تعداد نشریات | 161 |
تعداد شمارهها | 6,529 |
تعداد مقالات | 70,457 |
تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 124,016,388 |
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 97,129,874 |
تأثیر آموزش تعامل-محور مکالمهکاوی بر توانش تعاملی زبان آموزان ایرانی در تکالیف زوج-گفتار | ||
پژوهشهای زبانشناختی در زبانهای خارجی | ||
مقاله 4، دوره 8، شماره 2، دی 1397، صفحه 413-448 اصل مقاله (404.39 K) | ||
نوع مقاله: علمی پژوهشی(عادی) | ||
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22059/jflr.2018.245132.420 | ||
نویسندگان | ||
میلاد رمضانی1؛ بیوک بهنام* 2؛ سعیده آهنگری3 | ||
1دانشجوی دکترای آموزش زبان انگلیسی واحد تبریز، دانشکده زبان و ادبیات، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تبریز، ایران | ||
2دانشیار گروه آموزش زبان انگلیسی واحد تبریز، دانشکده زبان و ادبیات، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تبریز، ایران | ||
3گروه انگلیسی دانشگاه آزاد تبریز | ||
چکیده | ||
تعامل نهتنها دریادگیری زبان بشر عاملی بنیادین محسوب میشود، بلکه درزندگیاجتماعی وی نیز عنصری اساسی است. با توجه بهاهمیت بررسی تعامل درزباندوم که محوریت اجتماعی دارد، هدف پژوهش حاضر بررسی تأثیرآموزش تعامل-محور (مبتنی بر مکالمهکاوی) بر توانشتعاملی درتکالیف زوج-گفتار بوده است که بدین منظور 124 زبانآموز سطح متوسط بر اساس نمرات آنها، در آزمون تعیین سطح تافل، در دو گروه آزمایش و کنترل قرارگرفتند. گروهآزمایش علاوه بر منابع اصلی خود، مکالمات برگزیده از کتاب فراترازگفتار را طبق چرخه آموزشی فیلیپی و روهان (2015) فراگرفتند درحالیکه گروه کنترل تنها در معرض یادگیری منابع اصلی خود بودند. توانش تعاملی آنها در 4 تکلیف مختلف زوج-گفتار بهوسیلة مقیاس سنجش توانش-تعاملی ونگ (2015) مورد سنجش قرارگرفت. نتایج برآمده از تحلیل کواریانس موید موفقیت گروه آزمایش نسبت بهگروه کنترل بود. بنابراین شایسته است که معلمان با اتخاذ این رویکرد آموزشی، فرصتهایی دراختیار زبانآموزان قرار دهند تا آنها بتوانند بهشکل معناداری مفاهیماصلی مکالمه را در زبانگفتار همسازی نمایند. این تعامل میتواند منجر بههوشیاری بیشتر در مهارت گفتاری و نیز طبیعیتر بهنظر رسیدن مکالمات روزمرة آنها شود. | ||
کلیدواژهها | ||
آموزش تعامل-محور؛ مکالمهکاوی؛ توانش تعاملی؛ تکالیف زوج-گفتار؛ همسازی | ||
عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
The Effect of CA-oriented Interaction-Focused Pedagogy on Iranian EFL learners’ Interactional Competence in Paired-Speaking Tasks | ||
نویسندگان [English] | ||
Milad Ramazani1؛ Biook Behnam2؛ Saeideh Ahangari3 | ||
1Department of English, Tabriz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tabriz, Iran | ||
2Associate Professor, Department of English, Tabriz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tabriz, Iran | ||
3English Department, Tabriz Branch, Islamic Azad University | ||
چکیده [English] | ||
Interaction is fundamental not only in human’s language learning process but also in his social life. Due to the significance of L2 interactions which are socially oriented, the current study attempts to investigate the effect of interaction-focused pedagogy based on conversation analysis on interactional competence of Iranian EFL learners. 124 Iranian intermediate EFL learners were placed in treatment and control groups based on their TOEFL iBT scores. The selected dialogues of the book ‘Beyond Talk’ were taught to the treatment group according to the principles of conversation analysis using the pedagogy wheel by Filipi and Barraja-Rohan (2015) while the control group were only taught by their main materials. Their interactional competence were assessed by Wang’s (2015) rating scale in pretest and posttest. After running MANCOVA, the results revealed the outperformance of the treatment group. Therefore, it is suggested that interaction-focused pedagogy can provide opportunities for co-construction of meaning in conversation and meaningful interaction. This interaction can lead to an awareness in speaking and authenticity in conversation. | ||
کلیدواژهها [English] | ||
interaction-focused pedagogy, conversation analysis, interactional competence, paired-speaking tasks, co-construction | ||
مراجع | ||
Bachman, L. F. (1990). Fundamental considerations in language testing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bachman, L. F. (2002). Some reflections on task-based language performance assessment. Language Testing, 19(4), 453–476.
