سامانه پشتیبانی خدمات اطلاعات

  اخبار و اعلانات

 آمار

تعداد نشریات161
تعداد شماره‌ها6,532
تعداد مقالات70,501
تعداد مشاهده مقاله124,099,261
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله97,206,805
دهقانی فیروزآبادی, سید جلال, شکری, مرتضی, اسمعیلی اردکانی, علی. (1397). سیاست خارجی ترکیه در اوراسیای مرکزی؛ رویکرد دیپلماسی انرژی در ابعاد منطقه‌ای (2014-2002). , 11(1), 81-100. doi: 10.22059/jcep.2018.210941.449656
سید جلال دهقانی فیروزآبادی; مرتضی شکری; علی اسمعیلی اردکانی. "سیاست خارجی ترکیه در اوراسیای مرکزی؛ رویکرد دیپلماسی انرژی در ابعاد منطقه‌ای (2014-2002)". , 11, 1, 1397, 81-100. doi: 10.22059/jcep.2018.210941.449656
دهقانی فیروزآبادی, سید جلال, شکری, مرتضی, اسمعیلی اردکانی, علی. (1397). 'سیاست خارجی ترکیه در اوراسیای مرکزی؛ رویکرد دیپلماسی انرژی در ابعاد منطقه‌ای (2014-2002)', , 11(1), pp. 81-100. doi: 10.22059/jcep.2018.210941.449656
دهقانی فیروزآبادی, سید جلال, شکری, مرتضی, اسمعیلی اردکانی, علی. سیاست خارجی ترکیه در اوراسیای مرکزی؛ رویکرد دیپلماسی انرژی در ابعاد منطقه‌ای (2014-2002). , 1397; 11(1): 81-100. doi: 10.22059/jcep.2018.210941.449656

سیاست خارجی ترکیه در اوراسیای مرکزی؛ رویکرد دیپلماسی انرژی در ابعاد منطقه‌ای (2014-2002)

مطالعات اوراسیای مرکزی
مقاله 6، دوره 11، شماره 1، فروردین 1397، صفحه 81-100    اصل مقاله (532.04 K)
نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22059/jcep.2018.210941.449656
نویسندگان
سید جلال دهقانی فیروزآبادی1؛ مرتضی شکری* 2؛ علی اسمعیلی اردکانی2
1استاد روابط بین‌الملل، دانشگاه علامه طباطبایی
2دانشجوی دکتری روابط بین‌الملل، دانشگاه علامه طباطبایی
چکیده
از مهم‌‌ترین تحولات سیاست خارجی ترکیه در یک دهۀ گذشته به‌ویژه با روی‌کارآمدن حزب عدالت و توسعه، توجه به مناطق پیرامونی از جمله منطقۀ اوراسیا در چارچوب اصل «به‌صفررساندن اختلاف با همسایگان» و «بیشینۀ همکاری» است که در آیین سیاست خارجی این کشور بر آن تأکید شده است. تحول در سیاست خارجی ترکیه نسبت به منطقۀ اوراسیای مرکزی در شرایطی است که پیش از روی‌کارآمدن حزب عدالت و توسعه در آمریکا، مقام‌های آنکارا تنها بر اساس مناسبات فرهنگی و زبانی، سیاست خارجی خود را نسبت به این منطقه تعیین می‌کردند. در این زمان ارزش‌های عرفی­گرایی و پان‌ترک­­گرایی پایۀ سیاست خارجی ترکیه را تشکیل می‌داد؛ اما با روی‌کارآمدن حزب عدالت و توسعه و اولویت‌یافتن توسعۀ اقتصادی در سیاست خارجی ترکیه، جذابیت اقتصادی منطقۀ اوراسیا تا حدود زیادی اولویت‌های فرهنگی این کشور را در منطقه در تأثیر قرار داد. در همین زمینه، سیاست خارجی رقابت‌محور ترکیه (رقابت ایدئولوژیک با کشورهای منطقه از جمله روسیه، گرجستان، ارمنستان) جای خود را به سیاست همکاری با آن‌ها داده است. این نوشتار با استفاده از روش توصیفی‌تحلیلی به‌دنبال پاسخ‌گویی به این پرسش است که مهم‌‌ترین عامل در شکل‌دهی به سیاست خارجی ترکیه نسبت به منطقۀ اوراسیا چه بوده است؟ یافته‌های پژوهش نشان می‌دهد که با توجه به رشد اقتصادی ترکیه در یک دهۀ اخیر و نیاز روزافزون به واردات انرژی از یک‌سو و نیز موقعیت ژئواستراتژیک و ژئوپلیتیک مناسب این کشور به‌منظور تبدیل‌شدن به هاب انرژی دنیا از سوی دیگر، می‌توان ادعا کرد که مسئلۀ انرژی مهم‌‌ترین عامل تأثیرگذار بر شکل‌دهی سیاست خارجی ترکیه نسبت به منطقۀ اوراسیا در سال‌های اخیر بوده است.
