|تعداد مشاهده مقاله||103,791,995|
|تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله||81,530,808|
تحلیل سبک مدیریت محلی در مناطق روستایی و تاثیر آن بر میزان مشارکت پذیری روستائیان (منطقۀ مورد مطالعه: روستاهای دهستان زرین گل شهرستان علی آباد)
|پژوهشهای جغرافیای انسانی|
|مقاله 5، دوره 52، شماره 3، مهر 1399، صفحه 851-870 اصل مقاله (1005.2 K)|
|نوع مقاله: مقاله علمی پژوهشی|
|شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22059/jhgr.2019.239103.1007516|
|استادیار گروه جغرافیا دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد، مشهد|
|عوامل بسیاری در فرایند اثربخشی مدیریت تأثیرگذار است که یکی از آنها ویژگیها یا سبک مدیران و رفتارهای آنها با زیردستان است. این امر بهویژه در اجتماعات محلی و روستایی، که ارتباط نزدیکی بین مدیران و روستاییان وجود دارد، بسیار مهم است. زیرا مدیران محلی هستند که با رویکردهای اجرایی یا عملکردی خود میزان و زمینة حضور و مشارکتپذیری روستاییان را شکل میدهند. بنابراین،در پژوهش حاضر براساس روش توصیفی- تحلیلی و بهرهگیری از منابع موجود نخست به بررسی اثرهای سبک مدیریت روستایی پرداخته شده و سپس ارتباط آن بر میزان مشارکتپذیری روستاییان در سکونتگاههای روستایی دهستان زرینگل شهرستان علیآباد مد نظر قرار گرفته است. حجم جامعة نمونة این تحقیق متشکل از 269 سرپرست خانوار از 11 روستای دهستان است که در قالب پرسشنامة محققساخته بررسی شدهاند. یافتههای تحقیق حاکی از میانگین متوسط در اغلب شاخصهای پنجگانه (انگیزش، مشارکت در تصمیمگیری، تعامل، ارتباطات، و اعتماد و اطمینان) سازندة سبکهای مدیریت است؛ به گونهای که از میان 11 روستا، 10روستا دارای مجموع میانگین امتیازات شاخصهای بین ۶/2 تا ۲۵/۳ یعنی مدیریت مشورتی و یک روستا دارای میانگین امتیازات شاخصهای کمتر از2.6 یعنی دارای سبک مدیریتی غالب دلسوزانه است. از طرفی، ارتباط مستقیمی بین میزان سبک مدیریت و مشارکتپذیری روستاییان در روستاهای دهستان زرینگل وجود دارد. سطح معنیداری بیانگر این مطلب است که بین دو متغیر سبک مدیریت و مشارکتپذیری روستاییان همبستگی وجود دارد.|
|توسعة روستایی؛ دهستان زرینگل؛ سبکهای مدیریت؛ مدیریت روستایی؛ مشارکتپذیری|
|عنوان مقاله [English]|
|Analysis of local management style and its impact on the participation of villagers in rural areas (Case study: rural area of Zarin gol Dehestan)|
|Analysis of local management style and its impact on the participation of villagers in rural areas (Case study: rural area of Zarin gol Dehestan)|
For successes in now competitive world, utilizing of skills in management is essential. Also effective managers are most important and rare source of every institution/ community that institution/ community’s failure in optimum exploiting of resources could be related to unusable management of that. Thus, attending to importance of managers managing style is to the point that experts believe, if must be happen an effective and sustainable organization change, management culture of the organization should be changed. In rural area as a local community, from the last decades, local managers had a key and important role in rural management. In traditional attitude, local managers guide people based on this view that they are unable for changing themselves and community. In the event that, in new attitude, however managers as leader are known as effective element of community’s changes, rural people could be effective in changing themselves and their community because of having the necessary capabilities, such as the power of the individual, social and economic status. Creating a systematic change of rural communities to collaborate and move in the direction towards progress and excellence, is one of natural results of the rural management leadership effectiveness. Each group in the rural community efforts to collaborate and share their experiences for Rural Development. But in the meantime, for the realization of this goal it’s needed to management of human and natural systems, and facilitate the realization of this collaboration.
