سامانه پشتیبانی خدمات اطلاعات

  اخبار و اعلانات

 آمار

تعداد نشریات161
تعداد شماره‌ها6,532
تعداد مقالات70,501
تعداد مشاهده مقاله124,098,551
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله97,206,166
شاه‌پسند, محمدرضا, سارانی, ولی الله, سواری, مسلم. (1396). نقش سرمایه اجتماعی بر کیفیت زندگی کشاورزان شهرستان دیواندره. , 48(3), 431-441. doi: 10.22059/ijaedr.2017.63963
محمدرضا شاه‌پسند; ولی الله سارانی; مسلم سواری. "نقش سرمایه اجتماعی بر کیفیت زندگی کشاورزان شهرستان دیواندره". , 48, 3, 1396, 431-441. doi: 10.22059/ijaedr.2017.63963
شاه‌پسند, محمدرضا, سارانی, ولی الله, سواری, مسلم. (1396). 'نقش سرمایه اجتماعی بر کیفیت زندگی کشاورزان شهرستان دیواندره', , 48(3), pp. 431-441. doi: 10.22059/ijaedr.2017.63963
شاه‌پسند, محمدرضا, سارانی, ولی الله, سواری, مسلم. نقش سرمایه اجتماعی بر کیفیت زندگی کشاورزان شهرستان دیواندره. , 1396; 48(3): 431-441. doi: 10.22059/ijaedr.2017.63963

