پیوندهای مفید
اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 161 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 6,525 |
| تعداد مقالات | 70,444 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 123,997,477 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 97,117,114 |
بررسی عناصر چیره دستی سازمانی در سازمان های علمی و فناورانه (مطالعۀ موردی: جهاد دانشگاهی) | ||
| مدیریت دولتی | ||
| مقاله 10، دوره 7، شماره 3، مهر 1394، صفحه 619-636 اصل مقاله (513.13 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله علمی پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22059/jipa.2015.56996 | ||
| نویسنده | ||
| محمدرضا پورعابدی* | ||
| استادیار مدیریت منابع انسانی، جهاد دانشگاهی، تهران، ایران | ||
| چکیده | ||
| هدف پژوهش حاضر بررسی عناصر چیره‌دستی سازمانی در سازمان‌های علمی و فناورانه است. پژوهش حاضر از دسته پژوهش‌های توصیفی به‌شمار می‌رود که به روش پیمایش اجرا می‌شود. در این پژوهش مدل چیره دستی سازمانی از نظر کمی آزمایش شده است. جامعۀ آماری از میان شرکت‌های فعال علمی و فناورانۀ جهاد دانشگاهی انتخاب شده است، به‌طوری که این شرکتها بیش از 10 نفر کارمند و 5 مدیر دارند و 94 شرکت را دربرمیگیرد. با توجه به فرمول کوکران 76 نمونۀ آماری از شرکت‌های فعال به روش تصادفی ساده انتخاب شد. در هر شرکت 3 مدیر به سؤالهای پرسشنامه پاسخ دادند که میانگین نظر آنها بهمنزلۀ نمایندۀ شرکت تحلیل شد. بازگشت پرسشنامهها از نمونۀ آماری 92 درصد بود که داده‌های جمعآوریشده بهکمک روش مدل‌سازی معادلات ساختاری و تکنیک تحلیل مسیر تحلیل شدند. این پژوهش نُه فرضیه را مطرح کرده است که هشت فرضیۀ آن به تأیید رسید و فقط تأثیر عوامل مداخله‌گر بر استراتژی‌ها و راهبردهای چیره‌دستی به‌دلیل عدد معناداری پایین تأیید نشد. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| بهره‌برداری فناورانه؛ پژوهش مهندسی‌شده؛ چیره‌دستی سازمانی؛ سازمان‌های علمی و فناورانۀ جهاد دانشگاهی | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Designing Ambidexterity model in scientific and technological organizations Based on Grounded Theory (A Case of ACECR) | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Mohammadreza Pour Abedi | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| . By Using Theorical Sampling and using sampling techniques targeted (judgment) Sampling and application of Snowball (chain) and Purposive Sampling was carried out on the basis of 16 interviews with administrators, faculty and Academic Experts of ACECR Which were Experienced in the field of Exploitation and Exploration and are Expert in both Fields. Analysis of Interview Data in The Process of Open Coding, Axial Coding and Selective Coding emerged in a theory in the field of ambidexterity in which architecture of Ambidexterity based on Committed Intelligence, Engineering Exploration and Technology-Based Exploration were Selected as Main Concepts Orienting to Ambidextrous. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| Ambidexterity, Grounded theory, Scientific and technological organizations | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Adler, P., Goldoftas, B. & Levine, D. (1999). Flexibility versus efficiency? A case study of model changeovers in the Toyota production system. Organization Science, 10(1): 43-68.
Beckman, C.M. (2006). The influence of founding team company affiliations on firm behavior. Academy of Management Journal, 49(4): 741-758.
Bledow, R., Frese, M., Anderson, N., Erez, M., & Farr, J. (2009). A dialectic perspective on innovation: Conflicting demands, multiple pathways, and ambidexterity. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 2(3), 305-337.
Cantarello, S., Martini, A., & Nosella, A. (2012). A Multi‐Level Model for Organizational Ambidexterity in the Search Phase of the Innovation Process. Creativity and Innovation Management, 21(1), 28-48.
Cao, Q., Gedajlovic, E. & Zhang, H. (2009). Unpacking organizational ambidexterity: Dimensions, contingencies, and synergistic effects. Organization Science, 20(4): 781-796.
Eisenhardt, K. M. & Brown, S. L. (1998). Patching. Restitching business portfolios in dynamic markets. Harvard business review, 77(3): 72-82.
Ferrary, M. (2011). Specialized organizations and ambidextrous clusters in the open innovation paradigm. European Management Journal, 29(3): 181-192.
Flickinger, M., Gruber-Mücke, T. & Fiedler, M. (2013). The linkage between human resource practices and organizational ambidexterity: An analysis of internal labor market dynamics in a port-of-entry context. Journal of Business Economics, 83(8): 923-946.
Gibson, C. B., & Birkinshaw, J. (2004). The antecedents, consequences and mediating role of organizational ambidexterity. Academy of Management Journal, 47, 209-226.
Glaser, B. G. (1992). Emergence vs forcing: Basics of grounded theory analysis. United States: Sociology Press.
