پیوندهای مفید
اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 158 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 6,230 |
| تعداد مقالات | 67,764 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 115,151,888 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 89,910,377 |
بررسی پتانسیل مرتع برای زنبورداری با استفاده از روش تحلیل سلسله مراتبی (AHP) | ||
| نشریه علمی - پژوهشی مرتع و آبخیزداری | ||
| مقاله 13، دوره 70، شماره 3، آذر 1396، صفحه 711-722 اصل مقاله (900.17 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22059/jrwm.2017.104147.736 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| مهدیه صالحی1؛ حسین ارزانی* 2؛ علی طویلی3؛ مهدی قربانی3 | ||
| 1دانش آموختۀ کارشناسی ارشد مرتعداری، دانشکدۀ منابع‌طبیعی، دانشگاه تهران | ||
| 2استاد دانشکده منابع طبیعی دانشگاه تهران | ||
| 3دانشیار دانشکدۀ منابع‌طبیعی، دانشگاه تهران | ||
| چکیده | ||
| در سالهای اخیر استفادۀ چندمنظوره از مراتع به عنوان یکی از راه حلهای اصلی در کاهش فشار ناشی از چرای دام و در عین حال افزایش رفاه و درآمد سرانۀ بهرهبرداران و رسیدن به توسعه و مدیریت پایدار مطرح شده است. زنبورداری در مراتع راهکاری سودآور و به عنوان یکی از جنبههای استفاده چندمنظوره در حوزه بالاطالقان و در سامانهای عرفی ناریان، دیزان و مهران هدف این مطالعه قرار گرفت. در این مطالعه تلاش گردید تا در تعیین شایستگی زنبورداری علاوه بر مسائل بومشناختی به مسائل اجتماعی نیز پرداخته شود. جهت تعیین شایستگی این سامانهای عرفی چهار معیار پوشش گیاهی، عوامل محیطی، عوامل فیزیکی و مسائل اجتماعی در نظر گرفته شد که این معیارها به طور کلی چهارده شاخص را شامل میشوند، لذا به علت پیچیدگی مسأله از روش تصمیمگیری چندمعیاره (AHP) استفاده شده است. سلسله مراتب تصمیمگیری در چهار سطح هدف، معیارها، شاخصها و گزینهها تشکیل شد. یکی از معیارها کیفی بود که جهت دستیابی به نتایج منطقی در مورد معیار کیفی (مسائل اجتماعی) از همکاری متخصصین استفاده شد. نتایج حاصل از قضاوت متخصصین، معیار مسائل اجتماعی را نسبت به سایر معیارها در اولویت نشان داد. همچنین نتایج حاکی از آن است که در روش تحلیل سلسله مراتبی سامانهای عرفی ناریان، دیزان و مهران در اولویت اول تا سوم شایستگی قرار گرفته است. به طور کلی جهت دستیابی به کاربری زنبورداری در مراتع علاوه بر تقویت بخش فنی میبایست میان نهادهای دولتی و غیردولتی و بهرهبرداران هماهنگی ایجاد شود. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| تحلیل سلسله مراتبی؛ زنبورداری؛ شایستگی مرتع؛ طالقان؛ مسائل بومشناختی و اجتماعی | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Investigation of Rangeland potential for Apiculture by using Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) Technique | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| mahdieh salehi1؛ Hossein Arzani2؛ ِAli Tavili3؛ Mahdi Ghorbani3 | ||
| 1u | ||
| 2Professor, Faculty of Natural resources, Tehran University, Tehran | ||
| 3university of tehran | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| Rrecently, rangeland multiple use has been found to be one of the primary solutions to alleviate livestock grazing pressure while improving stakeholder's welfare and per capita income and sustainable management and development. Beekeeping in rangeland as a profitable approach and one of multiple use components in upper Taleghan basin and Saman Orfi of Narian, Dizan and Mehran were studied. The present study was aimed to determine beekeeping suitability as well as ecological and social issues. According to permanent standards and resource sites priority for comprising of these Samans Orfi reserves 4 criteria to be considered such as vegetation,environmental, physical and social issues.These criteria are included overall 14 sub criteria. So Multi-Criteria Decision Making Methods (MCDM) has used because of problem complexity. The hierarchical formed in the 4 levels that is purpose, criteria, sub criteria and options. One of the criteria were qualitative. For accessing logical results, we benefit specialist cooperation. The results showed that social problem are more important than the other criteria in priority. Also, final results of Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) indicated that Saman Orfi Narian, and Mehran and Dizin were fall into first to third priorities respectively. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| Analytical Hierarchy Process, beekeeping, Rangeland suitability, Taleghan, social and ecological issues | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
[1] Amiri, F. and Arzani, H. (2012). Determination of site priority for apiculture by using Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) method. Journal of Range and Desert Research, 19(1), 160-177. [2] Amiri, F., Bassiri, M. and Chaichi, M.R. (2007). Application of Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) in Prioritizing Methods in Utilization Measurement in Eurotia Ceratoides. Journal of Natural Resources, 60(2), 637-651. [3] Arzani, H. (2009). Forage Quality and Daily Requirement of Grazing Animal, University of Tehran Press. [4] Arzani, H., Jangjo, M., Shams, H., Mohtasham Nia,S., Agha Mohseni Fashami, M., Ahmadi, H., Jafari, M., Darvisa Sefat, A. A. and Shahriari, A. (2006). Modeling range suitability classes for sheep grazing in center Albourz, Ardestan and Zagrous regions of Iran. Journal of Agricultural sciences and Natural Resources, 10(1), 273-289. [5] Ashfaq, M. (2006). Honey production. Pakistan Agricultural Research Council. http://www.parc.gov.pk/Faq/hbm.html (20/05/2013). [6] Beyene, T. and Davide, P. (2007). Ensuring small scale producers in Ethiopia to achieve sustainable and fair access to honey markets. International Development Enterprises (IDE) and Ethiopian Society for Appropriate Technology (ESAT). [7] Bunruamkaew, Kh. and Murayama, Y. (2011). Site suitability evaluation for ecotourism using GIS and AHP (A case study of Surat Thani province, Thailand). Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 21, 269-278. [8] Carlsson, L. and Berkes, F. (2005). Co-management: Concepts and methodological implications. Journal of Environmental Management, 75, 65-76. [9] Chen, L., Wang, J., Ye, Z., Zhao, J., Xue, X., Heyden, Yv. and Sun, Q. (2012). Classification of Chinese honeys according to their floral origin by near infrared spectroscopy. Agricultural and food chemistry, 135, 338-342. [10] Duc, T.T. (2006). Using GIS and AHP technique for land-use suitability analysis. International symposium on geoinformatics for spatial infrastructure development in earth and allied sciences, Hochiminh, Vietnam, pp. 1-6. [11] Duchelle, A.E., Guariguata, M.R., Less, G., Albornoz, M.A., Chave, A. and Melo, T. (2011). Evaluating the opportunities and limitations to multiple uses of Brazil nuts and timber in Western Amazonia. Forest Ecology and Management, 268, 39-48. [12] Estoque, RC. and Murayama, Y. (2010). Suitability analysis for beekeeping sites in Launion, Philippines, Using GIS and multi-criteria evaluation techniques.Journal of Applied Sciences, 5(3), 242-253. [13] Fadaei, SH., Arzani, H., Azarnivand, H., Nehzati, GH.A., Kaboli, S.H. and Amin Zadeh, M. (2011 b). Effect of Pollen & Nectar rangeland plants for apiculture in central Taleghan rangelands. Journal of Animal Science, 42(1), 75-84. [14] Fadaei, SH., Arzani, H., Azarnivand, H., Nehzati, GH.A., Kaboli, S.H. and Amiri, F. (2011 a). A study of range suitability model for apiculture by using GIS (case study: central Taleghan rangelands). Journal of Applied RS & GIS Techniques in Natural Resource Science, 2(1), 31-47. [15] Ghodsipur, H. (2011). Analytical Hierarchy Process, University of Amir Kabir Press. [16] Ghorbani, M. (2012). The role of social network in operation mechanisms of rangeland (case study: Taleghan area). Ph.D. thesis. Department of Natural Resource. Tehran Uni, 430 pp. [17] Huang, B.I., Keisler, J. and Linkov, I. (2011). Multi-criteria decision analysis in environmental sciences: Ten years of applications and trends. Science of the Total Environment, 409, 3578-3594. [18] Hwang, Ch. and sun, Y.k. (1981). Multiple attribute decision making, Berlin: Springer varlag. [19] Javadi, A., Selsele, M., Arzani, H. and Folad Amoli, M. (2010). Classification of Lar rangelands suitability for apiculture by using GIS. Journal of Giah o Zist bom, 2(21), 93-106. [20] Kleinman, D.L. and Suryanarayanan, S. (2012). Dying bees and the social production of ignorance. Science Technology Human Values. http://www.sagepublications.com (03/05/2012). [21] Kooiman, J. (2003). Governing as Governance. SAGE publication London, New Delhi. [22] Lynch, T.B. and Rusydi, R. (1999). Distance Sampling for Forest Inventory in Indonesian Teak Plantation. Forest Ecology and Management, 113:215-221. [23] Masara, Ch. (2010). Learning commercial beekeeping: Two cases of social learning in southern African community natural resources management contexts.Thesis submitted in fulfillment of the requirements of the degree of masters in environmental education, 193 pp. [24] Motiei Langroudi, H., Nasiri, H., Azizi, A. and Mostafaie, A. (2012). Modeling land ecological potential agricultural and range management land uses by using Fuzzy AHP method in GIS. Journal of Land use Planing, 4(6), 101-124. [25] Movaghari, M. (2013). Determination of criteria and indicators for multiple-use suitability and sustainable from rangeland (Lasem Haraz rangeland). Ph.D. thesis. Department of Natural Resource. Tehran Uni, 430 pp. [26] Noor Maris, N. M., Mansor, Sh., Zulhaidi, H. and Shafri, M. (2008). Apicultural site zonation using GIS and Multi-Criteria decision analysis. Trop Agricultural Science, 31(2), 147-162. [27] Qaiser, T., Ali, M., Taj, S. and Akmal, N. (2013). Impact assessment of beekeeping in sustainable rural livelihood. Social Sciences, 2(2), 82-90. [28] Safaeian, R. (2005). Multiple use of rangelands. MS.C. thesis. Department of Natural Resource. Tehran Uni, 110 pp. [29] Salehi, M. (2013). Proposing a practical model of range land classification for beekeeping compared with FAO method. MS.C. thesis. Department of Natural Resource. Tehran Uni, 143 pp. [30] Shenkut, A.G., Getachew, Y., Assefa, D., Adgaba, N. and Abebe, W. (2012). Honey production systems (Apis melliferaL) in Kaffa, Shekea and Bench-Maji Zones of Ethiopia. Agricultural Extension and Rural Development, 4(19), 528-541. [31] Sour, A. (2012). Determination of multiple-use suitability from rangeland based on guidelins and compare with FAO method (1991) (case study: midlle Taleghan). MS.C. thesis. Department of Natural Resource. Tehran Uni, 190 pp. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 502 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 343 |
||