تعداد نشریات | 161 |
تعداد شمارهها | 6,532 |
تعداد مقالات | 70,503 |
تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 124,120,821 |
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 97,227,773 |
مقایسه عملکرد دستگاه جوجه کشی مجهز به سامانه هیبریدی خورشیدی مبتنی بر کنترلر فازی با نمونه تجاری مرسوم | ||
مهندسی بیوسیستم ایران | ||
مقاله 14، دوره 49، شماره 2، تیر 1397، صفحه 307-318 اصل مقاله (1.13 M) | ||
نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22059/ijbse.2018.246599.665014 | ||
نویسندگان | ||
ابراهیم احمد ابراهیم حسن1؛ رضا علیمردانی* 2؛ علی حاجی احمد3؛ حمید عبدالملکی4 | ||
1دانشگاه تهران، گروه مهندسی ماشین های کشاورزی | ||
2عضو هیئت عملی، گروه مهندسی ماشین های کشاورزی | ||
3عضو هیأت علمی گروه مهندسی ماشین های کشاورزی | ||
4دانشگاه تهران، گروه ماشینهای کشاورزی | ||
چکیده | ||
اولین مرحله در پرورش مرغ، تولید جوجه است که با توجه به رشد جمعیت به دستگاه جوجهکشی با عملکرد بالا نیاز است. در این پژوهش دو نمونه دستگاه جوجهکشی،یکی به سامانه هیبریدی با کنترلر فازی(HIFC) مجهز شد و نمونه دیگر بدون تغییر در ساختار بصورت ON/OFF با هم مقایسه شدند. بر اساس نتایج راندمان جوجهآوری در سامانه HIFC %13/92 و در سامانه ON/OFF برابر %16/78 بود. سامانه HFIC عملکرد بهتری در کنترل یکنواخت شرایط محیطی نسبت به سامانه ON/OF نشان داد. انرژی مصرفی سامانه HIFC %25/31 از سامانه ON/OFF کمتر بود. میزان انرژی خورشیدی دریافت شده برای سامانه HIFC در یک دوره 21 روزه برابر kWh20/27 بود. در حالی که میزان انرژی مورد نیاز برابر با kWh24/24 است که 21/12% مازاد بر نیاز سامانه HIFC تولید میشود. در صورتی که اگر از انرژی هیبریدی در سامانه ON/OFFاستفاده شود، فقط %77 توان مورد نیاز از این طریق تامین میشود. | ||
کلیدواژهها | ||
سامانه هیبریدی؛ جوجهکشی؛ شرایط محیطی؛ کنترلر فازی | ||
عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
Performance of an Egg Incubator instrumented with Hybrid System Based on Fuzzy Controller in compare with commercial Incubator | ||
نویسندگان [English] | ||
Ibrahim Ahmed-Ibrahim-Hassan1؛ Reza Alimardani2؛ Ali Hajiahmad3؛ Hamid Abdolmaleki4 | ||
1Department of Agricultural Machinery Engineering, University of Tehran | ||
2Department of Agricultural Machinery Engineering, University of Tehran | ||
3Department of Agricultural Machinery engineering | ||
4Department of Agricultural Machinery Engineering, University of Tehran | ||
چکیده [English] | ||
The first step in chicken breeding is the production of chicks, which requires a high-performance incubator. In this research, the performance of two incubators was compared. One of them was instrumented with a hybrid system based on fuzzy controller (HIFC), another one was the commercial incubator (ON/OFF). By comparing the important parameters to make suitable conditions for eggs hatchery, the percentage of eggs hatching, egg weight changes, chick’s hatch time and energy consumption were compared and evaluated. The result showed that the eggs hatching ratio was 92.13% for HIFC and 78.16% for ON/OFF systems. The HIFC system showed a better result in controlling egg environmental conditions than the ON/OFF system, based on eggs weight changes and chick’s hatch time. The energy consumption of the fuzzy controller was 31.25% less than the ON/OFF controller. The amount of energy received by the solar hybrid system over a 21 day periods was 27.20 kWh. For the HIFC system, the amount of energy needed for a hatching period was 24.24 kWh which shows an excess energy of 12.21%. For the ON/OFF system, contribution of solar hybrid system for power requirement was 77%. | ||
کلیدواژهها [English] | ||
hybrid system, Egg Incubator, Environmental Conditions, Fuzzy Controller | ||
مراجع | ||
Anon, (2010) The Statistical Reference for Poultry Executives. Watt Executive Guide to World Poultry Trends 2010. www.WATTAgNet.com Anon, (2015) Sudan Energy Research Center – Department of Solar Energy. Archer, G. S. & Cartwright, A. L. (2012) Incubating and Hatching Eggs. Agrilife extension. Texas. Castañeda-Miranda, R. Ventura-Ramos E, del Rocío Peniche-Vera R. & Herrera-Ruiz G. (2006) Fuzzy greenhouse climate control system based on a field programmable gate array. Biosystems engineering, 94(2), pp.165-177. Data sheet Arduino Mega2560 Board http://www.mantech.co.za/datasheets/products/A000047.pdf. French N A. (1997) Modeling