پیوندهای مفید
اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 161 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 6,523 |
| تعداد مقالات | 70,429 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 123,968,288 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 97,098,437 |
بررسی و تحلیل روابط علّی و معلولی شاخص‌های تأثیرگذار بر مدیریت یکپارچۀ حریم پایتخت | ||
| پژوهشهای جغرافیای انسانی | ||
| مقاله 12، دوره 51، شماره 2، تیر 1398، صفحه 429-451 اصل مقاله (893.56 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله علمی پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22059/jhgr.2017.239788.1007527 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| نوبخت سبحانی1؛ پروانه زیویار* 2؛ رحیم سرور3 | ||
| 1دانشجوی دکتری جغرافیا و برنامه‌ریزی شهری، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، واحد علوم و تحقیقات، تهران، ایران | ||
| 2دانشیار گروه جغرافیا و برنامه‌ریزی شهری، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، واحد یادگار امام (ره) شهر ری، تهران، ایران | ||
| 3استاد گروه جغرافیا و برنامه‌ریزی شهری، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، واحد علوم و تحقیقات، تهران، ایران | ||
| چکیده | ||
| کلانشهر تهران در چند دهة اخیر شاهد دگرگونی‌های متنوع و متعددی در عرصه‌های مختلف جمعیتی، اجتماعی، اقتصادی و کالبدی-فضایی بر اثر سیاست تمرکزگرایی در فضای حریم بوده است. این موضوع از یک‌سو، با افزایش تمایل به ساخت‌وسازهای مسکونی و غیرمسکونی بیرون از محدودة قانونی شهر تهران و از سوی دیگر، با توجه به رویکرد کسب درآمد از اراضی پیرامون شهر تهران و ایجاد رقابت شدید برای تصاحب سهم بیشتر توسط ذینفعان مختلف، به بحران مبدل شده است. نوع پژوهش از لحاظ هدف، کاربردی و از نظر ماهیت، توصیفی-تحلیلی است. هدف پژوهش، سنجش حریم پایتخت به‌لحاظ شاخص‌های تأثیرگذار و اثرپذیر بر مدیریت یکپارچة حریم است. براساس آمار به‌دست‌آمده، از تعداد کل جامعه که شامل 30 نفر است، 11 نفر کارشناس ادارة حریم و مابقی متخصصان و خبرگان موضوع پژوهش بودند. برای پایایی پرسشنامه از ضریب آلفای کرونباخ استفاده شد که مقدار 0/8 به‌دست آمد. برای تجزیه و تحلیل یافته‌ها از روش دیمتل فازی بهره گرفته شد. مؤلفه‌های بررسی‌شده در این پژوهش، در4 عامل کالبدی، اقتصادی، مدیریتی و حکمروایی خوب شهری تقسیم‌بندی شدند. نتایج نشان داد عواملی چون مدیریت مجمع‌الجزایری حریم از لحاظ عملکردی، قلمروی و جغرافیایی، نبود حکمروایی خوب شهری، ضعف مدیریتی در تأمین زیرساخت‌ها برای عرضة مسکن مناسب و وجود اقتصاد غیررسمی در کانون‌های اسکان مستقر در حریم، بیشترین تأثیر را بر وضعیت حریم شهر تهران داشته‌اند. از سوی دیگر، نبود سامانة کنترل هوشمند، توسعة متراکم ساختمانی و ضعف بنیان‌های اقتصادی مبتنی‌برزمین در حریم، از اثرپذیری‌ترین عوامل بودند. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| تهران؛ حریم؛ دیمتل فازی؛ مدیریت یکپارچه | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Analysis of Cause Effect Relationships of the Indicators Influencing Integrated Management of Tehran Periphery, as the Capital of Iran | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Nobakht Sobhani1؛ Parvaneh Zivyar2؛ Rahim Sarvar3 | ||
| 1PhD Candidate in Geography and Urban Planning, Islamic Azad University, Science and Research Branch, Tehran, Iran | ||
| 2Associate Professor of Geography and Urban Planning, Islamic Azad University, Yadegare-Imam Branch, Shahr-e-Rey, Tehran, Iran | ||
| 3Professor of Geography and Urban Planning, Islamic Azad University, Science and Research Branch, Tehran, Iran | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| Introduction At the beginning of the 21st century, the population of the world was 6 billion, and now more than half of that is living in cities, also it is expected that it would increase in the future decades. Thus, by 2050, the world's population living in cities is projected to reach over 70% all over the world. Therefore, this high growth of urbanization over the last two centuries and the expansion of cities, have caused a lot of quantitative and qualitative changes in urban spaces, including City Peripheral. In the last few decades, Tehran metropolis has witnessed numerous and varied transformations in