سامانه پشتیبانی خدمات اطلاعات

  اخبار و اعلانات

 آمار

تعداد نشریات162
تعداد شماره‌ها6,578
تعداد مقالات71,072
تعداد مشاهده مقاله125,698,150
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله98,929,888
Eskandari, Hamidreza, Bahrami, Mohammad. (1396). Multi-Objective Operating Room Scheduling Using Simulation-based Optimization. , 51(1), 1-13. doi: 10.22059/jieng.2017.61890
Hamidreza Eskandari; Mohammad Bahrami. "Multi-Objective Operating Room Scheduling Using Simulation-based Optimization". , 51, 1, 1396, 1-13. doi: 10.22059/jieng.2017.61890
Eskandari, Hamidreza, Bahrami, Mohammad. (1396). 'Multi-Objective Operating Room Scheduling Using Simulation-based Optimization', , 51(1), pp. 1-13. doi: 10.22059/jieng.2017.61890
Eskandari, Hamidreza, Bahrami, Mohammad. Multi-Objective Operating Room Scheduling Using Simulation-based Optimization. , 1396; 51(1): 1-13. doi: 10.22059/jieng.2017.61890

Multi-Objective Operating Room Scheduling Using Simulation-based Optimization

Advances in Industrial Engineering
مقاله 2، دوره 51، شماره 1، تیر 2017، صفحه 1-13    اصل مقاله (709.52 K)
نوع مقاله: Research Paper
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22059/jieng.2017.61890
نویسندگان
Hamidreza Eskandari* ؛ Mohammad Bahrami
Management and Productivity Study Center, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran
چکیده
As the main source of income and expenses of hospitals, operating rooms (ORs) are the engines of hospitals' economics and they have a significant impact on public health. Many papers concerned regarding OR planning and scheduling problems, but they have not considerably applied the simulation-based optimization approach to solve the problems. In OR scheduling problems, there are a number of ORs and some surgeons with different specialties and each surgeon has a waiting list of some patients that each surgery should be planned and scheduled on the days when relevant surgeons are available. In this study, we consider two objectives: (1) minimizing the costs of overtime staffing and ORs’ idle time, and (2) minimizing the number of waiting days for patients. The mathematical model of OR scheduling problem is developed and solved by both exact method and simulation-based optimization approach. The comparison of results obtained from exact method and simulation-based optimization approach indicates that the exact method is only able to solve the small-size problems in reasonable time, while simulation-based optimization approach find competitive solutions for both small-size and large-size problems and solve large-size problems in an acceptable time.
کلیدواژه‌ها
Mathematical modeling؛ Operating room؛ Scheduling؛ Simulation-based optimization
عنوان مقاله [English]
زمان‌بندی چندهدفۀ اتاق عمل با استفاده از بهینه‌سازی مبتنی‌بر شبیه‌سازی
نویسندگان [English]
حمیدرضا اسکندری؛ محمد بهرامی
استادیار گروه مهندسی صنایع، مرکز مطالعات مدیریت و توسعۀ فناوری، دانشگاه تربیت‌مدرس
چکیده [English]
نقش اتاق‌های عمل در سلامت جامعه و اقتصاد بیمارستان‌ها در سال­های اخیر، توجه بسیاری از پژوهشگران را به مسئلۀ زمان‌بندی اتاق عمل جلب کرده است، اما برای حل این مسئله، از قابلیت‌های روش بهینه‌سازی مبتنی­بر شبیه‌سازی، استفادة چندانی نشده است. تعدادی جراح با تخصص‌های گوناگون و هریک با لیست انتظاری از بیماران وجود دارد که جراحی‌های آن­ها باید در روزهای حضور جراحان در یکی از اتاق‌های عمل زمان‌بندی شود. برای این مسئله، دو هدف کمینه­کردن هزینه‌های اضافه‌کاری و خالی­ماندن اتاق‌های عمل، و کمینه­کردن روزهای انتظار بیماران برای جراحی درنظر گرفته شد. حل این مسئله، به دو روش مدل‌سازی ریاضی و بهینه‌سازی مبتنی­بر شبیه‌سازی صورت گرفت. مطابق نتایج، برای مسئلة زمان‌بندی اتاق عمل، راهکار بهینه‌سازی مبتنی­بر شبیه‌سازی، نه‌تنها در مسائل کوچک، به­لحاظ کیفیت جواب قابل‌رقابت با مدل ریاضی است، بلکه این راهکار قابلیت آن را دارد که در مسائل بزرگ، جوابی مناسب در زمانی معقول پیدا کند.
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
اتاق عمل, بهینه‌سازی مبتنی‌بر شبیه‌سازی, زمان‌بندی, مدل‌سازی ریاضی
مراجع
  1. Denton, B., Viapiano, J. and Vogl, A. (2007). “Optimization of surgery sequencing and scheduling decisions under uncertainty”, Health Care Management Science, Vol. 10, No. 1, PP. 13–24.
  2. Litvak, E. and Long, M. (2000). “Cost and quality under managed care: Irreconcilable differences”, The American Journal of Managed Care, Vol. 6, No. 3, PP. 305–312.
  3. Ateeghechian, A. (2011). “Surgery operations scheduling with stochastic times”, PhD Thesis, Faculty of Industrial Engineering, Tarbiat Modarres University, Tehran, Iran.
  4. Cardeon, B., Demeulemeester, E. and Belien, J. (2010). “Operating room planning and scheduling: A literature review”, European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 201, PP. 921–932.
  5. Denton, B. T., Miller, A. J., Balasubramanian, H. J. and Huschka, T. R. (2009). “Optimal Allocation of Surgery Blocks to Operating Rooms under Uncertainty”, Operations Research, Vol. 58, No.4, PP. 802–816.
  6. Arnaout, J. P. M. and Kulbashian, S. (2008). “Maximizing the utilization of operating rooms with stochastic times using simulation”, A Proceedings of the 2008 Winter Simulation Conference, PP. 1617–1623.
  7. Liu, Y., Chu, C. and Wang, K. (2011). “New heuristic algorithm for the operating room scheduling problem”, Computers and Industrial Engineering, Vol. 61, PP. 865–871.
  8. Cochran, J. K. and Roche, K. (2009). “A multi-class queuing network analysis methodology for improving hospital emergency department performance”, Computers and Operations Research, Vol. 36, No. 5, PP. 1497–1512.
  9. Meskens, N., Duvivier, D. and Hanset, A. (2013). “Multi-objective operating room scheduling considering desiderata of the surgical team”, Decision Support Systems, Vol. 55, PP. 650–659.
10. Lamiri, M., Grimaud, F. and XIE, X. (2009). “Optimization methods for a stochastic surgery planning problem”, Int. J. Production Economics, Vol. 120, No. 2, PP. 400–410.

