سامانه پشتیبانی خدمات اطلاعات

  اخبار و اعلانات

 آمار

تعداد نشریات158
تعداد شماره‌ها6,230
تعداد مقالات67,759
تعداد مشاهده مقاله115,131,456
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله89,897,159
قائدی, علی, ایزدی, بهزاد, قاسمیان مقدم, محمدرضا. (1400). سنجش امواج مغزی، انگیختگی، لذت و تصمیم به خرید در صنعت خدمات ورزشی. , 13(2), 639-657. doi: 10.22059/jsm.2020.294673.2381
علی قائدی; بهزاد ایزدی; محمدرضا قاسمیان مقدم. "سنجش امواج مغزی، انگیختگی، لذت و تصمیم به خرید در صنعت خدمات ورزشی". , 13, 2, 1400, 639-657. doi: 10.22059/jsm.2020.294673.2381
قائدی, علی, ایزدی, بهزاد, قاسمیان مقدم, محمدرضا. (1400). 'سنجش امواج مغزی، انگیختگی، لذت و تصمیم به خرید در صنعت خدمات ورزشی', , 13(2), pp. 639-657. doi: 10.22059/jsm.2020.294673.2381
قائدی, علی, ایزدی, بهزاد, قاسمیان مقدم, محمدرضا. سنجش امواج مغزی، انگیختگی، لذت و تصمیم به خرید در صنعت خدمات ورزشی. , 1400; 13(2): 639-657. doi: 10.22059/jsm.2020.294673.2381

سنجش امواج مغزی، انگیختگی، لذت و تصمیم به خرید در صنعت خدمات ورزشی

نشریه مدیریت ورزشی
دوره 13، شماره 2، تیر 1400، صفحه 639-657    اصل مقاله (365.76 K)
نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22059/jsm.2020.294673.2381
نویسندگان
علی قائدی* 1؛ بهزاد ایزدی2؛ محمدرضا قاسمیان مقدم3
1دانشجوی دکتری مدیریت بازاریابی و رسانه در ورزش، دانشگاه کردستان، سنندج، ایران
2استادیار گروه مدیریت ورزشی، دانشگاه کردستان، سنندج، ایران
3استادیار، دانشکده تربیت بدنی و علوم ورزشی، دانشگاه علامه طباطبائی، تهران، ایران
چکیده
هدف از تحقیق حاضر بررسی نقش امواج مغزی، انگیختگی و لذت بر تصمیم به خرید خدمات ورزشی بود. تحقیق از نظر هدف کاربردی است و به‌صورت نیمه‌تجربی انجام گرفته است. نمونة آماری تحقیق 40 نفر (20 زن و 20 مرد) از دانشجویان رشتة تربیت ‌بدنی در محدودة سنی 25 تا 35 سال بودند که داوطلب شرکت در پژوهش شدند. به‌منظور تهیة ابزار تحقیق، تصاویر متناسب با راهبردهای تحقیق تهیه و روایی محتوایی آنها توسط 10 نفر از متخصصان بازاریابی ورزشی تأیید شد. از دستگاه الکتروآنسفالوگرافی برای ثبت امواج، پرسشنامة دومقوله‌ای برای سنجش تصمیم به خرید و شکل‌های خودارزیابی، برای سنجش انگیختگی و لذت استفاده شد. به‌منظور استخراج داده‌ها از نرم‌افزار Matlab 2013 b و برای تجزیه‌وتحلیل داده‌ها از روش‌های آمار توصیفی و آمار استنباطی شامل تحلیل واریانس با اندازه‌های تکراری و رگرسیون لجستیک، با استفاده از نرم‌افزار spss 22 استفاده شد. نتایج نشان داد که بین توان موج الفا در ناحیة فرونتال مغزی در راهبردهای خیرخواهانه، صحه‌گذاری، تبلیغ و تخفیف تفاوت معنا‌داری (05/0 > P)، وجود دارد. همچنین نتایج نشان داد که پاسخ‌های عصبی روان‌شناختی درصد زیادی از تصمیم به خرید مصرف‌کننده را تبیین می‌کنند. لذا بازاریابان و محققان می‌توانند با توجه به پاسخ‌های عصبی روان‌شناختی مصرف‌کنندگان اثربخشی بیشتر فعالیت‌های ترویجی خود را فراهم آورند.
