پیوندهای مفید
اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 161 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 6,532 |
| تعداد مقالات | 70,501 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 124,107,630 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 97,212,442 |
رویکرد شناختی به روایت اعتمادناپذیر در سینما | ||
| نشریه هنرهای زیبا: هنرهای نمایشی و موسیقی | ||
| مقاله 2، دوره 20، شماره 1، فروردین 1394، صفحه 15-26 اصل مقاله (2.06 M) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22059/jfadram.2015.55377 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| محمد شهبا* 1؛ بهاره سعیدزاده* 2 | ||
| 1استادیار گروه سینما، دانشکدة سینما ـ تئاتر، دانشگاه هنر، تهران، ایران. | ||
| 2دانشجوی دکترای پژوهش هنر، دانشگاه هنر، تهران، ایران. | ||
| چکیده | ||
| این مقاله بر آن است تا مفهوم روایت اعتمادناپذیر را که بیشتر در حوزة ادبیات مورد مطالعه بوده است، در سینما بررسی نماید و چگونگی کارکرد راوی اعتمادناپذیر را از منظر نظریة شناخت در سینما طرح کند. بدین منظور، تلاش شده است بررسی شود چگونه خالق روایت سینمایی، در قالب کنشها، گفتارها، نمودهای بیرونی و رفتاری، نشانههای محیطی و تصویری-صوتی، حس و حال فضا و شخصیت پردازی، روایت (راوی) سینمایی اعتمادناپذیر را ترسیم میکند و مخاطب با توجه به نشانههای موجود در اثر و چگونگی پیشبرد روایت، درجات گوناگونی از اشراف به جهان روایت پیدا میکند. بنابراین، این پژوهش پس از تبیین رویکرد شناختی پژوهشگرانی چون دیوید بوردول، نوئل کرول، گرگوری کوری و توربن گرودال در مطالعات سینمایی، و با تمرکز به رویکرد شناختی بوردول، علاوه بر مرور دستهبندیهای پژوهشگران دربارة انواع روایت اعتمادناپذیر، مدل تحلیلی هنسن را از چگونگی کارکرد روایت اعتمادناپذیر در سینما بررسی مینماید و نتیجه میگیرد که نظر به دخالت نوآوری در آفرینش روایتهای تازه و امکان پیدایش گونههای جدید در هر نوع هنری، الگوهای گوناگون روایت و از جمله روایت اعتمادناپذیر، چارچوبی محدود و از پیش تعیین شده نداشته، با گذشت زمان و ارائة روایتهای جدید ممکن است اشکال تازهای از آن نیز ساخته شوند. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| روایت اعتمادناپذیر در سینما؛ شخصیت کانونی؛ نقطه دید؛ نظریه شناخت | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| A Cognitive Approach to Unreliable Narratives in Cinema | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Mohammad Shahba1؛ Bahareh Saeedzadeh2 | ||
| 1Assistant Professor, School of Cinema –Theatre, Art University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran | ||
| 2PhD Candidate, School of Art Research, Art University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| The present study attempts to explore how the so far mainly literary issue of the Unreliable Narratives/Narrators, can be formulated and dealt with in Cinema. Thus, in order to analyze the form and function of such narratives/narrators in Cinema, the present paper tries to discover how the author(s) of the cinematic narrative (the overall collaboration of the screenwriter, the director, the cinematographer, the editor etc.) design(s) unreliability through actions, words, appearance and behavior of characters, story-telling techniques, environmental and audio-visual signs, the mood and atmosphere of the film, its camera work and lighting, editing and its characterization and use of voice-over narration. According to these and depending upon the way the narrative progresses and the order through which story data are revealed, the audience, bringing their own overall knowledge of the world with them to the text, will have different degrees of understanding of how the story must actually be. Since, narratives are created, presented and read/viewed by human beings, with all their mental, emotional and cognitive capacities and properties, the present study adopts a cognitive approach to the analysis of the concept of narrative unreliability, to find out how