تعداد نشریات | 161 |
تعداد شمارهها | 6,532 |
تعداد مقالات | 70,502 |
تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 124,118,071 |
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 97,223,886 |
اثر تغییر کاربری مرتع به جنگلکاری بر ذخایرکربن آلی و برخی خصوصیات خاک (مطالعۀ موردی: جنگلکاری حسنآباد سنندج) | ||
نشریه علمی - پژوهشی مرتع و آبخیزداری | ||
مقاله 13، دوره 71، شماره 3، آذر 1397، صفحه 747-758 اصل مقاله (678.54 K) | ||
نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22059/jrwm.2018.106763.757 | ||
نویسندگان | ||
نسیبه قنبری1؛ حسین آذرنیوند* 2؛ حامد جنیدی جعفری3؛ محمد جعفری4 | ||
1دانشجوی کارشناسی ارشد مرتعداری، دانشکدۀ منابع طبیعی، دانشگاه تهران، کرج، ایران. | ||
2استاد دانشکدۀ منابع طبیعی، دانشگاه تهران، کرج، ایران | ||
3استادیار دانشکدۀ منابع طبیعی، دانشگاه کردستان، سنندج، ایران. | ||
4استاد دانشکدۀ منابع طبیعی، دانشگاه تهران، کرج، ایران. | ||
چکیده | ||
پژوهش حاضر بهمنظور بررسی اثر تغییر کاربری مرتع به جنگلکاری بر میزان ترسیب کربن و ذخیرۀ ازت در منطقۀ جنگلکاری شدۀ حسنآباد در شهرستان سنندج صورت گرفت. تودههای مورد مطالعه شامل سرونقرهای، کاج تهران، زبانگنجشک، اقاقیا و سروخمرهای با متوسط سن 20 سال و مرتع مجاور که در آن تغییر کاربری ایجاد نشده و از لحاظ شرایط فیزیوگرافی و اقلیمی مشابه بودند به عنوان شاهد انتخاب شد. نمونهبرداری از خاک در تودههای جنگلکاری شده و شاهد انجام شد و خصوصیات کربن آلی، ازت، فسفر، پتاسیم، وزن مخصوص ظاهری، اسیدیته، هدایت الکتریکی، درصد رس، سیلت و ماسه اندازهگیری شد. جهت مقایسۀ اثر اجرای عملیات جنگلکاری با شاهد بر خصوصیات خاک از آزمون t مستقل و به منظور مقایسۀ اثر گونههای مختلف جنگلکاری شده بر خصوصیات خاک از تجزیۀ واریانس یکطرفه و جهت مقایسۀ میانگینها از آزمون دانکن استفاده گردید. نتایج نشان داد که گونۀ اقاقیا تأثیر قابل توجهی در افزایش کمی کربن و ازت ترسیب شده و مقدار فسفر و پتاسیم خاک داشت و در مجموع در تودۀ اقاقیا مقدار کربن ترسیب شده و ازت ذخیره شده در خاک 62/80 و 42/5 و در تیمار شاهد 05/47 و 08/3 تن در هکتار محاسبه شد. تیمار اقاقیا باعث افزایش مقدار کربن و ازت خاک به مقدار 71 و 75 درصد شد و کمترین مقدار کربن و ازت در خاک توده سرو نقرهای بدست آمد. نتیجۀ رگرسیون گامبهگام نشان داد که نیتروژن، فسفر و پتاسیم بهترتیب از مهمترین اجزای تأثیر گذار بر مقدار کربن ترسیب شده در خاک در تودههای بررسی شده است. | ||
کلیدواژهها | ||
تغییر کاربری؛ عملیات اصلاحی؛ جنگلکاری؛ ترسیب کربن؛ ذخیرۀ ازت | ||
عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
Effect of converting rangeland to afforestation on carbon sequestration and some properties of soil (Case study: Hassan Abad afforestation, Sanandaj) | ||
نویسندگان [English] | ||
nasibe ghanbari1؛ hossein azarnivand2؛ hamed joneidi jafari3؛ mohammad jafari4 | ||
چکیده [English] | ||
This study aimed to effect of converting rangeland to afforestation on carbon and nitrogen storage was done in forested areas of Hassan Abad in Sanandaj. Masses of studied was include Cupressus arizonica, Pinus eldarica, Fraxinus rotundifolia, Robinia psedoacacia and Thuja orientalis whit an average age of 20 years and adjacent rangeland that converting was not created was selected as control. Sampling of soil was done in afforestation mass and control and characteristics of organic carbon, nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium, bulk density, pH, electrical conductivity, percent clay, silt and sand was measured. To compare the effect of forestry corrective operations on carbon sequestration was used independent t-test analysis and to compare the effects of different types of afforestation on soil carbon and nitrogen sequestration rates was used one-way ANOVA. Results shows that Robinia psedoacacia have a significant effect on increase of carbon and nitrogen sequestered and amount of phosphorus and potassium in soil and in total in Robinia psedoacacia mass amount of cabon sequestered and nitrogen stored in soil was calculated 80.62 and 5.42 ton/ha and in control 47.05 and 3.08 ton/ha and Robinia psedoacacia mass cause to increase of soil carbon and nitrogen amount of 71 and 75 percent and lowest amount of carbon and nitrogen was obtained in soil of Cupressus arizonica mass. Stepwise regression results showed that nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium, respectively are most important components affecting in soil of investigated mass. | ||