کلیدواژه‌ها
انگیختگی؛ بازاریابی عصبی؛ خدمات ورزشی؛ لذت؛ موج آلفا
عنوان مقاله [English]
Measuring Brainwaves, arousal, pleasure and decision to purchase sports service industry
نویسندگان [English]
Ali Ghaedi1؛ Behzad Izadi2؛ Mohammadreza Ghasemyan3
1PhD Student in Sport Marketing and Media, University Of Kurdistan, Sanandaj, Iran
2Assistant Professor, Sport Management Group, University of Kurdistan, Sanandaj, Iran
3Assistant professor, Faculty of physical education and sport sciences, Allameh Tabataba'i University, Tehran, Iran
چکیده [English]
The purpose of this study was to investigate the role of the brainwaves, arousal, and pleasure on the decision to purchase the sports service industry. In terms of purpose, the study was an applied one which was done Semi-experimentally. The statistical sample of this study was 40 volunteers (20 women and 20 men) from students of physical education in the age range of 25 to 35 years. In order to provide the research tool, those images which were following research strategies were prepared and their content validity was confirmed by 10 sports marketing experts. An Electroencephalography device, a two-category questionnaire, and some self-assessment Manikins were used respectively to record the waves, to measure the purchasing decision and to measure arousal and pleasure. Matlab 2013 b software was used for extracting data. By using the SPSS 22 software, the descriptive and inferential statistical methods including analysis of variance with repeated measures and logistic regression were used to analyze data. The results showed that there was a significant difference (P <0.05) between the power of alpha wave in the frontal region of the brain in charitable strategies, validation, advertising and discount. Also, it was shown that the Neuropsychological responses explain a significant percentage of a consumer purchasing decisions. Therefore, marketers and researchers can provide more effective promotional activities for consumers based on their neuropsychological responses.
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
Alpha Wave, Arousal, Pleasure, Neuromarketing, sport services
مراجع
  1. Amiri, M., Hosseini Makarem, A., Falah heravi, M. (2014). “The basis and role of marketing is a valuable link in educational services”. Economic Journal, No: 11 and 12, pp: 108-93.
  2. Lee, N., Broderick, AJ. Chamberlain, L. (2007). “What is ‘neuromarketing’? A discussion and agenda for future research”. Int J Psychophysiol 63(2):199–204.
  3. .Samadi, m. (2008). “Investigation and determination of suitable promotion mix for dairy products using Multi Criteria Decision Making (MCDM)”. Agricultural Economics and Development, No. 16, pp: 97-117. [Persian].
  4. Stoldt, G. C., Dittmore, S. W., & Branvold, S. E. (2006). “Sport public relations: managing organizational communication”. Human kinetics, pp: 85.
  5. Pitts, B. G., & Stotlar, D. K. (2007). “Fundamentals of Sport Marketing, Fitness Information Technology”. Morgantown, WV, P: 56.
  6. Gordon, R. (2012). “Re-thinking and re-tooling the social marketing mix”. Australasian Marketing Journal (AMJ), 20(2), 122-126.
  7. Sue Adkins. (1999). “Cause Related Marketing: Who Cares Wins”. Routledge
  8. Stark, C., & Berggren, J. (2010). “Cause-Related Marketing, Win-Win-Win?” A Qualitative Study of the Pink Ribbon in Swedish Partner Companies´ CRM Campaign, P: 2.
  9. Vanhamme, J., Lindgreen, A., Reast, J. and van Popering, N. (2012). “To do well by doing good: improving corporate image through cause –related marketing”, Journal of business ethics, Vol. 109 No. 3, pp. 259-274.
  10. Melero, I. and Montaner, T. (2016). “Cause-related marketing: an experimental study about how the product type and the perceived fit may influence the consumer response”, European Journal of Management and Business Economics, Vol. 25 No. 3, pp. 161-167.
  11. Koschate-Fischer, N., Huber, I. V., & Hoyer, W. D. (2016). “When will price increases associated with company donations to charity be perceived as fair?” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 44(5), 608–626.
  12. Kuo, A., & Rice, D. H. (2015). “The impact of perceptual congruence on the effectiveness of cause-related marketing campaigns”. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 25(1), 78-88.‌
  13. Hanafizadeh, P., Behboudi, M., Ahadi, F., & Ghaderi Varkani, F. (2012). “Internet advertising adoption: a structural equation model for Iranian SMEs”. Internet Research, 22(4), 499-526.
