پیوندهای مفید
اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 162 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 6,578 |
| تعداد مقالات | 71,070 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 125,679,312 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 98,910,167 |
تاثیر ابعاد ساختاری ـ تشکیلاتی بر کارآفرینی در دانشکده‌های کشاورزی منطقه 5 دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی | ||
| تحقیقات اقتصاد و توسعه کشاورزی ایران | ||
| مقاله 9، دوره 48، شماره 1، خرداد 1396، صفحه 93-107 اصل مقاله (270.65 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22059/ijaedr.2017.62012 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| نگین فلاح حقیقی1؛ مسعود بیژنی* 2؛ غلامحسین کرمی3؛ معصومه زند4 | ||
| 1استادیار سازمان پژوهش‌های علمی و صنعتی ایران | ||
| 2استادیار گروه ترویج و آموزش کشاورزی دانشگاه تربیت مدرس | ||
| 3دانشجوی دکتری ترویج و آموزش کشاورزی | ||
| 4عضو هیأت علمی دانشکده کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد بروجرد | ||
| چکیده | ||
| امروزه، بیکاری و عدم تطابق محتوای رشته تحصیلی دانش‌آموختگان کشاورزی با نیازهای بازار کار به مراتب از سایر رشته‌های دانشگاهی حادتر است. بهترین گزیدار برای ﺭﻓﻊ این ﻣﻌﻀﻞ، ﺗﺮﺑﻴﺖ ﺍﻓﺮﺍدی ﻛﺎﺭﺁﻣﺪ ﻭ خلاﻕ و آماده نمودن فراگیران نظام آموزش عالی کشاورزی، جهت اشتغال در بازار کار از طریق آموزش کارآفرینی و تغییرات راهبردی در الگوهای آموزشی و پژوهشی دانشگاه‌ها و بهویژه ایجاد دانشکده‌های کشاورزی کارآفرین می‌باشد. در این راستا، یکی از اولویت‌ها، سامان‌دهی "ساختاری ـ تشکیلاتی" دانشکده‌های کشاورزی در حرکت به سوی کارآفرین شدن، می‌باشد. هدف این تحقیق، بررسی تأثیر ابعاد مختلف ساختاری ـ تشکیلاتی بر کارآفرینی در دانشکده‌های کشاورزی بود که به صورت کمّی، به روش توصیفی ـ همبستگی و با استفاده از فن پیمایش انجام گرفت. جامعه آماری تحقیق را دانشجویان دانشکده‌های کشاورزی واحدهای منطقه 5 دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی تشکیل دادند (2896=N) که تعداد 341 نفر از آنان به عنوان نمونه تحقیق با استفاده از جدول بارتلت و به روش نمونه‌گیری طبقه‌ای تصادفی با انتساب متناسب، انتخاب شدند. ابزار پژوهش پرسشنامه‌ای بود که روایی صوری و محتوایی آن مطابق نظر جمعی از صاحبنظران و اساتید مجرب و پایایی آن نیز از طریق آزمون آلفای کرونباخ برای بخش‌های مختلف پرسشنامه بین 76/0 تا 91/0 تأیید گردید. نتایج نشان داد که همه ابعاد ساختاری ـ تشکیلاتی شامل ساختار سازمانی، سیستم ارتباطات سازمانی، کارآفرین بودن نظام حقوق و پاداش و نوآوری در امور آموزشی و پژوهشی با کارآفرینی رابطه‌ای معنی‌دار و مستقیم دارند. همچنین، بر اساس نتایج مدل معادلات ساختاری با استفاده از نرم‌افزار لیزرل، عامل ساختاری ـ تشکیلاتی به عنوان یک عامل مؤثر، پیش‌بینی‌کننده کارآفرینی در دانشکده‌های کشاورزی بود. در پایان، بر اساس نتایج تحقیق، پیشنهادهایی ارایه شده است. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| کارآفرینی؛ مؤلفه‌های ساختاری ـ تشکیلاتی؛ دانشکده کشاورزی؛ دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| The Effect of Structural-Organizational Dimensions on Entrepreneurship at Colleges of Agriculture in Region 5 Branches of Islamic Azad University, Iran | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Negin Fallah Haghighi1؛ Masoud Bijani2؛ Gholam Hosein Karami3؛ Masoomeh Zand4 | ||
| 1Assistant Professor, Iranian Research Organization for Science and Technology (IROST) | ||
| 2Assistant Professor, Department of Agricultural Extension and Education, Tarbiat Modares University | ||
| 3PhD student of Agricultural Extension and Education | ||
