News

Qanavati, J., Qayyoomzadeh, M., Davoodabadi Farahani, M. (2022). Principles of General Theory of Collateral in the Law of Contracts. , 18(1), 97-118. doi: 10.22059/jorr.2020.297803.1008736
Jalil Qanavati; Mahmood Qayyoomzadeh; Mohammad Ebrahim Davoodabadi Farahani. "Principles of General Theory of Collateral in the Law of Contracts". , 18, 1, 2022, 97-118. doi: 10.22059/jorr.2020.297803.1008736
Qanavati, J., Qayyoomzadeh, M., Davoodabadi Farahani, M. (2022). 'Principles of General Theory of Collateral in the Law of Contracts', , 18(1), pp. 97-118. doi: 10.22059/jorr.2020.297803.1008736
Qanavati, J., Qayyoomzadeh, M., Davoodabadi Farahani, M. Principles of General Theory of Collateral in the Law of Contracts. , 2022; 18(1): 97-118. doi: 10.22059/jorr.2020.297803.1008736

Principles of General Theory of Collateral in the Law of Contracts

مجله علمی "پژوهشهای فقهی"
Article 5, Volume 18, Issue 1, April 2022, Pages 97-118    PDF (885.22 K)
Document Type: Research Paper
DOI: 10.22059/jorr.2020.297803.1008736
Authors
Jalil Qanavati1; Mahmood Qayyoomzadeh2; Mohammad Ebrahim Davoodabadi Farahani* 3
1Associate Professor, Faculty of Law, College of Farabi, University of Tehran, Qom, Iran
2Professor, Department of Law, College of Humanities ,Saveh Branch, Islamic Azad University, Saveh, Iran
3Ph.D Student in Private Law, Department of Law, College of Humanities, Saveh Branch, Islamic Azad University, Saveh, Iran
Abstract
Although mortgage, among other forms of guarantee contracts, has the widest application due to mortgagor’s direct domination over a mortgagee and developing better confidence, jurists, relying on four reasons, have different views about receipt and objectivity of the mortgaged property. Believing in the condition of receipt and material objectivity of mortgaged property in mortgage contract which also affect civil law had led to the shortcoming of this type of contract in the modern contracts which makes inevitable a change in the guarantee structure. Mortgage aims at achieving domination by the mortgagee over the mortgagor’s property to restitute his right. Domination is a conventional matter which has different instances in different times. Material receipt is only valid in this respect and its condition in making a mortgage contract cannot be proved by any jurisprudential reason. In addition, the objectivity of property, in its modern perception, is not limited to material object. The principles of general theory of collateral include proving this view, along with proving the unity of engagement and debt, the extent of guarantee, and concluding a guarantee as an innominate contract according to which it is possible to conclude any type of guarantee contract, material or non-material, such as the tangible specified object, debts, rights, intangible (descriptive) specified object. 
Keywords
General Theory of Collateral; Mortgage; Guarantee
References
  1. Abi Al-Qasim Najmuddin Ja'farebn Al-Hassan. (1981). Al- Mukhtasar al-nafi, 1, Tehran: albesat. (in arabic)
  2. Helli Abi Al-Qasim Najmuddin Ja'far bin Al-Hassan (Muhaqqiq al-Hilli). (1981). Shara'i' al-Islam fi masa'il al-halal wa l-haram, 1, Qom: Al Maaref Al Islamiyah. (in Arabic)
  3. Ahangran MR, Saeedi M. (2016). “Rereading the foundations of the legitimacy of indefinite”, contracts with a comparative approach in Islamic law. Knowledge of civil law, 10, pp.1-15. (in pesian)