  14. Lin, L.-Y. (2011). “the impact of advertising appeals and advertising spokespersons on advertising attitudes and purchase intentions”. African Journal of Business Management, 5(21), 8446.
  15. Khan, M. M. (2018). “The effect of celebrity endorsement on consumer purchase intention – evidence from Q mobile lion advertisement”. Pakistan Business Review, 19(4), 1065-1082.
  16. Keshker, S., Ghasemi, H., & Tojari, F. (2014). “Sport Marketing Management”. Tehran Science and Motion Publishing, Second Edition, P: 125. [Persian].
  17. Lee, S., Illia, A., & Lawson-Body, A. (2011). “Perceived price fairness of dynamic pricing”. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 111(4), 531-550.
  18. Lam, S.Y. (2001). “The effects of store environment on shopping behaviors: a critical review”. Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 28, pp. 190-197.
  19. Donovan, R.J. and Rossiter, J.R. (1982). “Store atmosphere: an environmental psychology approach”. Journal of Retailing, Vol. 58 No. 1, pp. 34-57.
  20. Bechara, A., & Damasio, A. R. (2005). “The somatic marker hypothesis: A neural theory of economic decision”. Games and economic behavior, 52(2), 336-372.
  21. Bell, P. A., Greene, T. C., Fisher, J. D., & Baum, A. (2001). “Environmental psychology (5th Ed)”. Fort Worth: Harcourt College Publishers, P: 131.
  22. Bargh, J. A., Schwader, K. L., Hailey, S. E., Dyer, R. L., & Boothby, E. J. (2012). “Automaticity in social-cognitive processes”. Trends in cognitive sciences, 16(12), 593-605.
  23. Agarwal, S, Xavier, MJ. (2015). “Innovations in consumer science: applications of neuro-scientific research tools”. In: Brem A, Viardot A (eds) adoption of innovation: balancing internal and external stakeholders in the marketing of innovation. Springer International Publishing, Switzerland. P: 18.
  24. Zurawicki, L. (2010). “Neuromarketing, exploring the brain of the consumer”. Springer, Berlin. PP: 25- 42.
  25. Eser, Z., Isin, F. B., & Tolon, M. (2011). “Perceptions of marketing academics, neurologists, and marketing professionals about neuromarketing”. Journal of Marketing Management, 27(7-8), 854-868.
  26. Yoon, C., Gonzalez, R., Bechara, A., Berns, G. S., Dagher, A. A., Dubé, L., ... & Smidts, A. (2012). “Decision neuroscience and consumer decision making”. Marketing Letters, 23(2), 473-485.‌
  27. Suomala, J. (2018). “Benefits of Neuromarketing in the Product/Service Innovation Process and Creative Marketing Campaign”. In: Moutinho L., Sokele M. (eds) Innovative Research Methodologies in Management. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. PP: 159 – 177.
  28. Dargi, P. (2013). “Neuromarketing, Theory and Practice”.Tehran, Marketing Publications. P: 38. [Persian].
  29. Morin, C., & Renvoisé, P. (2018). “The Persuasion Code: How Neuromarketing Can Help You Persuade Anyone, Anywhere, Anytime”. John Wiley & Sons.‌P: 125.
  30. Taghavian, A. (2012). “Neuro-Branding Roundtable with Neurologists, Clinical Psychology and Marketing Specialists”. Quarterly Journal of Market Engineering Development, No. 28, pp: 1 – 14. [Persian].
  31. Movahedi, y. (2018). “Comparing the Effect of Brand Advertising on Brain wave Patterns of Consumer and Non-branded Consumers”. Journal management system, Volume 3, Issue 11, pp: 131-142. [Persian].
  32. Telpaz, A., Webb, R., & Levy, D. J. (2015). “Using EEG to predict consumers' future choices”. Journal of Marketing Research, 52(4), 511-529.‌
  33. Sutton, S. K., & Davidson, R. J. (2000). “Prefrontal brain electrical asymmetry predicts the evaluation of affective stimuli”. Neuropsychologia, 38(13), 1723-1733.
  34. Braeutigam, S., Rose, S. P., Swithenby, S. J., & Ambler, T. (2004). “The distributed neuronal systems supporting choice‐making in real‐life situations: differences between men and women when choosing groceries detected using magnetoencephalography”. European Journal of Neuroscience, 20(1), 293-302.