11. Aringhieri, A., Landab, P., Sorianoc, P., Tànfanib, E. and Testi, A., (2015). “A two level metaheuristic for the operating room scheduling and assignment problem”, Computers and Operations Research, Vol. 54, PP. 21–34.

12. Davies, R. and Davies, H. (1994). “Modeling patient flows and resource provision in health systems”, Omega, Vol. 22, No. 2, PP. 123–131.

13. Lowery, J. C. (1998). “Getting started in simulation in health care”, Proceedings of the 1998 Winter Simulation Conference, PP. 31–35.

14. Saremi, A., Jula, P., Elmekkawy, T. and Wang, G. G. (2013). “Appointment scheduling of outpatient surgical services in a multistage operating room department”, Int. J. Production Economics, Vol. 141, No. 2, PP. 646–658.

15. M'hallah, R. and Al-roomi, A. H. (2014). “The planning and scheduling of operating rooms: A simulation approach”, Computers and Industrial Engineering, Vol. 78, PP. 235–248.

16. Persson, M. J. and Persson, J. A. (2009). “Health economic modeling to support surgery management at a Swedish hospital”, Omega, Vol. 37, No. 4, PP. 853–863.

17. Van Essen, J. T., Hans, E. W., Hurink, J. L. and Oversberg, A. (2012). “Minimizing the waiting time for emergency surgery”, Operations Research for Health Care, Vol. 1, No. 2, PP. 34–44.

18. Deb, K., Pratap, A., Agarval, S. and Meyarivan, T. (2002). “A Fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGAII”, IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, Vol. 6, No. 2, PP. 182–197.

19. Eskandari, H. and Geiger, C. D. (2008). “A fast Pareto genetic algorithm approach for solving expensive multiobjective optimization problems”, Journal of Heuristics, Vol. 14, No. 3, PP. 203–241.

20. Klemmt, A., Horn, S., Weigert, G. and Wolter, K. (2009). “Simulation-based optimization vs. mathematical programming: A hybrid approach for optimizing scheduling problems”, Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, Vol. 25, No. 6, PP. 917–925.

آمار
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 1,361
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 1,099





سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. قدرت گرفته از سیناوب