various demographic, social, economic and physical-spatial fields due to the policy of focusing on Peripheral space.This problem, in one hand, with increasing interest in residential and non-residential construction outside the legal area of Tehran, and on the other hand, with regard to the monetization approach of the land around Tehran and the creation of an intense competition to takeover more stakeholders contributions has become a crisis. Methodology This present study is an applied research with a descriptive-analytical method. In this process, the library and reference resources have been used based on the data requirements of the research. The main data collection tool of the research was a questionnaire designed as a paired comparison to identify effective and impressionable indicators on integrated Peripheral management of the capital based on the structure of the Fuzzy Dematel technique in two phases of weight determination and prioritization. Statistical population of this research contains all experts of the Tehran city Peripheral offices and University experts and professors in this field. According to statistics, the total number of the population is 30, of which 11 are specialists in the field of Peripheral and the rest are the specialists and experts in the subject. In this research, statistical population was surveyed through census because of the limited number of statistical population (experts of the Tehran city Peripheral office and specialists). According to the data, respondents were 66.7% male and 31.3% female. Most respondents (45.8%) have a bachelor's degree and then they have a Master’s degree and a higher degree (39.6%). Content validity method has been used for justifiability of the measure. In other words, after setting up the questionnaire, it was shared by several experienced professionals who verified the validity of questionnaire, and then the questionnaire was prepared. Also, the reliability of the research has been confirmed by Cronbach's alpha coefficient (0.8) which shows that the questionnaire has a desirable reliability and questions have a suitable internal correlation. Fuzzy Dematel technique was used to analyze the findings. Results and discussion Horizontal vector (Di+Ri) is the amount of causation of the intended factor. Vertical vector (Di-Ri) indicates the effectiveness of each factor. Usually when Di-Ri is positive, the factor is cause and otherwise Di-Ri is negative representing that the factor is effect. Looking at the diagram of cause, it is clear that the evaluation factors are divided into cause and effect groups. In terms of management, the caused groups include the weakness of information infrastructure for integrated urban management and the effected groups also include improvements to the intelligent control system and so on. Moreover, in terms of good urban governance, the caused groups include participation and so on, and the effect groups also include community-based, etc. The cause groups include lack of management in providing infrastructure to provide affordable housing and so on, and the effect groups also include space irregularities in the structure of settlements, etc. Conclusion Among the criteria, the management criteria are considered in terms of effectiveness and importance. In good urban governance, the sub-criterion of efficiency and effectiveness with a score of 0.0467 is in the first place, also in the physical section, the sub-criterion of the lack of management in providing infrastructure to provide affordable housing with a score of 0.0661 is in the first place. Finally, the sub-criterion of the economic sector including the existence of an informal economy in the peripheral residential areas is in the first place with the highest score (0.0605). Therefore, these sub-criteria are most important and effective in terms of earning points and being in the first place because they have the strongest relationship with other factors in the changes of the capital's Periphery. In terms of effect factors, it is possible to mention management criteria (lack of intelligent control system), good urban governance (central focus), physical (dense building development), and economic (profitable look at government sectors). | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| peripheral, integrated management, Tehran, Fuzzy Dematel technique | ||
