The Problem of Generality of “object in general”: A Consideration on The idea of a transcendental logic | ||
| فلسفه | ||
| Article 6, Volume 15, Issue 2 - Serial Number 29, November 2018, Pages 105-128 PDF (599.85 K) | ||
| Document Type: Scientific-research | ||
| DOI: 10.22059/jop.2018.249252.1006326 | ||
| Authors | ||
| majid moradi* 1; Seyyed Hamid Talebzadeh2 | ||
| 1theran | ||
| 2Associate Professor,University of Tehran | ||
| Abstract | ||
| Abstract: Here, I will introduce a totality of a view about “the concept of an object in general” in the Critique of Pure Reason. In order to do so, I will articulate an article under the title of Generality of Kant’s transcendental logic since the article has presented the view adequately and in an uninterrupted way. Alongside with this articulation, I will purpose a consideration about this totality: As we will see, the fundamental characteristic of the totality of this view is to concentrate on determining the status of “transcendental logic sensu stricto” as (1) a necessarily “non-formal logic” that (2) still stays “universal”. Thus, transcendental logic can be proposed as a transcendental “universal ontology” which its subject matter is “the concept of an object in general”. based on this view, in order to set these two conditions, we must abstract transcendental logic from any relation to any level of “transcendental aesthetics in general” and “intuition in general”. The hint to this abstraction is the principle that “transcendental logic sensu stricto” can only be achieved at the level of “reason in general” and any reference to the level of “critique” of “reason in general” would already dysfunction the transcendental logic itself. Through a consideration, I will attempt to discuss this subject that to what extent the abovementioned view, with its omitting of the level of “critique of pure reason” from transcendental logic, stays loyal to “the idea of a transcendental logic” in Critique of Pure Reason. | ||
| Keywords | ||
| transcendental logic; generality; Ontology; critique of pure reason | ||
| References | ||
|
کانت، ایمانوئل (1390)، سنجش خرد ناب، ترجمۀ میرشمسالدین ادیبسلطانی، چاپ چهارم، تهران: امیرکبیر. Husserl, Edmund (1982). Cartesian Meditations: An Introduction to Phenomenology, translated by Dorian Cairns, seventh impression, The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff. ــــــــــــــــــــــــ (1983). Ideas pertaining to a Pure Phenomenology and to a Phenomenological Philosophy: General Introduction to a Pure Phenomenology (First Book), translated by Fred Kersten, Dordrecht: Kluwer. Kant, Immanuel (1938). Kant's gesammelte Schriften, Herausgegeben von der Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften Vols. 21. Walter de Gruyter & Co, Berlin und Leipzig. ـــــــــــــــــــــ (1998). Critique of Pure Reason, translated and edited by Paul Guyer and Allen Wood, Cambridge University Press. Tolly, C. 2011. Kant on the Generality of Logic. forthcoming, Proceedings of the 11th International Kant Kongress. Berlin: de Gruyter. ــــــــــــــــــــ (2012). The Generality of Kant’s Transcendental Logic. Journal of the History of Philosophy 50:417-446. ــــــــــــــــــــ (2013). The non-conceptuality of the content of intuitions: a new approach. Kantian Review 18: 107-136.
| ||
|
Statistics Article View: 879 PDF Download: 586 |
||