News

NAGHAVI, M., hosseini, S., ramazani, R., keshkar, S. (2020). Identification and modeling of social behavior shaping factors of professional athletes in Iran. , 12(1), 83-99. doi: 10.22059/jsm.2018.233153.1839
MAHBOUBEH NAGHAVI; seyed emad hosseini; rahim ramazani; sara keshkar. "Identification and modeling of social behavior shaping factors of professional athletes in Iran". , 12, 1, 2020, 83-99. doi: 10.22059/jsm.2018.233153.1839
NAGHAVI, M., hosseini, S., ramazani, R., keshkar, S. (2020). 'Identification and modeling of social behavior shaping factors of professional athletes in Iran', , 12(1), pp. 83-99. doi: 10.22059/jsm.2018.233153.1839
NAGHAVI, M., hosseini, S., ramazani, R., keshkar, S. Identification and modeling of social behavior shaping factors of professional athletes in Iran. , 2020; 12(1): 83-99. doi: 10.22059/jsm.2018.233153.1839

Identification and modeling of social behavior shaping factors of professional athletes in Iran

نشریه مدیریت ورزشی
Article 5, Volume 12, Issue 1, April 2020, Pages 83-99    PDF (375.67 K)
Document Type: Research Paper
DOI: 10.22059/jsm.2018.233153.1839
Authors
MAHBOUBEH NAGHAVI* 1; seyed emad hosseini2; rahim ramazani3; sara keshkar4
1Assistant Professor, physical education and sport sciences. Art University, Tehran, Iran
2Assistant Professor, Faculty of physical education and sport sciences. Shahid Behshti University, Tehran, Iran
3professor, Faculty of physical education and sport sciences. Gilan University, Rasht, Iran
4Associate Professor of Sport Management, Faculty of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, Allameh Tabataba’i University, Tehran, Iran
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to develop a model of social behaviors in Iranian professional athletes. The research was based on a combination of exploratory and sequential exploration. Data collection tools were qualitative phase, semi-structured and open interviews with 23 professional athletes, athletic instructors, sports managers, psychologists and sports sociologists. In the qualitative research, statistical samples were selected using snowball method. Data were analyzed in qualitative phase by coding method in three stages: open, axial and selective. The findings included 93 tokens in open coding. In the central coding stage, the factors affecting the formation of the social behaviors pattern of professional athletes in Iran are categorized in the form of organizational component, economic component, political component, cultural component, ethical component, technical component, social component, component of rules and component of internal factors. In the selected coding stage, we have developed a model of social behaviors of professional athletes in Iran. The research tool was a researcher-made questionnaire based on the qualitative results of the research. Sampling in quantitative phase, randomized, classified. In the quantitative phase, structural equations under the Smart PLS 3.00 software were used to evaluate the behavior patterns of professional athletes in Iran. According to the results of the test, the coefficients (t-value) of all factor loads were significant at 99% confidence level and played a significant and positive role in shaping the behavior patterns of Iranian athlete's athletes.
Keywords
Athletes; Modeling; professional sport; Social behavior; Structural equation
References

1. Mohseni RA. An Analysis of Aggressive Behavior and Exercise Violence with Emphasis on Social Psychosocial Approach. Journal of Sociology. 2009; 1(3): 51 – 72. (In Persian)
2. Eichberg H. The global, the popular and the inter-popular: Olympic sport between market, state and civil society. Post-Olympism?: Questioning Sport in the 21st Century: Berg Publishers; 2004. p. 65- 80.
3.Foroghepor H, Sabonchi R, Paktenat Z. Cognitive and Psycho-Motion Development of
Ethical Behavior in the Championship Sports of the Country . Quarterly Journal of Sport
Sciences Research. 2011; (2): 85 – 91. (In Persian).
4.Balcikanli GS. The Turkish adaptation of the prosocial and antisocial behavior in sport scale (PABSS). Int J Humanit Soc Sci. 2013;3(18):271-6.
5. Shaji R. Approaches and theories in football sociology. Tehran: Shoraf Arin; 2014. (In Persian).
6.Kampf S. A study of division I men's college basketball official's perceptions of sportsmanship: State University of New York at Buffalo; 2006.
7.Rutten EA, Schuengel C, Dirks E, Stams GJJ, Biesta GJ, Hoeksma JB. Predictors of antisocial and prosocial behavior in an adolescent sports context. Social Development. 2011;20(2):294-315.
8.Hodge K, Lonsdale C. Prosocial and antisocial behavior in sport: The role of coaching style, autonomous vs. controlled motivation, and moral disengagement. Journal of sport and exercise psychology. 2011;33(4):527-47.
9.Kavussanu M, Stanger N. Moral behavior in sport. Current opinion in psychology. 2017;16:185-92.
10.Al-Yaaribi A, Kavussanu M, Ring C. Consequences of prosocial and antisocial behavior for the recipient. Psychology of Sport and Exercise. 2016;26:102-12.
11. Al-Yaaribi A, Kavussanu M. Consequences of prosocial and antisocial behaviors in adolescent male soccer players: The moderating role of motivational climate. Psychology of Sport and Exercise. 2018;37:91-9.
12. MirSafian H. Study of the knowledge of sports coaches about their legal duties towards
athletes. Research in sports education. 2017; 111- 134. (In Persian)
13. Keshkar S, Kareghar GH, Beneaze R. Role of Television Sports Programs in Transferring
Ethical Values and Patterns of Students in Islamabad West. Journal of Sport Management.
2015; 7(4): 601 – 619. (In Persian)
14. Afroze Ms, Mozafari AM, Aghai N, Safari M. Identify areas and factors affecting the social responsibility of Iranian soccer clubs. Two quarterly management and sports development. 2014; 9(2): 70 – 89. (In Persian).
15. MacCallum RC, Widaman KF, Preacher KJ, Hong S. Sample size in factor analysis: The role of model error. Multivariate Behavioral Research. 2001;36(4):611-37.

Statistics
Article View: 762
PDF Download: 712


Journal Management System. Powered by Sinaweb