سامانه پشتیبانی خدمات اطلاعات

  اخبار و اعلانات

 آمار

تعداد نشریات158
تعداد شماره‌ها6,225
تعداد مقالات67,685
تعداد مشاهده مقاله114,963,814
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله89,638,140
نامدار, راضیه, پزشکی راد, غلامرضا, صدیقی, حسن. (1396). کاربرد تئوری بنیانی در مطالعه رفتار پایدار زیست محیطی کشاورزان؛ یک تحلیل اکتشافی. , 48(4), 597-609. doi: 10.22059/ijaedr.2018.65234
راضیه نامدار; غلامرضا پزشکی راد; حسن صدیقی. "کاربرد تئوری بنیانی در مطالعه رفتار پایدار زیست محیطی کشاورزان؛ یک تحلیل اکتشافی". , 48, 4, 1396, 597-609. doi: 10.22059/ijaedr.2018.65234
نامدار, راضیه, پزشکی راد, غلامرضا, صدیقی, حسن. (1396). 'کاربرد تئوری بنیانی در مطالعه رفتار پایدار زیست محیطی کشاورزان؛ یک تحلیل اکتشافی', , 48(4), pp. 597-609. doi: 10.22059/ijaedr.2018.65234
نامدار, راضیه, پزشکی راد, غلامرضا, صدیقی, حسن. کاربرد تئوری بنیانی در مطالعه رفتار پایدار زیست محیطی کشاورزان؛ یک تحلیل اکتشافی. , 1396; 48(4): 597-609. doi: 10.22059/ijaedr.2018.65234

کاربرد تئوری بنیانی در مطالعه رفتار پایدار زیست محیطی کشاورزان؛ یک تحلیل اکتشافی

تحقیقات اقتصاد و توسعه کشاورزی ایران
مقاله 5، دوره 48، شماره 4، اسفند 1396، صفحه 597-609    اصل مقاله (1.18 M)
نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22059/ijaedr.2018.65234
نویسندگان
راضیه نامدار* 1؛ غلامرضا پزشکی راد2؛ حسن صدیقی2
1دانشگاه تربیت مدرس
2استاد دانشگاه تربیت مدرس
چکیده
توسعه پایدار یک راهکار برای زندگی و کار در قرن بیست و یکم است. در میان شاخص­های مختلف پایداری، مهم­ترین مؤلفه توسعه پایدار، حفاظت از محیط­زیست در نظر گرفته شده است. نگرانی اساسی سازمان­های بین­المللی و اندیشمندان، بروز معضلات محیط­زیست و روند رو به افزایش آن­ می­باشد. "انسان" به­عنوان عامل تأثیرگذار و قربانی این بحران به­شمار می­رود. مطالعه حاضر با هدف دستیابی به مهم­ترین عوامل در شکل­گیری رفتار زیست­محیطی کشاورزان، با رویکرد کیفی و با روش تئوری بنیانی صورت گرفت. در تحقیق حاضر، پس از انجام تعداد 27 مصاحبه عمیق با کشاورزان دو روستا از توابع شهرستان سپیدان فارس و ضمن استفاده از تکنیک­های مشاهده، مطالعه اسنادی،  و ضبط صوتی و کتبی مصاحبه­ها، جهت انجام کدگذاری باز، با استفاده از تکنیک “تحلیل سطر به سطر” اقدام به تحلیل یافته­ها گردید. نهایتاًً، تعداد 158 مفهوم شناسایی و طبقه­بندی شد. سپس، با روش کد­گذاری محوری از میان مقولات استخراج شده تعداد سه مقوله "نگرش زیست محیطی"، "موقعیت اقتصادی" و "سیاست­های زیست­محیطی"، به­عنوان مقوله­های اصلی و شش مقوله با عنوان­های دسترسی به منابع، مسایل زمینه­ای، آموزش، تکنولوژی، تعاون و مشارکت و تأثیر هم­نوعان و تجارب بومی به­عنوان مقولات فرعی قلمداد شدند و در نهایت، در مرحله کدگذاری گزینشی، با شناسایی مقوله هسته­ای، مدل پارادایمی ترسیم گردید.
کلیدواژه‌ها
توسعه پایدار؛ رفتارزیست محیطی؛ تئوری بنیانی
عنوان مقاله [English]
Application of Grounded Theory in Sustainable Environmental Behaviors of Farmers: an Exploratory Analyses
نویسندگان [English]
razieh Namdar1؛
چکیده [English]
 Sustainable development is an approach for live and work in 21 century. Among sustainability indices, environmental protection has considered as the most important index. Emerging environmental problems and their increasing trends are the most important concern for international organizations and scientist. "Human" is an influencing factor and the victim of this crisis. This study was conducted to access to most important factors influencing environmental behaviors of farmers, by utilizing qualitative approach, and grounded theory method. This study conducted by performing 27 interviews with farmers of two villages from Sepidan township of Fars province. Also, data were collected through observation, operational noting sound records of interviews, and literature review. “line to line analyses”  was used for open coding. By frequent referral to data, 158 concepts were recognized and assorted. From these concepts, 3 categories namely: "environmental attitude", "economic situation" and "environmental policies" were identified as primary categories and 6 categories were assigned as subsidiary categories, which included: access to recourse, background issues, education, technology, cooperation and partnership, fellow influence and indigenous experience. Finally, recognizing core coding, the paradigm was presented.
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
Sustainable Development, Environmental Behaviors, Grounded theory
مراجع
  1. Adib Haj Bagheri, M., et, al.,(2007).Qualitative Research Methods. Boshra publication. (In Farsi).
  2. Ajzen, I. & Madden, J.T. (1986). Prediction of goal directed behavior; Attitudes, intentions and perceived control. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 22, 253- 274.
  3. Austin, E. J. Willock, J. Deary, I. J. Gibson, G. J. Dent, J. B. Edwards-Jones, G. Morgan, O. Grieve, R. & Sutherland, A. (1998). Empirical Models of Farmer Behaviour Using Psychological, Social and Economic Variables. Part I: Linear Modelling. Agricultural Systems, 58(2), 203-224.
  4. Azkia, M., EmaniJajarmi, H., & FarziZadeh, Z. (2011). Qualitative Research Methods. Utilizing Grounded Theory. Keyhan publication. (In Farsi).
  5. Bager, T. & Proos, J. (1997). Voluntary Regulation and Farmers’ Environmental Behaviour in Denmark and the Netherlands. Sociologia Ruralis, 37(1), 79-96.
  6. Bayard, b. & Jolly, C., (2007). Environmental Behavior Structure and Socio- Economic Conditions of Hillside Farmers. Ecological Economics, (6) 2, 433-440.
  7. Bewsell and Kani, (2004). Understanding the Impact of Context: A New Approach to Understanding the Adoption of Improved Pest and Disease Management Practices. Journal of American International Agriculture Extension and Education. In: Proceeding of the 20th Annual conference, Dublin, Hreland: 682-693.
  8. Corbin, J. & Strauss, A. (1990). Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. Sage Publication, Inc.
  9. Daniere, A.G. & Takahashi L.M. (1999). Environmental behavior in Bangkok, Thailand: a portrait of attitudes, values, and behavior. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 47 (3), 525–557.