کلیدواژهها [English] | ||
converting, corrective operations, afforestation, Carbon sequestration, nitrogen storage | ||
مراجع | ||
[1] Abdi, N. (2005). Estimation of carbon sequestration capacity by Astragalus genus (sub genus Tragacantha) in Markazi and Isfahan provinces. Ph.D Thesis Azad University Islamic. Science and Research, 198 p. [2] Ajiboye, G.A., and Ogunwale, J.A. (2008). Potassium distribution in the sand, silt and clay separates of soils developed over talc at Ejiba, Koji State, Nigeria. World Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 4(6), 709-716. [3] Aliarab, A., Hosseini, S.M., Jalali, S.GH. (2005). Effects of species of Acer insigne, Robinia pseudoacacia, Populuseuramericana and Cupressus sempervirens on some physicochemical properties of soils in forestry Haraz East. Journal of Soil and Water Sciences. Vol. 19 (1): 96-106. [4] Ardakani, M.R., Rezvani, M. and Zaafaranian, F., 2007. Analysis methods in plant ecology. Tehran University publisher, 252 p. [5] Azarnivand,H., Joneidi Jafari,H., Zare Chahouki,M.A., Maddah Aref, H.and Nikoo.S.(2011). Investigation of the effects of some ecological factors on carbon sequestration in Artemisia sieberi rangelands of Semnan province Journal of Range and Watershed Management, 1, 64(1) : 127-107.pp. [6] Bakhshipour, R. (1993). Formation, evolution, classification, and mineralogy of Lahijan soils. Master’s thesis of soil, University of Isfahan, 115 p. [7] Bakhtiyarvand Bakhtiyari, S., Sohrabi, H. and Babaei Khorzoghi, M. (2011). Potential carbon storage of Pinus eldarica in afforestation around industrial areas. Fifth expertise conference on Environmental Engineering. Tehran. University of Tehran, Faculty of the environment. [8] Brown, S. and Lugo, A.E. (1990). Effects of forest clearing and succession on the carbon and nitrogen content of soils in Puerto Rico and US Virgin Islands. Journal of Plant and Soil, 124, 5364. [9] Cannel, M.G.R. and Milne, G. (1997). Carbon pools and sequestration in forest ecosystems in Britain. Journal of Forestry. 23-44: 361-378. [10] Cheng, C.M, Wang, R.S. and Jiang, J.S. (2007). Variation of soil fertility and carbon sequestration by planting Hevea brasiliensis in Hainan Island, China. Journal ofEnvironmental Sciences, 19 (3): 348-352. [11] Clary W.P. (1995). Vegetation and soil responses to grazing simulation on riparian meadows. Journal of Range manage, 48:18-25. [12] Dalal, R.C. and Mayer, R.J. (1986). Longterm trends in fertility of soils under continuous cultivation and cereal cropping in southern Queensland, I: overall changes in soil properties and trends in winter cereal yields. Australian Journal of Soil Research, 24, 265-279. [13] Farley, K.A., and Kelly, E.F. (2004). Effects of afforestation of Paramo grassland on soil nutrient status. Journal of Forest Ecology and Management, 195: 281-290. [14] Follett, R.F and Reed, D.A. (2010). Soil carbon sequestration in grazing lands: societal benefits and policy implications. Journal of Rangeland Ecology and Management, 63: 4-15. [15] Ghazanshahi, J. (1998). Soil and its relation to agriculture. Carno Publication, 266 