knowledge of the humankinds’ cognitive faculties can help pattern out and better narratives of the unreliable kind, as we are here interested in, as an author, and be a better reader/viewer in light of what our cognitive knowledge can offer to the task of deciphering behavioral patterns of characters. To achieve that goal, having gained its theoretical roots from David Bordwell’s cognitive approach to film analysis, the present work offers a brief summary of the major thoughts of some other cognitive-minded scholars, such as Noel Carroll, Gregory Currie and Torben Grodal on the subject; in analytic philosophy, narrative theory and film studies (with view to biology and neuroscience), respectively. Then, focusing mainly on Bordwell’s approach, and upon review of the most prominent thoughts given to the concept of the unreliable cinematic narrative, the present paper uses Hansen’s analytic model of how such narratives could actually be represented and formulated in Cinema. Finally, upon study of Hansen’s typology of the unreliable cinematic narratives, and in view of Tamar Yacobi’s five strategies for the naturalization of textual ambiguities and inconsistencies in unreliable narratives in general, and examining filmic examples comprising unreliable narratives, the present paper concludes that different forms of narratives (cinematic narratives as we are here concerned) do not have a limited and predefined pattern and as new narratives are introduced into the world of Cinema, new forms of them can potentially be produced. However, the audience’s experience in reading and viewing texts and films with such narratives can be of great help in deciphering their ambiguities and narratological codes, and enjoying the usually mindful plays on literary/cinematic storytelling at work in them. Nevertheless, it’s noteworthy that floating in the pleasurable realms of ambiguity and secretiveness, and being in a state of uncertainty regarding what is actually going on in what we are viewing, has its own unspeakable twilight zone pleasures. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| Unreliable Narrative, Focal Character, Point of View (Perspective), Cognitivism | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
پرینس، جرالد (1391). روایت‌شناسی: شکل و کارکرد روایت، ترجمة دکتر محمد شهبا، مینوی خرد، تهران.
تولان، مایکل جی. (1383) درآمدی نقادانه-زبان‌شناختی بر روایت، ترجمة ابوالفضل حری، فارابی، تهران.
شهبا، محمد(1389)، روایت و روایتگری، نامة هنرهای نمایشی و موسیقی (دو‌فصلنامة تخصصی دانشگاه هنر)، شماره ١، صص ٢٥ – ٣٢. کوری، گریگوری (1391). روایت‌ها و راوی‌ها، ترجمة دکتر محمد شهبا، مینوی خرد، تهران.
کوری، گریگوری (1388). تصویر و ذهن: فیلم، فلسفه و علوم شناختی، ترجمة دکتر محمد شهبا، مهر نیوشا، تهران.
لوته، یاکوب (1386). مقدمه‌ای بر روایت در ادبیات و سینما ، ترجمة امید نیک فرجام، مینوی خرد، تهران.
مارتین، والاس (1382). نظریه‌های روایت، ترجمة دکتر محمد شهبا، هرمس، تهران.
Armes، R (1968), The Cinema of Alain Resnais
, Zwemmer، A.S Barnes, London, New York.
Black, D. A(1986), Genette and film: Narrative level in the fiction cinema, Wide Angle, 8(3/4), 19-26.
Booth, W. C ([1961] 1983), The Rhetoric of Fiction, U of Chicago P, Chicago.
Bordwell, D & Carroll, N (eds.) (1996), Post-Theory: Reconstructing Film Studies, University of Wisconsin Press, Madison. Bordwell, D, Staiger, J and K. Thompson (1985), The Classical Hollywood Cinema: Film Style and Mode of Production to 1960, Columbia University Press, New York.
Bordwell, D (1986), Narration in the Fiction Film, Routledge, London.
Bordwell, D (1989a), Making Meaning: Inference and Rhetoric in the Interpretation of Cinema, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
Bordwell, D (1989b), A Case for Cognitivism, Iris, No. 9, pp 11-40.
