تعداد نشریات | 161 |
تعداد شمارهها | 6,489 |
تعداد مقالات | 70,096 |
تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 123,173,239 |
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 96,404,174 |
بررسی پیشرفت تدریجی در یادگیری دستور زبان انگلیسی میان زبانآموزان ایرانی سطح مبتدی با استفاده از بازی های رایانهای مختص یادگیری زبان انگلیسی | ||
پژوهشهای زبانشناختی در زبانهای خارجی | ||
مقاله 5، دوره 9، شماره 3، آذر 1398، صفحه 763-788 اصل مقاله (250.29 K) | ||
نوع مقاله: علمی پژوهشی(عادی) | ||
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22059/jflr.2019.264666.547 | ||
نویسندگان | ||
روح اله ترکی* 1؛ محمود نبی لو2؛ پونه مرادی3 | ||
1کارشناس ارشد آموزش زبان انگلیسی، دانشگاه خاتم الانبیاء(ص)، تهران، ایران | ||
2کارشناس ارشد آموزش زبان انگلیسی، دانشگاه پیام نور، قم، ایران | ||
3کارشناس زبان انگلیسی، دانشگاه پیام نور، شهرری، ایران | ||
چکیده | ||
این تحقیق تاثیر بازیهای رایانهای یادگیری زبان بر فراگیری دستور زبان انگلیسی، میان زبانآموزان ایرانی سطح مبتدی از طریق پیشرفت تدریجی را مورد بررسی قرار داده است. تعداد 40 یادگیرنده مذکر بین 8 تا 12 سال بر اساس نمرات آزمون تعیینسطح، بصورت همگن در یکگروه آزمایشی و یکگروه کنترل شرکت کردند. در گروه آزمایشی از بازیهای رایانهای یادگیری زبان برای تدریس حال ساده، حال استمراری، گذشته ساده، و گذشته استمراری استفاده شد و در گروه کنترل از روشهای متداول سنتی. دادههای تحقیق از یکمجموعه آزمون چهارگزینهای 40 سوالی در شش نوبت (یک پیشآزمون، چهار پسآزمون، و یک پسآزمون تاخیری) گردآوری شده است. نتایج آزمونهای آماری حاکی از عملکرد بهتر گروه آزمایشی در پسآزمونها نسبت بهپیشآزمون بوده که تفاوت آماری معناداری مشاهده شد. یافتههای تحقیق برای استادان و زبانآموزان، روششناسان و طراحان برنامههای درسی، زبانشناسان و کارشناسان آموزش زبان بهکمک رایانه ارزشمند است. | ||
کلیدواژهها | ||
بازی های رایانه ای؛ زبان آموزان مبتدی؛ دستور زبان انگلیسی؛ پیشرفت تدریجی؛ آموزش زبان به کمک رایانه | ||
عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
A microgenetic development study of learning English grammar through CALL in Iranian EFL beginner learners | ||
نویسندگان [English] | ||
Rouholla Torki1؛ Mahmoud Nabilou2؛ Poune Moradi3 | ||
1English department, Khatam-ol-Anbia University, Tehran, Iran | ||
2Department of English, Payame Noor University, Qom, Iran | ||
3Department of English, Payam Nour University, Shahre Ray, Tehran, Iran | ||
چکیده [English] | ||
The present study explored the effect of computer language learning games on learning grammar by Iranian English learners in a microgenetic development setting. Forty male elementary English learners aged between 8 and 12, participated in the study. Based on the placement test scores, the homogenized participants were placed in one experimental and one control group. The experimental group received the treatment using computer language learning games to teach English grammar- simple present, present continuous, simple past, and past continuous- while the control group received traditional methods. The research data were obtained from a 40-item multiple choice tests in six times- as a pre-test, four post-tests, and a delayed post-test. The results of t-test revealed better performance of experimental group learners in post-tests than the pre-test. However, a statistically significant difference was found. The findings are valuable for teachers and learners, methodologists and syllabus designers, linguists and CALL experts. | ||
کلیدواژهها [English] | ||
Computer Games, Elementary EFL Learners, English Grammar, microgenetic development, computer language learning | ||
مراجع | ||
Abu Naba’h, A. (2012). The impact of computer assisted grammar teaching on EFL pupils’ performance in Jordan. International Journal of Education and Development using Information and Communication Technology (IJEDICT), 8(1). 71-90.
