پیوندهای مفید
اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 158 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 6,230 |
| تعداد مقالات | 67,758 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 115,126,698 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 89,894,776 |
تعیین رابطه میان ویژگیهای شخصیتی، خلاقیت و خودشکوفایی در دانشجویان رشتۀ طراحی صنعتی: نقش تفاوت جنسیتی | ||
| نشریه هنرهای زیبا: هنرهای تجسمی | ||
| مقاله 11، دوره 22، شماره 4، دی 1396، صفحه 115-124 اصل مقاله (9.37 M) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22059/jfava.2017.64032 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| مهدی ابرازه* 1؛ علی زاده محمدی2؛ نادر شایگانفر3 | ||
| 1دانشگاه هنر اصفهان | ||
| 2دانشیار روانشناسی پژوهشکده خانوداه دانشگاه شهید بهشتی | ||
| 3استادیار فلسفه هنر دانشگده هنرهای تجسمی دانشگاه هنر اصفهان | ||
| چکیده | ||
| هدف از انجام این تحقیق پی بردن به رابطه میان برخی از متغیرهای بنیادین در آموزش هنر نظیر ویژگیهای شخصیت، خلاقیت و خودشکوفایی با در نظر گرفتن تفاوت های جنسیتی در میان دانشجویان هنر بوده است. دانشجویان رشتة طراحی صنعتی هر چهار سال تحصیلی از میان دانشجویان دانشگاه هنر بصورت غیر تصادفی انتخاب شدند. ابزارهای مورد استفاده در تحقیق عبارنتد از: ابزار سنجش خلاقیت آزمون تفکر خلاق تورنس (TTCT)؛ آزمون پنج عاملی ویژگیهای شخصیت (NEO-FFI)؛ ابزار خودشکوفایی استعداد (MAP) میباشند. جهت تحلیل همبستگی در SPSS از ابزار پیرسون استفاده شد. تحقیق حاضر در پی یافتن پاسخ این پرسش است که چه رابطهای میان ویژگیهای شخصیتی و خلاقیت با خودشکوفایی در دانشجویان رشتة طراحی صنعتی وجود دارد و همچنین چه تفاوتی میان دانشجویان پسر و دختر وجود دارد. یافته های تحقیق نشان میدهد که میان دانشجویان پسر و دختر تفاوتهای اندکی وجود دارد بدینصورت که تنها تفاوت میان دانشجویان پسر و دختر بین ویژگیهای شخصیت با خلاقیت در عامل روان آزردهخویی است. همچنین تنها تفاوت میان دو گروه بین شاخص خلاقیت و خودشکوفایی در وظیفه شناسی است. در نهایت، میان خلاقیت با خودشکوفایی میان دانشجویان دختر و پسر تفاوت وجود ندارد. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| هنر؛ طراحی صنعتی؛ ویژگیهای شخصیتی؛ خلاقیت؛ خودشکوفایی؛ تفاوت جنسیتی | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Relationship between Personality Traits, Creativity, and Self-Actualization among Students of Industrial Design: Role of Gender Differences | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Mahdi Ebrazeh1؛ Ali Zadehmohammadi2؛ Nader Shayganfar3 | ||
| 1Isfahan Art University | ||
| 2Associate Professor of Psychology in Family Research Institute, Shahid Beheshti University. | ||
| 3Assistant Professor in Visual Arts Faculty at Art university of Isfahan. | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| The main concern of conducting this study is basic needs for awareness of relationships between some fundamental variables within Art education like personality traits, creativity, and self-actualization with regarding gender differences to enhance quality of educational efficiency through the process of relevant policy making and applying efficient methods. After searching many databases around the world, it was not found parallel researches to cover our concerns; as a result, this study is literally a brand new of its kind which has focused on correlations between fundamental variables to enhance our educational understanding. Total Industrial design students of all four academic years from Art University were selected on the basis of nonprobability sampling which include of 49 female students and 43 male students and in total 92 students. Questionnaires which were used in this study included: The Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking (TTCT) selected as instrument for the measurement of Creativity: Fluency, Flexibility, Originality, and Elaboration; (NEO-FFI) selected as instrument for the measurement of five factors on personality traits: Neuroticism, Extraversion, Openness, Agreeableness, and Conscientiousness; the measure of actualization of potentials (MAP) was selected to measure Self-actualization: Openness, openness to self, openness to others, openness to others, Self-reference, Compatibility, Autonomy. These three measurements distributed at the end of second semester within classes among