کلیدواژه‌ها
امنیت انرژی؛ اوراسیا؛ ترکیه؛ خطوط لولۀ انرژی؛ سیاست خارجی
عنوان مقاله [English]
Turkey’s Foreign Policy toward Central Eurasia; Energy Diplomacy Approach Regional Sphere (2002-2014)
نویسندگان [English]
Seyed Jalal Dehghani Firouzabadi1؛ Morteza Shokri2؛ Ali Esmaeili Ardakani2
1Professor of International Relations Department, Allameh Tabataba’i University
2PhD Student of International Relations, Allameh Tabataba’i University
چکیده [English]
Turkey's foreign policy was initially formed based on non-interference in the internal affairs of its neighborhood countries and the periphery region. However, after the end of the Cold War and the collapse of the Soviet Union, and consequently the emergence of developments such as the new republics in Central Asia, the expansion of the idea of ​​democracy and the change in the security balance of the region, the foreign policy of Turkey changed. As a result, peripheral regions such as Eurasia, which were previously not in the top priority of Turkish foreign policy, found a special role in the country's diplomatic relations.
The development of Turkish foreign policy has been so dramatic that some have called it the new Turkey. The new foreign policy, the architect of which is Ahmet Davutoglu, is based on two principles, “Zero problems with neighbors” and “Maximum cooperation.” In the new Turkish foreign policy doctrine, foreign policy officials believe that Turkey has strategic depth due to its geographic and historical location. For this reason, it should be ranked as a unique country and be considered a central power. The doctrine believes that Turkey should take the lead in its peripheral regions and gain its strategic global significance. Therefore, Turkey must establish friendly relations with its neighbors and resolve its differences with them. Turkey's most important goal in this framework is to achieve the highest degree of convergence and cooperation with its neighbors.
One of the most important peripheries in Turkish foreign policy after the collapse of the Soviet Union is the Central Eurasia region.  An overview of Turkey's foreign policy in the first decade after the collapse of the Soviet Union shows that its foreign policy was based on the cultural and ideological policies towards the Central Eurasia region. But after the Justice and Development Party, which played a significant role in improving the Turkish economy, economic issues became the top priority of its foreign policy. In this regard, Turkey's competitive foreign policy (ideological competition with the countries of the region, including Russia, Georgia, and Armenia) has changed to cooperation with its neighbors. The main question of the article is, what was the most important economic factor affecting the activation of Turkey's foreign policy towards the Eurasian region after the rise of the Justice and Development Party? The hypothesis is that some issues related to the energy sector, such as providing energy needs, turning to be corridors, energy hubs, and energy security, have been the most important factors in taking Turkey's active orientation towards Central Eurasia.
This article, by using the regionalism approach, analyzes Turkey's foreign policy toward the Eurasian region. We can divide the regionalism of Turkey's foreign policy in different periods. In the first period that included the term of Kamal Ataturk's Presidency (1923-1939), Turkish foreign policy followed the principle of the traditional balance of power-peace, peace at home, peace in the world. In the second period (after World War II until the collapse of the Soviet Union) membership of the Council of Europe (1949) and NATO (1959) and ensuring the security of the West in the region was the main concern of Turkey’s foreign policy. Under these conditions, the main objectives of Turkish foreign policy, as well securing the West, was to confront the danger and influence of communism and maintain Israel's security. The third period of regionalism in Turkish foreign policy has continued since the collapse of the Soviet Union. Under this condition, the Eurasian region that has an important strategic and geopolitical role in energy, has become attractive for Ankara officials.
On the one hand the strategic role of Eurasia and the shortage of energy resources in Turkey and the increasing oil and gas consumption in this country, has made this region more important for turkeys officials.
There are some parameters that expose Turkey’s geopolitical and geo-economical significance in terms of Eurasian energy geopolitics.
- Turkey is located in a region that contains 71 percent of the World’s natural gas reserves and 72 percent of all oil reserves.1
- By 2012, 6-7 percent of the World’s oil demands are expected to be transported through Turkey.2
- Basic figures indicate Turkey’s significance for the Caspian Energy Basin.
