پیوندهای مفید
اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 158 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 6,230 |
| تعداد مقالات | 67,764 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 115,179,314 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 89,926,895 |
بررسی تأثیر نانو زئولیت عاملدار شده با نیتروژن بر میزان آبشویی نیترات در ارقام لوبیا | ||
| به زراعی کشاورزی | ||
| مقاله 3، دوره 23، شماره 1، فروردین 1400، صفحه 27-41 اصل مقاله (652.48 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22059/jci.2020.295091.2328 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| مسلم حیدری* 1؛ سید محسن موسوی نیک2؛ نوشین میر3 | ||
| 1دانشجوی دکتری، گروه زراعت، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه زنجان، زنجان، ایران | ||
| 2دانشیار، گروه زراعت، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه زابل، زابل، ایران. | ||
| 3استادیار، گروه شیمی، دانشکده علوم پایه، دانشگاه زابل، زابل، ایران | ||
| چکیده | ||
| کاربرد بیرویه کودهای شیمیایی موجب آلودگی خاک و منابع آب سطحی و زیرزمینی شده است. به این منظور آزمایشی با هدف بررسی امکان کاهش آلودگی آب‌های سطحی به نیترات و هم‌چنین تأثیر نیتروژن بر ویژگیهای کمی و کیفی لوبیا به‌صورت فاکتوریل در قالب طرح کاملاً تصادفی با چهار تکرار در مرکز تحقیقات کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی همدان در سال زراعی 94-93 به‌صورت گلدانی به‌اجرا در آمد. عامل اول شامل چهار نوع کود نیتروژندار، X1 (زئولیت- EN)، X2 (زئولیت- AcAcEN)، X3 (زئولیت-HED)، X4 (کود اوره) و X0(نمونه شاهد- عدم استفاده از کود) و عامل دوم دو گونه لوبیا شامل لوبیا قرمز (Phaseolus vulgarize L.) رقم درخشان و لوبیا چشم بلبلی (Vigna unguiculata L.) از ژنوتیپ 29005 بودند. کاربرد نانو کودهای زئولیت عاملدار شده باعث کاهش آبشویی نیترات از واحدهای آزمایشی (گلدانها) شدند. در این میان، کود زئولیتی X3 توانست در مقایسه با کود اوره، آبشویی نیترات را 48 درصد کاهش دهد. مقدار نیتروژن خاک در گلدان حاوی کود X3، 115/0 قسمت در میلیون بود و در مقایسه با تیمار کود اوره 30 درصد حفظ و نگهداری این عنصر را درخاک بهبود بخشید. کود زئولیت X3 توانست باعث بهبود ویژگیهای رشد در گیاه لوبیا شود. بر این اساس کود X3، موجب افزایش شاخص‌های کلروفیل، پروتئین و عملکرد دانه به‌ترتیب به‌میزان 44، 64 و 56 درصد در مقایسه با تیمار شاهد شد. به‌طورکلی کاربرد نانوزئولیتهای عاملدار شده نقش مفیدی در کاهش آبشویی نیترات و بهبود خصوصیتهای کمی و کیفی گیاه لوبیا دارد. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| حبوبات؛ عملکرد دانه؛ نانو فناوری؛ نیتروژن | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Evaluation the Effect of Functionalized Nano_Zeolite with Nitrogen on Nitrate Leaching in the Cultivation of bean cultivars Abstract | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| moslem heydari1؛ seyed mohsen mousavi nik2؛ nooshin mir3 | ||
| 1Ph.D. Student, Department of Agriculture, Faculty of Agriculture, Zanjan University, Zanjan, Iran. | ||
| 2Associate Professor, Department of Agriculture, Faculty of Agriculture, Zabol University, Zabol, Iran. | ||
| 3Assistant Professor, Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Basic Sciences, Zabol University, Zabol, Iran | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| Excessive use of chemical fertilizers has caused contamination of soil as well as surface and groundwater resources. For this purpose, an experiment has been conducted to investigate the possibility of reducing surface water pollution with nitrate and also the effect of nitrogen on quantitative and qualitative characteristics of beans as a factorial based on completely randomized design (CRD) with four replications in Hamadan Agricultural and Natural Resources Research Center between 2013 and 2014. The first