all students of four academic years in the field of Industrial design and dedicated 45 minutes to fulfill all questionnaires. Pearson correlation coefficient was used for the purpose of statistical analysis. The current study is seeking to find answer for this question what kind of relationships could be between personality traits with creativity; personality traits with self-actualization; creativity with self-actualization among students of Industrial design and the other also what kind of differences could be between male and female students. Findings show that there are few differences among male and female students therefore the only difference was found within Neuroticism scale in correlation of personality traits with creativity this while Extraversion, Agreeableness, and Conscientiousness could not make relationship with creativity but Openness could make relationship with creativity positively with intensity of strong correlation among both male and female students; the other findings show that Conscientiousness scale in the relationship between personality traits with Self-actualization is the only significant correlation with intensity of moderate among female students. Also, there was not found any differences among male and female students in correlation of Creativity with Self-actualization because both male and female students acquired the same scores very similar to each other but very little difference due to intensity of correlation which it is moderate among male students and strong among female students. After finding correlations between variables and detecting possible differences among male and female students, something that seems to be very important and vital for next studies attributed to adaptation of statistical outcomes with their visual architectural equivalents, probable stage model creativity, and ontological approaches for the better perception of relationship between quantitative and qualitative data. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| Art, Industrial design, Personality Traits, Creativity, self-actualization, gender differences | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
باقری خلیلی، علیاکبر؛ محرابی کالی، منیره (1390)، بررسی ادراک واقعیت و پذیرش خود و دیگران در غزلیات حافظ (بر اساس نظریة شخصیت/ خودشکوفایی آبراهام مزلو)، متنشناسی ادب فارسی، دورة 47، شمارة 3، صص 1-17. تاج، فاطمه (1390)، رابطه سبکهای دلبستگی و خودشکوفایی در رواندرمانگران و مقایسه آن با شاغلین غیررواندرمانگر شهرستان تهران، پایاننامه کارشناسی ارشد رشته مشاوره خانواده، دانشکده روانشناسی و علوم تربیتی دانشگاه شهید بهشتی، تهران. شقاقی، فرهاد؛ مژگان آگاه هریس (1389)، مقایسة خودشکوفایی دانشجویان دورههای کارشناسی و کارشناسی ارشد دانشگاه پیام نور، پیک نور، سال نهم، شمارة اول، ص62. شولتز، دوان؛ شولتز، سیدنی (1381)، نظریههای شخصیت، ترجمة سیّد محمدی، چاپ چهارم، مؤسسة نشر ویرایش، تهران. شولتز، دوان (1385)، روانشناسی کمال، ترجمة گیتی خوشدل، چاپ سیزدهم، نشر کیهان، تهران. گروسی فرشی، م. ت (1380)، رویکردی نوین در ارزیابی شخصیت (کاربرد تحلیل عاملی در مطالعات شخصیت)، چاپ اول، نشر دانیال و جامعه پژوه، تبریز. عابدی، جمال (1372)، خلاقیت و شیوهای نو در اندازهگیری آن، مجلة پژوهشهای روانشناختی، شمارة 3، صص 46-54.
Burleson, W (2005), Developing creativity, motivation, and self-actualization with learning systems, International Journal of human-computer studies, No. 63, pp.436-451.
Cashdan, S (1971), Social participation and sub-cultural influences in the study of adolescent creativity, Adolescence, 6(21), pp.39-52.
Chamorro-Premuzic, T; Reimers, S; Hsu, A & Ahmetgol, G (2009), Who art thou? Personality predictors of artistic preferences in a large UK sample the importance of openness, British Journal of Psychology, 100, pp.501-516.
Chamorro-Premuzic, T; Burke, C; Hsu, A & Swami, V (2010), Personality predictors of artistic preferences as a function of the emotional valence and perceived complexity of paintings, Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, Vol. 4, No. 4, pp.196-204.
Chavez-Eakle, R.A; Graftt-Guerrero, A; Garcai-Reyna, J; Vaugier, V & Cruz-Fuentes, C (2007), Celebral blood flow associated with creative performance: A comparative study, Neuroimage, 38, pp.528-529.