p. [16] Haghdoost, N., Akbarinia, M., Hosseini, M. and Varamesh, S. (2012). Effect of replacing destroyed forests north with afforestation on fertility and soil carbon sequestration. Journal of Environmental Studies, 3: 135-146. [17] Hoover, C.M. (2003). Soil carbon sequestration and forest management: challenges and opportunities. In: Kimble, J.M., L. S. Heath, R.A. Birdsey & R. Lal, (Eds.), The potential of U.S. forest soils to sequester carbon and mitigate the greenhouse effect.CRC Press. Boca Raton, FL: 211-238. [18] Hosseinzadeh. G., Jalillvand, H. and Tamartash, R. (2007). Changes in vegetation cover and some of the chemical characteristics of soil in rangelands with different grazing intensities. Iranian Journal of Range and Desert Research, 14 (4): 500-512. [19] Jafari Haghighi, M. (2003). Methods of soil analyze- physical and chemical sampling and analysis, published by Nedaye Zoha, 236 p. [20] Joneidi Jafari, H., Azarnivand, H., Zare Chahouki, M.and Jafari, M.(2013). Effects of contour furrow on carbon sequestration and nitrogen fixation in Artemisia sieberi rangelands of Semnan province, Iranian Journal of Range and Desert Reseach, 24 (2):298-308. [21] Jongmans, A.G., Pulleman, M.M., Balabane, M., Oort F. and Marinissen, J.C.Y. (2003). Soil structure and characteristics of organic matter in two orchards differing in earthworm activity. Journal of Applied Soil Ecology, 24: 219-232. [22] Jug, A., Makeschin, F., Rehfuess, K.E., and Hofmann-Schielle, C. (1999). Short-rotation plantations of balsam poplars, aspen and willows on former arable land in the Federal Republic of Germany. III. Soil ecological effects. For. Ecol. Man.121: 85-99. [23] Lal, R., 2004. Soil carbon sequestration to mitigate climate change. Journal of Geoderma, 123: 1-22. [24] Lorenz, K., Lal, R. and Shipitalo, M.J. (2008). Chemical stabilization of organic carbon pools in particle size fractions in no-till and meadow soils. Journal of Biology and Fertility of Soils, 44: 1043-1051. [25] Majd Taheri, H. and Jalili, A. (1996). Comparative study effects of afforestation with Pinus eldarica and Robinia pseudoacacia on some physical and chemical properties of soil and Understory vegetation (Case study:forest park of Cheetgar). Journal of Pajouhesh Va Sazandgi, 32: 6-16. [26] Mishra, A., Sharma, S.D. and Khan, G.H. (2003). Improvement in physical and chemical properties of sodic soil by 3, 6 and 9 years old plantation of Eucalyptus tereticornis. Journal of Forest Ecology and Management, Article in Press. [27] Neff, J.C. (2002). Variable effects of nitrogen additions on the stability and turnover of soil carbon, Nature, 419, 915917. [28] Ovington, J.D. (1953). Studies of the development of woodland conditions under different trees.I. Soils PH. Journal ofEcology, 4: 13-34. [29] Parfitt, R.L., Percival, H.J., Dahlgren R.A., and Hill, L.F., 1997. Soil solution chemistry under pasture and radiate pine in New Zealand. Journal of Plant and Soil, 191: 279-290. [30] Paul, K., Polglase, I., Nyakuengama, J.G. and Khanna, P.K. (2002). Change in soil carbon following afforestation. Journal of Forest Ecology and Management, 168: 241-257. [31] Rahimisoreh, S. and Sadeghi, H. (2005). Calculation and analysis of factors affecting in performance entrusted range management designs (Rangelands privatization). Journal of Agricultural Economic and Development, 31-65. [32] Rees, R.M., Bingham, I.J., Baddeley, J.A. and Watson, C.A. (2005). The role of plants and land management in sequestering soil carbon in temperate arable and grassland ecosystems. Soil Science Society of American Journal, 56: 125-132. [33] Richards, A.E., Dalal, R.C. and Schmidt, S. (2007). Soil carbon turnover and sequestration in native subtropical tree plantations. Journal of Soil Biology & Biochemistry. 