نقش سرمایه اجتماعی بر کیفیت زندگی کشاورزان شهرستان دیواندره

تحقیقات اقتصاد و توسعه کشاورزی ایران
مقاله 6، دوره 48، شماره 3، مهر 1396، صفحه 431-441    اصل مقاله (297.01 K)
نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22059/ijaedr.2017.63963
نویسندگان
محمدرضا شاه‌پسند* 1؛ ولی الله سارانی2؛ مسلم سواری3
1عضو هیات علمی موسسه آموزش عالی علمی کاربردی وزارت جهاد کشاورزی
2دانشگاه زابل
3دانشکده کشاورزی
چکیده
این پژوهش با هدف بررسی نقش سرمایه اجتماعی بر کیفیت زندگی کشاورزان انجام شد. جامعه آماری پژوهش کلیة کشاورزان شهرستان دیواندره بود (7931N=). حجم نمونه با استفاده از نمونه‏گیری کوکران  158 نفر به دست آمد که برای افزایش اعتبار نتایج تحقیق 180 پرسشنامه در میان جامعه آماری توزیع گردید که 174 پرسشنامه توسط آنان تکمیل و عودت داده شد. روش نمونه‏گیری به صورت تصادفی طبقه‏ای با انتساب متناسب بود. ابزار اصلی پژوهش پرسشنامه‏ای بود که گروهی از کارشناسان روایی آن را تایید کردند و برای تعیین پایای آن ضریب آلفای کرونباخ محاسبه گردید برای مقیاس‏های سرمایه اجتماعی و کیفیت محیط زندگی به ترتیب α=0.78 و α=0.83 به­دست آمد. تحلیل داده‏ها به‏وسیله‏ی نرم‏افزار SPSSwin18 انجام شد. یافته‏ها نشان داد که سطح سرمایه اجتماعی و کیفیت زندگی در بین کشاورزان مورد مطالعه «سطح پایینی» قرار دارد. نتایج تحلیل همبستگی نشان داد که بین مولفه‏‏های سرمایه‏ اجتماعی، یعنی: همیاری و مشارکت داوطلبانه، هویت‏ گروهی، تعاون و همکاری متقابل، ارتباطات و حسن تفاهم، اعتماد، انسجام و همبستگی گروهی و شبکه‏ها و هنجارهای مشترک با کیفیت زندگی رابطه‏ی مثبت و معنا‏داری وجود دارد. علاوه بر این، نتایج تحلیل رگرسیون نشان داد که چهار متغیر تعاون و همکاری متقابل، همیاری و مشارکت داوطلبانه، اعتماد  و انسجام و همبستگی گروهی می‏توانند تا 4/52 درصد از واریانس متغیر وابستة تحقیق (کیفیت زندگی) خانوار را تبیین کنند. 
کلیدواژه‌ها
سرمایه‏ اجتماعی؛ کیفیت زندگی؛ رفاه اجتماعی؛ کشاورزان؛ شهرستان دیواندره
عنوان مقاله [English]
The Impact of Social Capital on the Quality of Life for Farmers in Divandarreh County
نویسندگان [English]
mohammadreza shahpasand1؛ valiollah sarani2؛ moslem savari3
1Profesor Assistant of the Institute of Technical & Vocational Higher Education of Agricultural Jihad
2zabol university
3tehran university
چکیده [English]
The main purpose of this study was to investigate the impact of social capital on the quality of life for farmers in Divandarreh city. The statistical population of this study included all the farmers in Divandarreh city (N=7931). Sample number was obtained using Cochran's sampling formula (158 farmers). In order to increase the reliability of the results for this research, 180 questionnaires were distributed among farmers. 174 of the questionnaires were replied to and received. We utilized the stratified random sampling method. The main tool of the study was a questionnaire which was validated by a panel of experts. Also, its reliability was calculated by the use of Cronbach's Alpha Coefficient which was obtained α=0.78andα=0.83 for the social capital and the quality of life measures, respectively. The analysis of data was carried out by SPSSwin18 software. Results showed that the level of social capital and the quality of life among farmers was in a low level. The results of the correlation analysis showed that there was a positive and significant relationship among social capital components (cooperation and voluntary participation, collective identity, mutual cooperation, communications and responsiveness, trust, collective coherence, networks and common norms) and the quality of life. In addition, according to the results of the regression analysis, four variables can be concluded: cooperation and voluntary participation trust, and collective coherence can determine the variance of the dependent variables of the study up to 52.4 percent.
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
Social Capital Quality Life, Social Welfare, farmers, Divandarreh City
مراجع
  1. Allen, J., Voget, R. & Cordes, S. (2002). Quality of Life in Rural Nebraska: Trends and Changes, Institute of Agriculture and Natural Resources.
  2. Alvani, S.M., & Shirvani, A. (2006). Social capital: Concepts, Theories and Applications. Isfahan: Mani. (In Farsi).
  3. Anagh, M. (2005). The relationship between social capital and quality of life, Master's Thesis of Planning and Social Welfare, Social Sciences, Tehran University. (In Farsi).
  4. Arbuckle, J. L. (1999). Amos (version 4.01) [computer software]. Chicago: Small Waters.
  5. Azkia, M. & Ghafari, Gh. (2009). A theory of rural development with emphasis on rural community in Iran. Posted straw, Tehran. (In Farsi).
  6. Azkia, M. & Ghaffari, Gh. (2005). Sociology of Development, Tehran: Kayhan. (In Farsi).
  7. Bagstad, K.J., & Shammin, M.R., (2012). Can the Genuine Progress Indicator better inform sustainable regional progress? A case study for Northeast Ohio. Ecology Indicators, 18, 330–341.
  8. Barati, N. & Yazdanpanah Shahabadi, M. (2011). Surveying conceptual relation between social capital and quality of life in the urban environment case: the city of Pardis. Journal of Cultural Research, Institute for Humanities and Cultural Studies, I, 25-49. (In Farsi).
  9. Batjargal, B., (2007). Internet Entrepreneurship: Social Capital, Human Capital, and Performance of Internet Ventures in China, Research Policy, 36(5), 605- 618.
10. Baumgartner, H., & Homburg, C. (1995). Applications of structural equation modeling in marketing research: A review. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 13, 139–161.

