تعداد نشریات | 161 |
تعداد شمارهها | 6,479 |
تعداد مقالات | 70,032 |
تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 123,011,752 |
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 96,242,968 |
Challenge of successful KMSs implementation: exploration of effective factors on KM acceptance via mixed method | ||
Journal of Information Technology Management | ||
مقاله 12، دوره 7، شماره 2، مهر 2015، صفحه 429-450 اصل مقاله (451.46 K) | ||
نوع مقاله: Research Paper | ||
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22059/jitm.2015.53887 | ||
نویسندگان | ||
Mona Jami Pour1؛ Mohammad Hossein Sherkat* 2 | ||
1Assistance Prof., Faculty of Management, Hazrat-e-Masoumeh University, Qom, Iran | ||
2PhD., Faculty of Management, University of Tehran, Iran | ||
چکیده | ||
Regarding strategic importance of KM, achieving to KM objectives is difficult in practice and has faced with challenges. One of the major challenges is reluctance of users in KMS acceptance and use. In this paper in order to exploitation of comprehensive model, effective factors of knowledge initiatives are extracted via mixed method in which systematic literature review along with open codding of grounded theory are applied to enrich extracted factors and identifying native factors. Finally, in order to validating developed model, number of KM experts and specialists are asked to assess the factors and collected data were analyzed with structural equation modelling (SEM). Finally, individual, organizational, competitive and technological/ informational factors are confimed as external variables on TAM. | ||
کلیدواژهها | ||
Knowledge management (KM)؛ Grounded theory؛ structural equation modelling؛ Systematic literature review؛ Technology Acceptance | ||
عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
چالش پیاده سازی موفق سیستم های مدیریت دانش: بررسی عوامل موثر بر پذیرش مدیریت دانش در سازمان های ایرانی با رویکردی آمیخته | ||
نویسندگان [English] | ||
مونا جامی پور1؛ محمد حسین شرکت2 | ||
1استادیار گروه مدیریت، دانشکدۀ مدیریت، دانشگاه حضرت معصومه (س)، قم، ایران | ||
2دکتری مدیریت سیستم ها، دانشکدۀ مدیریت دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران | ||
چکیده [English] | ||
با توجه به اهمیت استراتژیک مدیریت، شواهد روزافزونی دال بر رشد گرایش شرکتها به ایجاد سیستمهای مدیریت دانش برای اکتساب و استخراج بهتر دانش سازمانی وجود دارد. علیرغم جذابیت این مفهوم، در عمل دستیابی به اهداف مدیریت دانش آسان نیست و چالشهایی را به همراه دارد که یکی از آنها بیرغبتی کاربران در پذیرش و استفاده از سیستمهای مدیریت دانش است. در این مقاله بهمنظور تبیین مدلی جامع، با بهرهمندی از روش آمیخته عوامل مؤثر بر پذیرش ابتکارهای دانشی استخراج شد و بهمنظور غنابخشی به عوامل استخراجشده، پس از مرور نظاممند ادبیات و شناسایی عوامل بومی، از فرایند کدگذاری باز نظریۀ دادهبنیاد بر اساس وضعیت سازمانهای داخلی، استفاده شد. بهمنظور ارزیابی مدل توسعهیافته در مرحلۀ قبل، از خبرگان حوزۀ مدیریت دانش نظرسنجی به عمل آمد و با استفاده از مدل معادلات ساختاری به تحلیل دادههای گردآوریشده اقدام شد. در نهایت، عوامل فردی، سازمانی، رقابتی و فناوری/ اطلاعاتی، بهمثابۀ متغیرهای برونزای مدل پذیرش فناوری به تأیید رسیدند. | ||
کلیدواژهها [English] | ||
پذیرش فناوری, مدل معادلات ساختاری, مدیریت دانش, مرور سیستماتیک ادبیات, نظریۀ دادهبنیاد | ||
مراجع | ||
Alavi, M. & Leidner, D.E. (2001). Review: Knowledge management and knowledge management systems: conceptual foundations and research issues. MIS Quarterly, 25(1): 107-136. Ale, M., Toledo, C., Chiotti, O., Galli, M. (2014). A conceptual model and technological support for organizational knowledge management. Science of Computer Programming, 95(1): 73-92. Boynton, A.C., Zmud, R.W. & Jacobs, G.C. (1994). The Influence of IT Management Practice on IT Use in Large Organizations. MIS Quarterly, 18(3): 299-318. Bueno, S. & Salmeron, J.L. (2008). TAM-based success modeling in ERP. Interacting with Computers, 20(6): 515-523. Chau, P.Y.K. & Tam, K.Y. (1997). Factors affecting the adoption of open systems: an exploratory study. MIS Quarterly, 21(1): 1-24. Davis, F.D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3): 319-340. Doong, H.S. & Lai, H. (2008). Exploring usage continuance of e-negotiation systems: expectation and disconfirmation approach. Group Decision and Negotiation, 17(2): 111-126. Dorasamy, M., Raman, M. & Kaliannan, M. (2013). Knowledge management systems in support of disasters management: A two decade review. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 80(9): 1834-1853. Eriksson, K., Kerem, K. & Nilsson, D. (2005). Customer acceptance of internet banking in Estonia. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 23(2): 200- 216. Jahangir, N. & Begum, N. (2008). The role of perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, security and privacy, and customer attitude to engender customer adaptation in the context of electronic banking. African Journal of Business Management, 2(2): 32-40. Jamporazmey, M. & Mehrafrouz, M. (2012). Designing an evaluation framework for knowledge management systems by using balanced scorecard. International Journal of Business Information Systems, 11(1): 110-125. Jamporazmey, M., Mohammadi, S. & Nejati, M. (2013). TAM-based acceptance modeling in knowledge management. In M. Nejati (Ed.), Frontiers of Business, Management and Economics: An Interdisciplinary Collection of Managerial Research Findings and Breakthroughs (pp. 316-325). Boca Raton, USA: Universal-Publishers. Kaldi, A., Aghaie, A. & Khoshalhan, F. (2008). KMS adoption in organizations. In: Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, 2008. IEEM 2008. IEEE International Conference on, 8-11 Dec, Singapore, PP. 37- 41. King, W. R., & He, J. (2006). A meta-analysis of the technology acceptance model. Information & Management, 43(6): 740-755. King, W.R. & Marks Jr, P.V. (2008). Motivating knowledge sharing through a knowledge management system. Omega, 36(1): 131-146. Kock, N. (2015). Warp PLS 5.0 User Manual, January 2015, Copyright @ by Ned Kock, avaible at: http://cits.tamiu.edu/WarpPLS/UserManual_v_5_0.pdf. Kuo, R. & Lee, G. (2009). KMS adoption: the effects of information quality. Journal of Management, 47 (10): 1633-1651. Lin, C., Wu, J.C. & Yen, D. C. (2012). Exploring barriers to knowledge flow at different knowledge management maturity stages. Information & Management, 49(1): 10-23. Migdadi, M. (2009). Knowledge management enablers and outcomes in small and medium sized enterprises. Industrial management and data system, 109(6): 840-858. Money, W. & Turner, A. (2004). Application of the technology acceptance model to a knowledge management system. Paper presented at the System Sciences, Proceedings of the 37th Annual Hawaii International Conference on. 5-8 Jan. Moqbel, M., Nevo, S. & Kock, N. (2013). Organizational members’ use of social networking sites and job performance. Information Technology & People, 26 (3): 240 – 264. Ngai, E.W.T. & Chan, E.W.C. (2005). Evaluation of knowledge management tools using AHP. Expert Systems with Applications, 29(4): 889-899. Ogiela, L. (2015). Advanced techniques for knowledge management and access tostrategic information. International Journal of Information Management, 35(2): 154–159 Ong, Ch., Lai, J., Wang, Y. & Wang, Sh. (2005). An understanding of power issues influencing employees’ acceptance of KMS: an empirical study of Taiwan semiconductor manufacturing companies. Proceedings of the 38th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Strauss, A. & Corbin, J. (2007). Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory, 3rd edition, London, SAGE Publications. Subramanian, A. M. & Soh, P.H. (2009). Contributing Knowledge to Knowledge Repositories: Dual Role of Inducement and Opportunity Factors. Information Resource Management Journal, 22(1): 45-62. Teo, T., Lee, C. B., Chai, C. S. & Wong, S. L. (2009). Assessing the intention to use technology among pre-service teachers in Singapore and Malaysia: Amultigroup invariance analysis of the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). Computers & Education, 53(3): 1000-1009. Tseng, S.M. (2008). Knowledge management system performance measure index. Expert Systems with Applications, 34(1): 734-745. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M.G., Davis, G.B. & Davis, F.D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3): 425-478. Xu, J., Quaddus, M. (2012). Examining a model of knowledge management systems adoption and diffusion: A Partial Least Square approach, Knowledge-Based Systems, 27: 18–28. Yu, S.H., Kim, Y.G. & Kim, M.Y. (2007). Do we know what really drives KM performance? International Journal of Knowledge Management, 11 (6): 39-53. Zhao, J., de Pablos, P. O. & Qi, Z. (2012). Enterprise knowledge management model based on China’s practice and case study. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(2): 324-330. | ||
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 4,100 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 3,051 |