Buckland, W (1995), Relevance and cognition: towards a pragmatics of unreliable filmic narration, in Towards a Pragmatics of the Audiovisual, vol. 2, ed. E. J. Mu¨ller, Nodus, Mu¨nster, pp 55–66.
Carroll, N (1990), The Philosophy of Horror, Routledge, New York and London.
Carroll, N (1996), Theorizing the Moving Image, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Chatman, S (1978), Story and Discourse, Narrative Structure in Fiction and Film, Cornell University Press, Ithaca & London. Chatman, S (1990), Coming to Terms, The Rhetoric of Narrative in Fiction and Film, Cornell University Press, Ithaca & London.
Cohn, D (1999), The Distinction of Fiction, The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore & London.
Cohn, D (2000), Discordant Narration, Style 34(2), 307-316.
Corbett, E. P. J. (1990), Classical rhetoric for the modern student, Oxford University Press, New York.
Currie, G (1995), Unreliability Refigured: Narrative in Literature and Film, The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, Vol. 53, No. 1 (Winter, 1995), pp. 19-29 Published by: Blackwell Publishing on behalf of The American Society for Aesthetics Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/431733 Accessed: 11/04/2010 01:30.
Currie, G (1999), Cognitivism, in Toby Miller and Robert Stam (eds.), A Companion to Film Theory, London, Blackwell, 1999, p. 106-112.
Ferenz, V (2005), Fight clubs, American psychos and mementos, The scope of unreliable narration in film, New Review of Film and Television Studies, 3(2), 133-159.
Fludernik, M (1996), Towards a 'Natural' Narratology, Routledge, London, New York.
Fludernik, M (1999), Defining (in)sanity: the narrator of The Yellow Wallpaper and the question of unreliability, in Grenzu¨berschreitungen: Narratologie im Kontext/ Transcending Boundaries: Narratology in Context, eds W. Gru¨nzweig & A. Solbach, Narr, Tu¨bingen, pp. 75–95.
Freeland, C (1996), Feminist Frameworks for Horror Films, in David Bordwell and Noël Carroll (eds.), Post-Theory: Reconstructing Film Studies, Madison, University of Wisconsin Press, 1996, pp 195-218.
Frey, J. N (1994(, How to Write a Damn Good Novel, II. St. Martin's Press.
Grodal, T (1997), Moving Pictures: A New Theory of Film Genres, Feelings, and Cognition, Clarendon Press, Oxford. Hansen, P. K (2009), Unreliable Narration in Cinema, University of Southern Denmark, http://cf.hum.uva.nl/narratology/a09_hansen.htm" (Amsterdam International Electronic Journal for Cultural Narratology (AJCN))
Hansen، P. K (2007), Reconsidering the Unreliable Narrator, Semiotica,165 (1/4), 227-246.
Jahn, M (1998), Package Deals, Exklusionen, Randzonen: das Pha¨nomen der Unverla¨ßlichkeit in den Erza¨hlsituationen, in Unreliable Narration: Studien zur Theorie und Praxis unglaubwu¨rdigen Erza¨hlens in der englischsprachigen Erza¨hlliteratur, ed. A. Nu¨nning, Wissenschaftlicher Verlag, Trier, pp. 81–106.
Lanser, S. S (1981), The Narrative Act, Princeton UP, Princeton.
Liebowitz, F (1996), Apt Feelings, or Why 'Women's Films' Aren't Trivial, in David Bordwell and Noel Carroll (eds.), Post-Theory: Reconstructing Film Studies, Madison, University of Wisconsin Press, 1996, p. 219-229.
Liptay, F (2005), Auf Abwegen, oder wohin fu¨hren die Erza¨hlstraßen in den road Literatur und Film, eds F. Liptay & Y. Wolf, edition text + kritik, Mu¨nchen.
Monaco, M (1978), Alain Resnais: the role of imagination, Secker & Warburg, London.