Bowles, M. A. (2004). L2 glossing: To CALL or not to CALL. Hispania, 87(3), 541-552.
Clarke, P. (2009). Supporting Children Learning English as a Second Language in the Early Years (birth to six years). Victoria: Victorian Curriculum and Assessment Authority.
Crystal, D. (2004). Words and Deed. Available online at http://www.davidcrystal.com/ DC_articles/Education2.pdf.
De Groot, A. M. B. (2000). What is hard to learn is easy to forget: The roles of word concreteness, cognate status, and word frequency in foreign-language vocabulary learning and forgetting. Language Learning, 50, 1-56.
deHaan, J. (2011). Teaching and learning English through digital game projects. Digital Culture & Education, 3(1), 46-55. Available at: http://www.digitalcultureand education.com/cms/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/dce1046_dehaan_2011.pdf
De la Fuente, M. J. (2003). Is SLA interactionist theory relevant to CALL? A study on the effects of computer-mediated interaction in L2 vocabulary acquisition. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 16 (1), 47-81.
Dislen, G. (2013). The Reasons of Lack of Motivation from the Students’ and Teachers’ Voices. ASOS Journal. 1(1), 35-45.
Eskandari, Z., Khonmohammad, H., & Komeijanifarahani, A. A. (2014). The effects of using games on English grammar with focus on Iranian young learners of English. International Journal of Language Learning and Applied Linguistics World, 5(1), 458-471.
Fotovatnia, Z., & Namjoo, M. (2013). The effects of cooperative versus competitive word games on EFL learners` vocabulary gain, motivation, and class atmosphere. MJSS, 4(1). doi:10.5901/mjss.2013.v4n1p189
Ghafoori, B., Dastgoshadeh, A., Aminpanah, A., & Ziaei, Sh. (2016). The effect of CALL on Iranian EFL learners' grammar of writing. International Journal of Language Learning and Applied Linguistics World, Volume 12(3). 14-23.
Ghorbani, S., & Marzban, A. (2013). The effect of CALL on Iranian beginner EFL learners’ grammar learning. Journal of Academic and Applied Studies (Special Issue on Applied Linguistics), 3(7). 15-25.
Jafari, D., Madani, D., & Maghsoudi, M. (2013). The effect of using the instructional games on Iranian EFL learners' vocabulary achievement and their retention. Retrieved from: http://www.languageinindia.com/oct2013/jafarigames.pdf
Lee, S. K. (1995). Creative games for the language class. Language Teaching, 33(1), 35-41.
Levy, M. (1997). Computer-Assisted Language Learning. Oxford University Press, New York.
Lindsay, C., & Knight, P. (2010). Learning and teaching English: A course for teachers. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
McCreesh, B. (1986). Do students learn more from a computer than from a book? Bulletin de l'ACLA/Bulletin of the CAAL, 8(2), 103-109.
Mohamad, F., & Amin, N. M. (2009). The effectiveness of customized courseware in teaching grammar. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference of Teaching and Learning (ICTL 2009), INTI University College, Malaysia.
Naraghizadeh, M., & Barimani, Sh. (2013). The effect of CALL on vocabulary learning of Iranian EFL learners. Journal of academic and applied studies (special issue on applied linguistics), 3(8), 1-12.
Nguyen, D., & Luu, T. (2012). Teaching English grammar through games. Studies in Literature and Language, 1(7), 61-75.
Nutta, J. (1998). Is computer-based grammar instruction as effective as teacher-directed grammar instruction for teaching L2 structures? CALICO Journal, 16(1). 49-62.
Paris, T. N. S. T., & Yussof, R. L. (2012). Enhancing grammar using board game. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 68(2012) 213 – 221
Tozcu, A., & Coady, J. (2004). Successful learning of frequent vocabulary through CALL also benefits reading comprehension and speed. Computer Assisted Language Learning. 17(5). 473-495.
Tuan, L. T., & Doan, N. T. M. (2010). Teaching English grammar through games. Studies in Literature and Language. 1(7). 61-75
Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.
Ur, P. (1988). Grammar practice activities: A practical guide for teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Woolfolk, A. E., Winne, P. H., & Perry, N. E. (2011). Educational Psychology. Pearson Canada; 5th edition.
Young, S. S. C., & Wang, Y. H. (2014). The Game Embedded CALL System to Facilitate English Vocabulary Acquisition and Pronunciation. Educational Technology & Society, 17(3), 239–251. | ||
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 737 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 584 |