  4. Al-Amoli MH. (2007). al mahazorat fi fiqh al-rahn, 1, Tehran: Olom Eslami publisher. (in arabic)
  5. Al-Asfur MH. (1994). al anwar al lavami sharh mafatih al Shara'i', 1, Tehran: Islamiyah publisher. (in Arabic)
  6. al-Haeri K. (2000). Fiqh Al-oqoud, 2, Qom: majma al-fekr Islamiyah. (in arabic)
  7. al-Hassani H, (1983). Nazariat al-Aqd fi Fiqhu al-Jafari Maktab Al Hashem, Beiru. t(in arabic)
  8. Alhor Ameli M. (1996). Vasael Alshieh, 1, dar ihya al turath al arabi, Beirut. (in arabic)
  9. Al-Hosseini Al-Ameli SJ. (2008). Miftah Al Karama Fi Sharah Qawayed Le Allama, 1, Qom: Islamiyah publisher,. (in arabic)
  • Al-Hosseini Al-Maraghi M. (1997). Al-Anavin Al-faqih, 1, Qom: Islamiyah publisher. (in arabic)
  • Allamah Al-Hilli H. (1992). Mukhtalaf al-Shi'a, 1, Islamiyah publisher, Qom. (in arabic)
  • Allamah Al-Hilli H. (1989). Tabsara Almotalemin, 1, Qom: Faqih publisher. (in arabic)
  • Allamah Al-Hilli H. (1989). Ershad al-azhan, 1, Qom: Jameeh Modaressin publisher. (in arabic)
  • Allamah Al-Hilli H. (1992). Qawaid al-ahkam, 1, Islamiyah publisher, Qom. (in arabic)
  • Al-Khoei SA. (1991). Mesbah Al-Feqahe., 1, Beirut: Dar Al Hadi. (in Arabic)
  • al-Makki al-Amili M. (1990). Al-Lum'a al-Dimashqiyya, 1, Beirut: Dar Al Fekr. (in Arabic)
  • ------------------------- (1996). al dorous al sharia, 1, Qom: Islamiyah publisher. (in Arabic)
  • ----------------------------- (1980). al qawaid va al fawaid, 1, Qom: Mofid book store,. (in Arabic)
  • al-Muḥaqqiq al-Qummī MA. (1992). Jami' al-shitat, 1, Tehran: kayhan. (in Arabic)
  • Baḥr al-ʿUlūm SM. (1983). Balaqat al-faqih, 4, Tehran: Maktab al-sadiq publisher. (in Arabic)
  • Sadr MB. (2000). “Draft”, Fiqh of Ahl al-Bayt, Vol.21, pp.3-16.(in persian)
  • Davood Abadi Farahani ME, Qayoom Zadeh M. (2015). “Sale of future property”, Jurisprudential research, Vol.12, No.4, pp.797-820. (in persian)
  • Dehkhoda AA (1998). Dehkhoda dictionary, 2, Tehran: Tehran university publisher. (in persian)
  • Emami SH (2003). Civil law, 2, 10, Tehran: Eslamiyeh publisher, (in persin)
  • Esfahani MH. (1997). hashiyat almakaseb, 3, Tehran: Zave Al Qorba publisher. (in arabic)
  • Fahd Abū Ha̲ḍraẗ (2012). Qamoos Al Majmaa, 1, Algeria: Dar Al Hoda publisher. (in arabic)
  • Fayz Kashani M. (1981). Mafatih Ash-Shara’i, 3, Qom. (in Arabic)
  • Fazel Abi. (1998). Kashf al-Romouz, 1, Qom: Jameeh Modaressin publisher. (in arabic)
  • Gilani Najafi Rashti MH. Al-Ghasb, 2,(in Arabic)
  • Habiba S. (2015). “Critical inquiry into the reasons why the mortgage is necessary”, Studies of Islamic jurisprudence and law,Vol.12, pp.65-96. (in persin)
  • Hakim SM.(1992). Nahj al-Feqaha, 1, 22 Bahman publisher, Qom(in Arabic)
  • Ibn Abi Jumhur al-Ahsa'i. (1989). Al-aqtab al-faqih, 1, Qom: Ayatollah Marashi Najafi Library, (in arabic)
  • Ibn Idris al-Hilli. (1990). Al Saraer, 2, Qom: Islamiyah publisher. (in arabic)
  • Ibn Rushd (Averroes). (1994). Badayata Al-Mujtahid wa Nahayat Al-Muqtasid, 1, Qom: Dar Al Fekr publisher. (in arabic)
  • Ibn Zohreh Halabi. (1996). Qanie Nozo Eli Elmi al-osul al-furu, 1, Qom: Islamiyah publisher. (in arabic)
  • Jamalizadeh A (2001). Jurisprudential review of insurance contract, 1, Qom: Boostan publisher. (in persin)
  • Javadi Amoli A. (1985). al-salat, 1, Islamiyah publisher, Qom(in arabic)
  • Jaziri AA. (2010). AL-FIQH 'ALA AL-MADHAHIB AL-ARBA'A, Beirut: dar ibn hazm. (in Arabic)