This research practical and developed study was conducted using descriptive-analytic methods. Data was collected through the documents library and field studies carried with the help of the questionnaire that designed and implemented based on management styles in form of Likert Spectrum. According to them, the four management styles among managers of Zaringol Dehestan from Aliabad Township and based on Likert scale was measured. After designing the research made questionnaire and its validity confirming by elites and experts, its reliability were examined that based on the Cronbach's alpha, its reliability level is 0.76. Based on Cochran’s formula with the five percent sample error in 9733 population of case study area, 247 householders were selected as sample community that by modifying number of samples in some rural point, increased to 269 Inventory.
The results of index management style analyzing, show that consultative management style is the common and prevailing attitude among most villages of the case study area. Also, there is meaningful direct correlation with moderate-intensity between managerial style and rural people participation. So by increasing the tendency of managers to consultation management style, the participation of villagers in the village and a sense of responsibility in the village rises. For analyzing the five aspects of management style builder including: confidence, motivation, interaction, communication, and decision on the participation had been used of multiple regression. Then adjusted coefficient of determination is equal to 0.74 that respectively, suggested a role of independent variables in explaining the variance of the dependent variable. According to amount of F, independent variable are able to explain the depended variable changes so well. Also, B amount show that among 5 aspect of management style factors, interaction and confidence, had most efficiency on participation attracting and other aspect including to: decision communication and motivation are in next level of importance on participation attracting in rural area.
Conclusion and Recommendation
Management of rural development in Iran has faced to numerous challenges and structural problems from the past decade until now. On the one hand, the traditional management structure in rural areas wasn’t able to solving the problems due to the changing conditions and time circumstances and on the other hand, the new management structure in rural areas based on people's participation and bottom-up planning, for various reasons, including non-native and widespread government intervention and … could not solve today's problems in rural areas. At the same time, management styles through of variant aspects and indicators could help rural people's participation in rural development realization. So, management styles could be categorized to different patterns from expert opinion and based on variables such as the amount of communication, interaction, motivation, interests, change, decision-making and leadership and provide or forecasts different participatory and presence status for stakeholders of development. Today in rural management, despite efforts to establish collaborative structure, low average of some indicators such as interaction, confidence, decision-making and orientation cause to failure of traditional pattern and increasing tendency to participatory management's patterns. In the case study area of research, based on the results, the dominant paradigm of management is advisory management style and regression test results indicate a correlation between management styles and their impact on the participation of villagers in the village and approve this communication. Based on the results also, management style have important effect on attracting and promotion of the participation indicators of villagers. So, by increase in the averages of participative management styles indexes, imperative management decrease and participation had been improved. The results could be taken in line with previous research in this field such as Mirlotfi and Kheirabadi (2009) and Dina (2013) and the others that account management as a lever of influence on improving the performance, participation and organizational development. According to the results, the study offers could be adjusted and presented in the form of the following:
- Using of young and participative managers
- Using of educated managers
- Using of experienced managers
- Training the positive and negative points of different management styles to managers and also the ways of attracting the rural people participation to them before they appointment.
Key words: : style of management, rural management, participation, accountability, rural development, Zaringol rural district.
|style of management, rural management, participation, Accountability, Rural Development|
31. Affjeh, A. A., 2009, Philosophic Principle and leadership and organizational behavior theories, Tehran: Publicated by the Organization for Researching and Composing University textbooks in the Humanities, 6th edition.
32. Afrakhteh, H., 2009, Rural management; with emphesis on Iran, Ganje Honar Press.
33. Aizuddin Md Rami, A.; Abdullah, R.; Ibrahim, A. I. and Hamdy, A., 2017, Influence of Local Leadership in Poverty Eradication in the State of Terengganu, Malaysia, Journal of social science, Vol. 12, No. 7, 1305-1309.
