پیوندهای مفید
اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 161 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 6,532 |
| تعداد مقالات | 70,501 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 124,097,640 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 97,205,310 |
بررسی اثرات رژیم آبیاری و کود زیستی بر عملکرد و اجزاء عملکرد گندم | ||
| به زراعی کشاورزی | ||
| مقاله 2، دوره 22، شماره 2، تیر 1399، صفحه 193-204 اصل مقاله (860.94 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22059/jci.2019.281664.2219 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| شهرام امیدواری* 1؛ نادر سلامتی2؛ صمد عبدی3 | ||
| 1استادیار پژوهش بخش تحقیقات خاک و آب، مرکز تحقیقات، آموزش کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی کرج، سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی، تهران، ایران. | ||
| 2استادیار پژوهش بخش تحقیقات خاک و آب، مرکز تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی خوزستان، سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی، اهواز، ایران. | ||
| 3استادیار پژوهش بخش تحقیقات خاک و آب، مرکز تحقیقات، آموزش کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی لرستان، سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی، خرم‌آباد، ایران. | ||
| چکیده | ||
| به منظور بررسی تأثیر رژیم آبیاری و کودهای زیستی بر عملکرد و اجزای عملکرد در کشت گندم، آزمایشی به صورت کرت‌های یک بار خرد شده در قالب طرح آماری بلوک‌های کامل تصادفی با سه تکرار در سال زراعی 1393-1392 در ایستگاه تحقیقات کشاورزی سراب چنگایی خرم‌آباد اجرا گردید. عامل اصلی شامل آبیاری در دو سطح 75 و 150 میلی‌متر تبخیر از تشت کلاس A و عامل فرعی، کود زیستی در چهار سطح شامل ازتوباکتر، مایکوریزا، ازتوباکتر+ مایکوریزا و شاهد (بدون استفاده از کود زیستی) بودند. نتایج نشان داد اثر آبیاری و کود و همچنین اثر متقابل کود و آبیاری بر صفات اندازه گیری شده معنی دار است. تیمار 75 میلی‌متر تبخیر از تشت کلاس A در تمام صفات برتری معنی داری نسبت به تیمار 150 میلی‌متر تبخیر از تشت کلاس A داشت. در تیمار 75 میلی‌متر تبخیر صفت طول سنبله 7 درصد ، وزن سنبله 7/7 درصد، تعداد دانه در سنبله 7/6 درصد، وزن هزار دانه 3/7 درصد، عملکرد دانه 1/7 درصد، عملکرد بیولوژیک 4/7 درصد نسبت به تیمار 150 میلی‌متر تبخیر افزایش نشان داد. کود ازتوباکتر +مایکوریزا در بین تیمارهای کودی تیمار برتر بود. به طوری که در این تیمار نسبت به تیمار شاهد صفت طول سنبله 6/28 درصد، وزن سنبله 3/48 درصد، تعداد دانه در سنبله 9/56 درصد، وزن هزار دانه8/39 درصد، عملکرد دانه 4/54 درصد، عملکرد بیولوژیک 3/51 درصد و کارایی مصرف آب 7/55 درصد افزایش نشان داد. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| افزایش عملکرد؛ تبخیر؛ کارایی مصرف آب؛ کود زیستی؛ عملکرد بیولوژیک | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Study the effects of irrigation regime and biofertilizers on yield and yield component of wheat | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| shahram omidvari1؛ Nader Salamati2؛ Samad Abdi3 | ||
| 1Assisstant professor of Soil and Water Research Department,Karaj Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, AREEO, Tehran, Iran. | ||
| 2Assistant Professor, Soil and Water Research Department, Khouzestan Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center. Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Ahvaz, Iran. | ||
| 3Assistant Professor, Soil and Water Research Department, Lorestan Agricultural Education and Natural Resources. Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Khoramabad, Iran. | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| In order to investigate the effect of irrigation regime and biofertilizers on yield and yield components of irrigated wheat, an experiment was conducted in a split-plot layout based on randomized complete block design with three replications at Sarab Changai research station, Khoramabad, during 2014-2015 crop year. Irrigation intervals were in two levels including 75 and 150 mm evaporation from A class evaporation pan were allocated to main plots and biological fertilizers were in four levels including Azotobacter, Micorhiza, Azotobacter + Micorhiza and blank (No fertilizer use) were allocated to sub plots. The results showed that the effect of Irrigation intervals, biological fertilizer and their interaction effects on determined characteristics are significant. 