| مراجع | ||
43. Ahmadi Pour , Zahra & Ghasem Karami. )2016). “Analysis of Problems Arising from Interference of Tehran City and Neighboring Cities”. Administrative and Political Areas. Vol. 31. Issue 3. PP.32-42. (in Persian). 44. The General Office of Private Affairs. (2011). Unpublished reports on the privacy of Tehran. (in Persian). 45. 44. Asad Beygy, Hamid. (1394). “The Need for Intermediate Development in Sustainable Land Management in Tehran”. Negar. No. 72. PP. 50-63. (in Persian). 46. Bahiraei, Hamid, Rahim Sarvar, Bahman Karegar & Abdolreza Farajirad. (2016). “A strategicaly analysis of operational-spatial changes in southern limit area of Tehran Mega police (Case study: the Shahr-e-Rey & Islamshahr)”. Vol. 25. No. 98. PP. 57-72. (in Persian). 47. Barakpour, Naser & Iraj Asadi. (2008). “Management theories and the Urban Validation”. Art university. School of Architecture and Urban Planning Department of Urbanism. (in Persian). 48. Baserat, Meysam. (2010). Familiar with the urban area. Publications of the municipalities and villages of the country Familiar with the urban area. (in Persian). 49. Hamdi Karim and Amir Entekhabi Shahram (2010), The Greater Tehran Megalopolis and Urban Management Challenges, territory, Vol. 7, No. 26, PP. 1-13. 50. Robert B. Potter; Sally L. loyd-Evans. (1384). The City in the Developing World, Kiomars. Translator, Irandust; dehghan mehdi And Ahmadi Mitra. Tehran: Organization of Municipalities and Villages of the Country (in Persian). 51. Parhizkar, Ali Akbar & Ali Firouzbakht. (2011). “Iranian urban management outlook with emphasis on urban Sustainable development”. Vol. 32. No.4. PP. 43-67. (in Persian). 52. Pourahmad, Ahmadfar Frank Sayfiddini & zeba, parnoon. (2011). “Migration and Land Use Change in Islamshahr City”. Journal of Arid Regions Geographics Studies. Vol. 2. No. 5. PP. 131-152. (in Persian). 53. Mohammad reza. Pourjafar, Mehdi Montazerolhodjah, Ehsan. Ranjbar & Reza. Kabiri. (2012). “Surveying the Process of Physical Development of Sahand New Town and Defining Appropriate Districts for Its Future Development”. Urban Regional Studies and Research. Vol. 4. No. 13. PP. 81-94. (in Persian). 54. Teimouri Asghar, Valiollah Rabieifar, Faramarz Hadavi & Mohammad Reza Hadavi. (2013). “Evaluating and Predicting Horizontal Expansion of the City of Qazvin Emphasizing the Land-Use Changes from 1986 to 2011”. Vol. 2. No. 5. PP. 15-27. (in Persian). 55. Khalil Hajipour. (2008). “Explanation of Formation and spatial Evolution of Tehran Metropolitan Region”. University of Tehran. University College of Fine Arts Department of Urban and Regional Planning. supervisor, Esfandiar Zebardast. (in Persian). 56. Razavian, Mohammad Taghi. (2010). Urban Development Management. Publishing payvan No. (in Persian). 57. Ziyari, Karamatollah. (1999). Principles and Methods of Regional Planning. Yazd: Yazd University Press. (in Persian). 58. sobhani, Nobakht. (2012). “Analysis on how the land use planning with social justice approach (The case study Shahyndzh city) ”. Islamic Azad university of marand. supervisor, bakhtiar eztpanah (in Persian). 59. Sarvar, rahem & Jamal Bafrani. (2017). “Green belt, the missing link in the system of political space management in Tehran, Strategic analysis of the situation and offer suggestions”. Political Spatial Planning of Space. Vol. 1. No. 1. PP. 73-98. (in Persian). 60. Saidi, Abas & Hosseini, Sedigheh. (2007). “Municipal integration of rural settlements by looking at the metropolis of Tehran and the surrounding area”. Geography Journal. No. 12 & 13. PP. 8-18. (in Persian). 