پیوندهای مفید
اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 161 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 6,532 |
| تعداد مقالات | 70,501 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 124,098,558 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 97,206,167 |
تأثیر نظام‌های مختلف تغذیه بر ویژگی‌های کمی و کیفی چغندر قند در شیوه‌های مختلف کشت | ||
| به زراعی کشاورزی | ||
| مقاله 5، دوره 23، شماره 1، فروردین 1400، صفحه 59-72 اصل مقاله (741.12 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22059/jci.2020.290174.2279 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| مهدی مهر اندیش1؛ محمد گلوی* 2؛ محمود رمرودی3؛ محمد آرمین4 | ||
| 1دانشجوی دکتری، گروه زراعت و اصلاح نباتات، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه زابل، زابل، ایران | ||
| 2استاد، گروه زراعت و اصلاح نباتات، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه زابل، زابل، ایران. | ||
| 3دانشیار، گروه زراعت و اصلاح نباتات، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه زابل، زابل، ایران | ||
| 4دانشیار، گروه زراعت و اصلاح نباتات، واحد سبزوار، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، سبزوار، ایران. | ||
| چکیده | ||
| به‌منظور بررسی تأثیر نظام‌های مختلف تغذیه (شیمیایی، آلی، شیمیایی+ آلی و شاهد) بر ویژگی‌های کمی و کیفی چغندرقند در شیوه‌های مختلف کشت (کشت مستقیم، کشت نشایی و گلدانی)، آزمایشی به‌صورت کرتهای خردشده در قالب طرح بلوکهای کامل تصادفی در سه تکرار در دو سال، 1397-1395 در مزرعه‌ای در کیلومتر 75 شمال‌غرب شهرستان سبزوار انجام شد. نتایج آزمایش نشان داد که در سال اول بالاترین عملکرد ریشه از تیمار تلفیقی کود شیمیایی و آلی و در شیوه کاشت گلدانی (84/84 تن در هکتار) و در سال دوم نیز از تیمار کود تلفیقی، ولی در شیوه کشت نشایی (96/82 تن در هکتار) به‌دست آمد. بالاترین درصد قند ناخالص در هر دو سال در تیمار شاهد و در شیوه کاشت مستقیم به‌دست آمد. بیش‌ترین عملکرد قند خالص هم در سال اول (29/13 تن در هکتار) و هم در سال دوم (54/14 تن در هکتار) را کشت نشایی تولید کرد. کشت‌های نشایی و گلدانی، ناخالصیهای ریشه بیش‌تری در مقایسه با کشت مستقیم داشتند. در بین روشهای تغذیهای، بالاترین ناخالصیهای ریشه در مصرف تلفیقی کود به‌دست آمد. کشت مستقیم و عدم مصرف کود نیز بالاترین شاخص قلیائیت را تولید کرد. در مجموع، نتایج نشان داد با وجود افزایش ناخالصیهای ریشه در کشت نشایی یا گلدانی و مصرف تلفیقی کود، این تیمارها بالاترین عملکرد قند را تولید کردند. بر این اساس کشت نشایی و کوددهی تلفیقی را می‌توان جهت تولید بالاترین عملکرد ریشه و قند توصیه کرد. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| کشت گلدانی؛ کشت نشایی؛ عملکرد قند؛ مدیریت تلفیقی کود؛ ناخالصی ریشه | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Effect of different nutrient system on quantitative and qualitative traits of sugar beet in different cultivation methods | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Mahdi Mehrandesh1؛ Mohammad Galavi2؛ Mahmoud Ramroudi3؛ Mohammad Armin4 | ||
| 1Ph.D. Student, Department of Agronomy and Plant Breeding, Faculty of Agriculture, Zabol University, Zabol, Iran | ||
| 2Professor, Department of Agronomy and Plant Breeding, Faculty of Agriculture, Zabol University, Zabol, Iran | ||
| 3Associate Professor, Department of Agronomy and Plant Breeding, Faculty of Agriculture, Zabol University, Zabol, Iran | ||
| 4Associate Professor, Department of Agronomy and Plant Breeding, Sabzevar Branch, Islamic Azad University, Sabzevar, Iran | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| In order to investigate the effect of different nutrition systems (chemical, organic, chemical+organic, and control) on quantitative and qualitative characteristics of sugar beet in various planting methods (direct planting, potting, and transplanting), an experiment has been conducted as split plot in randomized complete block design with three replicates between 2016 and 2018 in a field, 75 km northwest of Sabzevar. The results show that in the first year, the highest root yield (84.34tha-1) has been obtained from the potting method and chemical along with organic fertilizer application. In the second year, the highest yield (82.96tha-1) belongs to the chemical and organic fertilizer treatment in transplanting method. In both years, the