پیوندهای مفید
اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 161 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 6,532 |
| تعداد مقالات | 70,500 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 124,085,264 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 97,189,205 |
Investigating the Balance of Power between Iran and the United States after the Islamic Revolution | ||
| Contemporary Researches on Islamic Revolution | ||
| مقاله 4، دوره 3، شماره 7، خرداد 2021، صفحه 53-74 اصل مقاله (269.15 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: Science - Research | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 20.1001.1.26767368.2021.3.7.4.4 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| Tajedin Salehiyan* 1؛ Vali Mirzaei2 | ||
| 1Ph.D. in International Relations, President of Farhangian University of Ilam, Ilam, IRAN. | ||
| 2Assistant Professor, Department of Jurisprudence and Law, University of Islamic Denominations, Tehran, IRAN. | ||
| چکیده | ||
| Today, using international relations theories is essential for explaining and analyzing international events and issues. One of the most influential international relations theories is structuralism or neorealism, developed by Kenneth Waltz, which divides into offensive and defensive. Brett Hansen, Toft, and Wivel, with their amendments to Kenneth Waltz's neo-realism, have proposed a model of neo-realism to explain international politics and the foreign behavior of governments. In this model, the strategy of governments against a single pole is affected by the probability of their military conflict. Therefore, if the likelihood of military conflict is low, governments' strategy against a single pole is "Bandwagoning." If the probability of military conflict is high, their approach will be "Balance." What influences the balance and sequence of "Hard" or "Soft" will be "Ideology." In this article, using a descriptive-analytical method, we deal with the confrontation between Iran and the United States. We will say that due to the high probability of conflict and the tremendous ideological distance between them in the region, the Islamic Republic of Iran's strategy against the United States is "Hard Balance." | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| Neo-Realism؛ Islamic Republic of Iran؛ America؛ Hard Balance | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| بررسی موازنه ی قدرت ایران در مقابل آمریکا پس از انقلاب | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| تاج الدین صالحیان1؛ ولی میرزایی2 | ||
| 1دکترای روابط بین الملل، سرپرست دانشگاه فرهنگیان ایلام،ایلام، ایران | ||
| 2استادیار فقه و حقوق دانشگاه مذاهب اسلامی ، تهران، ایران | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| امروزه استفاده از چارچوب نظریات روابط بین الملل یکی از مهمترین روشها برای تبیین و تحلیل رویدادها و مسایل بین المللی محسوب می شود. از جمله مهمترین نظریه های روابط بین الملل ساختار گرایی یا نئورئالیسم است توسط کنث واتز ساخته و پرداخته شد، که خود به نحله های تهاجمی و تدافعی تقسیم می شود. برت هنسن، پترتافت و آندره ویول با اصلاحیه هایی که بر نو واقعگرایی کنث والتز وارد نموده اند، مدلی از نو واقع گرایی را جهت تبیین سیاست بین الملل و رفتار خارجی دولت ها ارائه کرده اند. در این مدل، راهبرد دولت ها در برابر تک قطب متأثر از احتمال منازعه نظامی آن ها می باشد، به طوری که اگر احتمال منازعه نظامی کم باشد راهبرد دولت ها در برابر تک قطب «دنباله روی» و اگر احتمال منازعه نظامی زیاد باشد راهبرد شان «موازنه» خواهد بود. اما آنچه در «سخت» و یا «نرم» بودن موازنه و دنباله روی تأثیرگذار است، «ایدئولوژی» خواهد بود. در این مقاله با استفاده از روش توصیفی-تحلیلی به تقابل ایران و آمریکا پرداخته و خواهیم گفت که با توجه به احتمال بالای منازعه و فاصله ایدئولوژیکی زیاد بین آنها در منطقه ، راهبرد اتخاذ شده از سوی جمهوری اسلامی ایران در مقابل آمریکا «موازنه سخت» بوده است. