News

Yazdanshenas, M. (2017). Effect of Ambidextrous Leadership on Work Attitudes; Moderating Role of Social Capital and Self-efficacy. , 4(4), 527-545. doi: 10.22059/jscm.2018.242067.1454
Mahdi Yazdanshenas. "Effect of Ambidextrous Leadership on Work Attitudes; Moderating Role of Social Capital and Self-efficacy". , 4, 4, 2017, 527-545. doi: 10.22059/jscm.2018.242067.1454
Yazdanshenas, M. (2017). 'Effect of Ambidextrous Leadership on Work Attitudes; Moderating Role of Social Capital and Self-efficacy', , 4(4), pp. 527-545. doi: 10.22059/jscm.2018.242067.1454
Yazdanshenas, M. Effect of Ambidextrous Leadership on Work Attitudes; Moderating Role of Social Capital and Self-efficacy. , 2017; 4(4): 527-545. doi: 10.22059/jscm.2018.242067.1454

Effect of Ambidextrous Leadership on Work Attitudes; Moderating Role of Social Capital and Self-efficacy

مجله علمی "مدیریت سرمایه اجتماعی"
Article 4, Volume 4, Issue 4, January 2018, Pages 527-545    PDF (597.52 K)
Document Type: Research/Original/Regular
DOI: 10.22059/jscm.2018.242067.1454
Author
Mahdi Yazdanshenas*
Assistant Professor, Faculty of Management & Accounting, Allameh Tabataba`i University, Tehran, Iran
Abstract
This study aims to examine the effect of ambidextrous leadership on work attitudes in which the moderating role of social capital and self-efficacy were considered as well. Research method is of descriptive- correctional surveys. Statistical population consisted 1520 employees of Telecommunications Infrastructure Company which a random sample of them was selected which consisted 307 employees. Data were collected via questionnaires that have been used in previous researches. Collected data were analyzed according to structural equation modeling using AMOS software. Results show that ambidextrous leadership has a positive effect on job satisfaction and emotional commitment as the main work attitudes. Meanwhile, findings show that social capital and self-efficacy play the moderating roles in this relationship. Therefore, ambidextrous leadership behaviors would have greater positive effect on employees` work attitudes if they enjoy social capital and self-efficacy.
Keywords
Ambidextrous leadership; Self-Efficacy; Social capital; Work Attitudes
References
  1. Alvarez, E. C., & Romani, J. R. (2017). Measuring social capital: further insights. Gaceta Sanitaria, 31(1), 57-61.
  2. Ashforth, B. E., & Mael, F. (1989). Social identity theory and the organization. Academy of Management Review, 14(1), 20-39.
  3. Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191-215.
  4. Bourdieu, P. (1986). Forms of capital, In Richards, J. C. (ed.). Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education, New York: Greenwood Press.
  5. Burnheimer, R. L. (2014). The effects of trust and perceived supervisor and organizational support on employees' attitudes and behavior. New York: State University of New York at Albany.
  6. Caldwell, C., & Hayes, L. A. (2016). Self-efficacy and self-awareness: moral insights to increased leader effectiveness. Journal of Management Development, 35(9), 1163-1173.
  7. Cassar, V., Bezzina, F., & Buttigieg, S. C. (2017). The relationship between transformational leadership and work attitudes: comparing mediating influences of social identity and the psychological contract. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 38(5). 646-661.
  8. Chaudhary, R., Rangnekar, S., & Barua, M. K. (2012). Relationships between occupational self-efficacy, human resource development climate, and work engagement. Team Performance Management: An International Journal, 18(7/8), 370-383.
  9. Chebbi, H., Yahiaoui, D., Vrontis, D., & Thrassou, A. (2017). The Impact of Ambidextrous Leadership on the Internationalization of Emerging‐Market Firms: The Case of India. Thunderbird International Business Review, 59(3), 421-436.
  10. Chen, G., Gully, S. M., & Eden, D. (2001). Validation of a new general self-efficacy scale. Organizational Research Methods, 4(1), 62-83.
  11. Chow, W. S., & Chan, L. S. (2008). Social network, social trust and shared goals in organizational knowledge sharing. Information & Management, 45(7), 458-465.
  12. Deuling, J. K., & Burns, L. (2017). Perfectionism and work-family conflict: Self-esteem and self-efficacy as mediator. Personality and Individual Differences, 116, 326-330.
  13. Dhurup, M., Surujlal, J., & Kabongo, D. M. (2016). Finding synergic relationships in teamwork, organizational commitment and job satisfaction: a case study of a construction organization in a developing country. Procedia Economics and Finance, 35, 485-492.
  14. Dinda, S. (2014). Inclusive growth through creation of human and social capital. International Journal of Social Economics, 41(10), 878-895.
  15. Hobfoll, S. E. (2001). The influence of culture, community, and the nested‐self in the stress process: advancing conservation of resources theory. Applied Psychology, 50(3), 337-421.
