Planning the Natural Context of Ecological Networks (A Case Study of Urban Landscape of Karaj) | ||
| مجله علمی " آمایش سرزمین " | ||
| Article 4, Volume 11, Issue 2, October 2019, Pages 263-283 PDF (1.04 M) | ||
| Document Type: Research Paper | ||
| DOI: 10.22059/jtcp.2019.287565.670017 | ||
| Authors | ||
| Sholeh Hassani1; Shahindokht Barghjelveh* 2 | ||
| 1MSc, Environmental Sciences Research Institute, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran | ||
| 2Associate Professor, Environmental Sciences Research Institute, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran | ||
| Abstract | ||
| The qualitative study of the urbanization process indicates that inappropriate development has caused a great deal of damage to the urban landscape structure. The problem solving tool is planning the ecological networks as matter and energy pathways. Planning natural elements of the structure, including green and open spots and corridors, will guide the researcher toward achieving research goals such as the conservation and restoration of natural resources and the improvement of cybernetic forces to enhance performance sustainability, structural equilibrium, and habitat variability. The methodological model of research in the Karaj metropolis identified flexible elements to strengthen ecological processes. Then, adopting the ecological-sociological approach and forming the urban habitat network, it was applied for sustainability. GIS software was used to map and digitize the data, RS to capture satellite images, and FRAGSTATE 4.2 to analyze the metrics changes in the years 2008 and 2018. The results of Bayer spot changes were -7.98% for CA, +5.79% for NP, and -1.5% for Cohesion, while residential spot changes were -24.15% for CA, +26.16% for NP, -3.96% for Cohesion, and green-space spot changes were -38.8% for CA, +275.5% for NP increase, and -34.0% for Cohesion. These indicated increased discontinuity, decreased natural bedding connectivity, and decreased ecological performance along with its adverse effect on social structure. Thus, using a nature-based planning, we can witness the network dynamics of natural/man-made communication/isolation networks over time, and by establishing a holistic, bio-ethical culture, we can overcome social vacuum. This way, Karaj can move in the excellent sustainable development path. | ||
| Keywords | ||
| Ecological-sociological planning; Urban planning; Landscape ecology; Karaj; Natural infrastructure of ecological networks | ||
| References | ||
|
Barghjelveh, Sh., Islami, S. Y., & Sayad, N. (2015). The logic of the “ecology of place”, a model of thought for urban landscape development, case study: Tehran’s Farahzad River-valley. (Springer Science+Business Media)Urban ecosystems, 18(4), 1165-1186.. Barghjelveh, Sh., Medghalchi, N., Mobarghaee Dinan, N. (1392). Evaluating the Ecological Function of Urban River-valley Corridor System (Case Study: Tehran–Darakeh River-valley Corridor System). Environmental Researches, 4(8), 1-91. (In Persian) Barghjelveh, Sh., Mansouri, M., Islam, S. Y. (1395). The Role of Ecological Networks in the Environmental Logic of Urban Regions' Identity Planning (Case Study: Isfahan - Poladshahr Urban Region). Journal of Environmental Studies.42 (1), 194. (In Persian) Barghjelveh, Sh., Mobarghaee Dinan, N. (1392). The Development of Greenways' Sustainability Indicators based on Landscape Ecology Principles. Environmental Science and Technology, 15(2). (In Persian) Cen, X., Wu, C., Xing, X., Fang, M., Garang, Z., & Wu, Y. (2015). Coupling Intensive Land Use and Landscape Ecological Security for Urban Sustainability: An Integrated Socioeconomic Data and Spatial Metrics Analysis in Hangzhou City.Sustainability,7, 1459-1482. Lal, K., Kumar, D., & Kumar, A. (2017). Spatio-temporal landscape modeling of urban growth patterns in Dhanbad Urban Agglomeration, India using geoinformatics techniques. The Egyptian Journal of Remote Sensing and Space Sciences, 20 (1), 91–102. Pickett, S. T. A., Boone, C. G., McGrath, B. P., Cadenasso, M. L., Childers, D. L., Ogden, L. A., ... & Grove, J. M.(2013). Ecological science and transformation to the sustainable city. ELSEVIER, Cities, 32, 10–20. Pickett, S. T., Cadenasso, M. L., Childers, D. L., McDonnell, M. J., & Zhou, W. (2017). Evolution and future of urban ecological science: ecology in, of, and for the city. Ecosystem Health and Sustainability 2(7). Pickett, Steward T. A.,Cadenasso ,M.L & Grove, J.M (2003). Resilient cities: meaning, models, and metaphor for integrating the ecological, socio-economic, and planning realms. Landscape and Urban Planning 69 (2004), 369–384. Sayyahniya,R., Mukhtari, Z.(1395). FRAGSTATE software guide. Tehran: Shahid Beheshti University, Avayeh Ghalam Institute. (In Persian) Wu, Jianguo., He, Chunyang., Huang, Ganlin., Yu ,Deyong., NB, Grimm., SH , Faeth., CL, Redman., J, Wu., X , Bai & JM, Briggs (2008). Urban Landscape Ecology: Past, Present, and Future. Globalchange and the ecology of cities. Science. 319(5864), 756–60. Wu, J. (2013). Key concepts and research topics in landscape ecology revisited: 30 years after the Allerton Park workshop. Landscape ecology, 28(1), 1-11. | ||
|
Statistics Article View: 485 PDF Download: 483 |
||