پیوندهای مفید
اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 161 |
| تعداد شمارهها | 6,489 |
| تعداد مقالات | 70,096 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 123,160,145 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 96,391,470 |
Shear Behavior of Panel Zone Considering Axial Force for Flanged Cruciform Columns | ||
| Civil Engineering Infrastructures Journal | ||
| دوره 53، شماره 2، اسفند 2020، صفحه 359-377 اصل مقاله (864.62 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: Research Papers | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22059/ceij.2020.283400.1590 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| Sina Sarfarazi1؛ Hamed Saffari* 2؛ Ali Fakhraddini3 | ||
| 1Department of Civil Engineering, Graduate University of Advanced Technology, Kerman, Iran | ||
| 2Department of Civil Engineering, Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman | ||
| 3Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman | ||
| چکیده | ||
| Panel zone is a part of a column web where surrounded by the continuity plates and the column flanges. Panel zone plays a vital role in the connection behavior. Despite the upward tendency of using cruciform section in many seismic regions, few studies have focused on the behavior of these columns, and especially on the behavior of their panel zone. As well, some recent studies have shown that axial load has a remarkable effect on the yielding process of the panel zone. In this research, a mathematical model is presented to consider the effect of axial force on the behavior of the panel zone in the cruciform columns. The model included the shear stiffness of the panel zone in the elastic and non-elastic region, the yield shear and the ultimate shear capacity of the panel zone. Consequently, 432 Finite Element Models (FEM) in a wide range of dimensions are performed and a parametric study has been done. The comparisons of the results of proposed mathematical model with the results of all Finite Element models demonstrate that the average and maximum deviation for yield and ultimate shear strength of the panel zone are respectively 5.32%, 8.12%, 6.2%, and 8.44%. This matter exhibits the accuracy and efficiency of the proposed mathematical relations. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| Axial Force؛ Beam To Column Connection؛ Cruciform Column؛ FEM؛ Panel Zone | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
AISC, American Institute of Steel Construction. (2016). Seismic provisions for structural steel buildings, AISC 341-16, Chicago, IL.
AISC, American Institute of Steel Construction. (2016). Specification for structural steel buildings, AISC 360-16, Chicago, IL.
Bertero, V.V., Krawinkler, H. and Popov, E.P. (1973). Further studies on seismic behavior of steel beam-to-column subassemblages, EERC Report No. 73-27, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA.
Brandonisio, G., De Luca, A. and Mele, E. (2012). “Shear strength of panel zone in beam-to-column connections”, Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 71, 129-142.
Broujerdian, V., Shayanfar, M.A. and Ghamari, A. (2017). “Corner crack effect on the seismic behavior of steel plate shear wall system”, Civil Engineering Infrastructures Journal, 50(2), 311-332.
Ebrahimi, E., Abdollahzadeh, G.R. and Jahani, E. (2019). “The effect of axial force variations on nonlinear modeling and seismic response of reinforced concrete structures”, Civil Engineering Infrastructures Journal, 52(2), 379-395.
El-Khoriby, S., Sakr, M. A., Khalifa T. M. and Eladly M.M. (2017). “Modelling and behavior of beam-to-column connections under axial force and cyclic bending”, Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 129, 171-184.
El-Tawil, S., Mikesell, T., Vidarsson, E. and Kunnath, S. (1998). Strength and ductility of FR welded-bolted connections, Report No. SAC/BD-98/01, Applied Technology Council, Redwood City, California.
Engelhard, M.D. and Sabol, T.A. (1998). “Reinforcing of steel moment connections with cover plates: benefits and limitations”, Engineering Structures, 20(4), 510-520.
Graham, J.D., Sherbourne, A.N., Khabbaz, R.N. and Jensen, C.D. (1960). “Welded interior beam-to-column connections”, Welding Research Council, 63, 1-28.
Ibrahim S.A., El-Dakhakhni W.W. and Elgaaly M. (2006). “Behavior of bridge girders with corrugated webs under monotonic and cyclic loading”, Engineering Structures, 28(14), 1941-55.
Kasar, A., Bharti, S.D., Shrimali, M.K. and Goswami, R. (2017). “Mechanics based force-deformation curve of steel beam to column moment joints”, Steel and Composite Structures, 25(1), 19-34.
Kiani, B.K., Torabian, S. and Mirghaderi S.R. (2015). “Local seismic stability of flanged cruciform sections (FCSs)”, Engineering Structures, 96, 126-138.
Kim, T., Whittaker, A., Gilani, A., Bertero, V. and Takhirov, S. (2002). “Cover–plate and flange-plate steel moment–resisting connections”, J. Structural Engineering, 128(4), 474-482.
