News

Hosseini, S., Aminravan, M. (2015). Investigating the effect of supportive policies on cotton acreage in Golestan Province. , 46(2), 197-206. doi: 10.22059/ijaedr.2015.54885
Seyed Safdar Hosseini; Marzieh Aminravan. "Investigating the effect of supportive policies on cotton acreage in Golestan Province". , 46, 2, 2015, 197-206. doi: 10.22059/ijaedr.2015.54885
Hosseini, S., Aminravan, M. (2015). 'Investigating the effect of supportive policies on cotton acreage in Golestan Province', , 46(2), pp. 197-206. doi: 10.22059/ijaedr.2015.54885
Hosseini, S., Aminravan, M. Investigating the effect of supportive policies on cotton acreage in Golestan Province. , 2015; 46(2): 197-206. doi: 10.22059/ijaedr.2015.54885

Investigating the effect of supportive policies on cotton acreage in Golestan Province

تحقیقات اقتصاد و توسعه کشاورزی ایران
Article 2, Volume 46, Issue 2, July 2015, Pages 197-206    PDF (784.89 K)
Document Type: Research Paper
DOI: 10.22059/ijaedr.2015.54885
Authors
Seyed Safdar Hosseini* 1; Marzieh Aminravan2
1Professor of Agricultural Economics, Faculty of Economics and Agricultural Development, University of Tehran, Iran
2MSc. of Agricultural Economics, Faculty of Economics and Agricultural Development, University of Tehran, Iran
Abstract
From the past cotton has been introduced as one of the basic and strategic goods in Iran. Golestan province, during the past years has provided a large part of the nation's cotton requirement and has become one of the main poles of cultivation of this product. In this paper, the effects of support policies on Golestan's cotton supply has been investigated by using variable of producer support estimate of cotton to competing products and estimating irrigated and dryland acreage response equations through Nerlove's partial adjustment model. The results shows that the positive effect of producer support estimate of cotton to its competing products on cotton acreage has been significant in both irrigated and dryland models. Supply elasticity’s of this variable in the irrigated model is 0.12 in short run and 0.27 in long run. In dryland model, this elasticity is 0.16 and 0.26 respectively in short run and long run. According to the results, in addition to increasing the relative profitability of cotton compared to its competitors and reducing non-programing import, rising price and non-price supports of cotton like guaranteed prices in order to motivate farmers to increase the supply of this product is suggested.
Keywords
acreage; Cotton; Golestan province; support policies; producer support estimate
References
  1. Alikhani, M., Sadrol Ashrafi, M., Yazdani, S. & Shirin Bakhsh, Sh. (2010). Economic analysis of government intervention policies effects on cotton pricing in Iran. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 4(1), 31-49. (In Farsi).
  2. Aminravan, M. (2013). Evaluating affecting factors on supply response of cotton produces in Golestan province, M.Sc. Thesis, Department of Agricultural Economics and Development, Tehran University. (In Farsi).
  3. Atghayi Kordkolayi, M. (2010). Evaluating of equilibrium exchange rate and investigating of its possible effects on support of agricultural producers’ indicator in Iran. M.Sc. MSc Thesis, Department of Agricultural Economics and Development, Tehran University. (In Farsi).
  4. Bakhshodeh, M. & Shafiei, H. (2006). Investigating Effects of Guaranteed Purchasing Policy on Land Cultivations and Yields of Cotton, Potatoes and Onions in Fars Province. Journal of Science and Technology of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Isfahan University of Technology; 10 (3):257-265. (In Farsi).
  5. Behbod, A. & Najafi, B. (2011). Investigating effects of protectionist policy on the supply of sunflower. Journal of Agricultural Economics Research. Vol. 3, Number. 2: 133-146. (In Farsi).
  6. Britt M.D. (2002). Producer response for cotton in United States. MSc Thesis, Agricultural and applied economics. Texas Tech university.