- The Caspian Energy Basin contains 4 percent (200 billion barrels) of the World’s oil reserves and 5 percent (180 trillion m³) of all natural gas reserves. Therefore it is of outstanding importance.
So the targets16 of the Turkish Energy Policies can be summarized as:
- To become an energy corridor (Not only between the East and West but also between the North and South).
- Utilizing its geopolitical location to become a transit country and the 4th main arterial road and to integrate with EU energy markets.
- To become an energy hub and make Ceyhan a significant port just like Amsterdam in the long term. To make Ceyhan the energy distribution center of global energy markets.
In a nutshell, Turkey’s energy strategy is aimed to cover the energy needs independently, at least on paper. The theoretical backgrounds for above mentioned targets are ready and are waiting to be practiced. As a result, we can say that the dependency in Turkish energy policies and increasing energy demands are major factor for its foreign policy toward Eurasia. Considering that Turkey has a strategic position in the transit of oil and gas resources to Europe, it can gain huge profits from the Eurasia region. Furthermore, Eurasia provides Turkey accessibility to new consumption markets; therefore, it seems Central Asia will be more important for Turkey in the future.
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
Energy Pipelines, Energy Security, Eurasia, Foreign Policy, Turkey
مراجع
  1. Baldwin, D. A. (2013), “Power and International Relations”, in: W. Carlsnaes, T. Risse and B. A. Simmons (eds), Handbook of International Relations, London: Sage, pp. 273-297.
  2. Barzegar, Kayhan (2010), “Regionalization in Iran’s Foreign Policy”, Central Eurasia Studies, Vol. 3, No. 5, pp. 23-40 [in Persian].
  3. Bilgin, Mert (2010), “Turkey’s Energy Strategy: What Deference does it Make to Become an Energy Transit Corridor, Hub or Center?”, UNISCI Discussion Papers, No. 23, pp. 20-40.
  4. Bilgin, Pinar and Ali Bilgiç (2011), “Turkey’s “New” Foreign Policy toward Eurasia”, Eurasian Geography and Economics, Vol. 52, No. 2, pp. 173-195.
  5. Borzel, Tanja A. and Thomas Risse (2007), “Theorizing Regionalism: Cooperation, Integration and Governance”, Handbook of Comparative Regionalism, Oxford University Press, Available at: file:///C:/Users/khavarmianeh/Downloads/B%C3%B6rzel%20Cooperation_Integration_Governance%20EUSA.pdf, (Accessed on: 21/5/2018).
  6. BP (2014), “Statistical Review of World Energy”, Available at: http://www.slideshare.net/BP_plc/bp-statistical-review-of-world-energy-2014-presentation, (Accessed on: 18/9/2014).
  7. Chegenizadeh, Gholamali and Behzad Khoshandam (2010), “Cooperation and Confrontation between Periphery and West Approach in Turkish Foreign Policy”, Foreign Relations, No. 55, pp. 189-220 [in Persian].
  8. Colantoni, Lorenzo and Others (2017), “Energy and Climate Strategies, Interests and Priorities of the EU and Turkey”, FEUTURE Online Paper, Available at: http://www.iai.it/sites/default/files/feuture_4.pdf, (Accessed on: 21/5/2018).
  9. Davutoğlu, Ahmet (2009), “Turkish Foreign Policy and the EU in 2010”, Turkish Policy Quarterly, Vol. 8, No. 3, pp. 11-17.
  10. Dailysabah (2016), “Turkey to Chair 2017 Energy Club of Shanghai Cooperation Organization”, Available at: https://www.dailysabah.com/energy/2016/11/23/turkey-to-chair-2017-energy-club-of-shanghai-cooperation-organization, (Accessed on: 13/10/2017).
    1. Dehghani Firouzabadi, Seyed Jalal(2010), “The Evolution of Regionalization’s Theories”, Central Eurasia Studies, Vol. 3, No. 1, pp. 99-116 [in Persian].
  11. Eksi, Muharrem (2010), “The Role of Energy in Turkish Foreign Policy”,The Turkish Yearbook of International Relations, Vol. 41, No. 5, pp. 59-69.
    1. Erdal, Gülistan, Hilmi Erdal and Kemal Esengün (2008), “The Causality between Energy Consumption and Economic Growth in Turkey”, Energy Policy, Vol. 36, No. 10, pp. 3838-3842.