10. Emadi, M.H. (2006). Reviewingthe conceptand strategies ofenvironmental education, challengeandsolution. KeyhanMehr publication.

11. Farasatkhah, M. (2009). Assessment of Iran's Higher Education Quality, Application of Grounded Theory. Tehran: Institute for Research and Planning in Higher Education. (In Farsi).

12. Gatersleben, B. & Vlek, C., (1998). Household Consumption, Quality of Life and Environmental Impacts. In: Noorman, K.J., Schoot-Uiterkamp, A.J.M. (Eds.), Green Households? Domestic Consumers, Environment and Sustainability. Earthscan, London, pp. 141–183.

13. Goulding, Q. (2000). Grounded Theory: The Missing Methodology on  theInterpretivist Agenda, Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, 1(1), 50-57.

14. GreenCom (2001). Environmental Education and Communication (EE&C) for Behavior Change. Environmental Education and Communication (GreenCom) Project. Center for Environment in partnership with the Center for Human Capacity Development of the Bureau for Global Programs Academy for Educational Development. Retrieved from: http://www.usaid.gov/environment/greencom

15. Grob, A. (1995). A Structural Model of Environmental Attitude and Behaviour. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 15, 209-220.

16. Hérodin, B. &  Zühlsdorff, P. (2006). Environmental Education –the path to Sustainable. Packaging Recovery Organization Europe. Retrieved from: http://www.pro-e.org/files/environmental_education.pdf

17. Ingels, C., Campbell, D., George, M.R., & Bradford, E. (2000). What is sustainable agriculture?[online]. Retrieved from: www.url;;http;//sarep.ucdavis.edu/concept.htm.

18. Karami, E., & Hayati , D. (1998). Compared with Conventional Agriculture and Sustainable Agriculture: Measurement of Attitudes. Journal of Natural Resources and Agricultural Sciences, 2(I), 17-1. (In Farsi).

19. Karimi  E., & Mansoorabadi, A. (2008). Sustainable agricultural attitudes and behaviours: a gender analysis of Iranian farmers. Environmental Development Sustainable, (2008), 10, 883-898.

20. Kempster, S. & Parry, K. W. (2011).  Grounded theory and leadership research: A critical realist perspective. The Leadership Quarterly, 22(1), 106-120.