Graetz, F. & Smith, A. (2005). Organizing forms in change management: The role of structures, processes and boundaries in a longitudinal case analysis. Journal of Change Management, 5(3): 311-328.
Grant, R. M. (1996). Toward a knowledge‐based theory of the firm. Strategic management journal, 17(S2), 109-122.
Gupta, A. K., Smith, K. G. & Shalley, C. E. (2006). The interplay between exploration and exploitation. Academy of management journal, 49(4): 693-706.
He, Z. & Wong, P. (2004). Exploration vs. Exploitation: An Empirical Test of the Ambidexterity Hypothesis. Organization Science, 15: 481-494.
Jansen, J. J., Tempelaar, M. P., Van den Bosch, F. A., & Volberda, H. W. (2009). Structural differentiation and ambidexterity: The mediating role of integration mechanisms. Organization Science, 20(4): 797-811.
Jansen, J. J., Volberda, H. W., & Van Den Bosch, F. A. (2005). Exploratory innovation, exploitative innovation, and ambidexterity: The impact of environmental and organizational antecedents. Schmalenbach Business Review, 57: 351-363.
Jansick, V. J. (1994). The dance of qualitative research design. Handbook of qualitative research, 209-219.
Junni, P., Sarala, R. M., Taras, V., & Tarba, S. Y. (2013). Organizational ambidexterity and performance: A meta-analysis. The Academy of Management Perspectives, 27(4), 299-312.
Lee, G., Delone, W. and Espinosa, J. A. (2006), "Ambidextrous Coping Strategies in Globally Distributed Software Development Projects", Communications of the ACM, vol. 49, no. 10, pp. 35-40.
Lee, J. Y. and MacMillan, I. C. (2008), "Managerial knowledge-sharing in chaebols and its impact on the performance of their foreign subsidiaries", International Business Review, vol. 17, no. 5, pp. 533-545.
Lin, Z., Yang, H., & Demirkan, I. (2007). The performance consequences of ambidexterity in strategic alliance formations: Empirical investigation and computational theorizing. Management Science, 53(10), 1645-1658.
Lubatkin, M. H., Simsek, Z., Ling, Y., & Veiga, J. F. (2006). Ambidexterity and performance in small-to medium-sized firms: The pivotal role of top management team behavioral integration. Journal of management, 32(5), 646-672.
O’Reilly III, C.A., Tushman, M.L. (2008). Ambidexterity as a dynamic Capability: Resolving the innovator’s Dilemma. Research in organizational behaviour, 28: 185-206.
O’Reilly, C.A. & Tushman, M.L. (2008). Ambidexterity as a dynamic Capability: Resolving the innovator’s Dilemma. Research in organizational behaviour, 28: 185-206.
O'Reilly, C.A. & Tushman, M. (2013). Organizational ambidexterity: Past, present and future. The Academy of Management Perspectives, published online before print. doi:10.5465/amp.2013.0025.
Pellegrinelli, S., Murray-Webster, R., & Turner, N. (2015). Facilitating organizational ambidexterity through the complementary use of projects and programs. International Journal of Project Management, 33(1): 153-164.
Raisch, S. & Birkinshaw, J. (2008). Organizational ambidexterity: Antecedents, outcomes, and moderators. Journal of Management, 34(1): 375-409.
Reilly, C. A. & Tushman, M. L. (2004). The ambidextrous organization. Harvard business review, 82(4): 74-83.
Smith, W. K., & Tushman, M. L. (2005). Managing strategic contradictions: A top management model for managing innovation streams. Organization Science, 16, 522-536.
Smith, W. K., Binns, A., & Tushman, M. L. (2010). Complex business models: Managing strategic paradoxes simultaneously. Long Range Planning, 43(2), 448-461.
Strauss, A. L. & Corbin, J. (1990), Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques, Los Angeles: Sage.
Taylor, A., & Helfat, C. E. (2009). Organizational linkages for surviving technological change: Complementary assets, middle management, and ambidexterity. Organization Science, 20(4): 718-739.
Venkatraman, N., Lee, C. H., & Iyer, B. (2007). Strategic ambidexterity and sales growth: A longitudinal test in the software sector. In Unpublished Manuscript (earlier version presented at the Academy of Management Meetings, 2005).
Wang, C. L., & Rafiq, M. (2014). Ambidextrous Organizational Culture, Contextual Ambidexterity and New Product Innovation: A Comparative Study of UK and Chinese High‐tech Firms. British Journal of management, 25(1): 58-76.
Wei, Z., Yi, Y. & Guo, H. (2014). Organizational learning ambidexterity, strategic flexibility, and new product development. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 31(4): 832-847.
Wei, Z., Zhao, J. & Zhang, C. (2014). Organizational ambidexterity, market orientation, and firm performance. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 33(1): 134-153.
Yang, Z., Zhou, X., & Zhang, P. (2015). Discipline versus passion: Collectivism, centralization, and ambidextrous innovation. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 32(3): 745-769. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 2,214 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 1,047 |
||