| 4Faculty member of College of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Islamic Azad University, Boroujerd Branch | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| At present, unemployed agricultural graduates and their mismatch course content to the needs of the labor market is much more serious than other academic disciplines. The best alternative to resolve this problem is training of skilled, efficient and creative people and preparing students of higher agricultural education system or employment in the labor market through entrepreneurship education and strategic changes in patterns of academic education and research and establish entrepreneur colleges of agriculture. In this regard, one of the priorities is improving “structural-organizational” components at colleges of agriculture toward being entrepreneur. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of structural-organizational dimensions on entrepreneurship at colleges of agriculture which was done in quantitative approach by using a descriptive-correlation method and a survey technique. Statistical population of this research consisted of agricultural students at branches in region 5 of Islamic Azad University, Iran (N=2896). As a sample, by using Bartlett Table, 341 students whom were chosen via stratified random sampling method. The research tool included a questionnaire that which its validity was confirmed by a group of professionals and its reliability through Cronbach's alpha test for different parts of the questionnaire was confirmed from 0.76 to 0.91. Findings revealed that there are a significant and direct relationship between entrepreneurship in colleges of agriculture and all dimensions of structural-organizational components including type of organizational structure, system of organizational communication, being entrepreneur of the salaries and bonuses system and innovation in educational and research affairs. Also, based on the results of structural equation modeling by using LISREL software, structural organizational component as an efficient factor can prognosticate entrepreneurship at colleges of agriculture. At the end, according to the results some recommendations have been presented. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| Entrepreneurship, Structural- organizational Components, College of Agriculture, Islamic Azad University | ||
| مراجع | ||
10. Blenker, P., Dreisler, P., Frgemann, H. M. & Kjeldsen, J. (2004). Entrepreneurship education and university context, Conference paper IntEnt 2004, Napoli. Retrieved from http://www.hha.dk/org/cmsdocs/resme/intent04.doc.
11. Brazeal, D. V. (1993). Organizing for internally developed corporate venture. Journal of Business Venturing, 8(1), 75-90.
12. Chambers, R. (2002). Human capital foe Entrepreneurship in Higher Education. London, Edgar.
13. Cornwall, J. R. & Perlman, B. (1990). Organizational Entrepreneurship. Homewood: Irwin.
14. Echols, A. E., & Neck, C. P. (1998). The impact of behaviors and structure on corporate entrepreneurial success. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 13(1-2), 38-46.
15. Etzkowitz, H., Webster, A., Gebhardt, C. & Cantisano, B. R. (2000). The future of the University and the University of the Future: evolution of ivory tower to entrepreneurial paradigm. Research Policy, 29(2), 313-330.
16. Fallah Haghighi, N., Rezvanfar, A., Kalantari, K. & Razavi, S.M. (2011). Investigating entrepreneurial characteristics of the students of agricultural faculty, University of Tehran. Iranian Journal of Agricultural Economics and Development Research, 3(2-42): 357-366. (In Farsi).
17. Fallah Haghighi, N., Razavi, S. M., Rezvanfar, A. & Kalantari, K. (2014). Evaluating faculty members’ attitude regarding to entrepreneurship obstacles in agricultural faculties of Iran. Journal of Organizational Vulture Management. 12 (2):325-343. (In Farsi).
