پیوندهای مفید
اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 158 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 6,225 |
| تعداد مقالات | 67,685 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 114,939,862 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 89,609,238 |
برآورد بار رسوب معلق و ارزیابی همگنی و ناهمگنی دبی و رسوب (مطالعۀ موردی: حوضۀ آبخیز کسیلیان، مازندران) | ||
| اکوهیدرولوژی | ||
| مقاله 20، دوره 7، شماره 4، دی 1399، صفحه 1099-1112 اصل مقاله (952.45 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22059/ije.2020.304694.1345 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| اکبر نوروزی1؛ مهدی پژوهش* 2؛ خدایار عبدالهی2؛ اباذر اسمعلی عوری3 | ||
| 1دانشجوی دکترای آبخیزداری، دانشکدۀ منابع طبیعی و علوم زمین، دانشگاه شهرکرد، شهرکرد، ایران | ||
| 2استادیار گروه مرتع و آبخیزداری، دانشکدۀ منابع طبیعی و علوم زمین، دانشگاه شهرکرد، شهرکرد، ایران | ||
| 3دانشیار گروه مرتع و آبخیزداری، دانشکدۀ کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی، دانشگاه محقق اردبیلی، اردبیل، ایران | ||
| چکیده | ||
| از آنجا که بسیاری از حوضههای آبخیز کشور ایران ایستگاه رسوبسنجی ندارند، بین اندازهگیریها و برآوردهای انجامشده اختلاف زیادی مشاهده میشود. به همین دلیل، ارزیابی استفاده از مدلهای تجربی و روشهای آماری برآورد رسوب معلق انتقال رودخانهها ضروری به نظر میرسد. هدف از تحقیق حاضر، ارزیابی همگنی و ناهمگنی، روند تغییرات میزان دبی جریان و رسوب و مقایسۀ مناسب کارایی روشهای برآورد بار رسوب معلق با استفاده از منحنی سنجه در منطقۀ مطالعه‌شده است. با استفاده از نرمافزار ProUCL از طریق آزمون منـ کندال و پتیت به‌ترتیب به تغییرات روند و ارزیابی همگنی و ناهمگنی سری زمانی دبی آب و رسوب پرداخته شد. برای برآورد رسوب‌دهى معلق منحنی سنجۀ یکخطی، دوخطی و حد وسط دستهها بررسی شده و بهترین روش از میان روشهای یادشده از طریق معیار R2، NSE، RMSE و SD ارزیابی و انتخاب شد. نتایج نشان داد روش حد وسط دستهها با بیشترین کارایی به عنوان روش مناسب برای این منطقه است. همچنین، نتایج حاصل از بررسی روند تغییرات دبی جریان و رسوب با استفاده از آزمون منـ کندال با سطح 5 درصد معناداری نشان داد روند به صورت نزولی بوده و نشان‌دهندۀ تطابق تغییرات دبی و رسوب در این منطقه است. در ارزیابی آزمون پتیت مشخص شد که سری زمانی گسسته در دبی رسوب ناهمگن و در دبی آب همگن است؛ بنابراین داشتن دانشی در ارتباط با همگنی و ناهمگنی دبی جریان و رسوب میتواند برای اقدامات حفاظتی و تعدیل آثار زیستمحیطی مؤثر باشد. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| آزمون پتیت؛ آزمون من- کندال؛ رسوب‌دهى معلق؛ منحنی سنجۀ رسوب؛ ناهمگنی رسوب | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Estimating the Suspended Sediment Load and Evaluating the Homogeneity and Heterogeneity of Water and Sediment (Case Study: Kasilian watershed, Mazandaran) | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Akbar Norouzi1؛ Mahdi Pajouhesh2؛ Khodayar Abdollahi2؛ Abazar Esmali Ouri3 | ||
| 1Ph.D. Candidate at the Shahrekord University, Faculty of Natural Resources and Earth Science, Department of Natural Engineering, Shahrekord Unversity, Shahrekord, Iran | ||
| 2Assistant Professor, Faculty of Natural Resources and Earth Science, Department of Range and Watershed Management, Shahrekord Unversity, Shahrekord, Iran | ||
| 3Associated Professor, Faculty of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Department of Range and Watershed Management, Mohaghegh-Ardabili Unversity,Ardabil, Iran | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| There is a significant difference between the observed and simulated suspended sediment yield with respect to many watersheds in Iran as this country does not have sediment stations. Due to station limitation, it is necessary to evaluate the experimental models and statistical methods for estimating the transfer rivers suspended sediment. The aim of this study is to evaluate homogeneity and heterogeneity, the trend of changes in discharge and sediment value and assesses a suitable comparison