incubation temperature: The effects of incubator design, embryonic development, and egg size. Poultry Science, 76(1), pp.124-133. French N A. (2002) Managing the incubation environment in commercial hatcheries to meet the requirements of the embryo. Avian and Poultry Biology Reviews, 13(3), pp.179-185. French N A. (2009) The critical importance of incubation temperature. Avian Biology Research, 2(1-2), p.55. French, N.A. (1994) Effect of incubation temperature on the gross pathology of turkey embryos. British poultry science, 35(3), pp.363-371. García-Hierro, J., José, I. R., Pilar, B., Eva, C. C.H. & Belen, D. (2012) Design of a Solar Incubator. Part 1: Monitoring Temperature and Enthalpy Gradients under Commercial Production. En: "International Conference of Agricultural Engineering. Gholamrezai, N. Qaderi, K. & Jafari Naeimi, K. (2016) Temperature, Humidity and Energy Consumption Forecasting in the Poultry Hall Using Artificial Neural Network, Journal of Agricultural Machinery. Vol. 7, No. 2, Fall - Winter 2017, p. 546-557. Javadikia, P. (2010). Design, Implementation and Evaluation of Intelligent System Based on Fuzzy Logic Controller for Greenhouse Automation, Ph.D. dissertation, University of Tehran, Karaj. in Farsi. Juan C, R., (2015). Renewable Energy Contribution To The Energy Supply: Is There Convergence Across Countries?. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 45 (2015) 290–295. Kalantar, M. & Salari, J. (2012) A Handbook for Egg Incubation Technology, Mashhadi, S. K. M. & Dashtaki M G N. (2012) Incubator with Fuzzy Logic. The Journal of Mathematics and Computer Science. Mirzaee- Ghaleh, E. (2013 ) Development of an intelligent solar system based on fuzzy logic controller for heating of a model poultry house, Ph.D. dissertation, University of Tehran, Karaj. in Farsi. Mirzaee-Ghaleh E, Omid M, Keyhani A, & Dalvand M J. (2015) Comparison of fuzzy and ON/OFF controllers for winter season indoor climate management in a model poultry house. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 110, pp.187-195 Mnahil, O. (2013) Solar Power in Sudan, the Perfect Choice and a Promising Future for the Production of Electricity. Sudan News Agency. http://www.sudacon.net/2013/05/blog-post_24.html Mohamed, M. S., (2014) BVM, MSc, Diploma Finance. The Sudanese Poultry Industry History, Statistics and Future Investment Challenges. University of Pretoria, Department of Production Animal Studies. Avi Africa, June 2014. Mousazadeh, H. & Javanbakht, S. (2007) Photovoltaic for professionals solar electric systems marketing, design and installation, by: Falk Antony, Christian Durschner, Karl-Heinz Remmers, in Farsi. Özçelik M, Ekmen F. & Elmaz Ö. (2009) Effect of location of eggs in the incubator on hatchability of eggs from Bronze turkey breeders of different ages. South African Journal of Animal Science, 39(3) Saedi, I. (2017) Design, Fabrication and Evaluation of a Rotary Cultivation System with Fertigation Cycle Fuzzy Control Based on Evapotranspiration Estimations and Solar Energy Utilization, Ph.D. dissertation, University of Tehran, Karaj. in Farsi. Tchimmoue, G.E., Kamdem, J., Sone, M.E. & Tchapga, C.T. (2016) Development of a cost-effective ARDUINO based automatic BIRD-EGG incubator. Van Brecht, A. Aerts, J.M., Degraeve, P. & Berckmans, D., (2003) Quantification and control of the spatiotemporal gradients of air speed and air temperature in an incubator. Poultry science, 82(11), pp.1677-1687. Wilson H R. (1990) Physiological requirements of the developing embryo: temperature and turning. Avian incubation., pp.145-156. Wilson H R. (1996) Incubation and hatching of ratites. University of Florida Cooperative Extension Service, Institute of Food and Agriculture Sciences, EDIS. Yaser, R. Y. (2013) Poultry Sector, Promising Economies and Wide Employment Opportunities. Sudan News Agency – SUNA. http://mod.gov.sd Yildirim I, & Yetisir R. (2004) Effects of different hatcher temperatures on hatching traits of broiler embryos during the last five days of incubation. South African Journal of Animal Science, 34(4), pp.211-216.
| ||
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 564 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 361 |