Costa, P. T & McCrae, R. R (1992), Revised NEO personality inventory (NEO PI-R): professional manual, Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
Dahl, J.R; Wakefield J. R, A.J; Kimlicka, M.T & Wiederstein, M (1983), How the personality dimensions of neuroticism, extroversion, and psychoticism relate to self-actualization, Personality and individual differences, 4(6), pp.683-695.
Doyle, J.S (1975), Self-Actualization, neuroticism, and extroversion revisited, Psychological reports, 39, pp.1081-1082.
French, S & Joseph, S (1999), Religiosity and its association with happiness, purpose in life, and self-actualization, Mental Health, Religion and Culture, 2, pp.117-120.
Gebauer, E.J; Riketta, M; Broemer, P & Gregory, M.R (2008), Pleasure and pressure based prosocial motivation: Divergent relations to subjective well-being, Journal of research in personality, Vol 42, Isuue 2, pp.399-420.
Heussenstamm, F. K (1971), Humanizing higher education, Art education, 24 (26), pp.17-18.
Hough, L. M & Ones, D. S (2001), The structure, measurement, validity and use of personality variables in industrial, work and organizational psychology. In N. Anderson, D. S. Ones, H.K. Sinangil & C. Viswesvaran (Eds), Handbook of industrial, work and organizational psychology, Sage, London.
Jones, Alvin & Crandall, Risk (1986), Validation of a Short Index of Self-Actualization, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Volume 12, Issue 1, pp.63-73.
Knapp, R.P (1995), Relationship of a measure of self-actualization to neuroticism and extraversion, Journal of consult psychology, 29, pp.168-172.
Kuffman, I (1966), Art and education in contemporary culture, the Macmillan Company, New York.
Leclerc, G; Dube, M; Hbert, R & Gaulin, P (1997), The development and validation of a self-report measure of self-actualization, Social behavior and personality: an international journal, Vol. 25, No. 4, pp. 353-365.
Maslow, A (1954), Motivation and personality, Harper & Row, New York.
Maslow, A.H (1970), Motivation and personality, 2nd Edition., Harper & Row, New York.
Masters, Bradley R (2009), A study of self-actualization of gifted children in public high school programs, Dissertation submitted to the Faculty of Holos University, Doctoral dissertation of Theology.
Plucker, J; Beghetto, R & Dow, G (2004), Why isn't creativity more important to educational psychologist? Potential, pitfalls, and future directions in creativity research, Educational psychologist, 39(2), pp.83-96.
Rawlings,D; Vidal, N. B & Furnham, A (2000), Personality and Aesthetic preference in Spain and England: Two studies relating sensation seeking and openness to experience to liking for paintings and music, European Journal of Personality, Vol. 14, Issue 6, pp.553-576.
Ryder, W.W (1987), The role Art in self-actualization, Art education, Vol. 40, No. 2, pp.22-24.
Silvia, P.J; Winterstein, B.P; Willse, J.T; Barona, C.M; Cram, J.T& Hess K.I (2008), Assessing creativity with divergent thinking tasks: Exploring the reliability and validity of new subjective scoring methods, Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 2, pp.68–85.
Smith, Michael Robert (2002), the relationship between personality traits, and trainee effectiveness in counseling sessions: cognitive flexibility, self-actualization and spirituality, Dissertation submitted in doctor of philosophy in counseling and educational psychology, University of Nevada-Reno.
Sternberg, R.J & Lubart, T.I (1996), Defying the crowd: Cultivating creativity in a culture of conformity, Free Press, New York.
Sternberg, R.J; Kaufman, J.C & Pretz, J.E (2003),A propulsion model of creative leadership, Leadership Quart, 14, pp.455-473.
Stockes, P.D (1999), Novelty, In M. A. Runco & S. R. Pritzker, Encyclopedia of creativity (pp. 297- 304), San Diego, CA, Academic Press.
Torrance, E.P (1990), Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking. Scholastic Testing Service, IL, Bensenville.
Tosi, D.J & Hoffman, S (1972), A factor analysis of the personal orientation inventory, Journal of humanist psychology, 12, pp.86-93.
| ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 1,541 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 2,076 |
||