  • Karimi A. (2016). “Mortgage of debt”, Journal of Law and Political Science, Tehran University, Vol.38, pp.19-42. (in persin)
  • Mafi H, Falah M. (2013). “Documentary and Guarantee Characteristics of Guaranteed Documentary Validity in International Trade Law”, Comparative Law Research, Vol.17, No.2, pp.143-166. (in persin)
  • Makarem Shirazi N. (1995). Tafsir Nemooneh, Tehran: Dar Al Kutub Al Islamiyah publisher. (in persin)
  • Motahhari M. (1985). Bank insurance usury, Tehran: Sadra publisher. (in persin)
  • Montazeri HA. (1994). al-makasib al-muharrama, Qom: Tafakor publisher. (in Arabic)
  • mousavi bojnordi M,(1940). Al Qawaaid al Fiqhiyyah, 1, Hadi publisher, Qom(in Arabic)
  • Mousavi Bojnordi SM.(1996). The role of the prehension in the mortgage contract”, Fiqh of Ahl al-Bayt, Vol.3, pp.189-206. (in Arabic)
  • Mousavi Khomeini SR. (2000). Tahrir al-Wasilah ,4 , Qom: Dar Al ilm publisher, (in Arabic)
  • Mousavi Khomeini SR. (1989). Al-Bei ,4 , Qom: Esmaelian publisher. (in Arabic)
  • Nahhas AJ. (1988). Maani Al-Quran ,1 ,Umm Al Qura, Saudi Arabia.(in arabic)
  • Naini Gharavi MH. (1994). Munyat at-Talib fi Sharh al-Makasib, 1, Qom: Maktaba al-Mohammadieh, (in arabic)
  • Najafi MH. (1981). Jawahir al-kalam, 7, Beirut: Dar ihya al turath al arabi, (in Arabic)
  • Nili F, Alavi M. (2004). “The effect of contract guarantee on economic performance”, Proceedings of the 13th Annual Conference on Monetary and Foreign Exchange Policy, pp.355-390. (in persin)
  • Pilvar R. (2015). “The concept of intellectual property in property law and its status”, Studies of Islamic jurisprudence and law, Vol.12, pp.7-40. (in persin)
  • Qudamah A. al mughni,Dar Alkitab Al Arabi, Beirut(in Arabic)
  • Sabiq S. (1997). Fiqh-us-Sunnah, 1, Dar Al Fekr, Beirut(in Arabic)
  • Sadeghi M. (2016). “A Study of the General Rules Governing Certified Guarantee Agreements in International Trade with a Look at Iranian Law”, Journal of Commerce, Vol.79, pp.177-195. (in persin)
  • Shaykh Tusi M.(1961). Al-Nahayat fi Mojarrad al-Fiqh va al-Fatawi, 1, Qom: Mohammadi publisher, (in Arabic)
  • Shaykh Tusi M. (2008). Al-Mabsut fi fiqh al-Imamiyya, 1, Qom: Maktaba al-Mortazavi. (in arabic)
  • Shaykh Tusi M. (1988). Al-Tibyan fi tafsir al-Qur'an, 1, Maktab al-Alam al-Islami.(in Arabic)
  • Shaykh Noori F. (1993). rule of zeman ala-l-yad, 1, Islamiyah publisher. (in Arabic)
  • Shaykh Tabarsi F. (1994). Tafsir Majma' al-Bayan, 1, Beirut: Ala Alami lil matbouat. (in Arabic)
  • Soltani M, Hazaveh H. (2012). “Nature and legal rules of stock authentication”, Stock Exchange, pp.141-161.(in persin)
  • Tabatabaei SA. (1997). Riyadh al-Masail fi Tahqiq al-Ahkam bi al-Dalail, 1, Qom: AAlulbayt. (in Arabic)
  • Tabatabaei SMH. (1995). Al-Mizan fi tafsir al-Qur'an, 5, Qom: Islamiyah publisher.(in Arabic)
  • Tabatabaei Yazdi SK. (1988). Al-Orvat al-Vosqa, 2, Beirut: Ala Alami lil matbouat. (in Arabic)
  • Tabatabaei Yazdi SK. (1991). hashiyat almakaseb, 4, Qom: Ismaeilian publisher, (in Arabic)
  • Zayn al-Din Bin Ali. (1996). Tahrir Al Rouza Fi Sharh Al-Loma, 1, Qom: Taha publisher . (in Arabic)
  • Zayn al-Din Bin Ali. (1993). Masalik al-afham ila tanqih shara'i ' al-Islam, 1, Qom: Al Maaref Al Islamiyah, (in Arabic)
Statistics
Article View: 2,907
PDF Download: 420


Journal Management System. Powered by Sinaweb