75 mm evaporation from A class evaporation pan was superior than the 150 mm evaporation in all traits. In 75 mm evaporation spike length (7%), spike weight (7.7%), grain number in spike(6.7%), Weight of one thousand grains (7.3%), grain yield(7.1%), biological yield(7.4%) were higher than 150 mm evaporation. Azotobacter + Micorhiza fertilizer treatment was superior to other fertilizer treatments. So that In this treatment the spike length was 28.6%, spike weight 48.3%, number of seeds per spike 56.9%, 1000 grain weight 39.8%, grain yield 54.4%, biological yield 51.3% and water use efficiency 55.7% were increased than blank. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| Biological yield, Biologic fertilizer, Evaporation, Water use efficiency, Yield increase | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Abotalebian, M. A. & Khalili, M. (2014). Effect of arbuscular mycorrhiza and Bradyrhizobium japonicum on soybean yield and yield components under water stress. Iranian Journal of Field Crop Science, 45(2), 169-181. DOI: 10.22059/IJFCS.2014.51896. (in Persian) Amraei, B., Ardakani, M.R., Rafei, M., Paknejad, F. & Rejali, F. (2018). Effect of biofertilizer (Mycorrhizal and Azotobacter) application on yield and some agronomic characters of wheat varieties (Triticum aestivum L.) under dry land conditions of Khorramabad, Lorestan province. Journal of Agronomy and Plant Breeding, 12(2), 1-17. Baghani, J. & Ghodsi, M. (2004). Effect of irrigation intervals on yield of wheat cultivars. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research. 5(19), 1-14. (in Persian) Bahrani, A., Pourreza, J. & Hagh Joo, M. (2010). Response of Winter Wheat to co-inoculation with Azotobacter and Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi (AMF) under different sources of nitrogen fertilizer. American-Eurasian Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, 8(1), 95-103. http://www.idosi.org/.../14.pdf Biyari, A., Gholami, A. & Asadi Rahmani, H. (2008). Sustainable production and improvement of nutrient absorption by maize in reaction to seed inoculation by PGPR. Proceeding of the 2nd National Iranian Agroecology Conference, Gorgan, Iran p. 8. (in Persian) Cakir, R. (2004). Effect of Water Stress at Different Development Stages on Vegetative and Reproductive Growth of Corn. Field Crops Research,89,1-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2004.01.005. Choukan, R. (2015). Final report of Yield trial of promising late and medium maturing maize hybrids (final stage). Ministry OF Jahad-e-Agriculture. Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization. Seed and Plant Improvement Institute, 16. (in Persian) Cooper, K. M. & Tinker, P. B. (2003). Translocation and transfer of nutrients in vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhiza. Uptake and translocation of phosphorus, zinc and sulphur. New Phytologist, 81, 43-52. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.1978.tb01602.x Daneshmand, N. G., Bakhshandeh, A. & Rostami, M.R. (2012). Biofertilizer afects yield and yield components of wheat. International Journal of Agriculture, 2(6), 699-704. http://ecisi.com/.../699-704.doc.pdf Emam, Y. & Niknejad, M. (2004). An Introduction to the Physiology of Crop Yield. 2nd Ed., Shiraz University Press, 571 p. Iran. Ghodsi, M., Nazeri, S. M. & Zare' Feyzabadi, A. (1998). Response of new cultivars and spring wheat elite lines to drought stress. Proceedings of the 5th Iranian Congress of Crop Scinces, Karaj. pp.252. Hassanpour, J. & Zand, B. (2014). Effect of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) seed inoculation with bio-fertilizers on reduction of drought stress damage. Iranian Journal of Seed Sciences and Research, 1(2), 1-12. (in Persian) Kiani, A. R. & Raeisi, S. (2013).Assessment of water use efficiency in some soybean cultivars under different amount of irrigation . Journal of Water and Soil Conservation, 20(5). (in Persian) Kiani, A.R., Mirlatifi, M., Homaee, M. & Gheraghi, A. (2004). Effect of different irrigation regimes and salinity on wheat yield in Gorgon region. Journal of Science and Technology of Agriculture and Natural Resources, 11, 79-90. (in Persian) Leilah, A. A. &Al-Khateeb, S. (2005). Statistical analysis of wheat yield under drought conditions. Journal of Arid Environments, 61, 483-496. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaridenv.2004.10.011 Marschner, H. (1995). Mineral Nutrition of Higher Plants. .Second edition. 889pp. London: Academic Press, England. Moemeni, A., Afuni, D. & Zarei, G. (2008). Comparison of yield and genetic features of some advanced lines of wheat under late season drought. Journal of Crop Science and Plant, 5, 63-71. (in Persian) Mohamadi, S. (2014). Evolution of Grain Yield and its Components Relationships in Bread Wheat Genotypes under Full Irrigation and Terminal Water Stress Conditions Using Multivariate Statistical Analysis. Iranian Journal of Field Crops Research, 12(1), 99-109. (in Persian) Nabati, I. & Sharifi, P. (2016). The Effect of Irrigation Regimes on Yield and Yield Componets of Three Wheat Cultivars. Journal of Crop Ecophysiology, 10 (1), 183-200. (in Persian) Namarvari, M., Fathi, G., Bakhshandeh, A., Gharineh, M. H. & Jafari, S. (2013). Effect of Drought Stress and Biological and Chemical Fertilizerson Wheat Flag Leaf Chlorophyll and Correlation with the Grain Yield. Journal of Crop Production and Processing, 3(10), 79-87. (in Persian). http://jcpp.iut.ac.ir/article-1-2005-fa.html Namvar, A. & Khandan, T. (2013). Response of wheat to mineral nitrogen fertilizer and biofertilizer (Azotobacter sp. and Azospirillum sp.) inoculation under diferent levels of weed interference. EKOLOGIJA. 59(2), 85-94. DOI: 10.6001/ekologija.v59i2.2711 Ortas, I., Sari, N., Akpinar, C. & Yetisir, H. (2011). Screening mycorrhiza species for plant growth, P and Zn uptake in pepper seedling grown under greenhouse conditions. Scientia Horticulturae, 128(2), 92-98. DOI: 10.1016/j.scienta.2010.12.014 pandya, A., Naik, N. & Markande, A.R. (2017). Effects of enhancers with biofertilizer on the better Wheat (Triticum aestivum) growth. Journal of Pharmacy and Applied Sciences, 3(2), 14-18. Sadras, V. O. & Milro, S. P. (1996). Soil-water thresholds for the responses of leaf expantion and gas exchange: A review. Field Crops Research, 47, 253-266. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-4290(96)00014-7 Saini, V. K., Bhandari, S. C. & Tarafdar, J. C. (2004). Comparison of crop yield, soil microbial C, N and P, N-fxation, nodulation and mycorrhizal infection in inoculated and non-inoculated sorghum and chickpea crops. Field Crops Research, 89, 39-47. DOI: 10.1016/j.fcr.2004.01.013 Samsami, N., Nakhzari Moghaddam, A., Rahemi Karizaki, A. & Gholinezhad, E. (2019). Effect of mycorrhizal fungi and rhizobium bacterial on qualitative and quantitative traits of soybean in response to drought stress. Crops Improvement (Journal of Agricultural Crops Production), 2(1), 13-26. (in Persian) Sepahvand, M. (2009). Comparison of Water Requirement, Water Productivity and Its Economic Productivity in Wheat and Canola in the West of Iran during Rainy Years. Iranian Journal of Water Research, 3(4), 63-68. (in Persian) Singh, R. R. & Parasad, K. (2011). Effect of bio-fertilizers on growth and productivity of wheat (Triticum aestivum). Journal of Farm Sciences, 1(1), 1-8. Smith, S. E. & Read, D. J. (1997). Mycorrhizal Symbiosis. Academic Press, San Diego, United States. Song, H. 2005. Effects of VAM on host plantin the condition of drought stress and its mechanism. Electronic Journal of Biology, 1, 44-48. Welong, L., Zizhen, L. & Weid, L. (2004). Effect of the niche-fithness at different water supiyment fertilization on yield of spring wheat in farmland of semi-arid area, Agricultural Water Management, 67, 1-13. DOI:10.1016/j.agwat.2003.12.007 Yadegari, M., Asadirahmani, H., Noormohammadi, G. & Ayneband, A. (2010). Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria increase growth, yield and nitrogen fixation in Phaseolus vulgaris. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 33(12), 1733-743, 1733-1743. DOI: 10.1080/01904167.2010.503776 Zahir, A. Z., Arshad, M. & Frankenberger, W. F. (2004). Plant growth promoting hizobacteria: applications and perspectives in agriculture. Advances in Agronomy, 81, 97-168. DOI: 10.1016/S0065-2113(03)81003-9 | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 561 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 474 |
||