نظام ملی ارزیابی؛ نیاز مبرم فرایندهای قانون‌گذاری و برنامه‌ریزی جمهوری اسلامی ایران

1- امامی‌میبدی, راضیه. (۱۳۹۴). اصول عام ارزیابی نظام‌های ارزیابی سیاست. دوفصلنامه علمی پژوهشی دانش سیاسی, ۱۱(۱), ۴۵-۶۸.

2- امامی‌میبدی, راضیه, & اشتریان, کیومرث. (1391). طراحی نظام ارزیابی سیاست‌های عمومی در جمهوری اسلامی ایران. پژوهشنامه علوم سیاسی, 7(2).

3- سلطانی, علی‌محمد‌. (1390). مدل ارزیابی سیاستگذاری فناوری نانو در ایران. (پایان‌نامه دکترای تخصصی), دانشگاه علامه طباطبایی.  

4- غفاری, غلامرضا. (1388). منطق پژوهش تطبیقی. مجله مطالعات اجتماعی ایران, 3(4).

قانون برنامه و بودجه کشور,  (1351).

5- Arnold, E. (2004). Evaluating research and innovation policy: a systems world needs systems evaluations. Research Evaluation, 13(1), 3-17.

6- Arnold, E., & Balazs, K. (1998). Methods in the Evaluation of Publicly Funded Basic Research. A review for OECD. Can be found at: www.technopolis.co.uk/reports.

7- BIS. (2010). Impact Assessment Toolkit; a guide to undertaking an impact assessment and completing the IA Template. Retrieved from London:

8- Blalock, Ann Bonar. (1999). Evaluation research and the performance management movement: from estrangement to useful integration? Evaluation, 5(2), 117-149.

9- bovens, mark, hart, paul ’t, & kuipers, sanneke. (2006). THE POLITICS OF POLICY EVALUATION The Oxford Handbook of Public Policy: Oxford University Press.

10- Brass, Clinton T. (2012). Changes to the Government Performance and Results Act (GPRA): Overview of the new framework of products and processes. Retrieved from

11- Basic Guidelines for Implementing Policy Evaluation（Revised）,  (2017).

12- CEE. (2018). Centre of Excellence for Evaluation (CEE).   Retrieved from https://www.canada.ca/en/treasury-board-secretariat/services/audit-evaluation/centre-excellence-evaluation.html

13- Clinton, Janet. (2014). The true impact of evaluation: Motivation for ECB. American journal of evaluation, 35(1), 120-127.

14- CONEVAL. (2018). The National Council for the Evaluation of Social Development Policy (CONEVAL).   Retrieved from https://www.coneval.org.mx/quienessomos/Paginas/Quienes-somos-en.aspx

15- Cunion, K. M. (1995). UK Government Departments experience of RT&D programme evaluation and methodology. Scientometrics, 34(3), 363-374.

16- Curristine, Teresa. (2006). Performance information in the budget process. OECD Journal on Budgeting, 5(2), 87-131.

17- Džinić, Jasmina. (2017). Effective Implementation of a Quality Management Policy in Public Administration: Experiences from Spain and Lessons for Croatia. Croatian & Comparative Public Administration, 17(4).

18- Evans, Mark. (2017). Policy transfer in global perspective: Routledge.

19- Fahrenkrog, G., Polt, W., Rojo, J., Tübke, A., Zinöcker, K., Eth, S. A., et al. (2002). RTD evaluation toolbox. Retrieved from

20- Feinstein, Osvaldo, & Zapico-Goñi, Eduardo. (2010). Evaluation of government performance and public policies in Spain. Retrieved from

21- Government_of_Botswana. (2018). National AIDS Coordinating Agency (NACA).   Retrieved from http://www.gov.bw/en/Ministries--Authorities/Ministries/State-President/National-AIDS-Coordinating-Agency-NACA1/Monitoring--Evaluation/Overview/

22- Government Policy Evaluations Act (Act No. 86 of 2001),  (2001).

23- HM_Treasury. (2018). THE GREEN BOOK; CENTRAL GOVERNMENT GUIDANCE ON APPRAISAL AND EVALUATION.

24- Lengrand, L. (2006). Smart Innovation: A Practical Guide to Evaluating Innovation Programmes. Retrieved from

25- Lu, Xuejin, & Xie, Donhai. (2005). Evaluation in the People's Republic of China. Journal of Multidisciplinary Evaluation, 2(3), 172-179.

26- McDavid, James C, Huse, Irene, Hawthorn, Laura RL, & Ingleson, Laura RL. (2012). Program evaluation and performance measurement: Sage.

27- Mertens, Donna M, & Wilson, Amy T. (2018). Program evaluation theory and practice: Guilford Publications.

28- MIC, Japan. (2018). Guidance on the Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications.   Retrieved from http://www.soumu.go.jp/english/soumu/io.html

29- NABO. (2018). National Assembly Budget Office - Program Evaluation Bureau Retrieved from http://korea.nabo.go.kr/eng/01_about/program.page

30- Newcomer, Kathryn E, Hatry, Harry P, & Wholey, Joseph S. (2015). Handbook of practical program evaluation Fourth Edition: John Wiley & Sons.

31- Radin, Beryl A. (2000). The Government Performance and Results Act and the tradition of federal management reform: Square pegs in round holes? Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 10(1), 111-135.

32- Rosenstein, Barbara. (2015). Status of National Evaluation Policies Global Mapping Report. Retrieved from

33- Runnels, Vivien, Andrew, Caroline, & Rae, Jennifer. (2017). Building Evaluation Culture and Capacity in a Community-Level Program: Lessons Learned from Evaluating Youth Futures. Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation, 32(1).

34- Sanderson, I. (2002). Evaluation, policy learning and evidence-based policy making. Public administration, 80(1), 1-22.

35- Sanderson, Ian. (2000). Evaluation in complex policy systems. Evaluation, 6(4), 433-454.

36- Smith, G. (1999). Make Success Measurable! A Mindbook-Workbook for Setting Goals and Taking Action. Toronto: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

37- Talbot, Colin. (2006). Performance regimes and institutional contexts: Comparing Japan, UK and USA. Paper presented at the International Symposium on Policy Evaluation, Tokyo.

38- US-Congress. (1993). Government Performance and Results Act of 1993.

39- Van Dooren, Wouter, Bouckaert, Geert, & Halligan, John. (2015). Performance management in the public sector: Routledge.