تعداد نشریات | 161 |
تعداد شمارهها | 6,539 |
تعداد مقالات | 70,537 |
تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 124,173,086 |
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 97,278,415 |
بررسی تأثیر کلاس درس معکوس بر پیشرفت خواندن و خودکارآمدی زبانآموزان | ||
پژوهشهای زبانشناختی در زبانهای خارجی | ||
مقاله 5، دوره 11، شماره 3، آبان 1400، صفحه 435-452 اصل مقاله (1.17 M) | ||
نوع مقاله: علمی پژوهشی(عادی) | ||
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22059/jflr.2021.330102.889 | ||
نویسندگان | ||
جلیل فتحی* 1؛ سید جمال بارخدا2 | ||
1گروه زبان انگلیسی دانشگاه کردستان | ||
2دانشگاه کردستان | ||
چکیده | ||
پژوهشهای بسیاری در رابطه با آموزش زبانهای خارجی انجامشده است که حکایت از اثربخشی آموزشهای معکوس در بهبود نتایج عملکرد زبانی دانشآموزان دارد. بااینوجود، تعداد کمی از مطالعات به بررسی تأثیر آموزش معکوس بر درک مطلب در زبان دوم پرداختهاند. هدف این مطالعه بررسی تأثیر کلاس درس معکوس بر پیشرفت درک مطلب و خودکارآمدی زبانآموزان در مدارس ایرانی است. برای این منظور، نمونهای متشکل از 48 زبانآموز ایرانی موردنظر قرارگرفته و بهصورت تصادفی در دو گروه آزمایش (25 نفر ) و کنترل (23 نفر) موردبررسی قرارگرفتهاند. پژوهش حاضر با روش شبه آزمایشی به انجام رسیده است؛ به این صورت که آزمودنیها در گروه آزمایش آموزشهای معکوس را دریافت نموده و در گروه کنترل با شیوههای معمول به مدت سه ماه مورد آموزش قرار گرفتند. در راستای جمعآوری دادههای پژوهش از دو پرسشنامهی استاندارد پرسشنامهی مقدماتی انگلیسی کمبریج (CPET) و پرسشنامهی خودکارآمدی خواندن (RSEQ) استفاده گردیده که روایی آنها با استفاده ازنظر متخصصان مربوطه تائید گردید و پایایی دو آزمون نیز با استفاده از آزمون آلفای کرونباخ به ترتیب0.84 و... بهدستآمدهاند. نتایج پژوهش نشان داد تفاوت معنیداری بین استفاده از دو روش نامبرده در پژوهش وجود دارد به این معنی که فراگیران گروه آزمایش ازلحاظ پیشرفت خواندن زبان دوم و خودکارآمدی خواندن بهطور معناداری بهتر از گروه کنترل عمل میکنند. بهطورکلی ، میتوان نتیجه گرفت که مدرسان زبانهای خارجی میتوانند شیوه آموزش معکوس را در کلاسهای خواندن بگنجانند تا به زبانآموزان کمک کرده تا اعتمادبهنفس و خودکارآمدی بیشتری را برای انجام مؤثرتر فعالیتهای مربوط به درک مطلب از خود نشان دهند. | ||
کلیدواژهها | ||
کلاس درس معکوس؛ مطالب آموزشی الکترونیکی؛ درک مطلب؛ خودکارآمدی در خواندن؛ زبان آموزان؛ تکنولوژی | ||
عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
Exploring the effect of the flipped classroom on EFL learners' reading achievement and self-efficacy | ||
نویسندگان [English] | ||
Jalil Fathi1؛ Jamal Barkhoda2 | ||
1Assistant Professor in TEFL, University of Kurdistan, Sanandaj, Iran | ||
2University of Kurdistan | ||
چکیده [English] | ||
The body of research on second language (L2) teaching has documented and reported the usefulness of flipped instruction in enhancing foreign language development. Nevertheless, little research has explored the impact of flipped teaching on L2 reading comprehension. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of flipped classroom on EFL learners' reading achievement and self-efficacy. In so doing, a total number of 48 Iranian EFL learners served as participants and were randomly assigned to an experimental group (N = 25) and a control group (N = 23). Employing a quasi-experimental design, the researchers utilized an experimental group that received flipped instruction via electronic materials and a control group that were instructed based on the regular method for a period of three months. The reading component of Cambridge Preliminary English Test (CPET) and the Reading Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (RSEQ) were administered to measure the reading comprehension reading self-efficacy of the participants. The outcomes of the study revealed that the students in the flipped group substantially performed better than those of the non-flipped group regarding both L2 reading achievement and reading self-efficacy. Overall, it may be concluded that EFL practitioners can incorporate flipped instruction into their reading classrooms in order to aid students to gain both confidence and competence in doing reading tasks more properly. | ||
کلیدواژهها [English] | ||
The flipped classroom, electronic materials.reading comprehension, reading self-efficacy, EFL learners, technology | ||
سایر فایل های مرتبط با مقاله
|
||
مراجع | ||
Abaeian, H., & Samadi, L. (2016). The effect of flipped classroom on Iranian EFL learners’ L2 reading comprehension: Focusing on different proficiency levels. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Language Research, 3(6), 295-304.