factor includes four types of nitrogen fertilizers, X1 (zeolite - EN), X2 (zeolite - AcAcEN), X3 (zeolite - HED), X4 (urea fertilizer), and X0 (control sample - no fertilizer use) and the second one involves two bean species, namely red beans (Phaseolus vulgarize L.) of Derakhshan cultivar and genotype 29005 of Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L.). Applying functionalized zeolite nanofertilizers reduces nitrate leaching from the experimental units (pots). Meanwhile, zeolite X3 fertilizer is capable of reducing nitrate leaching by 48% in comparison with urea fertilizer. The amount of soil nitrogen in pots, containing X3 fertilizer, is 0.115 ppm and, compared to the urea fertilizer treatment, it improves this element’s maintenance in the soil by 30%. Accordingly, X3 fertilizer increases chlorophyll, protein, and grain yield by 44%, 64%, and 56%, respectively, in comparison with the control. In general, the application of functionalized nano zeolites has a beneficial role in reducing nitrate leaching and improving the quantitative and qualitative characteristics of bean plants. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| Cereals, Clinoptilolite, Nanotechnology, Nitrogen, Seeds | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Abdali, Sh. & Daneshi, N. (2005). Determine the water required for bean cultivation. The first national conference on beans, Ferdousi University of Mashhad, May 25-26. https://www.civilica.com/Paper-PULSES01-PULSES01_095.html Abedi-Koupai, J. & Asadkazemi, J. (2006). Effect of a hydrophilic polymer on the field performance of an ornamental plant (Cupressus Arizonica) under reduced irrigation regimes. Iranian Polimer Journal, 15(9), 715- 725. Afruos, A. Sh., Liaghat, A. M. Sutodehnia, A. & Bashlideh, H. (2005). Pollution of Groundwater by Agricultural Fertilizers (Case Study of Qazvin). National Conference on Irrigation and Drainage Networks, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Faculty of Water Engineering, May, 12-14. Bansiwal, N. K., Rayalu, S. S., Labhasetwar, N. K., Juwarkar, A. A., & Devotta, S. (2006) Surfactant-Modified Zeolite as a Slow Release Fertilizer for Phosphorus. Journal of Agricultural Food and Chemistry, 54(4), 4773–4779. Bhattacharyya, T., Pal, D. K. & Deshpande, S. B. (1993). Genesis and transformation of minerals in the formation of red (Alfisols) and black (Inceptisols and Vertisols) soils on basalt in the Western Ghats, India. Journal of Soil Science. 44(1), 159-171. Bradford, M. M. (1976). A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Analytical Biochemistry, 72(32), 248-254. Breck, D. W. (1984). "Zeolite molecular sieves". Robert. E. Krieger publishing co. Chinnamuthu, C. R. & Boopathi, P. (2009). Nanotechnology and agroecosystem. Madras Agricultural Journal. 96(12), 17-31. Cook, B. G., Pengelly, B. C., Brown, S. D., Donnelly, J. L., Eagles, D. A., Franco, M. A., Hanson, J., Mullen, B. F., Partridge, I. J., Peters, M., & Schultze-Kraft, R. (2005). Tropical forages. CSIRO, DPI & F(Qld), CIAT and ILRI, Brisbane, Australia. Cui, H., Sun, C. Liu, Q. Jiang, J. & Gu, W. (2006). Applications of Nanotechnology in Agrochemical Formulation, Perspectives, Challenges and Strategies, Institute of Environment and Sustainable Development in Agriculture, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China, 1-6. Dadkhah, A., Amini Dehghi, M. & Kafi, M (2010). Effect of different levels of nitrogen and phosphorus fertilizers on quantitative and qualitative yield of German chamomile. Iranian Journal of Agricultural Research, 1(2), 321-326. Dionisiou, N. S., Matsi, T. & Misopolinos, Ν. D. (2013). Nitrogen Adsorption–Desorption on a Surfactant-ModifiedNatural Zeolite: A Laboratory Study. Water Air Soil Pollution. 