پیوندهای مفید
اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 161 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 6,532 |
| تعداد مقالات | 70,501 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 124,098,314 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 97,205,977 |
ارزیابی جریان انرژی و اثرات زیست محیطی تولید کیک در استان گیلان با رویکرد ارزیابی چرخه زندگی | ||
| مهندسی بیوسیستم ایران | ||
| مقاله 7، دوره 50، شماره 3، آبان 1398، صفحه 569-579 اصل مقاله (602.98 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22059/ijbse.2019.257865.665062 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| مجید خانعلی* 1؛ اسداله اکرم2؛ مهدیه محمدنیا3؛ هما حسین زاده بندبافها4؛ بهزاد الهامی5 | ||
| 1گروه مهندسی ماشین های کشاورزی، دانشکده مهندسی و فناوری کشاورزی، پردیس کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی، دانشگاه تهران، کرج | ||
| 2گروه مهندسی ماشین‌های کشاورزی، دانشکده مهندسی و فناوری کشاورزی، پردیس کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی، دانشگاه تهران، کرج. | ||
| 3گروه مهندسی ماشین‌های کشاورزی، دانشکده مهندسی و فناوری کشاورزی، پردیس کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی، دانشگاه تهران | ||
| 4گروه مهندسی ماشین های کشاورزی،دانشکده مهندسی و فناوری کشاورزی، پردیس کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی، دانشگاه تهران | ||
| 5گروه مکانیزاسیون کشاورزی، دانشکده مهندسی زراعی و عمران روستایی، دانشگاه علوم کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی خوزستان، اهواز. | ||
| چکیده | ||
| در این تحقیق مصرف انرژی و انتشار آلایندههای زیست محیطی تولید کیک با روش ارزیابی چرخه زندگی در استان گیلان مطالعه و بررسی شد. دادههای لازم از طریق پرسشنامه و مصاحبه حضوری از 21 کارخانه تولید کیک در گیلان جمعآوری شد. انرژی معادل نهادهها و ستانده با استفاده از ضرایب انرژی نهادهها بهدست آمد. نتایج این پژوهش نشان داد که مقدار 57/62670 مگاژول انرژی برای تولید هر تن کیک مصرف شده است. بیشترین سهم انرژی مصرفی به گاز طبیعی با 30931 مگاژول اختصاص داشت. بررسی شاخصهای انرژی نشان داد که بازده مصرف انرژی در تولید کیک در گیلان 2872/0 است. نتایج ارزیابی چرخه زندگی نشان داد در تولید کیک 49/13099 کیلوگرم کربن دیاکسید معادل به هوا منتشر شده است که در حدود 86 درصد از آن ناشی از فعالیتهای خارج از کارخانه و بقیه مربوط به احتراق گاز طبیعی جهت پخت کیک است. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| ارزیابی چرخه زندگی؛ انرژی؛ شاخصهای زیست محیطی؛ شاخصهای انرژی؛ کیک | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Evaluating the Energy Flow and Environmental Effects of Cake Production in Guilan Province by Life Cycle Assessment Approach | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Majid Khanali1؛ Asadollah Akram2؛ Mahdieh Mohammadnia Galeshklamei3؛ homa hosseinzadeh-bandbafha4؛ behzad elhami5 | ||
| 1Department of Agricultural Machinery Engineering, Faculty of Agricultural Engineering and Technology, University of Tehran, Karaj. | ||
| 2Department of Agricultural Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Technology, College of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Tehran University | ||
| 3Department of Agricultural Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Technology, College of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Tehran University | ||
| 4Department of Agricultural Machinery, Faculty of Agricultural Engineering and Technology, College of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Tehran University | ||
| 5Department of of Agricultural Mechanization, Department of Agricultural Machinery Engineering, Ramin Agriculture and Natural Resources University of Ahvaz. | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| In this study, the energy consumption and environmental emissions for cake production were studied using life cycle assessment in Guilan Province. Necessary data using questionnaires and interviews was gathered from 21 factories of cake production. Equivalent energy of inputs and outputs was obtained using coefficients of energy. The results of this study showed that 62670.57 MJ of energy was consumed for the production of one ton of cake. The highest share of energy consumption allocated to natural gas with 30931 MJ. Evaluation of energy indices showed that energy efficiency in the production of cake in Guilan is 0.2872. The results of life cycle assessment showed that in cake production 13099.49 kg CO2 eq. is released into the air that about 86 percent of that was related to activities outside of the factory and the rest was related to the combustion of natural gas for cooking cake. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| Cake, Energy, Energy indicators, Environmental indicators, Life Cycle Assessment | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Abolshikhi, M. (2014). Study of life cycle of bread production - Case Study: Ray County, Tehran. M. Sc. Thesis. University of Tehran, Iran. (In Persian with English abstract). Andersson, K., & Ohlsson, T. (1999). Life cycle assessment of bread produced on different scales. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 4(1), 25-40. Arman, SA and Zare, R. (2009). Energy consumption in different sectors and its relation to economic growth in Iran: causality analysis based on Toda and Yamamoto method. Energy Economics Studies, 6 (21), 67-92. (In Persian with English abstract). Baum, A. W., Patzek, T., Bender, M., Renich, S., & Jackson, W. (2009). The visible, sustainable farm: A comprehensive energy analysis of a Midwestern farm. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences, 28(4), 218-239. Bimpeh, M., Djokoto, E., Doe, H., & Jequier, R. (2006). Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of the Production of Homemade and Industrial Bread in Sweden. KTH, Life Cycle Assessment Course (1N1800). Braschkat, J., Patyk, A., Quirin, M., & Reinhardt, G. A. (2004). Life cycle assessment of bread production-a comparison of eight different scenarios. DIAS report, 9. Brentrup, F., Küsters, J., Lammel, J., Barraclough, P., & Kuhlmann, H. (2004). Environmental impact assessment of agricultural production systems using the life cycle assessment (LCA) methodology II. The application to N fertilizer use in winter wheat production systems. European Journal of Agronomy, 20(3), 265-279. Canakci, M., Topakci, M., Akinci, I., & Ozmerzi, A. (2005). Energy use pattern of some field crops and vegetable production: Case study for Antalya Region, Turkey. Energy Conversion and Management, 46(4), 655-666. Ceylan, H. 2002. Analysis and design of concrete pavement systems using artificial neural networks, Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana- Champaign. Ceylan, H., Guclu, A., Tutumluer, E. & Thompson, M. R. (2004). Use of artificial neural networks for backcalculation of pavement layer moduli. In2004 FWD users group meeting, University Inn, West Lafayette, IN. Chaudhary, V. P., Gangwar, B., & Pandey, D. K. (2006). Auditing of energy use and output of different cropping systems in India. Agricultural Engineering International: the CIGR Ejournal, 8, 1-13. Curran, M. A., Mann, M., & Norris, G. (2005). The international workshop on electricity data for life cycle inventories. Journal of Cleaner Production, 13(8), 853-862. De Boer, I. J. (2003). Environmental impact assessment of conventional and organic milk production. Livestock Production Science, 80(1), 69-77. Erdal, G., Esengün, K., Erdal, H., & Gündüz, O. (2007). Energy use and economical analysis of sugar beet production in Tokat province of Turkey. Energy, 32(1), 35-41. Espinoza-Orias, N., Stichnothe, H., & Azapagic, A. (2011). The carbon footprint of bread. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 16(4), 351-365. Geerken, T.H., Scholliers, D., De Vooght, C., Spirinckx, V., Van Holderbeke, M., &Vercalsteren, A. (2006). Analysis of the 4 Cases 1/5. Case Study: Bread, Sustainability Developments of Product Systems, 1800-2000. The Belgian Science Policy. pp. 29-43. Guinée, J. B. (2002). Handbook on life cycle assessment operational guide to the ISO standards. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 7(5), 311-313. ISO. (2006). Environmental Management- Life Cycle Assessment- Principles and Framework- ISO,14040. Geneva, Switzerland. Karakaya, A., & Özilgen, M. (2011). Energy utilization and carbon dioxide emission in the fresh, paste, whole-peeled, diced, and juiced tomato production processes. Energy, 36(8), 5101-5110. Kitani, O. (1999). CIGR handbook of agricultural engineering. Energy and biomass engineering, ASAE Publications, St Joseph, MI. Kulak, M., Nemecek, T., Frossard, E., Chable, V., & Gaillard, G. (2015). Life cycle assessment of bread from several alternative food networks in Europe. Journal of Cleaner Production, 90, 104-113. Maupu, P., Berthoud, A., Négri, O., Leguereau, B., Gely, B., & Poupart, A. (2012). Traceability of environmental information all along the cereal industry: from the wheat field to the bakery. In Proceedings 2nd LCA Conference, November, (Vol. 6, p. 7). Nabavi-Pelesaraei, A., Abdi, R., Rafiee, S., & Mobtaker, H. G. (2014). Optimization of energy required and greenhouse gas emissions analysis for orange producers using data envelopment analysis approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 65, 311-317. Namdari, M. (2015). Optimization of sugar beet production using colonial competition algorithm and life cycle assessment of sugar production. Ph. D. Thesis. University of Tehran, Iran. (In Persian with English abstract). Notarnicola, B., Sala, S., Castellani, V., Tassielli, G., Renzulli, P.A., & Goralczyk, M. (2015). Environmental impact of the european food basket using LCA. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Life Cycle Assessment as Reference Methodology for Assessing Supply Chains and Supporting Global Sustainability Challenges: LCA for “feeding the Planet and Energy for Life”. Stresa, 6-7thOctober 2015-Milano, Expo, 8th October 2015. ENEA, Roma. Notarnicola, B., Tassielli, G., Renzulli, P. A., & Monforti, F. (2017). Energy flows and greenhouses gases of EU (European Union) national breads using an LCA (Life Cycle Assessment) approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 140,455-469. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 533 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 401 |
||