An Intelligent Model of Transparent Governance in Policymaker Organizations with the Approach of Good Governance

Sepehrnia, Roya; Alborzi, Mahmood; Kermanshah, Ali; Azar, Adel; Sepehrnia, Rozita

doi:10.22059/jitm.2020.294437.2438

فهرست نشریات

فهرست نشریات دارای اعتبار وزارت علوم، تحقیقات و فناوری

فهرست مجلات علمی- پژوهشی دانشگاه تهران

نحوه ارسال مقاله برای مجله- ثبت نام در سامانه- فراموش کردن رمز عبور

تعداد نشریات	161
تعداد شماره‌ها	6,573
تعداد مقالات	71,033
تعداد مشاهده مقاله	125,502,607
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله	98,766,773

	An Intelligent Model of Transparent Governance in Policymaker Organizations with the Approach of Good Governance
Journal of Information Technology Management
مقاله 3، دوره 12، شماره 1، 2020، صفحه 43-66 اصل مقاله (630.37 K)
نوع مقاله: Research Paper
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22059/jitm.2020.294437.2438
نویسندگان
Roya Sepehrnia¹؛ Mahmood Alborzi^* ²؛ Ali Kermanshah³؛ Adel Azar⁴؛ Rozita Sepehrnia⁵
¹Ph.D. Candidate in Information Technology Management/ Business Intelligence, Department of Information Technology Management, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
²Associate Prof., Department of Information Technology Management, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
³Associate Professor, Department of Management, Sharif University of Technology, Tehran, Iran.
⁴Professor, Department of Management, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran.
⁵Assistant Professor of Social Science, Roudehen Branch, Islamic Azad University, Roudehen, Iran.
چکیده
The new paradigm of good governance has an emphasis on international transparency, and this in this study takes into account the actual impacts of organizational intelligence in policymaker organizations. This study primarily aims to design an intelligent model of transparent governance in policymaker organizations with the approach of good governance. The study is a fundamental research in terms of objectives. In the qualitative section, data collection was done through Delphi interview questions, and the statistical population was senior managers, specialists, and policymakers with targeted sampling. In the quantitative part, the population was mid-level managers and organizational intelligence experts. The random sampling method was via the Cochran formula, and 432 individuals were selected. Data gathering tools were interviews and researcher-made survey questionnaires. The content and face validity and Cronbach alpha reliability were employed. The data were analyzed by descriptive and inferential statistics, including factor analysis, regression, and structural equations. Model fit and Friedman test were employed. The findings indicated three dimensions in the proposed model design, including transparency, knowledge creation, and knowledge translation, along with six components, five subcomponents, and 23 indicators. The results suggested that there is a relatively strong and appropriate relationship between organizational intelligence and organizational transparency. Furthermore, sense-making had the highest correlation with organizational transparency. Also, the strongest predictor was the sense-making variable.
کلیدواژه‌ها
Organizational intelligence؛ Intelligent governance؛ Good governance؛ Transparency؛ Policymaker organizations؛ Transparent intelligent governance