18. Fallah Haghighi, N. & Bijani, M. (2016). A Qualitative Approach on Conceptualizing an Entrepreneurial University (The Case of Jönköping University, Sweden). INTAN Management Journal, 2016(6): 25-30.
19. Fry, L. (1993). Entrepreneurship: A Planning Approach. Minnesota: West Publishing Company.
20. Galloway, L. & Brown, W. (2002). Entrepreneurship education at university: A driver in the creation of high growth firms? Journal of Education and Training, 44(9), 398-405.
21. Galloway, L., Anderson, M., Brown, W., & Wilson-Edwardes, L. A. (2005). Enterprise skills for the economy. Journal of Education and Training, 47 (1), 7-17.
22. Gorman, G., Hanlon, D. & King, W. (1997). Some research perspectives on entrepreneurship education, enterprise education and education for small business management: A ten years literature review. International Small Business Journal, 15(3), 56-78.
23. Jacob, M., Lundqvist, M. & Hellsmark, H. (2003). Entrepreneurial transformations in the Swedish University system: the case of Chalmers University of Technology. Research Policy, 32(9), 1555-1569.
24. Jones, C. and English, J. (2004). A contemporary approach to entrepreneurship education. Journal of Education and Training, 46(8-9):416-423.
25. Kordnaeij, A., Moghimi, S., Ghanati, S. & yazdan, H. (2010). Investigation on the Relationship between Organizational Structure and Entrepreneurship Culture in Tehran University. Quartery Journal Public Administration, 1(3), 119-134. (In Farsi).
26. Kuratko, D. F., Hornsby, J. S. & Corso, L. M. (1996). Building an adaptive firm. Small Business Forum, 14(1), 41-48.
27. Kuratko, D., Ireland, R. D., Covin, J. G. & Hornsby, J. S. (2005). A model of middle level managers’entrepreneurial behavior. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29(6), 699-716.
28. Lieblein, G., Francis, C. & King, J. (2000). Conceptual framework for structuring future agricultural colleges and universities in industrial countries. The Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension, 6(4), 213-222.
29. Lockett, A. & Wright, M. (2005). Resources, capacities, risk capital and the creation of university spin-out companies. Research Policy, 34(7), 1043-1057.
30. Madhoshi, M. (2007). Investigation and determination of the indigenous model of internal barriers of organizational entrepreneurship in the Interior Ministry. National Conference of Entrepreneurship, Creativity and Future Organizations. (In Farsi).
31. Meyer, M. (2003). Academic patents as an indicator of useful research? A new approach to measure academic incentives. Research Evaluation, 12(1), 17-27.
32. Miclea, M. (2004). Learning to do as a pillar of education and its links to entrepreneurial studies in Higher Education: European contexts and approaches. Higher Education in Europe, 39(2), 221-231.
33. Moradi, H., Bijani, M., Shabanali Fami, H., Fallah Haghighi, N., Tamadon, A.R. & Moradi, A.R. (2011). Analysis of effective components on professional development of agricultural extension agents in Kermanshah Province in Iran. International Journal of Food, Agriculture & Environment (JFAE), 3- 4(9): 803-810.
34. Moradi, H., Bijani, M., Fallah Haghighi, N., Bosshagh, M.R., & Raeisi, M. (2012). An investigation of organizational entrepreneurship by using analysis of managerial-organizational factors in agricultural extension agency of Kermanshah Province in Iran. International Journal of AgriScience, 2(6): 558-570.
36. Morris, M. H., & Kuratko, D. F. (2002). Corporate Entrepreneurship. Fort Worth, Tex: Harcourt College Publisher.
37. Nadirkhanlou, S., Pourezzat, A. & Gholipour A. (2010). Representating barriers to academic entrepreneurship and knowledge commercialization at University of Tehran. Journal of Science and Technology Policy, 2 (4), 65-77. (In Farsi).
