تعداد نشریات | 161 |
تعداد شمارهها | 6,532 |
تعداد مقالات | 70,501 |
تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 124,110,912 |
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 97,214,507 |
Effect of Organic Fertilizer and Irrigation Intervals on the Yield and Quality of Cherry Tomato (Solanum lycopersicon var. cerasiforme) | ||
International Journal of Horticultural Science and Technology | ||
دوره 7، شماره 4، دی 2020، صفحه 327-334 اصل مقاله (352.18 K) | ||
نوع مقاله: Research paper | ||
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22059/ijhst.2020.303299.370 | ||
نویسنده | ||
Md. Farid Hossain* | ||
School of Agriculture and Rural Development, Bangladesh Open University, Gazipur-1705, Bangladesh | ||
چکیده | ||
To investigate the effects of organic fertilizers and irrigation frequencies on yield and quality of cherry tomato an experiment was conducted using six fertilizer doses including control (no fertilizer), NPK fertilizer (urea at 300 kg, TSP 200 kg and MoP 250 kg), cow-dung at 5 t ha-1, cow-dung at 10 t ha-1, poultry manure at 5 t ha-1 and poultry manure at 10 t ha-1 with two levels of irrigation frequencies including alternate day irrigation and two day interval irrigation in a split plot design with three replications. Data on yield and quality attributes of cherry tomato like plant height, number of fruits per plant, fruit yield per plant (g), yield (t ha-1), TSS (%) and vitamin C contents (mg 100 g-1) were recorded. Results revealed that poultry manure had significant effects on the yield and quality of cherry tomato. Among the fertilizer treatments, poultry manure at 5 t ha-1 showed the best results on yield and quality of cherry tomato. On the other hand, cherry tomato showed best performance in relation to yield and quality when field was irrigated in one-day interval. It can be concluded that application of poultry litter at 5 t ha-1 in combination with one day interval result in highest yield and quality on cherry tomato. | ||
کلیدواژهها | ||
Cherry tomato؛ Fertilizer؛ Irrigation؛ TSS (%)؛ Vitamin C؛ Yield | ||
مراجع | ||
10. Gomez, K.A. and Gomez, A.A. 1984. Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research (2 Ed.). An International Rice Research Institute Book. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. New York, USA. pp. 84-101. 11. IRRI (International Rice Research Institute). 2007. CropStat: Tutorial Manual. Part I. Version 6.1. Los Banos (Philippines). Crop Research Informatics Laboratory, IRRI. pp. 199-206. 12. Islam, A.S., Haque, M.M., Tabassum, R. and Islam, M.M., 2016. Effect of defoliation on growth and yield response in two tomatoes (Solanum lycopersicum Mill.) varieties. Journal of Agronomy 15(2), 68-75. 13. Ismail S.M, Ozawa K, Khondaker N.A. 2007. Effect of irrigation frequency and timing on tomato yield, soil water dynamics and water use efficiency under drip irrigation. In: Proceedings of 11th International Water Technology Conference (IWTC11). Sharm El-Sheikh, Egypt. 69-84. 14. Kalbani F.O.S.A, Salem M.A, Cheruth A.J, Kurup S.S, Senthilkumar A. 2016. Effect of some organic fertilizers on growth, yield and quality of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum). International Letters of Natural Sciences 53, 1-9. 15. Khan A.A, Bibi H, Ali Z, Sharif M, Shah S.A, Ibadullah H, Khan, K, Azeem I, Ali S. 2017. Effect of compost and inorganic fertilizers on yield and quality of tomato. Academia Journal of Agricultural Research 5(10), 287-293. 16. Koh E, Charoenprasert S, Mitchell A.E. 2012. Effects of industrial tomato paste processing on ascorbic acid, flavonoids, carotenoids and their stability over one-year storage. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 92(1), 23-28. 17. Klunklin W, Savage G. 2017. Effect on Quality Characteristics of Tomatoes Grown Under Well-Watered and Drought Stress Conditions. Foods. 6(8): 56. 18. Lahoz I, Perez-de-Castro A, Valcarcel M, Macua J.I, Beltrand J, Roselloc S, Cebolla-Cornejo J. 2016. Effect of water deficit on the agronomical performance and quality of processing tomato. Scientia Horticulturae 200, 55–65 19. Murmu K, Ghosh B.C, Swain D.K. 2013. Yield and quality of tomato grown under organic and conventional nutrient management, Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science 59(10), 1311-1321. 20. Naiji M, Souri M.K. 2018. Nutritional value and mineral concentrations of sweet basil under organic compared to chemical fertilization. Acta Sci. Pol. Hortorum Cultus 17(2), 167-175. 21. Prema G, Indiresh K.K, Santosha H.M. 2011. Evaluation of cherry tomato (Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme) genotypes for growth, yield and quality traits. Asian Journal of Horticulture 6(1), 181-184. 22. Raffo A, Leonardi C, Fogliano V, Ambrosino P.G. 2002. Nutritional value of cherry tomatoes (Lycopersicon esculentum cv. Naomi F1) harvested at different ripening stages. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 50(22), 6550–6556. 23. Rajya L.P, Saravanan S, Naik M.L. 2015. Effect of organic manures and inorganic fertilizers on plant growth, yield, fruit quality and shelf life of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) cv. PKM-1. International Journal of Agricultural Science and Research 5(2), 7-12. 24. Raviv M, Blom T. 2001. The effect of water availability and quality on photosynthesis and productivity of soilless-grown cut roses. Scientia Horticulturae 88(4), 257–276. 25. Sainju U.M, Dris R, Singh B. 2003. Mineral nutrition of tomato. Food, Agriculture and Environment 1(2), 176-183. 26. Souri, M.K. and Dehnavard, S. 2018. Tomato plant growth, leaf nutrient concentrations and fruit quality under nitrogen foliar applications. Advances in Horticultural Science 32(1), 41-47. 27. Souri M.K, Dehnavard S. 2017. Characterization of tomato growth and fruit quality under foliar ammonium sprays. Open Agriculture 2(1), 531-536. 28. Souri M.K, Hatamian M. 2019. Aminochelates in plant nutrition: a review. Journal of Plant Nutrition 42 (1), 67-78. 29. Ullah M.S, Islam M.S, Islam M.A, Haque T. 2008. Effects of organic manure and chemical fertilizers on the yield of brinjal and soil properties. Journal of the Bangladesh Agricultural University 6(2), 271-276. 30. Zamil S.S, Halim M.A, Ashraf-Uz-Zaman K, Chowdhury M.A.H. 2015. Available nitrogen and phosphorus release pattern from poultry manure, cow-dung and bio-gas slurry. International Journal of Business, Social and Scientific Research 3(2), 136-142. | ||
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 1,131 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 1,151 |