تعداد نشریات | 161 |
تعداد شمارهها | 6,532 |
تعداد مقالات | 70,501 |
تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 124,099,015 |
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 97,206,569 |
ارزیابی عملکرد، درصد اسانس و شاخص های سودمندی در کشت مخلوط ردیفی شنبلیله و مرزه | ||
به زراعی کشاورزی | ||
مقاله 6، دوره 21، شماره 1، فروردین 1398، صفحه 75-92 اصل مقاله (1.32 M) | ||
نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22059/jci.2019.268917.2110 | ||
نویسنده | ||
سکینه عبدی* | ||
استادیار، دانشکده کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی اهر، دانشگاه تبریز، آذربایجان شرقی، اهر، ایران | ||
چکیده | ||
بهمنظور بررسی اثر الگوهای مختلف کشت بر عملکرد و اسانس شنبلیله و مرزه در کشت مخلوط و همچنین ارزیابی سودمندی زراعی و اقتصادی آن، آزمایش مزرعهای بهصورت طرح بلوکهای کامل تصادفی با هشت تیمار و سه تکرار در سال ۱۳۹۴ اجرا شد. تیمارهای آزمایشی شامل الگوهای کشت با نسبتهای 1:1، 2:1، 1:2، 2:2، 3:1، 1:3 (مرزه : شنبلیله) و کشت خالص شنبلیله و مرزه بود. نتایج نشان داد که عملکرد دانه شنبلیله در کشت خالص بهطور معنیداری بیشتر از تیمارهای کشت مخلوط بود. بیشترین درصد پروتئین دانه شنبلیله، عملکرد زیستتوده مرزه، درصد اسانس و عملکرد اسانس مرزه از کشت 50 درصد مرزه+ 50 درصد شنبلیله حاصل شد. بالاترین عملکرد اسانس شنبلیله مربوط به کشت خالص بود که اختلاف معنیداری با کشت مخلوط با الگوی کشت 25 درصد مرزه+ 75 درصد شنبلیله نداشت. در بین تیمارهای کشت مخلوط، بیشترین مقدار سودمندی کشت مخلوط (۲۹/۱) از الگوی کشت 25 درصد مرزه+ 75 درصد شنبلیله بهدست آمد. بالاترین نسبت برابری زمین (94/1) در کشت 50 درصد مرزه+ 50 درصد شنبلیله بود که نشان-دهنده 94 درصد افزایش سودمندی زراعی نسبت به کشت خالص است. با توجه به عملکرد و شاخصهای سودمندی زراعی و اقتصادی محاسبه شده به نظر میرسد که الگوی کشت 50 درصد مرزه+ 50 درصد شنبلیله میتواند در افزایش درآمد اقتصادی و بهرهوری استفاده از زمینهای کشاورزی بهطور قابل ملاحظهای موثر باشد. | ||
کلیدواژهها | ||
بهره وری سیستم؛ پروتئین دانه؛ زیست توده؛ عملکرد؛ متابولیت های ثانویه | ||
عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
Evaluation of Yield, Essential Oil percentage and Advantage Indices in Fenugreek and Savory Intercropping ratios | ||
نویسندگان [English] | ||
Sakineh Abdi | ||
Assistant Professor, Ahar Faculty of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Tabriz, East Azerbaijan, Iran. | ||
چکیده [English] | ||
To investigate the effects of different intercropping arrangement on fenugreek and savory yield and essential oil. An experiment based on randomized complete block design (RCBD) was conducted with three replications. Treatments included different row intercropping systems; 1+1, 1+2, 2+1, 2+2, 1+3, 3+1 (savory+fenugreek) and sole cropping fenugreek and savory. Results revealed that fenugreek yield in sole cropping is significantly higher than that of intercropping system. The highest percentage of fenugreek grain protein, savory dry weight, savory essential oil percentage and essential oil yield was obtained in 1 row savory+1 row fenugreek. The highest fenugreek essential oil yield was achieved in sole cropping and 1 row savory+3 row fenugreek. Among the used intercropping treatments, the highest intercropping advantage (IA) (1.29) was obtained in 1 row savory+3 row fenugreek. The maximum land equivalent ratio (LER) values (1.94) was obtained in 1 row savory+1 row fenugreek, indicating yield improvement in intercropping systems by 94 percent as compared with sole cropping. According to the yield and agronomic and economic benefits, it seems that 1 row savory+1 row fenugreek is suitable for increasing the income of farmers and land use efficiency. | ||
کلیدواژهها [English] | ||
Biomass, seed protein, Intercropping ratio, Secoundary metabolite, System productivity, yield | ||
مراجع | ||