Kosari, E., Poursha, M. and Abedi, K. (2019). “Seismic evaluation of tall unstiffened Steel Plate Shear Wall (SPSW) systems with emphasis on reversal phenomenon in the higher mode pushover curve”, International Journal of Civil Engineering, 17 (5), 523-540.
Kosarieh, A.H., Danesh, F. and Shiri, R. (2015). “Column axial load effects on performance of panel zone in welded-flange-plate connections”, Advances in Structural Engineering, 18(6), 775-789.
Krawinkler, H. (1978). “Shear in beam-column joints in seismic design of steel frames”, Engineering Journal, AISC, 5(3), 82-91.
Krawinkler, H., Bertero, V.V. and Popov, E.P. (1971). Inelastic behavior of steel beam-to-column subassemblages, EERC Report No. 71-7, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA.
Lee, K.H., Stojadinovic, B., Goel, S.C., Margarin, A.G., Choi, J., Wongkaew, A., Reyher, B.P. and Lee, D.Y. (2000). “Parametric tests on unreinforced connections”, SAC Background Document, SAC/BD-00/01, SAC Joint Venture, Richmond, CA, USA.
Lin, K.C., Tsai, H.C., Kong, S.L. and Hsieh, S.H. (2000). “Effect of panel zone deformations on cyclic performance of welded moment connections”, XII WCEE, New Zealand, Document No. 1252.
Mansouri, I. and Saffari, H. (2014). “A new steel panel zone model including axial force for thin to thick column flanges”, Steel and Composite Structures, 16 (4), 417-436.
Nasrabadi, M.M., Torabian, S. and Mirghaderi, S.R. (2013). “Panel zone modelling of flanged cruciform columns: An analytical and numerical approach”, Engineering Structure, 49, 491-507.
Pan, L., Chen, Y., Chuan, G., Jiao, W. and Xu, T. (2016). “Experimental evaluation of the effect of vertical connecting plates on panel zone shear stability”, Thin-Walled Structures, 99, 119-131.
Popov, E.P., Yang, T.S. and Chang, S.P. (1998). “Design of steel MRF connections before and after 1994 Northridge earthquake”, Engineering Structures, 20(12), 1030-1038.
Ricles, J.M., Zhang, X., Lu, L.W. and Fisher J.W. (2004). Development of seismic guidelines for deep-column steel moment connections, ATLSS Report No. 04-13.
Ronga, B., Liua, S., Yana, J.B. and Zhanga, R. (2018). “Shear behavior of panel zone in through-diaphragm connections to steel tubular columns”, Thin-Walled Structures, 122, 286-299.
Saffari, H., Sarfarazi, S. and Fakhraddini, A. (2016). “A mathematical steel panel zone model for flanged cruciform columns”, Steel and Composite Structures, 20(4), 851-867.
Sarfarazi, S., Fakhraddini, A. and Modaresahmadi, K. (2016). “Evaluation of panel zone shear strength in cruciform columns, box columns and double- web columns”, International journal of structural and civil engineering research, 5(1), 52-56.
Sherbourne, A.N. and Jensen, C.D. (1957). Direct welded beam column connections, Report. No. 233.12, Fritz Laboratory, Lehigh University, Bethlehem, Pennsylvania.
Silva, L. D., Lima, L., Vellasco, P. and Andrade, S. (2004). “Behaviour of flush endplate beam-to-column joints under bending and axial force”, Steel and Composite Structures, 4(2), 77-94.
SIMULIA, ABAQUS. (2013). Analysis and theory manuals, Providence (RI, USA): SIMULIA, the Dassault Systèmes, Realistic Simulation.
Tartaglia, R., D’Aniello, M., Rassati, G., Swanson, J. and Landolfo, R. (2018). “Full strength extended stiffened end-plate joints: AISC vs recent European design criteria”, Engineering Structures, 159, 155-171.
Tuna, M. and Topkaya, C. (2015). “Panel zone deformation demands in steel moment resisting frames”, Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 110, 65-75.
Wang, M., Shi, Y., Wang, Y., and Shi, G. (2013). “Numerical study on seismic behaviors of steel frame endplate connections”, Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 90, 140-152.
Wang, S.J. (1988). “Seismic response of steel building frames with inelastic joint deformation”, Lehigh University.
Yousaf, M., Siddiqi, Z.A., Sharif, M.B. and Qazi, U. (2017) “Force- and displacement-controlled non-linear FE analyses of RC beam with partial steel bonded length”, International Journal of Civil Engineering, 15(4), 499-513.
Zepeda, J.A., Itani, A.M. and Sahai, R. (2003). “Cyclic behavior of steel moment frame connections under varying axial load and lateral displacements”, Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 59, 1-25. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 546 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 481 |
||