries and an Australian Example of their Application, Ocean & Coastal Management 43, PP. 537-556.
Opricovic, Serafim, and Gwo-Hshiung Tzeng, 2004, Compromise solution by MCDM methods: A comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS, European Journal of Operational Research 156, PP. 445-455.
Oruonye, E.D., 2013, The Impacts of the Drying Lake Chad on Rural Dwellers of Africa, Spanish Journal of Rural Development, Vol. IV (3), PP. 1-14.
Pitcher, Tony J., Preikshot, David, 2001, RAPFISH: A Rapid Appraisal Technique to Evaluate the Sustainability Status of Fisheries, Fisheries Research, 49, PP. 255-270. Fisheries Centre, University of British Columbia, 2204 Main Mall, Vancouver, Canada V7R 2L7, Received 9 September 1998; received in revised form 27 January 2000; accepted 11 April 2000.
Prasetiamartati, Budiati, Fauzi, Akhmad, Dahuri, Rokhmin, Fahrudin, Achmad, Lange, Hellmuth, 2006, Destructive Fishery and Fishery Sustainability Assessing Fishery Sustainability Using a Multicriteria Participatory Approach :A Case Study of Small Islands in South Sulawesi, Journal of Coastal Development, ISSN: 1410-5217, Volume 9, Number 3, June, PP. 163-174.
Tesfamichael, D. and T.J., Pitcher, 2006, Multidiciplinary Evaluation of the Sustainability of Red Sea Fisheries using Rapfish, fish. Res. 78, PP. 227-235.
Reference in Persian
Abedini Bibalani, M., 2009, Heavy Livestock Problems for Gilani Fishermen, World economy, Wednesday 23 January, the news Code DEN- 191848 available at: http://www.donya-e-eqtesad.com/Default_view.asp?@=191848.
Gilan Fisheries Administration, 2009, Information Office, fishing fact and figures.
Kalantari, Kh., 2012, Quantitative Models in Planning (regional, urban and rural), Saba culture, Tarh o manzar consultants, Tehran.
Sadeghdaghighi, L., Motieelangeroodi, S.H., 2009, PAREH Fishing Cooperatives Role in the Development of the Rural Economy of Dhka’ Districts; Case study, cooperatives Magazine, November and December, No. 208 and 209.
Tehran Fisheries Administration, 2008, Information Office, Fishing fact and figures.
| ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 2,375 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 1,141 |
||