61. Saidi abas, Abdollah Reza Rahmani Fazli & M. ahmadi. (2014). “Annexation of Rural Settlements to Zanjan City Case study: Sayan and Gawazang Villages”. Journal of Housing and Rural Environment. Vol. 145. No. 33. PP. 3-16.(in Persian). 62. Sayahnia, Romena, Majid Makhdoum & Sharzad Faryadi. (2014). “Remote Sensing Role in Land Use StudiesCase Study: Tehran Metropolitan and its Boundary”. Vol. 7. NO. 3. PP.69-73 (in Persian). 63. Shieh Esmail. (2010). Urban planning workshop. Tehran: Iran University of Science and Technology. (in Persian). 64. Safari, Rojayar. (2013). “Urban creep and corrosive rural lands, case; City of Marivan 65. Zia Tavana, mohammad Hassan & Hamed Ghadermazy. (….).“Land Use Changes of Peri-Urban Villages in Urban Sprawl Process: Case study: Naisar & Hassanabad Villages of Sanandaj”. Journal of Research in Human Geography. Vol. 42. No. 68. PP. 119-135. (in Persian). 66. Zaheri, Mohammad. (2008). “The Rate of Frame Development and Extension of Tabriz and its Role on Changes in Using the Lands of Impact Area Villages and Suburbs (The Case Study: Alvare-Sofla, Bagh-e-Maroof, Shadabad-Mashayekh)”. Vol. 6. No. 11. PP. 181-198. (in Persian). 67. Azizi, Mohammad Mehdi, Mohammad Abouei Ardakan & Nasrin Noori. (2012). “The Role of Urban Management Operant and Tools in the Integrated Management of Tehran Metropolitan, hoviat shahr”. Vol. 6. No. 10. PP. 5-16. (in Persian). 68. Zohreh, fanni. (2003). Small cities another approach in regional development. Tehran: Organization of municipalities of the country. (in Persian). 69. Ghalibaf, Mohammad Bagher, Mohammad Reza Hafeznia & Ali Mohammadpour. (2013). “The role of city divisions in integrated urban management Case study: Tehran, Geography”. Vol. 11. No. 37. PP. 47-69. (in Persian).
71. Rasoul Ghorbani, Razieh Teimouri, Naeimeh Turkmennia & Alireza Jadidian. (2014). “Evaluation of Urban Land Use Change in Urban Instable Development (Case Study: Maragheh during 2001 – 2011)”. Vol. 9. Issue 28. PP. 73-84. (in Persian). 72. Kardan, Behzad & Somayeh Simabi. (2015). “Analysis of Factors Affecting the Audit Risk Model Using Dumble Technique”. 13 th National Accounting Conference of Iran. (in Persian). 73. . Kazemian, Gholam Reza & Seyedeh Zohre Mir Abedini. (2012). “Identification of Dimensions and Solutions for the Implementation of Integrated Urban Management by Farathalich Method”. Fourth Conference on Urban Management and Planning. (in Persian). 74. Kazemian, Gholamreza & Zohreh Mirabedini. (2011). “Pathology of Integrated Urban Management for Tehran in view of Policy and Decision Making”.honar-ha-ye- ziba. memari-va- sharsazi. Vol. 3. No. 46. PP. 27-36. (in Persian). 75. Lotfi, Haydar, Fardad Edalatkhah, Minno Mirzaie & shabbo Vazirpour. (2009). “Urban management and its position in promoting the rights of citizens”. Human Geographic Quarterly. 76. Masnavi, Mohammad Reza. (2004). “Research on Sustainable Development and new urban development paradigms (Compact City and Urban dispersal)”. journal of environmental studies. Vol. 29. No. 31. PP. 89-104. (in Persian). 77. Center for Urban Studies and Planning. (2014). Horizontal approaches to control the growth of cities Case study: Tehran. Published: Information Technology Management and Documentation Center. (in Persian). 78. Maboodi, Mohammad Taghi & Hadi Hakimi. (2015). “Analysis of Land Use Changes and Urban Sprawl Simulation in Mid-Sized Cities (Case Study: Khoy City)”. Vol. 3. Issue 2. PP. 211-226. (in Persian). 79. Maleki, Saeed, Reza Ahmadi & Zabihollah Torabi. (2013). “An Investigation on Spatial Distribution of Educational Development in the Cities of Khuzestan Province”. Journal Educational planning studies. Vol. 2. No. 4. PP. 39-56. (in Persian). 80. Mousavi, Mirnieh & Ali Bagheri Keshkoli. (2012). “Evaluation of Spatial Distribution of Quality of Life in Sardasht neighborhoods”. Journalmangement sestem. Vol. 3. No. 9. PP. 97-118. (in Persian).