Nünning, A (1997a), But Why Will You say That I Am mad? On the Theory, History and Signals of Unreliable Narration in British Fiction, in Arbeiten aus Anglistik und Amerikanistik 22/1, pp 1 -105.
Nünning, A (1997b), Deconstructing and Reconstructing the Implied Author: The Resurrection of an Anthropomorphized Passepartout or the Obituary of a Critical Phenomenon?, Anglistik. Organ des Verbandes Deutscher Anglisten, 8, 95–116. Nünning, A (1999), Unreliable, Compared to What? Towards a Cognitive Theory of Unreliable Narration: Prolegomena and Hypotheses.” W. Grünzweig & A. Solbach (eds).
Grenzüberschreitungen: Narratologie im Kontext / Transcending Boundaries: Narratology in Context, Tübingen: Narr, 53–73.
Nünning, A (2005), Reconceptualizing Unreliable Narration: Synthesizing Cognitive and Rhetorical Approaches. J. Phelan & P. J. Rabinowitz (eds). A Companion to Narrative Theory, Oxford, Blackwell, 89–107.
Nünning, A (2005), Reconceptualizing Unreliable Narration, A Companion to Narrative Theory. J. Phelan and P. J. Rabinowits. Malden, Ma & Oxford, Blackwell Pub, pp 89-107.
Nünning, A (ed.) (1998), Studien zu Theorien und Praxis unglaubwürdigen Erzählens in der englischsprachigen Erzählliteratur, Wissenschaftlicher Verlag, Trier.
Olson, G (2003), Reconsidering Unreliability: Fallible and Untrustworthy Narrators, In: Narrative, Nr. 11, 93–109.
Phelan, J & Martin, M. P (1999), The Lessons of ‘Weymouth’: Homodiegesis, Unreliability, Ethics, and The Remains of the Day, D. Herman (ed), Narratologies: New Perspectives on Narrative Analysis, Columbus: Ohio State UP, 88–109.
Phelan, J (2005), Living to tell about it: A rhetoric and ethics of character narration, Cornell University Press, Ithaca. Plantinga, C & Smith, G. M (eds.) (1999), Passionate Views: Film, Cognition, and Emotion, John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.
Quart, A (2000), Alissa Quart, "The Insider: David Bordwell Blows the Whistle on Film Studies”, Lingua Franca, Vol. 10, No. 2, pp 34-43.
Rabinowitz, P. J. (1977), Truth in Fiction: A Reexamination of Audiences, In: Critical Inquiry, Nr. 1, 121–141.
Rimmon-Kenan, S (1983), Narrative Fiction: Contemporary Poetics, London, Methuen.
Shen, D(?????????), Unreliability, In: Hühn, Peter et al. (eds.), the living handbook of narratology, Hamburg: Hamburg University Press.
URL = hup.sub.uni-hamburg.de/lhn/index.php?title=Unreliability&oldid=1529 [view date: 01 Jul 2012]
Thagard, P(2008), Cognitive Science, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2008 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), First published Mon Sep 23, 1996; substantive revision Mon Apr 30, 2007 ( Retrieved from: http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2008 /entries/ cognitive -science/, access date: May 20, 2013)
Wilson, G (1986), Narration in Light: Studies in Cinematic Point of View, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore and London.
Wilson, G. M (1986), Narration in light.Studies in cinematic point of view, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore. Yacobi, T (1981), Fictional Reliability as a Communicative Problem, Poetics Today, 2(2), 113-126.
Yacobi, T (2001), Package deals in fictional narrative: the case of the narrator’s (un)reliability, Narrative, Vol. 9, No. 2, pp 223–22
Zerweck, B (2001), Historicizing unreliable narration: unreliability and cultural discourse in narrative fiction, Style, Vol. 35, No. 1, pp 151–178.
http://www.iricss.org/fa/Pages/CS-Definition.aspx http://www.wikipedia.org | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 2,196 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 3,476 |
||