Abeysekera, L., & Dawson, P. (2015). Motivation and cognitive load in the flipped classroom: definition, rationale and a call for research. Higher Education Research & Development, 34(1), 1-14.
Adnan, M. (2017). Perceptions of senior-year ELT students for flipped classroom: A materials development course. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 30(3-4), 204-222.
Allan, D. (2004). Oxford Placement Test. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Amiryousefi, M. (2019). The incorporation of flipped learning into conventional classes to enhance EFL learners’ L2 speaking, L2 listening, and engagement. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 13(2), 147-161.
Bergmann, J., & Sams, A. (2012). Flip your classroom: Reach every student in every class every day. International society for technology in education.
Bonk, C. J., & Graham, C. R. (2012). The handbook of blended learning: Global perspectives, local designs. John Wiley & Sons.
Butt, A. (2014). Student views on the use of a flipped classroom approach: Evidence from Australia. Business Education & Accreditation, 6(1), 33-43.
Chen Hsieh, J. S., Wu, W. C. V., & Marek, M. W. (2017). Using the flipped classroom to enhance EFL learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 30(1-2), 1-21.
Davies, R. S., Dean, D. L., & Ball, N. (2013). Flipping the classroom and instructional technology integration in a college-level information systems spreadsheet course. Educational Technology Research and Development, 61(4), 563-580.
Enfield, J. (2013). Looking at the impact of the flipped classroom model of instruction on undergraduate multimedia students at CSUN. TechTrends, 57(6), 14-27.
Fathi, J., & Rahimi, M. (2020). Examining the impact of flipped classroom on writing complexity, accuracy, and fluency: A case of EFL students. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 1-39.
Fathi, J., Naghshbandi, Z., & Mohamadi, P. (2021). The effect of a flipped writing classroom on writing performance and self-regulation of Iranian EFL learners. Language Related Research, 12(4), 615-644.
Fathi, J., & Soleimani, H. (2020). The effect of reading strategy instruction on reading self-efficacy and reading attitudes: A case of young female Iranian EFL learners. Applied Research on English Language, 9(3), 382-408.
Faulkner, T., & Green, J. (2017). The peer instruction flipped learning model. In Blended learning: Concepts, methodologies, tools, and applications (pp. 285-307). IGI Global.
Ferreri, S. P., & O’Connor, S. K. (2013). Redesign of a large lecture course into a small-group learning course. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 77(1).
Ghezlou, M., Kordi, L., & Nasri Nasrabady, A. (2014). Gender differences in reading strategy use, reading self-efficacy, and perceptual learning styles among EFL learners. International Journal of Language Learning and Applied Linguistics World (IJLLALW), 5(1), 609-624.
Ghonsooly, B., & Elahi, M. (2010). Learners' self-efficacy in reading and its relation to foreign language reading anxiety and reading achievement. Journal of English Language Teaching and Learning, 2(217), 45-68.
Goodwin, B., & Miller, K. (2013). Research says. Educational Leadership, 70, 80-82.
Guo, J. (2019). The use of an extended flipped classroom model in improving students’ learning in an undergraduate course. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 31(2), 362-390.
Johnson, L., Becker, S. A., Estrada, V., & Freeman, A. (2014). NMC horizon report: 2014 K (pp. 1-52). The New Media Consortium.
Hamdan, N., McKnight, P., McKnight, K., & Arfstrom, K. M. (2013). A review of flipped learning. Flipped Learning Network. George Mason University: Harper and Row Ltd.
Hawks, S. J. (2014). The flipped classroom: now or never?. AANA journal, 82(4).
Hung, H. T. (2017). The integration of a student response system in flipped classrooms. Language Learning & Technology, 21(1), 16-27.
Hadadi, M. H., & Sadri, N. (2020). A comparative study of the teacher-centered and student-centered teaching methods in educating German grammar as a foreign language. Journal of Foreign Language Research, 10(4), 722-733.