  35. Ravaja, N., Somervuori, O., & Salminen, M. (2013). “Predicting purchase decision: The role of hemispheric asymmetry over the frontal cortex”. Journal of Neuroscience, Psychology, and Economics, 6(1), 1.
  36. Rothschild ML, Hyun YJ, Reeves B, Thorson E, Goldstein R (1988). “Hemispherically lateralized EEG as a response to television commercials”. J Consum Res 15:185–198.
  37. Vecchiato G, Astolfi L, De Vico Fallani F, Cincotti F, Mattia D, Salinari S, Soranzo R, Babiloni F (2010). “Changes in brain activity during the observation of TV commercials by using EEG, GSR, and HR measurements”. Brain Topogr 23(2):165–179.
  38. Guerreiro, J., Rita, P., & Trigueiros, D. (2015). “Attention, emotions and cause-related marketing effectiveness”. European Journal of Marketing, 49(11/12), 1728-1750.‌
  39. Golnar-Nik, P., Farashi, S., & Safari, M. S. (2019). “The application of EEG power for the prediction and interpretation of consumer decision-making: A neuromarketing study”. Physiology & behavior, 207, 90-98.
  40. Cherchi, E., Vuong, Q., & Stergiou, A. (2020). “Using EEG to understand how our brain elaborate information in stated choice experiments: Easy versus hard tasks in the choice of vehicles”. bioRxiv.‌
  41. Chark, R. (2018). “Neuromarketing”. In Innovative Research Methodologies in Management (pp. 179-198). Palgrave Macmillan, Cham.
  42. Mehrabian, A., & Russell, J. A. (1974). “An approach to environmental psychology”. The MIT Press. P: 24.
  43. Ha, Y., & Lennon, S. J. (2010). “Online visual merchandising (VMD) cues and consumer pleasure and arousal: Purchasing versus browsing situation”. Psychology & Marketing, 27(2), 141-165.‌
  44. Glimcher, P. W., & Fehr, E. (2013). “Neuroeconomics: Decision Making and the Brain”. London: Academic Press.
  45. Falk, E. B., O’Donnell, M. B., Tompson, S., Gonzalez, R., Cin, S. D., Strecher, V., Cummings, K. M., & an, L. (2016). “Functional Brain Imaging Predicts Public Health Campaign Success”. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 11(2), 204–214. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsv108.
  46. Boksem, M. A. S., & Smidts, A. (2015). “Brain Responses to Movie Trailers Predict Individual Preferences for Movies and Their Population-Wide Commercial Success”. Journal of Marketing Research, 52(4), 482–492. https:// doi.org/10.1509/jmr.13.0572.
  47. Schreiber, J. B., et al. (2006). “Reporting structural equation modeling and confirmatory factor analysis results: A review”. The Journal of educational research, 99(6), 323-338.‌
  48. Cook, E. W., et al. (1988). “Emotional imagery and the differential diagnosis of anxiety”. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 56(5): 734.
  49. Morris, J.D. and Boone, M.A. (1998). “The effects of music on emotional response, brand attitude, and purchase intent in an emotional advertising condition”. Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 25 No. 1, pp. 518-526.
  50. Vieira, V.A. (2013). “Stimuli-organism-response framework: a meta-analytic review in the store environment”. Journal of Business Research, Vol. 66 No. 9, pp. 1420-1426.
  51. Mead, R. (1990). “The design of experiments: statistical principles for practical applications”. Cambridge university press. P: 26.
  52. Stasi, A., et al. (2018). “Neuromarketing empirical approaches and food choice: a systematic review”. Food Research International, 108, 650-664.‌
  53. Baumeister, R. F., & Vohs, K. D. (2007). “Self‐Regulation, ego depletion, and motivation”. Social and personality psychology compass, 1(1), 115-128.‌
  54. Plassmann H, Ambler T, Braeutigam S, Kenning P (2007). “What can advertisers learn from neuroscience?” .Int J Advert 26(2):151–175.
  55. Halonen-Knight, E., & Hurmerinta, L. (2010). “Who endorses whom? Meanings transfer in celebrity endorsement”. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 19(6), 452-460.
آمار
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 770
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 362


سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. قدرت گرفته از سیناوب