39: 2078–2090. [34] Richter, D.D. and Markewitz, D. (1994). Soil chemical change during three decades in an old-field loblolly pine (pinus taeda L.) ecosystem. Journal of Ecology, 75(5): 1463-1473. [35] Rustad, L.E. (1994). Element dynamics along a decay continuum in a red spruce ecosystem in Maine, USA., Journal of Ecology, 75: 867-879. [36] Safaiyan, R., Azarnivand, H., Jafari, M. and Azadi, S. (2008). Role of environmental factors in strategy of sustainable utilization from Prangos plantation with emphasis on soil and topography factors (Case study: Prangos plantation of northern Fars province). Journal of Rangeland, 3 (2): 190-202. [37] Salehi, A., Mohammadi, A. and Safari, A. (2011). Investigation and comparison of physical and chemical soil properties and quantitative characteristics of trees in less-damaged and damaged area of Zagross forests (Case study: Poldokhtar, Lorestan province). Iranian Journal of Forest, 3 (1):81-89. [38] Schulp Catharina J. E., Naburus, G.J., Verburg, P.H. and Waal, R.W. (2008). Effect of tree Species on Carbon Stock in forest floor and mineral soil and implication for soil carbon inventories. Journal of Forest Ecology and Management, 256: 482-490. [39] Shabanian, N., Heydari, M., and Zeinivand, M. (2010). Effect of afforestation with conifers and broad leaf species to herbaceous diversity and some physico-chemical properties of soil (case study: Dushn afforestation, sanandaj). Iranian Journal of Forest and Poplar Research. 18 (3), 437-446. [40] Singh, G., Bala, N., Chaudhuri, K.K. and Meena, R.L. (2003). Carbon sequestration potential of common access resources in arid and semi-arid regions of northwestern India. Journal of Indian Forester, 129 (7), 859-864. [41] Singh, Y.P., Singh, G. and Sharma, D.K. (2010). Biomass and bio-energy production of tenmultipurpose tree species planted in sodic soils of indo-gangetic plains. Journal of Forestry Research, 21(1): 19-24. [42] Sparks, D.L., and Huang, P.M. (1985). Physical chemistry of soil potassium. P201-276, In: Munson, R. (ed.), Potassium in Agriculture. ASA-CSSA-SSSA. Madison, Wi. USA. [43] UNDP (2000). Carbon sequestration in the desertified rangelands of Hossein Abad, through community based management, Program coordination, 17. [44] Varamesh, S., Hoseini, M., Abdi, N., and Akbarnia, M. (2010). Increment of soil carbon sequestration due to forestation and its relation with some physical and chemical factors of soil. Iranian Journal of Forest, 2 (1), 25-35. [45] Wang, Q.K., Wang, S.L. and Huang Y. (2008). Comparisons of litterfall, litter decomposition and nutrient return in a monoculture Cunninghamia lanceolata and a mixed stand in southern China. Journal of Forest Ecology and Management, 255, 1210-1218. [46] Xiao-Wen, D. Shi-Jie, H. Yan-ling and Yumei, ZH. (2009). Carbon and Nitrogen Transformations in Surface Soils under Ermans Birch and Dark Coniferous Forests. Journal of Pedosphere, 19(2): 230-237. [47] Zhang, K., Dang, H., Tan, S., Wang, Z., and Zhang, Q. (2010). Vegetation community and soil characteristics of abandoned agricultural land and pine plantation in the Qinling Mountains, China. Journal of Forest Ecology and Management. 259: 2036–2047. [48] Zhao, Q., Zeng, D.H., Lee, D.K., He, X.Y., Fan, Z.P. and Jin, Y.H. (2007). Effects of Pinus sylvestries Var. Mongolica on Soil Phosphorous status of the Kerrqin sandy lands in China. Journal of Arid Environments, 69: 568-582. | ||
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 439 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 276 |