11. Bhagavatula, S., Elfring, T., Tilburg, A. V., & Gerhard G. V. B., (2010). How Social and Human Capital Influence Opportunity Recognition and Resource Mobilization in India's Handloom Industry, Journal of Business Venturing, 25(3), 245-260.

12. Cleaver, F. (2005). The inequality of social capital and the reproduction of chronic poverty. World development. 33(6), 893-906.

13. Collados, C. & Duane, T., (1999). Analysis natural capital quality of life: a model for evaluating the sustainability of alternative regional development paths, Journal of Ecological Economics, 30 (1999), 441-460.

14. Costanza, R., Fisher, B., Ali, S., Beer, C., Bond, L., Boumans, R., Danigelis, N.L., Dickinson, J., Elliott, C., Farley, J., Gayer, D.E., MacDonald Glenn, L., Hudspeth, T., Mahoney, D., McCahill, L., McIntosh, B., Reed, B., Rizvi, S.A.T., Rizzo, D.M., Simpatico, T., & Snapp, R., (2007). Quality of life: an approach integrating opportunities, human needs, and subjective well-being. Ecology Economics, 61, 267–276.

15. Diener, E., & Lucas, R., (1999). Personality and subjective well-being. In: Kahneman, D., Diener, E., Schwarz, N. (Eds.), Well-being: The Foundations of Hedonic Psychology. Russell Sage Foundation, New York, pp. 213–229.

16. Diener, E., & Suh, E., (1997). Measuring quality of life: economic, social, and subjective indicators. Journal of Social Indicators Research, 40, 189–216.

17. Easterlin, R., (2003). Explaining Happiness. Proc Journal of Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 100, 11176–11183.

18. Flores, M. & Rello, F. (2003). Social capital and poverty lessons from case studies in Mexico and Central America. ESA working paper, 3, 1-16.

19. Fukuyama, F. (2000). End of regulation: social capital and its maintenance, translated by Hossein Tavassoli, Tehran: Janafruz. (In Farsi).

20. Gangadharappa, H.V, Pramod, K.T.M, & Shiva, K.H.G. (2007). Gastric floating drug delivery systems: a review. Journal of Pharmaceutical Sxiences. 41, 295–305.

21. Ghaffari, Gh. & Omidi, R. (2009). Quality of life, social development indicators, Tehran: Shirazeh. (In Farsi).

22. Hayati, D., Karami, E. & Slee, B. (2006). Combining qualitative and quantitative methods in the measurement of rural poverty: The case of Iran. Social indicators research. 75, 361-349.

23. Kalantari, Kh (2010). Data processing and analysis in Socio- Economic Research. Issued Landscape Design Consultants, Fourth Printing, (In Farsi).

24. Kamp I.V., Leidelmeijer Kees, M. & Hollander, A. (2003). Urban Environmental Quality and Human Well-being towards a Conceptual Framework and Demarcation of Concepts, a Literature Stud. Landscape and Urban Planning, 65(2003), 5-18.

25. Kawachi, I. (2001). Social capital for health and human development. The society for international development, 44(1), 31- 35.

26. Kilpatrick, S, Field, J & Falk, L. (2003). Social Capital: an analytical tool for exploring lifelong learning and community development. British Educational Research Journal, 29 (3), 417-435.

27. Kiss, A. N. & Danis, W. M., (2008). Country Institutional Context, Social Networks, and New Venture Internationalization Speed, European Management Journal, 26(6), 388-399.

28. Lin, N. (2001). Building a Network Theory of social capital.  Connections, 22(1), 28-51.

29. Majedi, M. & Lahsayyzadeh, A. (2006). Examine relationships between context variables and social capital: A case study village in the Fars province. Journal of Rural Development, 9(4), 91-135. (In Farsi).

30. Miri, Gh. (2010). Examine the role of social capital and satisfaction with quality of life, case study Poshtab Systan. Journal of Human Geography, 2(4), 24 (In Farsi).

