تعداد نشریات | 161 |
تعداد شمارهها | 6,532 |
تعداد مقالات | 70,501 |
تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 124,114,105 |
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 97,217,911 |
Structural Relationship of Sustainable Manufacturing Divers and Incentives | ||
Advances in Industrial Engineering | ||
مقاله 2، دوره 51، شماره 2، مهر 2017، صفحه 133-146 اصل مقاله (756.42 K) | ||
نوع مقاله: Research Paper | ||
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22059/jieng.2017.62208 | ||
نویسندگان | ||
Mohammad aslam Hosseinbor؛ Abdolhamid Safaei Qadikolaei* ؛ Mehrdad Madhooshi | ||
Department of Industrial Management, University of Mazandaran, Iran | ||
چکیده | ||
This paper is to study the factors that encourage, drive or force companies to alter manufacturing processes in a way that simultaneously minimizes their environmental and social effects and is cost-efficient for the companies. The principal focus of this research is on the relationships of these drivers, and their mutual influence on each other. This research is descriptive, and a case study is conducted in automotive plastic parts industry in Iran. After recognizing the drivers of sustainable manufacturing, they were localized, and finally ten drivers were approved. Then the relationships between the drivers were analyzed applying Grey-DEMATEL method. The most effective and important drivers in the macro-environment are laws and media, and in the micro-environment, competitors and customers are the key drivers. Business benefits and partners transfer the influences of cause drivers to effect divers. Managers, owners and personnel are the most effected drivers. | ||
کلیدواژهها | ||
Grey DEMATEL؛ Sustainability drivers and incentives؛ Sustainable manufacturing | ||
عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
بررسی روابط ساختاری محرکها و مشوقهای تولید پایدار | ||
نویسندگان [English] | ||
محمد اسلم حسین بر؛ عبدالحمید صفایی قادیکلایی؛ مهرداد مدهوشی | ||
دانشجوی دکتری مدیریت تولید و عملیات، دانشگاه مازندران | ||
چکیده [English] | ||
در پژوهش حاضر، عواملی بررسی میشوند که شرکتها را تشویق، ترغیب یا مجبور میکنند فرایندهای تولید را تغییر دهند؛ بهگونهایکه تبعات زیستمحیطی و اجتماعی آنها به حداقل برسد، اما برای شرکتها صرفة اقتصادی نیز داشته باشد. تأکید این تحقیق بر روابط میان این محرکها و تأثیرگذاری متقابل بر یکدیگر است. این پژوهش، توصیفی است و بهصورت موردپژوهی در صنعت قطعات پلاستیک خودرو ایران انجام شده است. پس از شناسایی محرکهای تولید پایدار، بومیسازی انجام گرفت و درنهایت، ده محرک تأیید شدند. سپس با استفاده از روش دیماتل خاکستری، تحلیل روابط محرکها انجام گرفت. در محیط کلان، قوانین و رسانهها و در محیط خرد، رقبا و مشتریان تأثیرگذارترین عوامل بهشمار میروند. مزایا و منافع تجاری و شرکا و همکاران، آثار محرکهای علی را به محرکهای معلول منتقل میکنند. مدیران، صاحبان و کارکنان، تأثیرپذیرترین عوامل بهشمار میروند. | ||
کلیدواژهها [English] | ||
تولید پایدار, دیماتل خاکستری, محرکها و مشوقهای پایداری | ||
مراجع | ||
10. Joshi, K., Venkatachalam, A. and Jawahir, I. (2006). “A new methodology for transforming 3R concept into 6R concept for improved product sustainability”, IV Global Conference on Sustainable Product Development and Life Cycle Engineering. PP. 3–6.
11. Abdul-Rashid, S. H. H., Sakundarini, N., Raja Ghazilla, R. A. and Thurasamy, R. (2017). “The impact of sustainable manufacturing practices on sustainability performance: empirical evidence from Malaysia”, International Journal of Operations & Production Management, Vol. 37, No. 2, PP. 182-204.
12. Shankar, K. M., Kumar, P. U. and Kannan, D. (2016). “Analyzing the Drivers of Advanced Sustainable Manufacturing System Using AHP Approach”, Sustainability, Vol. 8, No. 8, PP. 824-835.
13. Smith, P., Gaffney, M., Shi, W., Hoard, S., Armendariz, I. I. and Mueller, D. (2017). “Drivers and barriers to the adoption and diffusion of Sustainable Jet Fuel (SJF) in the US Pacific Northwest”, Journal of Air Transport Management, Vol. 6, No. 58, PP. 113–124.
14. Dubey, R., Gunasekaran, A., Papadopoulos, T., Childe, S. J., Shibin, K. and Wamba, S. F. (2017). “Sustainable supply chain management: framework and further research directions”, Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 141-150, No. 142, PP. 1119–1130.