Aasim, M., Umer, E. M. & Karim, A. (2008). Yield and competition indices of intercropping cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) using different planting pattern, Tarim Bilimleri Dergisi, 14(4), 326-333. Agegnehu, G., Ghizaw, A. & Sinebo, W. (2006). Yield performance and land use efficiency of barley and faba bean mixed cropping in Ettiopian highlands. European Journal of Agronomy, 25, 202-207. Ahmad, W. R., Hassan, F. H., Ansar, M., Manaf, A. & Sher, A. (2013) Enhancing crop productivity through wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) fenugreek intercropping system. The Journal of Animal and Plant Sciences, 23(1), 210-215. Ahmadi, A., Dabbagh Mohammdi Nasab, A., Zehtab Salmasi, S., Amini, R. & Janmohammadi, H. (2010). Evaluation of yield and advantage indices in barley and vetch intercropping. Journal of Agricultural Science and Sustainable Production, 20(4), 77-87. (In Persian) Amani Machiani, M., Javanmard, A., Nasiri, Y. & Morshedloo, M. R. (2017). Advantage of peppermint (Mentha piperita L.) and faba bean (Vicia faba L.) intercropping in different cropping patterns. Journal of Agricultural Science and Sustainable Production, 27(3), 45-62. (In Persian) Asadi, Gh. A. & Khorramdel, S. (2013). Effects of different ratio of barley and hairy vetch intercropping on yield, plant nitrogen content, weed population and diversity. Journal of Crop Production, 7 (1), 131-156. (In Persian) Ayanoglu, F., Mert, A., Aslan, N. & Gurbuz, B. (2012). Seed yields, yield components and essential oil of selected coriander coriander (Coriandrum sativum L.) lines. Journal Herbs Spices Medicinal Plants, 9, 71 -77. Banik, P. (1996). Evaluation of Wheat (Triticumaestivum) and legume. Agronomy and CropScience, 176, 289-294. Banik, P. A., Midya, B. K., Sarkar, S. & Ghose, S., (2006) Wheat and chickpea intercropping systems in an additive series experiment: advantages and weed smothering. EuropeanJournal Agronomy, 24, 325-332. Belel, M. D., Halim, R. A., Rafii, M. Y. & Saud, H. M. (2014). Intercropping of corn with some selected legumes for improved forage production: a review. Journal of Agricultural Science, 6, 48-62. Bigonah, R., Rezvani Moghaddam, P. & Jahan, M. (2014). Effects of Intercropping on Biological Yield, Percentage of Nitrogen and Morphological Characteristics of Coriander and Fenugreek. Iranian Journal of Field Crops Research, 12(3), 369-377. (In Persian)
Carrubba, A., La Torre, R., Saiano, F. & Aiello, P. (2008). Sustainable production of fennel and dill by intercropping. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 28, 247-256. Carruthers, K., Prithiviraj, B., Fe, Q., Cloutier, D., Martin, R. C. & Smith, D. L. (2000). Intercropping corn with soybean, lupin and forages: yield component responses. European Journal of Agronomy, 12, 103-115. Dhima, K. V., Lithourgidis, A. S. & Vasilakoglou, I. B. (2007). Competition indices of common vetch and cereal intercrops in two seeding rasio. Field Crops Research, 100, 249-256. Dordas, C. A., Vlachostergios, D. N. & Lithourgidis, A. S. (2012). Growth dynamics and agronomic-economic benefits of pea-oat and pea-barley intercrops. Crop and Pasture Science, 63, 45-52. Fernandez Aparicio, M., Sillero, J. C. & Rubials, D. (2007). Inter cropping with cereals reduces infection be Orobanche crenata in legumes. Crop Production, 26, 1166-1172. Ghosh, P. K. (2004). Growth, yield, competition and economics of groundnut/cereal fodder intercropping system in the semi–arid tropics of India. Field Crops Research, 88, 227-237. Hamzei, J. (2012). Evaluation of yield, SPAD index, landuse efficiency and system productivity index of barley (Hordeum vulgare) intercropped with bitter vetch (Vicia