31. Muazzin, A. & Alizadehaghdam, M, B. (2012). Quality of urban life: a model for evaluating and ranking Iranian province using cluster analysis. Iranian Journal of Sociology, 13(3), 149-179. (In Farsi).

32. Nasrabadi, M. & Niaz, M. (2007). Explain the role of social influence in the development of cooperatives. Journal of Cooperatives, 52, 187-188. (In Farsi).

33. Noll, H. (2002). Towards a European System of Social Indicators: Theoretical Framework and system architecture. Social Indicator Research, 1(3), 47-48.

34. Onyx, J & Bullen, P. (2000). Measuring social capital in fire communities. Journal o Applied Behavioral Science, 36, 23-42.

35. Ozdemir, S. (2009). Factors influencing job satisfaction in Azarbaijan companies, Journal of Qafqaz University, 102-108.

36. Pacione, M. (2003). Urban Environmental Quality and Human Wellbeing: A Social Geographical Perspective. Landscape and Urban Planning, 65, 19–30.

37. Pal, A. K., & Kumar, U. C., (2005). Quality of Life Concept for the Evaluation of Societal Development of Rural Community in West Bangal, India. Rural Development, 15(2), 83-93.

38. Petrosillo, I. Costanza, R. Aretano, R. Zaccarelli, N. & Zurlini, G. )2013.( The use of subjective indicators to assess how natural and social capital support residents’ quality of life in a small volcanic island. Ecological Indicators, 24 (2013), 609–620.

39. Putnam, R. (2000). The prosperous community: social capital and public life. The American Prospect .4(13), 35-42.

40. Putnam, R. D. ( 1995 ). Bowling Alone: America’s Declining Social capital. Journal of Democracy, 1, 65-78.

41. Rezvani, M. R., & Mansurian, H. (2008). Quality of Life, review concepts, indicators, models and proposed model for rural areas. Journal of Rural and Development, 11(3), 1- 26. (In Farsi).

42. Schmit, R. (2002). considering social capital in quality of life assessment: concept and measurement. Social Indicators Research. 58, 403-428.

43. Shook, C. L., Ketchen, D. J. Jr., Hult, G. T.M., & Kacmar, K.M. (2004). An assessment of the use of structural equation models in strategic management research. Strategic Management Journal, 25, 397–404.

44. Taghvai, M. & Norouziavargami, A. (2007). Analysis of the spatial distribution and service facilities in rural villages in Chahar Mahal and Bakhtiari province. Journal of Isfahan university (Humanities), 24, 3. 2-16. (In Farsi).

45. Vemuri, W.A., & Costanza, R., (2006). The role of human, social, built, and natural capital in explaining life satisfaction at the country level: toward a National Well-being Index (NWI). International Society for Ecological Economics (ISEE). 58, 119 133

46. Vilanava & Josa. (2003). Social capital as a Managerial Phenomenon. Department of Industrial Engineering & Management, Tampere University of Technology.

47. Vogiatzakis, I.N., Mannion, A.M., & Pugnetti, G., (2008). Introduction to Mediterranean landscapes. In: Vogiatzakis, I.N., Pugnetti, G., Mannion, A.M. (Eds.), Mediterranean Island Landscapes: Natural and Cultural Approaches. Landscape Series, vol. 9. Springer Publishing, Dordrecht, pp. 3–14.

48. Weng, C. S., Chen, W. Y., Hsu, H. Y., Lai, K. K. & Chen, S. J., (2008). A Holistic Network Approach to Study the Structure of Technological Network by the Block Modeling of Social Network Analysis, PP. 998-1011, available: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/4599709/metrics

49. Zhang, Q. & Hung, G (2006). China social and financial performance of private enterprises. Journal Of Small Business Enterprise And Development, 13 (2), 20 – 98

آمار
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 759
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 682


سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. قدرت گرفته از سیناوب