Bachman, L. F. (2005). Statistical Analysis for Language Assessment. (2nd ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Bachman, L. F., & Palmer, A. (2010). Language assessment in practice: Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bachman, L. F., & Palmer, A. S. (1996). Language testing in practice: Designing and developing useful language tests. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Barraja-Rohan, A. M. (2011). Using conversation analysis in the second language classroom to teach interactional competence. Language Teaching Research, 15(4), 479–507.
Brooks, L. (2009). Interacting in pairs in a test of oral proficiency: Co-constructing a better performance. Language Testing, 26(3), 341–366.
Brouwer, C. E. (2012). Conversation Analysis Methodology in Second Language Studies. In C. Chapelle (Ed.), The encyclopedia of applied linguistics. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
Button, G., & Lee, J. R. (Eds.). (1987). Talk and social organization (Vol. 1). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
Canale, M. (1983). From communicative competence to communicative language pedagogy. In J. C. Richards, & R.W. Schmidt (Eds.), Language and communication, 1(1), 1–47. London: Routledge.
Canale, M., & Swain, M. (1980). Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing. Applied Linguistics, 1, 1-47.
Carroll, D. (2000). Precision timing in novice-to-novice L2 conversations. Issues in Applied Linguistics, 11, 67-110.
Carroll, D. (2005). Vowel-marking as an interactional resource in Japanese novice ESL conversation. In K. Richards, & P. Seedhouse (Eds.), Applying conversation analysis (pp. 214–234). London: Palgrave McMillan.
Davis, L. (2009). The influence of interlocutor proficiency in a paired oral assessment. Language Testing, 26(3), 367–396.
Doehler, S. P. & Ziegler, G. (2007). Doing language, doing science and the sequential organization of the immersion class. In Z. Hua, P. Seedhouse, L. Wei, & V. Cook (Eds.), Language learning and teaching as social inter-action (pp. 72–86). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Doehler, S. P. (2010). Conceptual changes and methodological challenges: On language and learning from a conversation analytic perspective on SLA. In P. Seedhouse, & S. Walsh, & C. Jenks, (Eds.), Conceptualizing ‘learning’ in applied linguistics (pp. 105–126). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Doehler, S. P., & Pochon-Berger, E. (2011). Developing “methods” for interaction: a cross-sectional study of disagreement sequences in French L2. In J. K. Hall, J. Hellerman & S. P. Doehler (Eds.), L2 Interactional Competence and Development (pp. 206–243). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
Doehler, S. P. (2012). Conversation Analysis and Second Language Acquisition: CA‐SLA. In C. A. Chapelle (Ed.), The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
Doehler, S. P. (2013). Social-interactional approaches to SLA: A state of the art and some future perspectives. Language, Interaction and Acquisition, 4(2), 134–160.
Donato, R. (1994). Collective scaffolding in second language learning. In J. P. Lantolf, & G. Appel (Eds.), Vygotskian approaches to second language research (pp. 33-58). Westport, Connecticut, US: Greenwood Publishing Group.
Ducasse, A. M., & Brown, A. (2009). Assessing paired orals: Raters' orientation to interaction. Language Testing, 26(3), 423–443.
Ducasse, A. M. (2010). Interaction in paired oral proficiency assessment in Spanish: Rater and candidate input into evidence based scale development and construct definition. Bern, Switzerland: Peter Lang.
Ducasse, A. M., & Brown, A. (2009). Assessing paired orals: Raters' orientation to interaction. Language Testing, 26(3), 423–443.
Ellis, R. (2003). Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ellis, R., & Fotos, S. (1999). Learning a second language through interaction (Vol. 17). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins Publishing.
Filed, A. (2013). Discovering Statistics Using IBM SPSS, Statistics for Statistics. London: SAGE Publications.
Filipi, A., & Barraja-Rohan, A. M. (2015). An interaction-focused pedagogy based on conversation analysis for developing pragmatic competence. In S. Gesuato, & F. Bianchi, & W. Cheng (Eds.), Teaching, Learning and Investigating Pragmatics: Principles, Methods and Practices (pp. 231-251). Newcastle, UK: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Firth, A. (2009). The lingua franca factor. In I. Kecskes, (Ed.), Intercultural pragmatics 6(2), (pp. 147-170). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Galaczi, E. D. (2004). Peer-peer interaction in a paired speaking test: The case of the First Certificate in English. Unpublished PhD dissertation, Teachers College, Columbia University, New York.
Galaczi, E. D. (2008). Peer–peer interaction in a speaking test: The case of the First Certificate in English examination. Language Assessment Quarterly, 5(2), 89–119.