highest sugar content has been obtained from control treatment and direct planting, with transplanting method having the highest sugar yield in both years (13.29 and 14.44 tha-1, respectively). Transplanting and potting method have had more root impurities than direct cultivation. Among nutrition systems, the highest root impurities is obtained in the combination of chemical and organic treatment. Direct culture and control produce the highest alkalinity index. Overall, despite the increase in root impurities in transplanting or potting along with chemical with organic treatment, these treatments produce the highest sugar yield. Accordingly, chemical and organic fertilization along with transplanting could be recommended to produce the highest root and sugar yield. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| Integrated nutrition, Pot culture, Root impurity, Sugar yield, Transplanting | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Abdel-Motagally, F. M. F. & Attia, K. K. (2009). Response of sugar beet plants to nitrogen and potassium fertilization in sandy calcareous soil. International Journal of Agriculture and Biology, 11, 695–700. Abdollahiannoghab, M., Shikholeslami, R., & Babaee, B. (2005). Technical terms of sugar beet quantity and quality. Journal of Sugar Beet, 21(1), 101-104. (In Persian). Abyaneh, H. Z., Jovzi, M., & Albaji, M. (2017). Effect of regulated deficit irrigation, partial root drying and N-fertilizer levels on sugar beet crop (Beta vulgaris L.). Agricultural water management, 194, 13-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2017.08.016 Afshar, R. K., Nilahyane, A., Chen, C., He, H., Stevens, W. B., & Iversen, W. M. (2019). Impact of conservation tillage and nitrogen on sugarbeet yield and quality. Soil and Tillage Research, 191, 216-223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2019.03.017 Azimi, M. (2017). Study of sugar transplanting in order to save water comsumption. M. Sc. Thesis. Ferdowsi University of Mashhad. (In Persian). Bahrami, M. A. & Honor, M. (2017). The Effect of environmental conditions, planting and harvest time on the quantity and technological values of Beet sugars cultivated in west part of Iran. Journal of Food Technology and Nutrition, 14 (2), 1-14. (In Persian). Bloch, D., Hoffmann, C. M., & Marlander, B. (2006). Solute accumulation as a cause for quality losses in sugar beet submitted to continuous and temporary drought stress. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science, 192, 17- 24. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-037x.2006.00185.x Draycott, A. P. (2008). Sugar beet: John Wiley & Sons Press. Faraji, S., Rafieiolhossaini, M., & Abbasi, S. A. (2015). The effect of solitary and combined application of organic and biological manure and chemical fertilizer on some of the qualitative and quantitative properties of sugar beet. Journal of Crop Management, 17(3), 789-800. (In Persian). Ghiasabadi, M., Khajeh, H. M., & Mohammadabadi, A. (2014). The study of transplanting date on growth analyses and forage yield of maize (Zea mays L.) under Mashhad conditions. Iranian Journal of Field Crops Research, 12(1), 145-173. Hasibi, P., Kashani, A., Mamaghani, R. & Maskarashi, M. (2010). Feasibility study of spring culture of three sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) cultivars by paperpot and direct sowing methods in Ahvaz. Journal of Plant Production, 33 (2), 41-54. (In Persian). Hassanli, A., Ahmadirad, S., & Beecham, S. (2016). Monitoring sugar beet rooting depth irrigated with recycled waste water and different irrigation methods for water savings in an arid climate. Iran Agricultural Research, 35(1), 21-26. https://doi.org/10.22099/IAR.2016.3455 Hoffmann, C. M., Huijbregts, T., van Swaaij, N., & Jansen, R. (2009). Impact of different environments in Europe on yield and quality of sugar beet genotypes. European Journal of Agronomy, 30(1), 17-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2008.06.004 Hosseini, P., Kashani, A., Mamaghani, R., & Mskrbashy, M. (2011). Feasibility study of spring culture of three sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) cultivars by paperpot and direct sowing methods in Ahwaz. Plant Production, 33, 41-83. (In Persian). Jafarnia, B., Abadi, A. Z. F., Ghorbani, R., Moghadam, P. R., & Ghaemi, A. R. (2014). Effects of plant density and nitrogen and bio fertilizer on qualitative characteristics of sugar beet inmashhad and torbat-e-jam regions of Iran. Iranian Journal of Field Crops Research, 13(2), 278-286. (In Persian). Javanmard, A., Vahed Miandoab, R., Amani Machiani, M., Abbasi, A., & Fotouhi, K. (2018). Quantitative and qualitative response of Sugar Beet (Beta vulgaris L.) to integrated application of chemical and Nano fertilizers. Journal of Agricultural Science and Sustainable Production, 28(3): 171-185. (In Persian). Jovzi, M., & Zareabyaneh, H. (2016). Water productivity and water use efficiency indexes of Sugar beet under different levels of water and nitrogen fertilizer. Water and Soil Conservation, 22(5), 117-133. (In Persian). Kazemin Khah, K. (2005). The effects of transplanting time on the quality and quantity of paper pot cultivation of sugar beet in the salin soils of east Azarbaijan province. Journal of Agricultural Science, 15(1), 203-212. (In Persian). Lotfikeyvanlo, A., & Armin, M. (2017). The effect of seedlings age and date of transfer on quantitative and qualitative characteristics of sugar beet. Iranian Journal of Field Crop Science, 48(1), 291-301. (In Persian). Majidi, A., & Tabiehzad, H. (2018). Effect of different sources and amounts of nitrogen on root yield and some qualitative characteristics of sugar beet. Applied Soil Research, 6(3), 118-129. (In Persian). Mooleki, S., Schoenau, J., Charles, J., & Wen, G. (2004). Effect of rate, frequency and incorporation of feedlot cattle manure on soil nitrogen availability, crop performance and nitrogen use efficiency in east-central Saskatchewan. Canadian Journal of Soil Science, 84(2), 199-210. https://doi.org/10.4141/s02-045 Nasri, R., Kashani, A., Paknejad, F., Sadeghi, S. M., & Ghorbani, S. (2011). Correlation and path analysis of qualitative and quantitative yield in sugar beet in transplant and direct cultivation method in saline lands. Agronomy and Plant Breeding Journal, 8(1), 226-213. (In Persian). Noshad, H., & Khayamim, S. (2017). Effect of soil nitrogen on some physiological characteristics and quality of sugar beet. Iranian Journal of Field Crop Science, 48(1), 11-24. (In Persian). Rahimi, A. Dovlati, B. & Heydarzadeh, S. 2018. The Effect of manure on quantitative and qualitative characteristics of Sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) cv. Laetitia. Journal of Soil Management and Sustainable, 8(1), 141-157. (In Persian). Rostami, M., Hassanzadeh, M. & Ghaemi, A. S. (2016). Effect of irrigation interruption and nitrogen availability on quantitative and qualitative characteristics of autumn sugar beet. First National Conference on Sustainable Agriculture and Natural Resources. Mehr-e Arvand Institute, Tehran. (In Persian). Sadrabadi Haghighi, R., Amirmoradi, S., & Mirshahi, A. (2011). Investigation of growth analysis of conventional and commercial sugar beet (Beta vulgaris) varieties at delayed planting date in chenaran (khorasan razavi province). Iranian Journal of Field Crops Research, 9(3), 505-513. (In Persian). Singh, A., Agrawal, M., & Marshall, F. M. (2010). The role of organic vs. inorganic fertilizers in reducing phytoavailability of heavy metals in a wastewater-irrigated area. Ecological Engineering, 36(12), 1733-1740. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2010.07.021 Tsialtas, I. T., & Maslaris, N. (2013). Nitrogen effects on yield, quality and K/Na selectivity of sugar beets grown on clays under semi-arid, irrigated conditions. International Journal of Plant Production, 7(3), 355-371. Zarei, Z. (2015). Evaluation of the possibility of transplanting corn, sunflower, sugar beet and squash as early planting for saving water. Razi University. (In Persian).
| ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 539 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 357 |
||