21. Klöckner, C. A., & Blöbaum, A. (2010). A comprehensive action determination model: Toward a broader understanding of ecological behavior using the example of travel mode choice. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30, 574–586.

22. Li, P., ming-Li, H., & Zuo, X. (2010). A survey and analysis on farmer’s awareness and performance for promoting environmental management in rural China: A case study from Panjiazhuang Village. IEEE. (2010). 

23. Mironga, J. N. (2005). Effect of Farming Practices on Wetlands of Kissii District, Kenya. Applied Ecology & Environmental Research, (3)2, 81-91.

24. Mossalanejad, A. (2011). The Role of Economic Policy and Environment in Sustainable Development. International Journal of Environmental Research, 5(2), 395-402.

25. Mousavi, M. (2008). Investigation and Analysis of Factors Influencing Farmers' environmental behavior, a case study of wetlands Hashilan – Kermanshah Province. M. S. thesis. (In Farsi).

26. Mousavi, T. (2009). Factors influencing farmers' Environmental behavior in relation to water resources management in Khozestan province. M.S. thesis, Agricultural Extension and Education. Agriculture and Natural Resources University of Raman. (In Farsi).

27. Noori Pour, M. & ShahVali, M. (2011). Evaluation rural sustainability criteria of Dena Township based on communication process: the application of AHP. Rural Researches, 2(1), 63-92. (In Farsi).

28. Nordlund, A. & Gorvill, J. (2002).Value Structure behind Pro-environmental Behaviors. Journal of Environmental and Behaivior,  34(6).

29. Papzan, A. Ghobadi, P., Zarafshani, K., & Gravandi, Sh. (2010). Problems and restrictions of Rural Tourism (Utilizing Grounded Theory).Case Study Harir village, Kermanshah Province,  Journal of Rural Researches. 1(3),. (In Farsi).

30. Pretty, J., Brett, C., Gee, D., Hine, R., Mason, C., Morison, J., Rayment, M., Bijl, G. vander, & Dobbs, T. (2001).  Policy Challenges and Priorities for Internalizing the Externalities of Modern Agriculture. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 44(2), 263–283.

31. Rao, N. H. & Rogers P. P. (2006). Assessment of agricultural sustainability. Current Science, 91(4), 25.

32. Reed, M.S. (2008). Stakeholder participation for environmental management: A literature review. Biological Conservation, 141,  2417–2431.

33. RezaeeMoghadam, K., (1997). Agricultural Extension, Poverty and Sustainable Agricultural in Behbahan Township. M. S. dissertation, University of Shiraz, Iran. (In Farsi).

34. Rostami, R., (2010). Analyzing Factors Affecting Farmers’ Behavior towards Water and Soil Conservation.   M. S. dissertation, University of Tehran, Iran. (In Farsi).

35. Roudgarmi, P. (2011). Qualitative research for environmental sciences: A review. Journal of Food, Agriculture & Environment, 9 (3&4), 871-879.

36. Schwartz, S. H. (1975). The justice of need and the activation of humanitarian norms. Journal of Social Issues, 31, 111–136.

37. Shahvali, M., & Gheysari, H., (2011). Determining Environmental Empowerment of Farmers whose Members of Rural Production Cooperatives and Factors Affecting, in Fars Province. Journalof Rural Development, 14(2), 31-51. (In Farsi).

38. Stern, P.C. (2000). Towards a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior. Journal of Social Issues, 56, 407-424.

39. Struss, A. & Corbin, J. (2009). BiyookMohammadi. Basics of Qualitative Research Grounded Theory ,Techniques and Procedures.Tehran, Research Center of Human Science and Cultural Studies.(In Farsi).

40. Struss, A. & Corbin, J. (2011). Basics of Qualitative Research,Techniques and Stages of Grounded Theory. Ebrahim Afshar (translator). Ney press (In Farsi).

41. Struss, A. (1987). Qualitative analysis for social scientists. Cambridge university press.

42. UNESCO (United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization), 2005.UNESCO and Sustainable Development. UNESCO, Paris, 41 pp.

43. Vogel, S. (1996). Farmers' environmental attitudes and behavior: a case study for Austria. Environment and Behavior, 28 (5), 591–613.

44. Wautersa, E., Bielders C., Poesenc, J., Goversc, G., & Mathijs, E. (2010). Adoption of soil conservation practices in Belgium: An examination of the theory of planned behaviour in the agri-environmental domain .Land Use Policy, 27 (2010), 86–94.

Willock, J., Deary, I.J., Edwards-Jones, G., Gibson, G.J., McGregor, M.J., Sutherland, A., Dent J.B., Morgan, O. & Grieve, R. (1999). The role of attitudes and objectives in farmer decision making: business and environmental-oriented behavior in Scotland. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 50 (2), 286–303

آمار
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 963
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 1,096


سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. قدرت گرفته از سیناوب