پیوندهای مفید
اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 161 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 6,532 |
| تعداد مقالات | 70,501 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 124,113,357 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 97,217,249 |
تحلیل محتوای عناصر مدل اکوسیستم کارآفرینی آیزنبرگ در بستر نظام آموزش عالی کشاورزی | ||
| تحقیقات اقتصاد و توسعه کشاورزی ایران | ||
| دوره 55، شماره 1، فروردین 1403، صفحه 131-148 اصل مقاله (1.12 M) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22059/ijaedr.2019.283902.668776 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| زهره معتمدی نیا1؛ سید حمید موحد محمدی* 1؛ امیر علم بیگی1؛ حسین مهدیزاده2 | ||
| 1گروه ترویج و آموزش کشاورزی، دانشکده اقتصاد و توسعه کشاورزی، دانشگاه تهران، کرج، ایران | ||
| 2گروه کارآفرینی و توسعه روستایی، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه ایلام، ایلام، ایران | ||
| چکیده | ||
| تحقیق حاضر با هدف تحلیل محتوای عناصر مدل اکوسیستم کارآفرینی آیزنبرگ در بستر نظام آموزش عالی کشاورزی انجام شد. این مطالعه با رویکرد استقرایی و با استفاده از روش تحلیل محتوای کیفی هدایت شد. در این مطالعه با استفاده از نمونه‌گیری هدفمند دیدگاه‌های فعالان استارت‌آپی در دو بخش خصوصی و دولتی تحلیل گردید. به منظور مدیریت و تحلیل داده‌ها از نرم‌افزار MAXQDA12 استفاده شد. به این صورت که ابتدا واحدهای معنایی از متن مصاحبه‌ها استخراج شد. سپس این واحدها بر اساس اشتراک مضامین مقوله‌بندی شدند و در نهایت مقوله‌ها بر اساس ارتباطی که با یکدیگر داشتند، در طبقات جداگانه‌ای به نام مضامین قرار گرفتند. مطابق یافته‌ها خرده مقوله "حرکت دانشگاه‌ها در مسیر اکوسیستم" از مولفه سرمایه انسانی، خرده مقوله "دسترسی به منابع مالی متنوع" از مولفه سرمایه مالی، خرده مقوله "دسترسی به بازار" از مولفه بازار، خرده مقوله‌های "نگرش کارآفرینانه" و "فرهنگ کارآفرینی" از مولفه فرهنگ، خرده مقوله "تأمین زیرساخت" از مولفه حمایت و خرده مقوله "وضع قوانین" از مولفه سیاست دارای بیشترین فراوانی‌ها بودند. همچنین، مولفه-های سیاست و سرمایه انسانی به ترتیب اولویت‌های اول و دوم را به خود اختصاص دادند و مولفههای فرهنگ، حمایت، بازار و سرمایه مالی به ترتیب در رتبه‌های بعدی قرار گرفتند. به عبارتی، دولت‌ها از طریق وضع قوانین و مقررات و دانشگاه‌ها و مراکز آموزش عالی کشاورزی کشور از طریق ظرفیت‌های دانشی نقش‌های اصلی را در رشد اکوسیستم و به تبع آن توسعه کارآفرینی کشور برعهده دارند. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| تحلیل محتوا؛ اکوسیستم کارآفرینی؛ مدل آیزنبرگ؛ آموزش عالی کشاورزی؛ فعالان استارت آپی | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Content Analysis of the Elements of Isenberg’s Model of an Entrepreneurial Ecosystem in the context of Agricultural Higher Education System | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Zohreh Motamedi Nia1؛ Seyyed Hamid Movahed Mohammadi1؛ Amir Alambaigi1؛ Hossein Mahdizadeh2 | ||
| 1Department of Agricultural Extension & Education, Faculty of Agricultural Economics and Development, University of Tehran, Karaj, Iran | ||
| 2Department of Entrepreneurship and Rural Development, Faculty of Agricultural, Ilam University, Ilam, Iran. | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| The present research was conducted with the purpose of content analysis of the elements of Isenberg’s model of an entrepreneurial ecosystem in the context of agricultural higher education system. This study was led with an inductive approach, using a qualitative content analysis method. This study with using purposive sampling, startup activists were analyzed in two sections of private and public sector. The MAXQDA12 software was used to manage and analyze data. First, the semantic units were extracted from the interview transcripts. Then these units were categorized according to their common themes. And finally, based on their correlations, the categories were put into seperate classifications called “themes”. According to the findings, the subcomponent of “alignment of universities with the ecosystem” from the component of human capital, the subcomponent of “access to