15. Bhanot, N., Rao, P. V. and Deshmukh, S. (2017). “An integrated approach for analyzing the enablers and barriers of sustainable manufacturing”, Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol.141-150, No. 142, Part 4, PP. 4412–4439.
16. Rauter, R., Jonker, J., & Baumgartner, R. J. (2017). “Going one's own way: drivers in developing business models for sustainability”, Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 131-140, No. 140, Part 1, PP. 144–154.
17. Fargani, H., Cheung, W. M. and Hasan, R. (2016). “An Empirical Analysis of the Factors That Support the Drivers of Sustainable Manufacturing”, Procedia CIRP, Vol. 56, PP. 491–495.
18. Andelin, M., Sarasoja, A. L., Ventovuori, T. and Junnila, S. (2015). “Breaking the circle of blame for sustainable buildings–evidence from Nordic countries”, Journal of Corporate Real Estate, Vol. 17. No. 1, PP. 26–45.
19. Foerstl, K., Azadegan, A., Leppelt, T. and Hartmann, E. (2015). “Drivers of supplier sustainability: Moving beyond compliance to commitment”, Journal of Supply Chain Management, Vol. 51, No, 1, PP. 67–92.
20. Alblas, A. A., Peters, K., and Wortmann, J. C. (2014). “Fuzzy sustainability incentives in new product development: An empirical exploration of sustainability challenges in manufacturing companies”, International Journal of Operations and Production Management, Vol. 34, No. 4, PP. 513–545.
21. Stoughton, A. M. and Ludema, J. (2012). “The driving forces of sustainability”, Journal of Organizational Change Management, Vol. 25, No. 4, PP. 501–517.
22. Diabat, A. and Govindan, K. (2011). “An analysis of the drivers affecting the implementation of green supply chain management.” Resources, Conservation and Recycling, Vol. 55, No. 6, PP. 659–667.
23. Khidir ElTayeb, T., Zailani, S. and Jayaraman, K. (2010). “The examination on the drivers for green purchasing adoption among EMS 14001 certified companies in Malaysia”, Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, Vol. 21, No. 2, PP. 206–225.
24. Luken, R. and Van Rompaey, F. (2008). “Drivers for and barriers to environmentally sound technology adoption by manufacturing plants in nine developing countries”, Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 16, No. 1, PP. S67–S77.
25. Studer, S., Welford, R. and Hills, P. (2006). “Engaging Hong Kong businesses in environmental change: drivers and barriers”, Business Strategy and the Environment, Vol. 15, No. 6, PP. 416–431.
27. Perez‐Sanchez, D., Barton, J. R. and Bower, D. (2003). “Implementing environmental management in SMEs”, Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, Vol. 10, No. 2, PP. 67–77.
28. Murphy, J. and Cohen, M. (2001). “Consumption, environment and public policy”, Exploring Sustainable Consumption: Environmental Policy and the Social Sciences, Elsevier, Oxford, PP. 3–20.
29. Gunningham, N. and Sinclair, D. (1997). “ACEL final report: barriers and motivators to the adoption of cleaner production practices”, Acel Final Report: Barriers and Motivators to the Adoption of Cleaner Production Practices, Australian Centre for Environmental Law.
30. Cuttance, P. and Ecob, R. (2009). Structural modeling by example: Applications in educational, sociological, and behavioral research, Cambridge University Press.
31. Rajesh, R. (2017). “Technological capabilities and supply chain resilience of firms: A relational analysis using Total Interpretive Structural Modeling (TISM)”, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Vol. 111-120, No. 181, PP. 161-169.
33. Julong, D. (1989). “Introduction to grey system theory”, The Journal of Grey System, Vol. 1, No. 1, PP. 1–24.
34. Bai, C. and Sarkis, J. (2013). “A grey-based DEMATEL model for evaluating business process management critical success factors”, International Journal of Production Economics, Vol. 146, No.1, PP. 281–292.
35. Yan, G., Liu, C. and Shao, Z. (2009). “Analysis of influencing factors for the grey multi-attribute group decision making, Grey Systems and Intelligent Services,” IEEE International Conference on, IEEE: 2009; PP. 1081–1086.
37. Sarkis, J., Gonzalez-Torre, P. and Adenso-Diaz, B. (2010). “Stakeholder pressure and the adoption of environmental practices: The mediating effect of training”, Journal of Operations Management, Vol. 28, No. 2, PP. 163–176.
39. Lozano, R. (2015). “A holistic perspective on corporate sustainability drivers”, Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, Vol. 22, No. 1, PP. 32–44.
| ||
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 1,368 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 1,074 |