of suspended sediment load estimation methods efficiency using rating curves. The present study, the ProUCL software was used through the Kendall and Pitt test to evaluate trend changes and homogeneity and heterogeneity of time series relating to water and sediment discharge, respectively. To estimate suspended sediment a one-line, two-line, and mean-load rating curves were used. The performance of the methods was evaluated based on R2, NSE, RMSE and SD and the best method was selected. The finding of this study suggested that the mean-load method was selected as an appropriate method with the highest efficiency in the study area. Further, the trend changes of water and sediment discharges using the Kendall test showed that the trend is declining with a significance level of 5% and indicated that there are adaptations between water and sediment discharge changes. Pittet test revealed that the discrete time series in related to water and sediment discharges are homogeneous and heterogeneous, respectively. Therefore, having knowledge about the homogeneity and heterogeneity of water and sediment discharge can be effective in protection measures and environmental effects moderation. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| Pittet test, Man Kendall test, Suspended sedimentation, Sediment rating curve, and Sediment heterogeneity | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
[1]. Nearing MA, Xie Y, Liu B, Ye Y. Natural and anthropogenic rates of soil erosion. International Soil and Water Conservation Research. 2017;5(2):77-84. [2]. Martínez‐Hernández C, Rodrigo‐Comino J, Romero‐Díaz A. Impact of lithology and soil properties on abandoned dryland terraces during the early stages of soil erosion by water in south‐east S pain. Hydrological Processes. 2017;31(17):3095-109. [3]. Wei W, Chen L, Yang L, Fu B, Sun R. Spatial scale effects of water erosion dynamics: Complexities, variabilities, and uncertainties. Chinese Geographical Science. 2012;22(2):127-43. [4].Niu XY, Yan-Hua W, Hao Y, Jia-Wen Z, Jun Z, Mei-Na X, et al. Effect of land use on soil erosion and nutrients in Dianchi Lake Watershed, China. Pedosphere.2015; 25: 103–111. [5]. Liu Y. Landscape connectivity in soil erosion research: concepts, implication, quantification. Geographical Research. 2016;1:195-202. [6]. Verstraeten G. Regional scale modelling of hillslope sediment delivery with SRTM elevation data. Geomorphology. 2006;81(1-2):128-140. [7]. Trimble SW, Crosson P. US soil erosion rates-myth and reality. Science. 2000;289(5477):248-50. [8]. Kim J, Ivanov V, Fatichi S. Environmental stochasticity controls soil erosion variability. Scientific Report Nature. 2016؛ 6:220-65.
[9]. Ferguson RI. Accuracy and precision of methods for estimating river loads. Earth surface processes and landforms. 1987;12(1):95-104.
[10]. Hu B, Wang H, Yang Z, Sun X. Temporal and spatial variations of sediment rating curves in the Changjiang (Yangtze River) basin and their implications. Quaternary International. 2011;230(1-2):34-43.
[11]. Rostami M. A method presentation for improving river sediment load estimation. 3rd Iranian Hydraulic Conference. 2011. [Persian]
[12]. Kia1 E, Emadi A. Comparison of statistical methods for long-term suspended sediment yield estimation (Case Study: Babolrood River). Journal of Watershed Management Research. 2013; 4 (8): 15-27. [Persian]
[13]. Sebahani H. Application and comparison of statistical methods for estimating suspended sediment load (A Case study: Hableh Rud watershed). Master thesis. 2010. [Persian]
[14]. Zoratipour A, Mahdavi MO, Sigaroudi SK, Salajegheh A, Almaali NS. Assessment of the effect of classification on the improved estimation of suspended sediment load using hydrological methods (case study: Taleghan basin). Iranian Journal of Natural Resources. 2009;61(4):809-19.