  16. Jones, T., & Taylor, S. F. (2012). Service loyalty: accounting for social capital. Journal of Services Marketing, 26(1), 60-75.
  17. Judge, T. A., & Kammeyer-Mueller, J. D. (2012). Job attitudes. Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 341-367.
  18. Kakoudakis, K. I., McCabe, S., & Story, V. (2017). Social tourism and self-efficacy: Exploring links between tourism participation, job-seeking and unemployment. Annals of Tourism Research, 65, 108-121.
  19. Kim, B., & Kim, Y. (2017). College students’ social media use and communication network heterogeneity: Implications for social capital and subjective well-being. Computers in Human Behavior, 73, 620-628.
  20. Kim, M. J., Lee, C. K., & Bonn, M. (2016). The effect of social capital and altruism on seniors' revisit intention to social network sites for tourism-related purposes. Tourism Management, 53, 96-107.
  21. Lambert, E. G., Minor, K. I., Wells, J. B., & Hogan, N. L. (2016). Social support's relationship to correctional staff job stress, job involvement, job satisfaction, and organizational commitment. The Social Science Journal, 53(1), 22-32.
  22. Lee, A., Martin, R., Thomas, G., Guillaume, Y., & Maio, G. R. (2015). Conceptualizing leadership perceptions as attitudes: Using attitude theory to further understand the leadership process. The Leadership Quarterly, 26(6), 910-934.
  23. Lee, P. Y., Li, C. S. J., & Wu, M. L. (2017). The roles of cross-cultural adjustment and social capital formation in the dynamic capabilities development of multiunit organizations. Asia Pacific Management Review, In Press.
  24. Liu, C. H. (2017). The relationships among intellectual capital, social capital, and performance-The moderating role of business ties and environmental uncertainty. Tourism Management, 61, 553-561.
  25. Meyer, J. P., & Allen, N. J. (1991). A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment. Human Resource Management Review, 1(1), 61-89.
  26. Miller, D., Xu, X., & Mehrotra, V. (2015). When is human capital a valuable resource? The performance effects of Ivy League selection among celebrated CEOs. Strategic Management Journal, 36(6), 930-944.
  27. Nahapiet, J., & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(2), 242-266.
  28. Pena-Lopez, J. A., & Sanchez-Santos, J. M. (2017). Individual social capital: Accessibility and mobilization of resources embedded in social networks. Social Networks, 49, 1-11.
  29. Probst, G., Raisch, S., & Tushman, M. L. (2011). Ambidextrous leadership: Emerging challenges for business and HR leaders. Organizational Dynamics, 40(4), 326-334.
  30. Rosing, K., Frese, M., & Bausch, A. (2011). Explaining the heterogeneity of the leadership-innovation relationship: Ambidextrous leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 22(5), 956-974.
  31. Russell, S. S., Spitzmuller, C., Lin, L. F., Stanton, J. M., Smith, P. C., & Ironson, G. H. (2004). Shorter can also be better: The abridged job in general scale. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 64(5), 878-893.
  32. Rutherford, T., Long, J. J., & Farkas, G. (2017). Teacher Value for Professional Development, Self-Efficacy, and Student Outcomes within a Digital Mathematics Intervention. Contemporary Educational Psychology. 51, 22-36.
  33. Shamir, B., House, R. J., & Arthur, M. B. (1993). The motivational effects of charismatic leadership: A self-concept based theory. Organization Science, 4(4), 577-594.
  34. Urban, B. (2015). Evaluation of social enterprise outcomes and self-efficacy. International Journal of Social Economics, 42(2), 163-178.
  35. White, R. W. (1959). Motivation reconsidered: The concept of competence. Psychological Review, 66(5), 297, 333.
  36. Yan, M., Yu, Y., & Dong, X. (2016). Contributive roles of multilevel organizational learning for the evolution of organizational ambidexterity. Information Technology & People, 29(3), 647-667.
  37. Zacher, H., & Rosing, K. (2015). Ambidextrous leadership and team innovation. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 36(1), 54-68.
  38. Zacher, H., & Wilden, R. G. (2014). A daily diary study on ambidextrous leadership and self‐reported employee innovation. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 87(4), 813-820.
  39. Zacher, H., Robinson, A. J., & Rosing, K. (2016). Ambidextrous Leadership and Employees' Self‐Reported Innovative Performance: The Role of Exploration and Exploitation Behaviors. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 50(1), 24-46.
  40. Zuraik, A. (2017). A strategic model for innovation leadership: Ambidextrous and transformational leadership within a supportive climate to foster innovation performance. Doctoral Dissertation, Alliant International University.
Statistics
Article View: 1,701
PDF Download: 1,188


Journal Management System. Powered by Sinaweb