various financial resources” from the component of financial capital, the subcomponent of “market access” from the component of market, the subcomponents of “entrepreneurial attitude” and “entrepreneurship culture” from the component of culture, the subcomponent of “providing infrastructure” from the component of support, and the subcomponent of “legislation” from the component of policy were found to be of the highest level of importance. Moreover, the components of policy and human capital were found to have the first and second priorities respectively, followed by the components of culture, support, market and financial resources which came after considering the level of importance. In the other words, governments, through legislation, and universities, through educational capacities, have the main roles in the development of ecosystem and consequently, the development of the country's entrepreneurship. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| Content Analysis, Entrepreneurial Ecosystem, Isenberg’ Model, Agricultural Higher Education, Activists of Startup | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Ahookhosh, P. & Alibeigi, A.H. (2017). The factors influencing on educational burnout in students of agriculture and natural resources field in Razi University. Journal of Agricultural Education Administration Research, 40, 44-55. (In Persian) Aliabadi, V., Movahedi, R. & Papzan, A. (2018). Measure the relative efficiency of the entrepreneurial ecosystem of Agricultural Extension and Education Faculty with the knowledge generation approach of entrepreneurs (Application of Gray Relationship Analysis). Journal of Agricultural Education Administration Research, 44, 27-40. (In Persian) Abedi, B., Bradaran, M., Khosravi Pour, B., Yaghobi, J. & Yazdanpanah, M. (2012). Identification the Barriers to Establishing an Entrapreneurial University of Agriculture and Natural Resources Using Basic Theory. Agricultural Extention and Education Research, 10(1), 41-52. (In Persian) Abdullah Zadeh, Gh., Sharifzadeh, A., Arabioun, A. & Talaee, M. (2012). Identify and Prioritize the Topics and Content of Entrepreneurship Training Courses Based on Business Functions. Journal of Higher Education, 5(18), 113-89. (In Persian) Azizi, M., Shafizadeh, E. & Akbarzadeh, N. (2013). Identification of Entrepreneurial Competencies Required by University Administrators. Entrepreneurship Development, 6(2), 27-54. (In Persian) Bengtsson, M. (2016). How to plan and perform a qualitative study using content analysis. NursingPlusOpen, 2, 8-14. Bizhani, M., Fallah Haghighi, N., Karami, Gh., Asgari Ghods, M. & Zand, M. (2015). Investigation of Entrepreneurial Psychological Characteristics and Factors Promoting and Preventing Entrepreneurship in Agricultural Colleges (Case Study: Units of District 5 of Azadeh Islamic University). Journal of Agricultural Extension and Education Research, 29, 79-94. (In Persian) Brown, R. & Mason, C. (2017). Looking inside the spiky bits: a critical review and conceptualisation of entrepreneurial ecosystems. Small Bus Econ, 49, 11–30. Davari, A., Sefiedbari, L. & Baghersad, V. (2017). The factors of the Iranian entrepreneurship ecosystem are based on the Eisenberg model. Entrepreneurship Development, 10(1), 101-120. (In Persian) Dickson, P. H., Solomon, G. T. & Weaver, K. M. (2008). Entrepreneurial selection and success: does education matter?. Journal of small business and enterprise development, 15(2), 239-258. Erlingsson, C. & Brysiewicz, P. (2017). A hands-on guide to doing content analysis. African Journal of Emergency Medicine, 7(3), 93-99. Feld, B. (2012). Startup communities: building an entrepreneurial ecosystem in your city. Hoboken: Wiley. Forfas, F. (2009). Entrepreneurial Ecosystem: South West Ireland, rethinking entrepreneurship. Baseline Data and Analysis. South West Ireland. Dublin. 