ervilia). Journal of Crop Production and Processing, 2(4), 79-92. (In Persian) Hamzei, J. & Babaei, M. (2015). Study of canopy growth indices in mono and intercropping of chickpea and barley under weed competition. Journal of Agricultural Science and Sustainable Production, 24(4), 75-90. (In Persian) Hassanzadeh Aval, F., Koocheki, A., Khazaie, H.R. & Nassiri Mahallati, M. (2012). Effect of plant density on growth indices of summer savory (Satureja hortensis L.) and Persian Clover (Trifolium resupinatum L.) intercropping. Iranian Journal of Field Crops Research, 10(1), 75-83. (In Persian). Hauggard Nielson, H., Ambus, P. & Janson, E. S. (2001). Inter specific competition, N use and interference with weeds in pea barley intercropping. Journal of Field Crops Research, 70, 101-109. Hesse, P. R. (1971). A Text Book of Soil Chemical Analysis. John Murray, London. Hirpa, T. (2014). Response of maize crop to spatial arrangement and staggered interseeding of haricot bean. International Journal of Environment, 3, 126-138. Izadi, Z., Ahmadvand, G. H., Esna-Ashari, M. & Piri M. (2011). The effect of nitrogen and plant density on some growth characteristics, yield and essential oil in peppermint (Mentha piperita L.). Iranian Journal of Field Crop Research, 4, 824-836. (In Persian) Javanmard, A., Amani Machiani, M. & Rasoli F. (2018). Improvement of forage quantity and quality in corn-legumes intercroppingwith nitroxin biofertilizer application in double cropping. Journal of Agricultural Science and Sustainable Production, 28(1), 1-17. (In Persian). Karanja, S. M., Kibe, A. M., Karogo, P. N. & Mwangi, M. (2014). Effects of intercrop population density and row orientation on growth and yields of sorghum-cowpea cropping systems in semi-arid Rongai, Kenya. Journal of Agricultural Science, 6, 34-43. Koocheki, A., Shabahang, J., Khorramdel, S. & Azimi, R. (2013). The effect of irrigation intervals and intecropped marjoram (Origanum vulgare) with saffron (Crocus sativus) on possible cooling effect of corms for climate change adaptation. Iranian Journal of Field Crops Research, 11(3), 390-400. (In Persian) Lamei Hervani, J. (2013). Assessment of dry forage and crude protein yeilds, competition and advantage indices in mixed cropping of annual forage legume crops with barley in rainfed comditions of Zanjan province in Iran. Seed and Plant Production, 29(2), 169-183. (In Persian) Lithourgidis, A. S., Vlachostergios, D. N., Dordas, C. A. & Damalas, C. A. (2011). Dry mater yield, nitrogen content, and competition in pea-cereal intercropping systems. European Journal of Agronomy, 34, 287-294. Maffei, M. & Mucciarelli, M. (2003). Essential oil yield in peppermint/soybean strip intercropping. Field Crop Research, 84: 229-240. (In Persian). Mandegary, A., Pournamdari, M., Sharififar, F., Pour nour mohammadi, Sh., Fardiar, R. & Shooli, S. (2012). Alkaloid and flavonoid rich fractions of fenugreek seeds (Trigonella foenum-graecum L.) with antinociceptive and antiinflammatory effects. Journal Food and Chemical Toxicology, 50, 2503-2507. (In Persian) Mardani, F. & Balouch, H. (2015). Effect of intercropping on the yield and some quantitative and qualitative traits of Fenugreek and Anise. Journal of Agricultural Science and Sustainable Production, 25(2), 1-16. (In Persian) Marschner, H. (2003). Mineral Nutrition of Higher Plants. Academic Press, San Diego, CA, USA. Neamatollahi, E., Jahansuz, M. R., Mazaheri, D. & Bannayan, M. (2013). Intercropping. In: Lichtfouse, E. (ed.), Sustainable Agriculture Reviews, Sustainable Agriculture Reviews 12. Springer Dordrecht Heidelberg New York London Prasad, R., Singh, R., Sing, S. & Pal, M. (2001). Studies on intercropping potato