Practice-based research in the area of the arts,a new movement in methodology of research | ||
| نشریه هنرهای زیبا: هنرهای تجسمی | ||
| Article 2, Volume 22, Issue 3, September 2017, Pages 17-28 PDF (1.37 M) | ||
| Document Type: Research Paper | ||
| DOI: 10.22059/jfava.2017.63164 | ||
| Authors | ||
| Mahnaz Mohammadzadeh Mianji* 1; Mehrnoush Shafiei Sararoudi2; . Hossein Sarpoolaky3 | ||
| 1handicrafts department, Faculty of art, Alzahra University, Tehran | ||
| 2faculty member / Art University of Isfahan | ||
| 3Ceramic Department, Faculty of Materials and Metallurgical Engineering, University of Science & Technology of Tehran. | ||
| Abstract | ||
| In formal research in Art and Design, one of the most urgent debates has been about methodology. How can we carry out rigorous and respectable inquiry using methodologies and methods appropriate to practice – research without using merely theoretical, laboratorial and scientific methods. It was clear, and still is, that there are no simple answers! The most fruitful way to identify appropriate methodologies has been through an analysis of completed researches, and through evaluations of research in progress. The growth of completed research degrees in arts past two decades by using practice-based methods in many universities in other countries is a sign of the inadequacy of the methods that penetrate by irrespectively the nature of the arts. Because of the diversity and innovation in this field of research, is expected to be various maps depending on the nature of each project so this article presents a selective review of recent PhDs that identify and analyze the methodological innovation that is occurring in the field of arts, in order to give a general map. Practice-based Research is an original investigation undertaken in order to gain new knowledge partly by means of practice and the outcomes of that practice. In a practice-based research, claims of originality and contribution to knowledge may be demonstrated through creative outcomes in the form of designs, music, digital media, performances and exhibitions, etc. Four characteristics were found in practice-based art PhD methodology: innovations in the format and structure of the thesis, a pick-and-mix approach to research design, situating practice in the inquiry, and the validation of visual analysis. Research through practice refers to research where art or design practice is the vehicle of the research, and a means to communicate the result. And finally, research for the purpose of practice aims to communicate the research embodied in a piece of design. Artists and designers have taken an active role in contextualizing and interpreting the creative process in practice, as well as the products of this process, by looking at the process itself and the works produced through it. From this new point of view, the knowledge and the skills of a practicing artist or designer form a central part of the research process, and this has produced a new way of doing research. In this new type of research project, part of the research is carried out as art or design practice. The central methodological question of this emerging field of research is: how can art or design practice interact with research in such a manner that they will together produce new knowledge, create a new point of view or form new, creative ways of doing research? In this article, the making and the products of making are seen as an essential part of research: they can be conceived both as answers to particular research questions and as artistic or designing argumentation. As an object made by an artist–researcher, the artefact can also be seen as a method for collecting and preserving information and understanding. | ||
| Keywords | ||
| research; art research; methodology; practice-based research | ||
|
Supplementary Files
|
||
| References | ||
|
حنفی زاده، پ و محرابیون محمدی، م (1392)، طراحی سیستم الگوی اسلامی ایرانی پیشرفت: یک رویکرد سیستمی نرم، دومین کنفرانس الگوی اسلامی ایرانی پیشرفت: مفاهیم، مبانی و ارکان پیشرفت، مرکز الگوی اسلامی ایرانی پیشرفت، تهران. نظیری، ق؛ قاسم زاده، ح؛ عاطف وحید، م و بیان زاده، س.ا (1384)، معرفی شیوهی افتراق معنایی و کاربرد آن در ارزیابی بازنمایی معنایی بیماران افسرده، نشریهی روانپزشکی و روانشناسی بالینی ایران، 41، 204-211. Allan, G (2003), A critique of using grounded theory as a research method, Electronic journal of business research methods, 2(1), 1-10.
Bogue, R (1999), Art and Territory, in I. Buchanan (ed.) Duke University Press, pp. 85-102.
Borg, E. W (2010), The experience of writing a practice-based thesis in Fine Art and Design, Doctoral dissertation, The University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Bourdieu, P (1977), Outline of a Theory of Practice, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Dallow, P (1998), Media Arts, Research and the University, Practice: A Journal of Visual, Performing and Media Arts, 3, pp. 36-45.
Dallow, P (2003), Representing creativeness: practice-based approaches to research in creative arts, Art, Design & Communication in Higher Education, 2(1), 49-66.
Douglas, A (1994), The Creative Process as Material for Research Degrees, Matrix 2: A Conference on Postgraduate Research Degrees in Design and the Visual Arts, Central Saint Martin College of Art, The London Institute.
Eno, B (1996), A Year with Swollen Appendices, Faber & Faber, London.
Gray, C & Malins, J (2004), Visualizing research: A guide to the research process in art and design, VT: Ashgate, Burlington.
Gray, D. E (2013), Doing research in the real world, Sage, Los Angeles, London, Singapore, Washington.
Jayaratna, N (1994), Understanding and Evaluating Methodologies, McGraw Hill, London.
Kim, J. A (2006), The characterization of paper-composite porcelain: Material properties and Workability from ceramic art and design perspective, Unpublished thesis for the degree of Licentiate of Philosophy, Göteborg University, Gothenburg.
McKernan, J. (1998), Curriculum Action Research: a Handbook of Methods and Resources for the Reflective Practitioner, chapter 1, Kogan Page, London.
Puchta, C & Potter, J (2004), Focus group practice, Sage,London, Thousand Oaks, New Delhi.
Seago, A. 1995, Monograph, Research Methods for MPhil & PhD Students in Art and Design: Contrasts and Conflicts (Royal College of Art Research Papers: Vol 1, No 3, 1994/5.
Steier, F (1992), Research and Reflexivity, Thousand Oaks, Sage, CA.
Stonyer, A (1978), The development of kinetic sculpture by the utilization of solar energy, Leicester Polytechnic, Leicester, UK.
Strand, D (1998), Research in the Creative Arts, Department of Employment, Education, Training and Youth Affairs, Canberra.
Walter, M (2006), Social Science methods: an Australian perspective, Oxford University Press, New York.
Wild, L (1998), That was then: Corrections and amplifications, The education of a graphic designer, 39-52.
Wilson, P. G (2002), An investigation into a range of idiosyncratic crystalline glazes and aesthetically compatible forms, Western Sydney University, Australia.
| ||
|
Statistics Article View: 1,274 PDF Download: 1,679 |
||