Galaczi, E. D. (2013). Interactional competence across proficiency levels: How do learners manage interaction in paired speaking tests? Applied Linguistics, 35(5), 553–574.
Gan, Z. (2010). Interaction in group oral assessment: A case study of higher-and lower-scoring students. Language Testing Journal, 27(4), 585–602.
Gardner, R. (2007). ‘Broken’Starts: Bricolage in Turn Starts in Second Language Talk. In Z. Hua, P. Seedhouse, V. Cook, & L. Wei (Eds.), Language learning and teaching as social inter-action (pp. 58–71). Newcastle: Springer.
Gardner, R. (2007). The Right connections: Acknowledging epistemic progression in talk. Language in Society, 36(03), 319–341.
Gardner, R., & Wagner, J. (2005). Second language conversations. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.
Golato, A. (2005). Compliments and compliment responses: Grammatical structure and sequential organization (Vol. 15). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Hall, J. K. (1993). The Role of Oral Practices in the Accomplishment of Our Everyday Lives: The Sociocultural Dimension of Interaction with Implications for the Learning of Another Language. Applied Linguistics, 14(2), 145–166.
Hall, J. K. (1995). “Aw, man, where you goin'?'': Classroom Interaction and the Development of L2 Interactional Competence. Issues in Applied Linguistics, 6(2), 37-62.
Hall, J. K. (1997). A consideration of SLA as a theory of practice: A response to Firth and Wagner. The Modern Language Journal, 81(3), 301–306.
Hall, J. K. (2007). Redressing the roles of correction and repair in research on second and foreign language teaching. Modern Language Journal, 91 (4), 511-526.
Hall, J. K., Hellermann, J., & Doehler, S. P. (2011). L2 interactional competence and development. Second language acquisition: Vol. 56. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
Hall, J. K., & Pekarek Doehler, S. (2011). L2 Interactional Competence and Development. In J. K. Hall & S. Pekarek Doehler (Eds.), L2 interactional competence and development (pp. 1–15). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
He, A. W. (2004). CA for SLA: Arguments from the Chinese language classroom. The Modern Language Journal, 88(4), 568–582.
He, A. W., & Young, R. (1998). Language proficiency interviews: A discourse approach. In A. He & R. Young (Eds.), Talking and testing: Discourse approaches to the assessment of oral proficiency, 14, 1–24. Amesterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing.
Hellermann, J. (2006). Classroom interactive practices for developing L2 literacy: A micro-ethnographic study of two beginning adult learners of English. Applied Linguistics, 27(3), 377–404.
Hellermann, J. (2007). The development of practices for action in classroom dyadic interaction: Focus on task openings. The Modern Language Journal, 91(1), 83–96.
Hellermann, J. (2008). Social actions for classroom language learning. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
Hellermann, J. (2009). Looking for evidence of language learning in practices for repair: A case study of self‐initiated self‐repair by an adult learner of English. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 53(2), 113–132.
Hellermann, J., Cole, K., & Zuengler, J. (2001). Developing thinking communities through talk: Two case studies from science classes: National Research Center on English Learning & Achievement, University at Albany, State University of New York.
Hellermann, J., & Doehler, S. P. (2010). On the contingent nature of language‐learning tasks. Classroom Discourse, 1(1), 25–45.
Hutchby, I., & Wooffitt, R. (2008). Conversation analysis. Cambridge, England: Polity.
Huth, T., & Taleghani-Nikazm, C. (2006). How can insights from conversation analysis be directly applied to teaching L2 pragmatics? Language Teaching Research, 10(1), 53–79.
Kasper, G. (2008). Discourse and socially shared cognition. In S. May & N. H. Hornberger, (Eds.), Encyclopedia of language and education (pp. 1824–1842). London: Springer.
Kasper, G. (2009). Categories, context, and comparison in conversation analysis. In H. Nguyen & G. Kasper (Eds.), Talk-in-interaction: Multilingual perspectives, (pp. 1–28). Honolulu, Hawaii: National Foreign Language Resource Center-University of Hawaii.
Kasper, G., & Kim, Y. (2007). Handling sequentially inapposite responses. In Z. Hua, & P. Seedhouse, & L. Wei, & V. Cook (Eds.), Language learning and teaching as social inter-action (pp. 22-41). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Kasper, G., & Wagner, J. (2011). A conversation-analytic approach to second language acquisition. In D. Atkinson (Ed.), Alternative approaches to second language acquisition, (pp. 117–142). London, New York: Routledge
Kurhila, S. (2001). Correction in talk between native and non-native speaker. Journal of Pragmatics, 33(7), 1083–1110.
Kurhila, S. (2006). Second language interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.