26. Available at: www.forfas.ie. Fridlund, B. & Hildingh, C. (2000). Health and qualitative analysis methods. In Fridlund, B. & Hildingh, C. (Eds.). Qualitative research, methods in the service of health: Studentlitteratur. Graneheim, U. H. & Lundman, B. (2004). Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse education today, 24(2), 105-112. Hadizadeh , J., Saghafi , M. & Fathi , A. (2013). Education and Entrepreneurship Development. National Conference on Entrepreneurship (knowledge-based industry), Babolsar, Mazandaran University, May-May. (In Persian) Hejazi, Y., Hashemi, S. M., and Malek Mohammadi, E. (2008). Iranian agricultural graduates and agri-business ventures. American Eurasian Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Science, 4(3), 311-317. Isenberg, D. (2010). How to Start an Entrepreneurial Revolution, Harvard Business Review. Isenberg, D. (2011). The entrepreneurship ecosystem strategy as a new paradigm for economic policy: principles for cultivating entrepreneurship. Presentation at the Institute of International and European Affairs, May 12, 2011, Dublin Ireland. Available on line at http://entrepreneurialrevolution.com/.1-32 Kantis, H. D. & Federico, J. S. (2012). Entrepreneurial ecosystems in Latin America: the role of policies. In International research and policy roundtable (Kauffman Foundation). Liverpool: UK. Krippendorff, K. (2012). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Sage. Lee, S. M., and Peterson, S. J. (2000). Culture, entrepreneurial orientation, and global competitiveness. Journal of world business, 35(4), 401-416. Marjaei, S.H. & Poorasati, M. (2016). Application of University Entrepreneurship in Iranian Universities as a Problem. Iranian Journal of Social Problems, 7(2), 251-268. (In Persian) Martin, R. & Sunley, P. (2003). Deconstructing clusters: chaotic concept or policy panacea?. Journal of Economic Geography, 3(1), 5–35. Mason, C. & Brown, R. (2014). Entrepreneurial Ecosystems and Growth Oriented Entrepreneurship. Final Report to OECD, Paris, 30(1), 77-102. Moore, J. F. (1993). Predators and Prey: A New Ecology of Competition. Harvard Business Review, 71(3), 75-86. Morris, M. H., Kuratko, D. F. & Cornwall, J. R. (2013). Entrepreneurship programs and the modern university. Edward Elgar Publishing. Naderi, N., Yousefi, Z. & Rezaei, B. (2016). Identifying Strategies to Overcome Barriers to Starting a New Farming Business with a Phenomenological Approach. Journal of Technology Development, 4(2), 127-150. (In Persian) Napier, G. & Hansen, C. (2011). Ecosystems for Young Scaleable Firms, FORA Group. Polit, D. F. & Beck, C. T. (2004). Nursing research: Principles and methods. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. Richards, L. & Morse, J. M. (2012). Readme first for a user's guide to qualitative methods. Sage. Regele, M.D. & Neck, H.M. (2012). Entrepreneurship education sub-ecosystem in the United States: opportunities to increase entrepreneurial activity. Babson College, USASBE, 52-69. Sharifzadeh, M. SH. & Abdollahzadeh, Gh. (2015). Components of Entrepreneurial Education Development in Higher Agricultural Education System. Journal of Agricultural Education Administration Research, 32, 96-112. (In Persian) Suresh, J. & Ramraj, R. (2012). Entrepreneurial Ecosystem: Case Study on the Influence of Environmental Factors on Entrepreneurial Success. Stam, E. (2015). Entrepreneurial Ecosystems and Regional Policy: A Sympathetic Critique. European Planning Studies, 1759–1769. Stam, E., & Spigel, B. (2016). Entrepreneurial Ecosystems. . In R. Blackburn, D. De Clercq, J. Heinonen, & Z. Wang (Eds.). Handbook for Entrepreneurship and Small Business. London, UK: Sage. Toledano, N. & Urbano, D. (2008). Promoting entrepreneurial mindsets at universities: a case study in the South of Spain. European Journal of International Management, 2(4), 382-399. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 909 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 272 |
||