Study of Relationship Between Residents Satisfaction from Living Environment and their Attachment Sense In Kowsar High-Rise Residential Complex | ||
| نشریه هنرهای زیبا: معماری و شهرسازی | ||
| Article 7, Volume 20, Issue 3, September 2015, Pages 85-94 PDF (729.7 K) | ||
| Document Type: Research Paper | ||
| DOI: 10.22059/jfaup.2015.56880 | ||
| Authors | ||
| Atiyeh Bahrampour; Atoosa Modiri* | ||
| Abstract | ||
| Recently, increased growth of the population and insufficiency of infrastructures have expedited vertical development of cities, with the outcome of which being residence in such High-Rise complexes and creation of spiritless, dull masses which lack the prerequisites of making a permanent relationship with their residents, provoke high-level alienations, and dilute one’s attachment to his/her living environment. Whatever in the planning and design of residential complexes what has received little attention, is the principles and criteria for environmental quality and its impact on citizens' positive assessment on the status of their homes. Outcome of this neglect, was the formation of large masses of cold and bland buildings which lack the necessary conditions for a lasting relationship with its inhabitants and reduce the sense of attachment to their environment. On the other hand, attachment sense is key factor in creating sustainable urban spaces, creating a sense of identity and participation and social interaction. The aim of this study is to explain the relationship between quality criteria of residential environment and sense of attachment in high-rise residential complexes. So, we tried to explain the relationship of these criteria with residents' attachment sense by identifying quality criteria of living environment in the high-rise complexes. Therefore, an investigation of different approaches to living environment quality was carried out in order to identify environment quality criteria in high-Rise Residential complexes. By examining various, environmental quality criteria in high-rise residential complexes have been studied, and these criteria were presented in two levels of complex environment quality and residential environment quality due to the nature of High-Rise residential complexes. Consequently, in order to achieve the objectives of the research, theories of belonging to place were examined. Tehran-based Kowsar Township was evaluated as possessing High-Rise residential complex in order to affirm theoretical fundamentals of the research, and by distributing 380 questionnaires, the required data was collected. After Confirmatory factor analysis on the data, environment quality of township was calculated and determined that residential environment quality in Kowsar Township is in good condition. Then, 8 factors with Eigenvector more than 1 was extracted. after naming them, the factors 'town management , facilities and services, environmental variables , security and safety, residential environment facilities , costs and attachment sense' as criteria of residential environment quality in high-rise residential complexes were determined, and the model obtained was confirmed by theoretical foundations. Also attachment sense of residents determined and shown that is in good condition. In addition, the relationship between criteria obtained and the attachment sense were studied with Pearson correlation coefficients, this indicates that an increase in satisfaction from the quality of the environment of residents living in high-rise residential complex habitat may also increase their sense of belonging. Pearson correlation coefficient also showed that all the criteria of residential environment in the High-rise residential complexes have a significant effect on the attachment sense of residents, and it was shown that among them, the management of the town has the most impact on the attachment sense of residents of high-rise residential complexes. | ||
| Keywords | ||
| Quality of Living Environment; Residential satisfaction; Criteria of Residential Environment; High-Rise Residential Complex; place attachment | ||
| References | ||
|
بحرینی، حسین؛ طبیبیان، منوچهر (1377)، مدل ارزیابی کیفیت محیط زیست شهری، مجله محیط شناسی، مجموعه پژوهش های محیط زیست، دوره 24، شماره 21 و 22، صص41-56. بهزادفر، مصطفی؛ قاضی زاده، سیده ندا (1390)، حس رضایت از فضای باز مسکونی نمونه مورد مطالعه: مجتمع های مسکونی شهر، تهران، نشریه هنرهای زیبا- معماری و شهرسازی، شماره 45، صص 15-24. چرخچیان، مریم (1393)، بررسی نقش ویژگی های فردی در میزان دلبستگی کاربران به فضاهای شهری (نمونه موردی: خیابان خیام در قزوین)، جغرافیا و برنامه ریزی، دوره18، شماره47، صص 55-69. رفیعیان، مجتبی؛ عسکری زاده، زهرا؛ فرزاد، مهناز(1392)، مطلوبیتسنجی محیطهای شهری، نگرشی تحلیلی در سنجش کیفیت محیط شهری، موسسه نشر شهر، تهران. رفیعیان، مجتبی؛ مولودی، منوچهر(1390)، رویکردها و روش های سنجش کیفیت محیط مسکونی شهری، آذرخش، تهران. زبردست، اسفندیار؛ بنی عامریان، مهسا (1389)، بررسی ارتباط میان شاخصهای عینی و ذهنی بعد خدمات عمومی کیفیت زندگی شهری در شهر جدید هشتگرد، نامه معماری و شهرسازی، دوره2، شماره3، صص 5-22. سرمست، بهرام؛ متوسلی محمد مهدی (1389)، بررسی و تحلیل نقش مقیاس شهر در میزان حس تعلق به مکان « نمونه موردی شهر تهران»، مدیریت شهری، شماره 26، صص 133-146. شولتز، کریستین (1392)، روح مکان: بسوی پدیدار شناسی معماری، رخ داد نو، تهران. فروزنده جوان، علی؛ مطلبی، قاسم (1390)، مفهوم حس تعلق به مکان و عوامل تشکیل دهنده آن، هویت شهر، دوره 5، شماره 8، صص27-38. کشفی، محمدعلی؛ حسینی، سیدباقر؛ نوروزیان ملکی، سعید (1391)، نقش فضاهای عمومی ساختمان‌های مسکونی بلندمرتبه در افزایش تعاملات اجتماعی ساکنین؛ پژوهش موردی: برج بین‌المللی تهران، مدیریت شهری، دوره10، شماره 30، صص7-18. گیفورد، رابرت (1378)، ادراک و شناخت محیطی، ترجمه نسرین دهباشی، نشریهمعماریوفرهنگ، شماره 2و 3، صص5-23. معینی، مهدیه؛ اسلامی، سید غلامرضا(1391)، رویکردی تحلیلی به کیفیت محیط مسکونی معاصر، هویت شهر، دوره 6، شماره 10، صص 47–58. ملکی، محمدرضا؛ پارسا، سپیده؛ وثیق، بهزاد؛ مرادی، ابراهیم (1393)، بررسی حس تعلق به مکان با توجه به تفاوت های جنسیتی (مطالعه موردی: شهر ایلام)، مسکن و محیط روستا، دوره 33، شماره 148، صص99 -108. Altman, I ,& Low, S. M (Eds.) (1992), Place attachment (Vol. 12, Plenum Press), New York.