[15]. Asselman NE. Fitting and interpretation of sediment rating curves. Journal of Hydrology. 2000; 234(3-4):228-48.
[16]. Jung BM, Fernandes EH, Möller OO, García-Rodríguez F. Estimating suspended sediment concentrations from River Discharge data for reconstructing gaps of information of long-term variability studies. Water. 2020;12(9):23-82.
[17]. Benisi Ghadim H, Salarijazi M, Ahmadianfar I, Heydari M, Zhang T. Developing a sediment rating curve model using the curve slope. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies. 2020; 29(2):1151-1159. doi:10.15244/pjoes/103470.
[18]. Nourani V, Nezamdoost N, Samadi M, Daneshvar Vousoughi F. Wavelet-based trend analysis of hydrological processes at different timescales. Journal of Water and Climate Change. 2015;6(3):414-35.
[19]. Partal T, Kahya E. Trend analysis in Turkish precipitation data. Hydrological Processes: An International Journal. 2006; 20(9):2011-26.
[20]. Kallache M, Rust H, Kropp J. Trend assessment of correlated Data. Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research. 2004.
[21]. Walling D. The changing sediment loads of the world's rivers Land Reclamation.2008; 39: 3–20.
[22]. Mirabbasi Najafabadi R, Dinpashoh Y.Trend analysis of streamflow across the north west of Iran in recent three decades. Journal of Water and Soil, 2010; 24(4): 757-768. [Persian]
[23]. Li Z, Zheng FL, Liu WZ, Flanagan DC. Spatial distribution and temporal trends of extreme temperature and precipitation events on the Loess Plateau of China during 1961 -2007. Quaternary International. 2010; 226(1): 92-100.
[24]. Zhang S, Lu XX, Higgitt DL, Chen CT, Han J, Sun H. Recent changes of water discharge and sediment load in the Zhujiang (Pearl River) Basin, China. Global and Planetary Change. 2008;60(3-4):365-80.
[25]. Memarian H, Balasundram SK, Talib JB, Sood AM, Abbaspour KC. Trend analysis of water discharge and sediment load during the past three decades of development in the Langat basin, Malaysia. Hydrological Sciences Journal. 2012;57(6):1207-22.
[26]. Shayan S, Zare GH, Yamani M, Sharifikiya M, Soltanpor M. Trend analysis Statistical changes discharge and sediment Mand Catchment and its application in environmental planning. Journal of Applied Geomorphology Iran. 2013; 1(2): 37-50. [Persian]
[27]. Guo LP, Yu Q, Gao P, Nie XF, Liao KT, Chen XL, Hu JM, Mu XM. Trend and change-point analysis of streamflow and sediment discharge of the Gongshui River in China during the last 60 years. Water. 2018;10(9):1273.
[28]. Akter S, Howladar MF, Ahmed Z, Chowdhury TR. The rainfall and discharge trends of Surma River area in North-eastern part of Bangladesh: an approach for understanding the impacts of climatic change. Environmental Systems Research. 2019;8(1):1-2.
[29]. Murphy JC. Changing suspended sediment in United States rivers and streams: linking sediment trends to changes in land use/cover, hydrology and climate. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences. 2020 2(1);24-35.
[30]. Arabkhedri M. Sampling designs and estimation methods for sediment load prediction in two rivers in Iran and Malaysia. PhD Thesis, University Putra Malaysia. 2009; 236 p. [Persian]
[31]. Mirzaee M, Arabkhedri RM, Feiznia S, and Ahmadi H. A comparison of methods of estimation of suspended sediment in rivers. Iranian Journal of Natural Resources. 2005;58 (1): 301-313. [Persian] [32]. Jansson MB. Estimating a sediment rating curve of the Reventazon river at Palomo using logged mean loads within discharge classes. Journal of Hydrology. 1996;183(3-4):227-41.
[33]. Mann HB. Nonparametric tests against trend. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society. 1945; 1:245-59.
[34]. Pettit AN. Anon-parametric approach to the change-point detection. Appl. Stat. 1979;28:126-35.
