Local Content Development Plan in Oil and Gas Industry: Opportunities and Threats | ||
| مطالعات حقوق انرژی | ||
| Article 2, Volume 4, Issue 2, May 2019, Pages 267-292 PDF (722.73 K) | ||
| Document Type: ISI | ||
| DOI: 10.22059/jrels.2019.255246.195 | ||
| Authors | ||
| Seyed Nasrollah Ebrahimi1; Fatemeh Khoshchehreh* 2 | ||
| 1Assistant Professor of Law and Political Science, University of Tehran | ||
| 2Ph.D. Student, University of Tehran Oil and Gas Law | ||
| Abstract | ||
| Since the nationalization of petroleum industry and recognition of the states’ sovereign right over their reserves and underground resources, the “local content strategy” has become one of the main commitments of the international oil companies in the upstream oil and gas contracts. The rationale behind including such clause is to create jobs, promote enterprise development and to facilitate transfer of new skills and technologies to the host country. According to this provision, foreign investors are obligated to give priority to domestic goods and services as well as native workforce while conducting petroleum operations. Local Content requirement has become a customary rule in the industry and is implemented in different ways. While some of them are mandatory, others are voluntary. This provision increases the operators’ motivations by means of fiscal incentives or tax reduction. Local content regimes entail risks and opportunities for both host government and oil and gas companies. The requirement yields benefit for host governments as well as foreign investors through providing easy access to affordable manpower and services. However, the economic and social impacts associated with such requirement are not always positive for all parties of the contracts, and in some cases serious challenges may arise in host countries and for companies. For example, operators and international contractors may face unrealistic expectations or targets from host governments or local communities seeking quick results. So before proceeding to implementation phase, any potential challenge should be analyzed and appropriate solutions should be found in advance. | ||
| Keywords | ||
| Local content policy; Foreign Investment; opportunities and threats; Economic Development; oil and gas industry | ||
| References | ||
|
الف) فارسی 1) کتاب‌ها 1. زارع، محمدحسن (1385). سرمایه‌گذاری خارجی و سازمان تجارت جهانی با نگاهی به وضعیت ایران. تهران، شرکت چاپ و نشر بازرگانی. 2) مقاله‌ها 2. ابراهیمی، سید نصرالله؛ تقی‌زاده، ابراهیم؛ سریر، فرزانه (1393). «بررسی اصول حقوقی حاکم بر قراردادهای بالادستی صنعت نفت و گاز ایران». دوفصلنامۀ علمی- پژوهشی دانش حقوق مدنی، سال سوم، شمارۀ 2، ص 1 - 13. 3. درخشان، مسعود (1392). «ویژگی‌های مطلوب قراردادهای نفتی: رویکرد اقتصادی - تاریخی به عملکرد قراردادهای نفتی در ایران». فصلنامۀ اقتصاد انرژی ایران، سال سوم، شمارۀ 9، ص 53 - 113. 4. شیروی، عبدالحسین؛ پوراسماعیلی، علیرضا (1390). «مطالعۀ تطبیقی الزام سهم داخل در قوانین و مقررات ایران و مقررات سازمان تجارت جهانی». مجلۀ حقوقی دادگستری، سال 75، شمارۀ 74، ص 41 - 68. ب) انگلیسی 5. Decker, D.C (2014), Modern Economic Regulation: An Introduction to Theory and Practice; Cambridge University Press: New York, NY, USA.
6. Ernst and Young (2012). “Global Oil and Gas Tax Guide.” http://www.ey.com/Publication/
7. Ford, C.L (2008), “New Governance, Compliance, and Principles-Based Securities Regulation”. Am. Bus. Law J., 45, 1–60.
8. Hufbauer, G.C.; Schott, J.J.; Cimino-Isaacs, C (2013),” Local Content Requirements: A Global Problem”; Peterson Institute for International Economics Press: Washington, DC, USA; ISBN 978-0-88132-681-9.
9. IPIECA (2011), “Local content Strategy, A guidance document for the oil and gas industry”, available at www.ipieca.org
10. Ivar Kolstad & Abel Kinyondo (2016), “Alternatives to local content requirements in resource-rich countries”, Oxford Development Studies, p.4.
11. Kalyuzhnova, Yelena (2016), “Local Content Policies in Resource-rich Countries, Euro-Asian Studies”, p301.
12. Larsen, M. N., P. Yankson and N. Fold (2009),” Does FDI Create Linkages in Mining? The Case of Gold Mining in Ghana, Transnational corporations and development policy: Critical perspectives”, 247- 273.
13. Levett, Michaal & E.Chandler, Ashley (2012), “Maximizing development of local content across industry sectors in emerging markets”, center for strategic & international studies, p 19.
14. McKinsey Global Institute (2013), “Reversing the Curse: Maximizing the Potential of Resource-Driven Economies”.
15. Nikièma, S.H (2014), “Performance Requirements in Investment Treaties Best Practices Series”; International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD): Winnipeg, MB, Canada.
16. Tordo, S (2007). “Fiscal Systems for Hydrocarbons: Design Issues.” World Bank Working Paper 123/07, World Bank, Washington, DC.
17. Ramdoo, Isabelle (2016), “Local content policies in mineral-rich Countries, An overview”, European center for development policy management, No. 193.
18. Sigam, C.; Garcia, L (2010), “Extractive Industries: Optimizing Value Retention in Host Countries”; UNCTAD: Geneva, Switzerland.
19. Tordo, S., B. S. Tracy, and N. Arfaa (2011). “National Oil Companies and Value Creation.” World Bank Working Paper No. 218, Washington, DC. http://go.worldbank.org/ UOQSWUQ6P0. P 9.
20. Umemoto, masaru (1998), “three essays on local content requirements”, PhD dissertation in economics, faculty of graduate of Vanderbilt University.
| ||
|
Statistics Article View: 1,180 PDF Download: 909 |
||