82. Hall, peter. (2002). Urban and regional Planning. Translation Jalal Tabrizi. First Edition. Tehran: Processing Co and Urban Planning. (in Persian). 83. Heraini, Mostafa, Masoud Anbarloo & Aqeel Oven. (2016). “Urban creep and its effects on land use change (Case study: Khomein city in the last 30 years)”. The first international conference of urban economics with a resistance, action and action economy approach. (in Persian). 84. Hemafar, Milad & Navid Saeedi Rezvani. (2014). “A comparative study of Iran’s Planning Structure and Management of Urban Collections with Metropolitan regions such as Sydney and Toronto”. journal Urban studies. Vol. 3. No. 12. PP. 73-86. (in Persian). 85. Al Amin, M. Rashford, B. S. Bastin, C. T. and Aadland, D. M. (2013). “Agricultural Land-Use in a Changing Climate”: Implications for Waterfowl Habitat in Prairie Canada. University of Wyoming. 86. Araya, yikalo H, Cabral, Pedro. (2010). “Analysis and Modeling of Urban Land Cover Change in Setúbal and Sesimbra”. Publication. Remote. Vol. 2. No. 6. pp.1549-1563. 87. Audrey n.clar. (1985). Longman Dictionary of Geography; human and physical, Longman.Publisher: Addison-Wesley Longman Ltd. 88. Bakhtiar Ezzat panah, Rozhaneh Rivaz, nobakht Sobhani and Fereshte Babaoghli. (2013). “evaluation physical development patterns and spatial distribution of public services with social justice approach (the case study: naghadeh, iran) ”. ARPN Journal of Earth Sciences. Vol. 2. No. 3. pp. 110-116. 89. Clark, David. (2003). Urban World/Global City. Publisher: Taylor & Francis 90. .Clin, B. (2009). “Migration and unemployment”. UK, London564P Economy organization. (1996). impact of migration case in Iran. entsaratpublish. Tehran. 231p. 91. Farrell, Chad R. (2000). “Bifurcation, Fragmentation or Integration? The Racial and Geographical Structure of US Metropolitan Segregation, 1990-2000”. in: Urban Studies.Vol. 45. No.3. pp.467–499. 92. Ghanghermeh, Abdolazim; Roshan, Gholamreza Roshan; José A, Orosa, José L, Calvo- Rolle and Ángel M. Costa. (2013). “New climatic indicators for improving urban sprawl: a case study of Tehran city”. Journal entropy 2013.Vol.15. No. 3. pp999-1013. 93. Han, Ji. Yoshitsugu ,Hayashi. Xin ,Cao, Hidefumi ,Imura .(2009). “Application of an integrated system dynamics and cellular automata model for urban growth assessment: A case study of Shanghai”, China, Journal of Landscape and Urban Planning.Vol. 91. No.3. pp 133-141 94. Heikkila, Eric J. (2007). “Three Questions Regarding Urbanization in China”. Journal of Planning Education and Research. Vol. 27. No. 1. pp.65-81. 95. Hora, EndaleAlemu. (2014). “Factors that affect Women Participation in Leadership and Decision Making Position”. Asian Journal of Humanity. Art and Literature. Vol. 1. No. 2 . pp.99-118. 96. Hutchison, Ray. (2010). Encyclopedia of Urban Studies. SAGE Publications. 97. Jassbi, Javad; Mohamadnejad, Farshid and Nasrollahzadeh, Hossein. (2011). “ A Fuzzy DEMATEL Framework for Modeling Cause and Effect relationships of strategy map”. Expert Systems with Applications . Vol. 38. No. 5. pp. 243–252. 98. Ataollah Kelarestaghi · Zeinab Jafarian Jelouda., (2011). “Land use/cover change and driving force analyses in parts of northern Iran using RS and GIS techniques”. Arabian Journal of Geosciences. 4(3-4): pp.401-411. 99. Lees, Nicholas. (2010). “Inequality as an Obstacle to World Political Community and Global Social Justice”. Oxford University. Paper to be Presented at the SGIR 7th Annual Conference on International Relations. Sweden. September 9-11th 2010.
| ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 1,329 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 577 |
||