[35]. Ahmadi F, Nazeri Tahroudi M, Mirabbasi R, Khalili K, Jhajharia D. (2018). Spatiotemporal trend and abrupt change analysis of temperature in Iran. Meteorological Applications. 2016; 25(2), 314-321.[Persian]
[36]. Asadi F, Fazlola R, Emadi E. Extraction and selection of a suitable relationship for suspended sediment estimating in river (Case Study: Talar River). 11th National Seminar on Irrigation and Evaporation Reduction, Kerman, Iran. 2012. [Persian]
[37]. Gerami Loshabi Z, Arabkhedri M, Asadi H, Bayat R. The influence of rainfall erosivity temporal variation on suspended sediment load seasonality (Case Study: Kasiliyan Basin). Journal of Watershed Management Research. 2016; 7(14): 167-176. [Persian]
[38]. Thomas RB. Monitoring baseline suspended sediment in forested basins: the effects of sampling on suspended sediment rating curves. Hydrological Sciences Journal. 1988;33(5):499-514.
[39]. Walling DE. The reliability of rating curve estimates of suspended sediment yield: some further comments. InSymposium on Sediment Budgets, Porto Alegre, Brazil, 1988.
[40]. Arabkhedri, M. S. Hakimkhani, and D. Nikkami et al. Comparison of some statistical methods in estimation of suspended load in a watershed with snowy-rainy hydrological regime. Final report of research plan, Soil Conservation and Watershed Management Research Institute.2003.
[41]. Arabkhedri M, Hakimkhani S, Varvani J. The validity of extrapolation methods in estimation of annual mean suspended sediment yield. Journal of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources. 2004; 11 (3): 123-132. [Persian]
[42]. Habibnejad M, Fatahi R, Jalilvand H, Solaimani K. Evaluation of the effect of watershed characteristics on suspended sediment load using multiple regressions: Case Study of Neka River and Gorgan Bay, African Journal of Agricultural Research. 2010; 5(12): 1373-1379.
[43]. Fathian F, Morid S, Kahya E. Identification of trends in hydrological and climatic variables in Urmia Lake basin, Iran. Theoretical and Applied Climatology. 2015; 119(3-4):443-64.
[44]. Burn DH, Elnur MA. Detection of hydrologic trends and variability. Journal of hydrology. 2002; 255(1-4):107-22.
[45]. Bagherpoor M, Seyedian S M, Fathabadi AH, Mohamadi A. Study of Mann-Kendall test performance in detecting the series of autocorrelation. Iran-Watershed Management Science & Engineering. 2017; 36: 11-22. [Persian]
[46].Mardian2 M, Sheikh VB, Najafinejad A, Varvani J. Trend analysis of sediment yields in relation with annual precipitation and discharge in the main tributaries of the Tireh river, Lorestan province, Iran. Technical Note, Iran-Water Resources Research. 2013; 9(2):84-87. [Persian]
[47]. Gupta H, Chakrapani GJ. Temporal and spatial variations in water flow and sediment load in the Narmada river. Current science. 2007:679-84.
[48]. Walling DE, Fang D. Recent trends in the suspended sediment loads of the world's rivers. Global and planetary change. 2003;39(1-2):111-26.
[49]. Sobhani M, Tajbakhsh SM, Memarian H. Statistical trend analysis of suspended sediment load in association with watershed management practices (Case Study: Bar Watershed, Neyshabur, Iran). Iran-Watershed Management Science & Engineering. 2017; 12(37):69-84. [Persian]
[50]. Tramblay Y, Ouarda TB, St-Hilaire A, Poulin J. Regional estimation of extreme suspended sediment concentrations using watershed characteristics. Journal of Hydrology. 2010;380(3-4):305-17.
[51]. Boix-Fayos C, Martínez-Mena M, Arnau-Rosalén E, Calvo-Cases A, Castillo V, Albaladejo J. Measuring soil erosion by field plots: Understanding the sources of variation. Earth-Science Reviews. 2006; 78(3-4):267-85.
[52]. Bauzha T, Gorbachova L. Estimation of the homogeneity of the average annual runoff of the rivers and streams of the Zacarpatska station. International Conference on water, climate and environment. 2012. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 445 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 268 |
||