34. Amini, A. and Jamini, D., 2014, Analyzing the rural community assessment of Dehyary inistitutions fuction by using of structural equation modeling approches, Journal of Geographical resaerch, Vol. 29, No. 113, PP. 177-196.
35. Anabestani, A. A.; Javan, J. and Ahmadzadeh, S., 2012, The relationship between individual characteristics of women and their participation in rural development process (Case study: Darzab Dehestan - Mashhad County), Journal of Urban - Regional Studies and Research, Vol. 3, No. 12, PP. 61-78.
36. Arnstein, S. R., 1969, A Ladder of Citizen Participation, Journal of the American Planning Association, Vol. 35, No. 4, PP. 216-224.
37. Darban Astaneh, A. R., 2010, Rural management in 4th development plan, Journal of Dehyari, Vol. 3, No. 15, P. 14.
38. Dedina, J., 2013, The Choice Of The Appropriate Leadership And Management Style In Order To Enhance Work Performance Of Employees, Management, Knowledge and learning conference, 19-20 June 2013, Zadae, Croatia, PP. 117-123.
39. Eftekhari, A. R. R. and Sojasi Qeidari, H., 2009, Recreation of rural development management in Iran, second national conference of culture and Jihadi management, Tehran: Ministri of agricultural Jihad.
40. Eftekhari, A. R., 2010, Rural development management (theoretical foundations), Samt Press, Tehran.
41. English refrences
42. Feniri, C. D., 2005, Provisional management, tailored to organizational cultures, translated by Nasser mirsepasi, Tehran: Mir press.
43. Golshiri Esfahani, Z.; Khademi, H.; Seddighi, R. and Tazeh, M., 2009, Impacts of Social Solidarity on the Level of Iranian Rural People Participation: A Case Study of Gandoman District in Boroujen County, Journal of Village and Development, Vol. 12, No. 1, PP. 147-167.
44. Grage Ricketts, K., 2005, The Importance Of Community Leadership To Successful Rural Communities In Florida, a dissertation presented to the graduate school of the university of Florida in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of doctor of philosophy university of Florida, Department of Agricultural Education and Communication.
45. Hersey, P. and Blanchard, K., 2008, Management of organizational behavior, Tehran: Majed press, 6th edition.
46. Imani Jajarmi, H., 2011, Rural management and challenges of villagers participation, Month book of Social Science, No. 40, PP. 122-127.
47. Karimi, M., 2007, Assessment of Dehyaries functions in rural development: case study area: Kandovan district of Mianeh township, thesies of M.A Degree in Geography and rural planning, Tehran: Tarbiat Modares university.
48. Khosravi pour, B. and Foroushani, N., 2011, Womens participation and rural sustainable, Journal of work and socitey, No. 132-133, PP. 56-68.
49. Kreitner, R. and Kinicki, A., 2002, Organizational Behavior, McGraw-Hill Companies.
50. Lahasaiezadeh, A. A., 2009, Rural management in contemprery Iran, Journal of cooperation, No. 202-203.
51. Lau, Ch-M. and Ngo, H-Y., 2004, The HR system, organizational culture, and product innovation, International Business Review, Vol. 13, No. 6, PP. 685-703.
52. Mahdad, A., 2002, Industrial/ organizational psychology, Jungle publication.
53. Mahram, B. and Dashti Rahmatabadi, M., 2009, The effect of managers leadership style on sense of equality among employers of medical science university of Mashhad, Journal of health management, Vol. 12, No. 38, PP.7-16.
55. Mirlotfi, M. R. and Mohebi Kheirabadi, Z., 2012, Surveing the role of rural management in promotion of participation process, First national conference of rural development, Rasht: Gilan University.