224(6), 1362–1372. Gee, G. W. & Bauder, J. W. (1986). Particle-size analysis. Methods of soil analysis: Part 1: Physical and mineralogical methods, (methodsofsoilan1), 11(13), 383-411. Geetha, V. & K. Varughese. (2010). Response of vegetable cowpea to nitrogen and potassium under varying methods of irrigation. College of Agriculture, Vellayani 695522, rivandrum, India. Journal of Tropical Agriculture 39(11), 111-113. Gholam Hosseini, M., Aghalikhani, M. & Malekoti, M. G. (2000). Effect of different levels of nitrogen and zeolite on quantitative and qualitative performance of autumn canola. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology. 45(12), 55-75. Gottary, G. and Galli, E. (1985). “Natural Zeolite “Springer.Berlin. Gupta, Y. P. (2000). Nutritive value of pulses. Oxford and IBH Publishing Company, New Delhi, p: 601. Hauk, R. D. (1973). Nitrogen traces in nitrogen cycle studies post use and future needs. Journal of Environmental Quality. 2(3), 317-327. Haggerty, G. M. & Bowman, R. S. (1994) Sorption of inorganic anions by organo-zeolites. Environmental Science & Technology, 28(11), 452-458. Heydari, M., Mousavi Nik, S. & Mir, N. (2015). Effect of factorized nano zeolites on nitrate leaching and growth characteristics of bean plant. The First National Conference on New Achievements in the Life Sciences and Agricultural Sciences. Tehran. Heydari, M., Mousavi Nik, S. & Mir, N. (2017). Effect of modified nano-fertilizers with a new organic compound on properties Qualitative Two Beans, Journal of Crop Improve, 19(2), 517-531. Heydari, M., Mousavi Nik, S. & Mir, N. (2018). Reducing nitrogen loss by application of natural clinoptilolite modified with quaternary N-Alkyl agent as controlled-release fertilizer in two species of beans (P. Vulgaris and Vigna Unguiculata, Journal of Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 16(5), 1-18. Hosseini Abri, S., Kaveh, M. & Pasehzarmar, S. (2007). Effect of triple and zeolite superphosphate on quantitative and qualitative characteristics of potato plant. Basic Sciences Journal of Islamic Azad University (JSIAU), 64(19), 18-11. Kazemian, H. (2003). An introduction to zeolites, magic minerals. Behesht Publication. KhaShee Siveki, A., Kochak Zadeh, M. & Shahabifar, M. (2008). The Effect of Application of Clinoptilolite Natural Zeolite and Soil Moisture on Corn Yield Components. Journal of Soil Research (Soil and Water Sciences), 22(2), 56-67. Khazaei, H. R. & Arshadi, M. J. (2008). Investigation of the Effect of Nitrogen Circulation Fertilizer on Yield and Potato Quality Characteristics of Agria Cultivar in Mashhad Water and Climate Conditions. Journal of Horticulture (Agricultural Science and Technology), 22(3), 49-63. Kottegoda, N., Munaweera, I. Madusanka, N. & Karunaratne, A.V. (2011). Green slow-release fertilizer composition based on urea-modified hydroxyapatite nanoparticles encapsulated wood. Journal of Current science. 101(5), 73-78. Lai, R. (2007). Soil Science in the Era of Hydrogen Economy and 10 Billion People, The Ohio State University, USA, 1-9. Madani, H. Moghimi, A. & Sajedi, N. (2010). Effect of different levels of zeolite and irrigation interval on yield and some potato traits. New Agricultural Findings, 4(3): 281-289. Mollahi, F. Asghari, H. & Ghorbani, H. (2012). The effect of interaction of zeolite and mycorrhiza on leaching of nitrogen and phosphorus of soil under cultivation of Trifolium alexandrium. 