Lazaraton, A. (2001). Teaching oral skills. In M. Celce-Murcia (Ed.) Teaching English as a second or foreign language, 3, (pp. ) 103–115. Boston, MA: Heinle & Heinle.
Markee, N. (2000). Conversation analysis. London: Routledge.
Markee, N. (2004). Zones of interactional transition in ESL classes. The Modern Language Journal, 88(4), 583–596.
Markee, N. (2007). Conversation analysis: Issues and problems. In J., Cummins, & C. Davison, (Eds.), International handbook of English language teaching (Vol. 15), (PP. 1017–1032). New York: Springer Science & Business Media.
Markee, N. (2008). Toward a learning behavior tracking methodology for CA-for-SLA. Applied Linguistics, 29(3), 404–427.
Markee, N., & Seo, M.-S. (2009). Learning talk analysis. IRAL-International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 47(1), 37–63.
May, L. (2009). Co-constructed interaction in a paired speaking test: The rater's perspective. Language Testing, 26(3), 397–421.
May, L. (2011). Interactional competence in a paired speaking test: Features salient to raters. Language Assessment Quarterly, 8(2), 127–145.
May, T. (2011). Social research. Berkshire: Open University Press.
Mondada, L., & Doehler, S. P. (2004). Second language acquisition as situated practice: Task accomplishment in the French second language classroom. The Modern Language Journal, 88(4), 501–518.
Mori, J. (2003). The construction of interculturality: A study of initial encounters between Japanese and American students. Research on language and social interaction Journal, 36(2), 143–184.
Mori, J. (2007). Border crossings? Exploring the intersection of second language acquisition, conversation analysis, and foreign language pedagogy. The Modern Language Journal, 91(s1), 849–862.
Mori, J., & Hasegawa, A. (2009). Doing being a foreign language learner in a classroom: Embodiment of cognitive states as social events. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 47(1), 65–94.
Mori, J., & Hayashi, M. (2006). The achievement of intersubjectivity through embodied completions: A study of interactions between first and second language speakers. Applied Linguistics, 27(2), 195–219.
Mori, J., & Markee, N. (2009). Language learning, cognition, and interactional practices: An introduction. IRAL-International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 47(1), 1–9.
Mori, Y. (2003). The roles of context and word morphology in learning new kanji words. The Modern Language Journal, 87(3), 404–420.
O'Grady, W. (2001). A Linguistic Approach to the Study of Language Acquisition. Journal of Pan-Pacific Association of Applied Linguistics, 5(1), 57–71.
Olsher, A. D. (2003). Collaborative group work in second and foreign language classrooms: Talk, embodiment, and sequential organization (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of California, Los Angeles, US.
Packett, A. (2005). Teaching patterns of interaction in English for specific purposes. In K. Richards, & P. Seedhouse (Eds.), Applying conversation analysis (pp. 235-250). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Pallant, J. (2016). SPSS Survival Manual. (6th ed.). Australia: Allen & Unwin.
Richards, K. & Seedhouse, P. (Eds.). (2005). Applying conversation analysis. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Rose, K. R. (2005). On the effects of instruction in second language pragmatics. System, 33(3), 385–399.
Roth, E. H., & Aberson, T. (2010). Compelling conversations: questions and quotations on timeless topics: an engaging ESL textbook for advanced students. Charleston: Chimayo Press.
Schegloff, A.E., Ochs, E., & Thompson, S.A. (1996). Introduction. In E. Ochs, & A.E. Schegloff, & S.A. Thompson (Eds.), Interaction and grammar (pp. 1–51). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Seedhouse, P. (2004). Conversation analysis methodology. Language Learning, 54(S1), 1–54.
Seedhouse, P. (2005). Conversation analysis and language learning. Language Teaching, 38(4), 165–187.
Tabachnick, B.G. & Fidell, L.S. (2013). Using Multivariate Statistics. (6th ed.). Boston: Pearson Inc.
Wang, L. (2015). Assessing interactional competence in second language paired speaking tasks (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Northern Arizona University, North Arizona, United States.
Wagner, J. & Gardner, R. (Eds.). (2004). Second language conversations. New York: Continuum.
Wong, J., & Waring, H. Z. (2010). Conversation analysis and second language pedagogy: A guide for ESL/EFL teachers. New York: Routledge.
Young, R. (1999). Sociolinguistic approaches to SLA. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 19, 105–132.
Young, R. F. (2008). Language and interaction. London: Routledge.
Young, R. F. (2013). Interactional Competence in Language Learning, Teaching, and Testing. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of Research in Second Language Teaching and Learning. New York: Routledge.
Young, R. F., & Miller, E. R. (2004). Learning as changing participation: Discourse roles in ESL writing conferences. The Modern Language Journal, 88(4), 519–535. | ||
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 1,070 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 527 |