56. Mohammadi, B.; Einali, J.; Cheraghi, M. and Farihi, F., 2013, Analysis on economic- social obstacles of rural participation in rural management process; case study area: Lishtar rural district of Gachsaran county, Journal of management process and development, Vol. 26, No. 1(83), PP. 109-124.
57. Mola'i Hashtjin, N.; Amar, T.; Haj Alizadeh, A., 2014, Examine management challenges from the perspective of Islamic Councils, the persistence of rural villages in the central region of Ardabil, Journal of Geography, Vol. 12, No. 40, PP. 73-91.
58. Nan Jundeswaras wamy, T.S. and Swamy, D. R., 2014, Leadership styles, Journal of Advances In Management, Vol. 7, No. 2, PP. 57-62.
59. Okelly, P. and Marseden, D., 1991, Approaches of participation in rural development, translated by: Mansour Mahmoud nejad, Tehran: University Jihad press.
60. Olufemi Onweazu, O., 2014, Influence of Leadership Styles on Community Development Programmes’Implementation in Rural Communities of Akwa Ibom State Nigeria, An International Multidisciplinary Journal, Ethiopia, Vol. 8(2), No. 33, PP. 83-95.
61. Ozor, N. and Nwankwo, N., 2008, The Role of Local Leaders in Community Development Programmes in Ideato Local Government Area of Imo State: Implication for Extension Policy, Journal of Agricultural Extension, Vol. 12, No. 2, PP. 63-75.
62. Pugliese, P, 2001, Organic farming and sustainable rural development: a multifaceted and promising convergence, Journal of Sociologia Ruralis, Vol. 41, No. 1, PP. 112-130.
63. Rezaian, A., 2008, Principle of organization and management, Tehran: Publicated by the Organization for Researching and Composing University textbooks in the Humanities, 12th edithion.
64. Robbines, S. P., 2008, Principle of organizational behavior, translated by: Ali parsaeian and seyed Mohamad erabi, Tehran: cultural research office.
65. Saatchi, Mahmud, 2000, Work psychology, Tehran: Inistitution of press and edition.
66. Sayahi Kashi, J., 2004, A Country Papers for Islamic Republic of Iran. In: Report of the APO (Asian Productivity Organization) Seminar on Role of local communities and institution in integrated rural development. 15-20 June 2002 (ICD-SE-3-01), Tehran, Iran.
67. Seidali, M.; Sadeghi, Gh. and Mirzae Godarzi, Z., 2011, The Position of Management in Advancing Rural development, Case Study: Javanmardi Village (Lordegan County), Journal of Zonal Planning, Vol. 1, No. 2, PP. 79-91.
68. Shabanali Fami, H.; Alibeigi, A. H. and Sharif zadeh, A., 2004, Participation aPProaches and techniqes in agriculture promotion and rural development, Tehran: Inistitution of Iran rural development press.
69. Statistical center of Iran, 2011, Population and housing census.
70. Taleb, M., 1997, Rural management in Iran, second edition, Tehran: Tehran University Publication.
71. Taleb, M., 1997, Rural management in Iran, Tehran University Publication.
72. Taleb, M., 1997, Rural management in Iran, Tehran: Report of Bonyad Maskan inistitution of Islamic republic of Irans.
73. Tenguay, G. A.; Rajaonson, J., Lefebvre, J-F. and Lanoie, P., 2010, Measuring the sustainability of cities: an analysis of the use of local indicators, Journal of Ecological Indicators, Vol. 10, PP. 407-418.
74. Williams, L. L. and Lindsey, M. J., 2005, Rural Leaders and Leadership Development in Pennsylvania, The center of rural Pennsylvania press, Edinboro University of Pennsylvania.
75. Woods, M., 2011, Rural Geography; process, reactions and rural reconstruction experiments, translated by: Mohamad reza rezvani and Samet Farhadi, Tehran University Publications.
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 456
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 282