38. Powers, J. B. & McDougall, P. P. (2005). Universities start-up formation and technology licensing with firms that go public: A resource-based view of academic entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 20, 291-311.
39. Ranga, L. M., Debackere, K., & Von-Tunzelmann, N. (2003). Entrepreneurial universities and the dynamics of academic knowledge production: A case study of basic vs. applied research in Belgium. Scientometrics, 58(2), 301-320.
40. Razavi, S.M., Fallah Haghighi, N., Rezvanfar, A., & Kalantari, K. (2012). Analyzing entrepreneurship obstacles in agricultural faculties of Iran (students' viewpoints), Journal of Public Administration, 4(10): 59-78. (In Farsi).
41. Röpke, J. (2004). The entrepreneurial university: Innovation, academic knowledge creation & regional development in a globalize economic. Available at: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu.
42. Schulte, P. (2004). The entrepreneurial university: A strategy for institutional development. Higher Education in Europe, 29(2), 187-191.
43. Sharifzadeh, F., Razavi, S. M., Zahedi, S. & Najari, R. (2010). Effective Factors on the Academic Entrepreneurship in the University of Payam Noor: A Model Design and Analysis. Journal of Entrepreneurship Development, 2(6), 11-38. (In Farsi).
44. Shogh, B. & Safieepoor, A. (2013). The Effects of Organizational Structure on the Entrepreneurial Orientation of the Employees. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Science. 3 (11): 90-100.
45. Shook, C. L., Ketchen, D. J., Hult, G. T. M., & Kacmar, K.M. (2004). An assessment of the use of structural equation models in strategic management research. Strategic Management Journal. 25:397-404.
46. Sporn, B. (2001). Building adaptive universities: Emerging organisational forms based on experiences of European and US Universities. Tertiary Education and Management, 7(2), 121-134.
47. Taghizadeh, H., Tari, Gh. & Bina Goog Tappeh, B. (2012). Impact assessment organizational structural dimensions of toward entrepreneurship (Case Study). Journal of Industrial Management. 7 (20):35-48. (In Farsi).
48. Thornberry, N. E. (2003). Corporate entrepreneurship: teaching managers to be entrepreneurs, Journal of Management Development, 22 (4), 329-344.
49. Trachtenberg, M. (2000). R & D Policy: An overview and reassessment, National Bureau for Economic Research. Retrieved from http://www.nber.org/papers/w7930.
50. UNESCO. (2004). Higher education in Europe. Available at: http://www.unesdoc.unesco.org/images/001621/162192e.pdf.
51. Veciana, J. M., Aponte, M., & Urbano, D. (2005). University students’ attitudes to entrepreneurship: A two countries comparison. The International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 1(2), 165-182.
52. Venkataraman, S. (2004). Regional Transformation through Technological Entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 19(1), 153-167.
53. Yadollahi Farsi, J., Azizi Ziarat, O. & Khastar, H. (2010). An investigation of relationship between structure and organizational entrepreneurship (Case study: private banks in Tehran). Journal of Entrepreneurship Development. 2 (5): 55-80. (In Farsi).
54. Yadollahi Farsi, J., Zali M. & Bagherifard, S. (2011). Recognizing affective structural factors on developing academic entrepreneurship; the case of University of applied science and technology. Journal of Science and Technology Policy, 4(1), 17-33. (In Farsi).
55. Yao, X; Wen, W; Ren, Z. (2009). Corporate entrepreneurship in the enterprise clusters environment-Influence of network resources and entrepreneurial orientation on firm performance, Front. Bus. Res. China, 3(4): 566-582.
56. Zahra, S. (1993). Environment, corporate entrepreneurship and financials performance: A taxonomic approach. Journal of Business Venturing, 8(4): 319-340.
| ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 798 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 866 |
||
سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. قدرت گرفته از سیناوب