    2. Etaat, Javad and Hamidreza Nosrati (2010), “Oil, Geo-Economy and National Security of Iran”, in: Collection of Articles of the National Conference on Oil and Foreign Policy, Tehran: Strategic Research Center [in Persian].
      1. Fink, Daniel (2006), “Assessing Turkey’s Future as an Energy Transit Country”, The Washington Institute for Near East Policy, pp. 1-8, Available at: http://www.washingtoninstitute.org/policy-analysis/view/assessing-turkeys-future-as-an-energy-transit-country, (Accessed on: 11/6/2016).
      2. Gilpin, R. (2016), The Political Economy of International Relations, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
      3. Ibragimova, Galiya (2016), “Turkey’s Plans for Central Asia now Include Russia”, Available at: http://www.russia-direct.org/analysis/turkeys-plans-central-asia-now-include-russia, (Accessed on: 19/8/2016).
      4. Kaliber, Alper (2013), “The Post-Cold War Regionalisms of Turkish Foreign Policy”, Journal of Regional Security, Vol. 8, No. 1, pp. 25-48.
    3. Naghdinejad, Hossein and Naser Pour Ebrahim (2012), “Turkey and Central Asia”, June 15, Available at: http://uzbek.irib.ir/persian, (Accessed on: 28/7/2016) [in Persian].
      1. Oil and Gas Journal (2014), Available at: http://www.ogj.com/articles/print/volume-112/issue-1.html, (Accessed on: 12/10/2016).
      2. Politikaakademisi (2015), “The Turkish Foreign Policy in Justice and Development Party Era and the “Axis Shift” Debate”, Available at: http://politikaakademisi.org/the-turkish-foreign-policy-in-justice-and-development-party-era-and-the-axis-shift-debate, (Accessed on: 12/6/2016).
      3. Republic of Turkey Ministry of Foreign Affairs (2014), Available at: http://www.mfa.gov.tr/turkeys-energy-strategy.en.mfa, (Accessed on: 13/3/2015).
      4. Republic of Turkey Ministry of Foreign Affairs (2016), Available at: http://www.mfa.gov.tr/sub.en.mfa?6bda4d8b-81a3-44d7-b8a0-5a287804f77b, (Accessed on: 21/6/2016).
    4. Rouhani, Hasan (2010), “Foreign Policy and the Future of Oil and Gas in Iran”, Foreign Relations, No. 3, pp. 7-37 [in Persian].
  12. Schröder, M. (2017), “The Discursive Construction of Turkey’s Role for European Energy Security: a Critical Geopolitical Perspective”, FEUTURE, No. 1, Available at: http://www.iai.it/sites/default/files/feuture_phd_1.pdf, (Accessed on: 4/5/2017).
    1. The OPEC Annual Statistical Bulletin (2014), Available at: http://www.opec.org/opec_web/en/publications/202.htm, (Accessed on: 3/7/2016).
    2. The World of Economics (2014), “Analysis of Turkey’s Economy”, Issue No. 3267, August 11, Available at: https://donya-e-eqtesad.com/%D8%B1%D9%88%D8%B2%D9%86%D8%A7%D9%85%D9%87-%D8%B4%D9%85%D8%A7%D8%B1%D9%87-3267, (Accessed on: 9/8/2016) [in Persian].
    3. The World of Economics (2016), “Six Challenges in Trading with Russia”, Issue No. 1050368, April 29, Available at: https://donya-e-eqtesad.com, (Accessed on: 1/7/2016) [in Persian].
      1. Turkishweekly (2015), “Russia-Turkey Tension Brings Gas Trade on Top of Agenda” (2015), Available at: http://www.turkishweekly.net/2015/10/09/news/russia-turkey-tension-brings-gas-trade-on-top-of-agenda, (Accessed on: 13/9/2016).
      2. U.S. Energy Information Administration (2014), Available at: http://www.eia.gov/countries/country-data.cfm?fips=TU, (Accessed on: 17/7/2016).
      3. U.S. Energy Information Administration (2016), “International Energy Statistics”, Available at: http://www.eia.gov/cfapps/ipdbproject/IEDIndex3.cfm, (Accessed on: 14/3/2016).
      4. Trend News Agency (2017), “Minister: TANAP to Strengthen Turkey’s Energy Role in Region”, Available at: http://en.trend.az/world/2758118.html, (Accessed on: 23/5/2017).
آمار
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 750
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 506


سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. قدرت گرفته از سیناوب