6th National Conference and Specialized Exhibition of Environmental Engineering. Monreal, C. M. (2010). Nanofertilizers for increased N and P use efficiencies by crops, 12-13. In: Monreal Summary of Information Currently Provided to MRI Concerning Applications for Round 5 of the Ontario Research FundResearch Excellence Program. Mosier, A. R., Syers, J. K. & Freney, J. R. (2004). Agriculture and the Nitrogen Cycle: Assessing the Impacts of Fertilizer Use on Food Production and the environment. Washington DC, Island Press, USA. Mumpton, F. A. (1999). La Roca Magica: uses of natural zeolites in agriculture and industry. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 96, 3463–3470. doi:10.1073/pnas.96.7.3463 Nasiri, A., Delkhosh, B. Shirani Rad, A. & Nurmohammadi, Gh. (2012). Effect of different amounts of potassium and zeolite on quantitative and qualitative traits of canola in different irrigation regimes. Production of crops in conditions of environmental stresses, 4(3), 49- 57. Nelson, E. O. (1982). Soil pH and lime requirement. Amercian society of Agronomy, Madison, 199-224. Nelson, S. R. & Sommer, L. A. (1986). Estimation of available phosphorus in soils by extraction with sodium bicarbonate. United States Department of Agriculture; Washington. Nobahar, M. & Pazaki, R. (2010). Genetic diversity in some traits of indigenous Iranian fenugreek. Journal of Ecophysiology of Crops and Weeds. 100(12), 21-32. Petrucci, R. H., Harwood, W. S. Herring, G. F. & Madura, J. D. (2007). General chemistry: principles and modern applications. Upper Saddle River; New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall press, 9th ed. Sadeghipour Marvi, M. (2010). Fertilizer use efficiency in Iran. First Congress of Fertilizer Challenges in Iran: Half a Century of Fertilizer Consumption. March 10-12. Tehran. 1-9. Shaviv, A. (2000). Advances in controlled-release fertilizers. Journal of Nano Fertilizer Science, 12(5), 20-42. Sheldrick, W. F., Syers, J. K. & Lingard, J. (2002). A conceptual model for conducting nutrient audits at national, regional, and global scales. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems 62(6), 61-72. Sikoa L and Szmiat PAK, 2001. Nitrogen sources, mineralization rates and plant nutrient benefits from compost. In: Smith, J. V. (1976). "Zeolite chemistry and Catalysis". Am.Chem.Aoc. Rabo. J. A. 3. Soudi, B., Agbani, M. & Badraoui, M. (1997). Impact of N-fertilisation of sugar beet on nitrate leaching. 60. Institut International de Recherches Betteravières Congres, 1-3 July, Cambridge, UK. Thomas, J. M., Weller, S. C. & Ashton, F. M. (2008). Weed Science. Principles and Practices. 4th ed.United State of America. Valente, S., Burriesci, N. Cavallaro, S. Galvagno, S. & Zipelli, C. (1982). Utilization of zeolites as soil conditioner in tomato growing. Zeolites. 2(2), 271–274. doi:10.1016/S0144-2449(82)80069-9 Xiubin, H. & Zhanbin, H. (2001). “Zeolite application for enhancing water infiltration and retention in loess soil” Resour Conser. Recyc., 34(1), 45-52. Yasuda, H., Takuma, K. Fukuda, T. Suzuki, J. & Fukushima, Y. (1998). Effects of zeolite amendment on water and salt characteristics in soil proceedings. International Agricultural Engineering Conference, Bangkok. Thailand, 842-837. Yoldas, F. & Esiyok, D. (2004). Effects of temperature plant spacing sowing/planting date on generative growth and yield components of broccoli. 39th Croatian Symposium on Agriculture with International Participation. February 17-20, Opatija, Croatia.
| ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 315 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 239 |
||