  7. Elawad Salih S.M. (2001). Supply response of Sudan's cotton industry: Implications of government intervention. Phd. Philosophy. Economics and management. University Putra Malaysia.
  8. Granger C.W.J. (1988). Some Recent Developments in a Concept of Causality. Journal of Econometrics, (39) 199-211.
  9. Haeri, A. & Asayesh, A. (2009). Investigating cotton situation in Iran & Word, Office of Strategic and statistical studies of textile industry (Iran Textile Industries Association). (In Farsi).
  10. Houston J.E., Mcintosh CS., Stavriotis P.A. & Tumer S.C (1999). Leading Indicators of Regional Cotton Acreage Response: Structural and Time Series Modeling results. Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics. 31 (3): 507-517.
  11. Mehrparvar Hosseini, E. (2013). Investigate the factors on the behavior of the trade balance of agriculture in Iran. MSc Thesis, Agricultural Economics, Department of Agricultural Economics and Development, Tehran University. (In Farsi).
  12. Mohammadi, H., Faraj Zadeh, Z. & Kafil Zadeh, F. (2009). Impact of government supportive policy on supply, acreage and yield of sugar beet in Iran. Journal of Sugar Beet, 25(1). (In Farsi).
  13. Moraes M. (2006). Soybean acreage response in Brazil. Presented at the NCCC-134 conference on applied commodity price analysis, forecasting and market risk management. St. Louis, Missouri.
  14. Najafi, B. (2002). Investigating of the sugar beet price support policies: issues and approaches. Journal of Agricultural Economics and Development. 10(39), 28-47.
  15. Nerlove M. (1956). Estimates of elasticities of supply of selected agricultural commodities. Journal of farm economics. 38( 2), 496-509.
  16. Nerlove M. (1958). Distributed lags and estimation of long-run supply and demand elasticities: Theoretical Considerations. Journal of Farm Economics. (40), 301-311.
  17. Parrott S.D. & McIntosh C.S. (1996). Nonconstant price expectations and acreage response: The case of cotton production in Georgia. Journal of agricultural and applied economics, 28(1), 203-210.
  18. Rafati, M. (1991). Institute of Business Studies and Research, Cotton world market, International commodity market Publication, 4(2). (In Farsi).
  19. Sadighi, H., Lavler,  K. A. (2007). Econometric, Applied Approach, translated by: Shirin Bakhsh, Sh., Avaye-Noor Publisher. (In Farsi).
  20. Salehi Rad, M. (2007). Investigating the factors affecting on the development of the acreage of rape oilseed with emphasis on the role of government policies. MSc Thesis, Agricultural Economics, Department of Agricultural Economics and Development, Tehran University. (In Farsi).
  21. Statistics and information sector of Golestan province’s Jahad-Keshavarzi, 2010.
  22. Strategic plan of cotton research, Institute of Cotton Research, 2007.
  23. 23.    Taheri, F., Yazdani, S. & Mohamadi, H. (2009). Effects of government protective policies on supply, acreage and yield of wheat in Iran. Journal of Agricultural Economics Research, 1(1), 95-114. (In Farsi).
  24. Web site of Jahade-Keshavarzi Ministry. (2012). Office of Statistics and Information Technology.
  25. Web site of Jahade-Keshavarzi Ministry. (2012). Agricultural Data Bank of Jahade-Keshavarzi Ministry.
  26. Web site of Food and Agricultural Organization, (2011).
  27. Yazdani, S. & Mazhari, M. (1995). Investigating the factors affecting on the sugar been supply in Khorasan province. Iranian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 26(4), 1-7.
  28. Yu B., Liu F. & You L (2010). Dynamic agricultural supply response under economic transformation: A case study of Henan province. International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI) discussion paper 00987:2010.
  29. Zare, E., Chizari, A. & Nemati, N. (2010). Analysis of pricing policy in the cotton market of Iran. Journal of Agricultural and Development Economics, 18(69). (In Farsi).
 

Statistics
Article View: 2,099
PDF Download: 1,112


Journal Management System. Powered by Sinaweb