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| نو واقع گرایی, جمهوری اسلامی ایران, آمریکا, موازنه سخت | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Akhbari, M; Abdi, A; Mokhtari Hashi, H. (2011). "Iran's Geopolitical Position and US Efforts to Stabilize Self-Hegemony in the World." Human Geography Research. Vol. 1, no. 75, pp. 87-112. Barzegar, K. (2009). "Iran's Foreign Policy from the Perspective of Aggressive and Defensive Realism." International Quarterly Journal of Foreign Relations. Vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 113-153. Bill, J. (2001). "The Politics of Hegemony: The United States and Iran." Middle East Policy. Vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 89-100. Callahan, P. (2008). The Logic of American Foreign Policy, Theories of America's Global Role. (D, Gharayegh Zandi; M, Yazdan Pham; N, Pourakhondi. Trans). Tehran: Research Institute for Strategic Studies. Camp, J; Harkawy, R. (2004). Strategic Geography of the Middle East. (M, Hosseini Matin. Trans). Tehran: Institute for Strategic Studies. Dehghani Firoozabadi, J. (2009). Foreign Policy of the Islamic Republic of Iran. Tehran: SAMT. ـــــــــــــــــــــــــ (2012). "Neo-Realism and Foreign Policy of the Islamic Republic of Iran." Quarterly Journal of Politics Foreign. Vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 31-55. ـــــــــــــــــــــــــ (2014). Islamic Trans-Theory of International Relations. Tehran: Allameh Tabatabai University Press. Eftekhari, G; Bagheri Dehabadi, A. (2009). "The Course of Military Strategy in Iran and the Ambiguities Surrounding It." Quarterly Journal of Politics. Vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 53-70. Garnett, J. (2005). "Limited War," in John Baylis et al, Contemporary Strategy: Theories and Policies. London: Croom Helm. Haji Yousefi, A. (2010). "The Roots of Iran's Interactive-Confrontational Foreign Policy during the Presidency of Dr. Ahmadinejad." Quarterly Journal of Political and International Approaches. Vol. 2, no. 22, pp. 109-132. ـــــــــــــــــــــــــ (2008). Foreign Policy of the Islamic Republic of Iran in the Light of Regional Developments (1999-2001). Tehran: Ministry of Foreign Affairs Publishing Center. Hansen, B; Wivel, A; Toft, P. (2009). Security Strategies and American World Other: Lost Power. New York: Rutledge. Hansen, B. (2000). Unipolarity and the Middle East. Richmond: Curzon. Hansen, B; Taft, P; Viol, A. (2011). American Security Strategies and World Order "Lost Power." (A, Niakooi; A, Jancis. Trans). Rasht: Guilan University Press. Hendrickson, T. (2001). Foreign Policy for Americans in the 21 Century. California: Hoover Institution Press. Hosseini Matin, M. (2011). "Russia's Possible Action in the Face of the Threat of US Military Attack on Iran." Quarterly Foreign Policy. Vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 905-926. Ikenberry, J. (1999). Liberal Hegemony and the Future of American of World Politics. Cambridge: University Press. Mearsheimer, J. (2001). The Tragedy of Great Power Politics. New York: Norton. Mohammadi, M; Mottaqi, E. (2005). "The Doctrine of Constructive Interaction in the Foreign Policy of the Country." Yas Strategy. Vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 231-304. Mottaqi, E. (2006). "Conflict of Two Ideologies, a Study of the Pattern and Process of American Confrontation against Iran." ZAMANEH. Vol. 5, no. 44, pp. 44-53. Mouritzen, H; Wivel, A. (2005). The Geopolitics of Euro-Atlantic. London: Routledge. Pape, R. (2005). "Soft Balancing against the United States." International Security. Vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 7-45. Paul, V. (2004). Balance of power: Theory and Practice in the 21t Century. Stanford: Stanford University Press. Pillar, P. (2004). Terrorism and US Foreign Policy. Washington DC: Bookings, Institute Press. Rasouli Thani-abadi, E. (2014). "The Nature of Alliances in the Middle East, Power or Identity?" Quarterly Journal of Strategic Studies. Vol. 17, no. 65, pp. 171-196. Takhshid, M; Nourian, A. (2008). "American Unilateralism and its Impact on the Regional Role of the Islamic Republic of Iran." Quarterly Journal of Political Science. Vol. 11, no. 41, pp. 111-140. Walt, M. (1987). The Origins of Alliance. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. Waltz, N. (1979). Theory of International Politics. New York: Random House. www.Parsian.com. /2012/8/15. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 507 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 523 |
||