Amerigo, M ,& Aragones, J (1997), A theoretical and methodological approach to the study of residential satisfaction, Journal of Psychology, 17, 47-57.
Bonaiuto, M; Aiello, A; Perugini, M; Bonnes, M & Ercolani, A.P (1999), Multidimensional perception of residential environment quality and neighborhood attachment in the urban environment, J. Environ. Psychol, 19, 331–352.
Bonaiuto, M, Fornara , Ferdinando & Mirilia, Bonnes (2003), Indexes of perceived residential environment quality and neighbourhood attachment in urban environments: a confirmation study on the city of Rome, Landscape and Urban Planning, 65,41–52.
Carp, F; Zawadski, R & Shokron, H (1976), Dimensions of urban environmental quality, Environment and Behavior, 8(2), 239-264.
English Partner Ships (2007), Quality standards-delivering quality places: places-homes-people, available at: www.englishpartnerships.co.uk .(sep,2014).
Glaster, G. C & Hesser, G.W (1981), Residential satisfaction composition and contextual correlates, Environment and Behavior, 13 (6),735-758.
Ge, J & Hokao K (2006), Research on Residential Lifestyles in Japanese Cities from the Viewpoints of Residential Preference, Residential Choice and Residential Satisfaction, Landscape Urban Plan,78(3) ,pp.165-178.
Giuliani M.V & R. Feldman (1993), Place attachment in a developmental and cultural context ,Journal of Environmental Psychology, No 13, pp. 267–274.
Hidalgo, Carmona & Hernandez, Bernard (2001), Place Attachment: Conceptual and Empirical Questions, Journal of environmental Psychology, Vol 21, pp. 273-281.
Islam, N., M N Huda, F Narayan and P.B. Rana ( 1997), Addressing the Urban Poverty Agenda in Bangladesh: Critical Issues and 1995 Survey Findings, published for the Asian Development Bank, University Press Limited, Dhaka.
Jelinkova, Z & Picek, M (1984), Physical and Psychological Factors Determining Population Responses to Environment, Activ. Nerv. Sup., No.26, pp.144-146.
Khaef, S & Zebardast, E (2015), Assessing quality of life dimensions in deteriorated inner areas : a case from Javadieh neighborhood in Tehran metropolis , open access. In: Social indicators research, (2015) IN PRESS.
Kinsey, J & Lane, S )1983(, Race, housing attributes and satisfaction with housing, Housing and Society, 10, pp. 98-116.
Lansing, j. b & r.w. Marans (1969), Evaluation of neighborhood, Journal of the American institute of planners, 35, pp.195-199.
Onibokun, A. G (1974), Evaluatin consumers’ satisfaction with housing: an application of a system approach, Journal of the American Planning Association, 40(3), pp.189-200.
Ott, W. R (1978), Environmental indices: Theory and practice; Ann Arbor Science Publishers, Ann Arbor.
Scannell, L; Gifford, R (2010), Defining place attachment: A tripartite organizing framework, Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30, pp.1-10.
Ujang, N (2010), Place attachment and continuity of urban place identity, Asian Journal of Environment Behavior Studies, 11, pp. 41-74.
Van poll, R (1997), The perceived quality of the urban residential environment. A multi attitude evaluation, PhD thesis, center for energy and environmental studies (IVEM), university of Groningen (RuG), the Netherlands.
Varady. D.p & Carrozza, M. A (2000), Toward a better way to measure customer satisfaction levels in public housing: A report from Cincinnati, Housing Studies, 15(6), pp.797-825. | ||
|
Statistics Article View: 4,664 PDF Download: 53,943 |
||