مراجع
Bencherki, N., Basque, J., & Rouleau, L. (2019). A Sensemaking Perspective on Open Strategy. In D. Seidl, R. Whittington, & G. von Krogh (Eds.), Cambridge Handbook of Open Strategy (pp. 241–258). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108347921.015 Bowman, G. (2016). The Practice of Scenario Planning: An Analysis of Inter- and Intra-organizational Strategizing. British Journal of Management. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12098 Brinkerhoff, D. W. (2018). Accountability and Good Governance: Concepts and Issues. In International Development Governance (pp. 269–287). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315092577-15 Brunswicker, S., Pujol Priego, L., & Almirall, E. (n.d.). Transparency in policymaking: A complexity view. Elsevier. Retrieved January 10, 2020, from https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0740624X18301047 Cheng, S., Dai, R., Xu, W., & Shi, Y. (2006). Research on data mining and knowledge management and its applications in China’s economic development: Significance and trend. International Journal of Information Technology and Decision Making, 5(4), 585–596. https://doi.org/10.1142/S021962200600226X Clark, T. D., Jones, M. C., & Armstrong, C. P. (2007). The dynamic structure of management support systems: Theory development, research focus, and direction. MIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems, 31(3), 579–615. https://doi.org/10.2307/25148808 Cook, S. D. N., & Brown, J. S. (1999). Bridging Epistemologies: The Generative Dance between Organizational Knowledge and Organizational Knowing. Organization Science, 10(4), 381–400. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.10.4.381 Cucciniello, M., Porumbescu, G. A., & Grimmelikhuijsen, S. (2017). 25 Years of Transparency Research: Evidence and Future Directions. Public Administration Review, 77(1), 32–44. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12685 De Fine Licht, J., Naurin, D., Esaiasson, P., & Gilljam, M. (2014). When Does Transparency Generate Legitimacy? Experimenting on a Context-Bound Relationship. Governance, 27(1), 111–134. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12021 Ganguli, D. (2017a). Corporate Governance and Implications. Journal of Industrial Relationship, Corporate Governance & Management Explorer (e ISSN 2456-9461), 1(1), 1–5. Ganguli, D. (2017b). Corporate Governance and Implications. Journal of Industrial Relationship, Corporate Governance & Management Explorer (e ISSN 2456-9461), 1(1), 1–5. Golfarelli, M., Rizzi, S., & Cella, I. (2004). Beyond data warehousing: What’s next in business intelligence? In DOLAP: Proceedings of the ACM International Workshop on Data Warehousing and OLAP (pp. 1–6). ACM. Gregory, R. (2018). Assessing ‘good governance’: ‘scientific’ measurement and political discourse. Policy Quarterly, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.26686/pq.v10i1.4478 Hansen, H. K., & Flyverbom, M. (2015). The politics of transparency and the calibration of knowledge in the digital age. Organization, 22(6), 872–889. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508414522315 Hong, J. F. L., Snell, R. S., & Mak, C. (2016). Knowledge Assimilation at Foreign Subsidiaries of Japanese MNCs through Political Sensegiving and Sensemaking. Organization Studies, 37(9), 1297–1321. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840616634128 Huang, J., Newell, S., Huang, J., & Pan, S. L. (2014). Site-shifting as the source of ambidexterity: Empirical insights from the field of ticketing. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 23(1), 29–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2014.01.001 Janssen, M., Chun, S. A., & Gil-Garcia, J. R. (2009). Building the next generation of digital government infrastructures. Government Information Quarterly, 26(2), 233–237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2008.12.006 Keser, A., & Gökmen, Y. (2018). Governance and Human Development: The Impacts of Governance Indicators on Human Development. Journal of Public Administration and Governance, 8(1), 26–39. https://doi.org/10.5296/jpag.v8i1.12336 Kolb, A. Y., & Kolb, D. A. (2005). Learning styles and learning spaces: Enhancing experiential learning in higher education. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 4(2), 193–212. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMLE.2005.17268566 Kuhn, T., & Jackson, M. H. (2008). Accomplishing knowledge: A framework for investigating knowing in organizations. Management Communication Quarterly, 21(4), 454–485. https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318907313710 Laoworapong, M., Supattarakul, S., & Swierczek, F. W. W. (2015). Corporate Governance, Board Effectiveness, and Performance of Thai Listed Firms. AU Journal Management, 13(1), 25–40. Retrieved January 10, 2020, from https://www.aujm.au.edu/index.php/aujm/article/view/17 Lee, T. H., & Boynton, L. A. (2017). Conceptualizing transparency: Propositions for the integration of situational factors and stakeholders’ perspectives. Public Relations Inquiry, 6(3), 233–251. https://doi.org/10.1177/2046147X17694937 Maitlis, S., & Christianson, M. (2014). Sensemaking in Organizations: Taking Stock and Moving Forward. Academy of Management Annals, 8(1), 57–125. https://doi.org/10.1080/19416520.2014.873177 Mason, R. O. (1986). Four ethical issues of the information age. In MIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems (Vol. 10, pp. 5–12). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315259697-8 Meijer, A., & Bolívar, M. P. R. (2016). Governing the smart city: a review of the literature on smart urban governance. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 82(2), 392–408. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852314564308 Mr Gagandeep, & Kumar, D. R. S. (2016). Corporate Governance in Banking Sector. CORPORATE GOVERNANCE, 20. Retrieved January 10, 2020, from http://www.eminencejournal.com/images/pdf/AG3.pdf Newell, S. (2015). Managing knowledge and managing knowledge work: What we know and what the future holds. Journal of Information Technology, 30(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1057/jit.2014.12 Oliver, R. E. (2009). What is transparency? McGraw Hill Professional. Pakseresht, S., & Afshar, Z. (2017). Assessment of program theory of anti-corruption policies in Iran of ofter revolution. Retrieved January 10, 2020, from https://www.sid.ir/en/journal/ViewPaper.aspx?id=611966 Prashantham, S., Eranova, M., & Couper, C. (2018). Globalization, entrepreneurship and paradox thinking. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 35(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-017-9537-9 Rawlins, B. (2008). Give the emperor a mirror: toward developing a stakeholder measurement of organizational transparency. Journal of Public Relations Research, 21(1), 71–99. https://doi.org/10.1080/10627260802153421 Reuer, J. J., & Klijn, E. (2018). Governance of Hybrid Organizations. Annals of Corporate Governance, 3(1), 1–81. https://doi.org/10.1561/109.00000008 Rouhani, S., Ashrafi, A., Zare Ravasan, A., & Afshari, S. (2016). The impact model of business intelligence on decision support and organizational benefits. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 29(1). https://doi.org/10.1108/JEIM-12-2014-0126 Sepehrnia, R., Alborzi, M., Kermanshah, A., & Azar, A. (2019). Creative Pattern of Transparency with an Emphasis on Good Governance for Policymaker Organizations in Iran. Quarterly Journal of Innovation and Creativity in Human Sciences, 9(2), 77–102. Shollo, A., & Galliers, R. D. (2016). Towards an understanding of the role of business intelligence systems in organizational knowing. Information Systems Journal, 26(4), 339–367. https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12071 Sudhir, K., & Talukdar, D. (2015). The “Peter Pan Syndrome” in Emerging Markets: The Productivity-Transparency Trade-off in IT Adoption. Marketing Science, 34(4), 500–521. https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.2015.0921 Tao, Y., & Tombros, A. (2017). How collaborators make sense of tasks together: A comparative analysis of collaborative sensemaking behavior in collaborative information-seeking tasks. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 68(3), 609–622. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23693 Tavares, A. F., & da Cruz, N. F. (2017). Explaining the transparency of local government websites through a political market framework. Government Information Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2017.08.005
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 732 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 800

سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. قدرت گرفته از سیناوب

پیوندهای مفید

پیوندهای مفید

اخبار و اعلانات

آمار

An Intelligent Model of Transparent Governance in Policymaker Organizations with the Approach of Good Governance