with fenugreek. Acta Agronomica Hungarica, 49 (2), 189-191. Rezaei-chiyaneh, E., Tajbakhsh, M., Jamali, M. & Ghiyasi, M. (2016). Evaluation of yield and indices advantages at different intercropping patterns of dill (Anethun graveolens L.) and fenugreek (Trigonella foenum-graecum L.). Agricultural Crop Management, 8(1), 15-27. (In Persian) Rezvani Moghaddam, P. & Moradi, R. (2012). Assessment of planting date, biological fertilizer and intercropping on Yield and essential oil of cumin and fenugreek. Iranian Journal of Field Crop Science, 43(2): 217-230. (In Persian). Rostaie, M., Falah, S., and Souraki, A. (2015). Effect of fertilizer sources on growth, yield and yield components of fenugreek intercropped with black cumin. Journal of Crop Production, 7(4), 222-197. (In Persian) Sadri, S., Poor Yousef, M., and Soleimani, A. (2015). Evaluation of yield, essential oil and productivity indices in fennel and fenugreek intercropping. Agricultural Crop Management, 16(4), 921-932. (In Persian) Schultz, B. B., Phillips, C., Rossert, P. & Vandermeer, J. (1982). An experiment in intercropping tomatoes and cucumbers in southern Michigan. USA. Scientia Horticulturea, 18, 1-8. Tosti, G. & Guiducci, M. (2010). Durum wheat-fababean temporary intercropping: Effects on nitrogen supply and wheat quality. European Journal of Agronomy, 33, 157-165. Vandermeer, J. (1990). Intercropping. In Agroecology, Mc Graw-Hill publishing Co. The University of Michigan, P: 641. Weston, E. J., King, A. J., Strong, W. M., Lehane, K. J., Cooper, J. E. & Holmes, C. J. (2002). Sustaining productivity of a vertisoil at warra, Queensland, with fertilizers, no tillage or legumes. Production and nitrogen benefits from annual medic in rotation with wheat. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture, 42, 961-969. Willey, R. W. (1979). Intercropping-its importance and research needs. Part 1. Competition and yield advantages. Field Crop Abstract, 32, 1-10. Willey, R. W. & Rao, M. R. (1980). A competitive ratio for quantifying competition between intercrops. Experimental Agriculture, 16, 117-125. Yazdanpanah, S., Baghizadeh, A. & Abbassi, F. (2011). The interaction between drought stress and salicylic and ascorbic acids on some biochemical characteristics of Satureja hortensis. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 6 (4), 798-807. (In Persian) Yilmaz, S., Atak, M. & Erayman, M. (2008). Identification of advantages of maize legume intercropping over solitary cropping through competition incides in the East Mediterranean region. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, 32, 111-119. Yilmaz, S., Atak, M. & Erayman, M. (2015). Effects of seeding rates on competition sndices of barley and vetch intercropping systems in the eastern Meditherranean. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, 39, 135-143. Zarifpour, N., Naseri Poor Yazdi, M. T., and Nasiri Mahallati, M. (2014). Evaluate the effect of different intercropping arrangements of cumin (Cuminum cyminum L.) and chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) on quantity and quality characterastis of species. Iranian Journal of Field Crops Research, 12(1), 34-43. (In Persian) Zhang, G., Yang, Z. & Dong, S. (2011). Inter specific competitiveness affects the total biomass yield in an alfalfa and corn intercropping system. Field Crops Research, 124, 66-73. Zhang, L., Van Der Werf, W., Bastiaans, L., Zhang, S., Li, B. & Spiertz, J. H. J. (2008). Light interception and utilization in relay intercrops of wheat and cotton. Field Crops Research, 107, 29-42.
| ||
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 592 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 510 |