Karabulut‐Ilgu, A., Jaramillo Cherrez, N., & Jahren, C. T. (2018). A systematic review of research on the flipped learning method in engineering education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 49(3), 398-411.
Kushairi, N., & Ahmi, A. (2021). Flipped classroom in the second decade of the Millenia: a Bibliometrics analysis with Lotka’s law. Education and Information Technologies, 1-31.
Jiang, M. Y. C., Jong, M. S. Y., Lau, W. W. F., Chai, C. S., & Wu, N. (2021). Using automatic speech recognition technology to enhance EFL learners’ oral language complexity in a flipped classroom. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 37(2), 110-131.
Kim, J., Park, H., Jang, M., & Nam, H. (2017). Exploring flipped classroom effects on second language learners’ cognitive processing. Foreign Language Annals, 50(2), 260–284.
Kurt, G. (2017). Implementing the flipped classroom in teacher education: Evidence from Turkey. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 20(1), 211-221.
Lantolf, J. P. (2011). The sociocultural approach to second language acquisition: Sociocultural theory, second language acquisition, and artificial L2 development. In Alternative approaches to second language acquisition (pp. 36-59). Routledge.
Lai, C. L., & Hwang, G. J. (2016). A self-regulated flipped classroom approach to improving students’ learning performance in a mathematics course. Computers & Education, 100, 126-140.
Lee, L. (2021). Exploring Self-Regulated Learning Through Flipped Instruction with Digital Technologies: An Intermediate Spanish Course. In Language Education in Digital Spaces: Perspectives on Autonomy and Interaction (pp. 39-59). Springer, Cham.
Lee, G., & Wallace, A. (2018). Flipped learning in the English as a foreign language classroom: Outcomes and perceptions. TESOL Quarterly, 52(1), 62-84.
Leow, R. P., & Mercer, J. D. (2015). Depth of processing in L2 learning: Theory, research, and pedagogy. Journal of Spanish Language Teaching, 2(1), 69–82.
Littlewood, W. (1999). Defining and developing autonomy in East Asian contexts. Applied Linguistics, 20(1), 71-94.
Mehring, J. (2016). Present research on the flipped classroom and potential tools for the EFL classroom. Computers in the Schools, 33(1), 1-10.
Morrison, G. R., Ross, S. M., Kalman, H. K., & Kemp, J. E. (2011). Introduction to the instructional design process. Designing effective instruction, 1-26.
Maghsodi, M. (2021). A reflection on the undergraduate teaching English as a foreign language curriculum at Farhangian University from TPACK perspective. Journal of Foreign Language Research, 11(2), 722-733.
Namaziandost, E., & Çakmak, F. (2020). An account of EFL learners’ self-efficacy and gender in the Flipped Classroom Model. Education and Information Technologies, 1-15.
Lockwood, R. B., & Folse, K. S. (2014). Flip It!: Strategies for the ESL classroom. Michigan: University of Michigan Press.
O'Flaherty, J., & Phillips, C. (2015). The use of flipped classrooms in higher education: A scoping review. The Internet and Higher Education, 25, 85-95.
Pallant, J. (2013). SPSS survival manual: A Step by Step guide to data analysis using IBM SPSS. McGraw-Hill Education (UK): Open University Press.
Pica, T., Lincoln‐Porter, F., Paninos, D., & Linnell, J. (1996). Language learners' interaction: How does it address the input, output, and feedback needs of L2 learners?. TESOL Quarterly, 30(1), 59-84.
Pekkinen, K. (2011). Lernerzentriertheit im DaFUnterricht. Unterrichtsversuch zum Thema Verbrektion. Maserarbeit. Deutsche Sprache und Kultur. Fachbereich Sprach-, Translations- und Literaturwissenschaften. Universität Tampere.
Polat, H., & Karabatak, S. (2021). Effect of flipped classroom model on academic achievement, academic satisfaction and general belongingness. Learning Environments Research, 1-24.
Rahimi, M., & Fathi, J. (2021). Exploring the impact of wiki-mediated collaborative writing on EFL students’ writing performance, writing self-regulation, and writing self-efficacy: a mixed methods study. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 1-48.
Silberman, M. (1996). Active Learning: 101 Strategies To Teach Any Subject. Prentice-Hall, PO Box 11071, Des Moines, IA 50336-1071.
Strayer, J. F. (2012). How learning in an inverted classroom influences cooperation, innovation and task orientation. Learning Environments Research, 15(2), 171-193.
Szeto, E., & Cheng, A. Y. N. (2017). Pedagogies across subjects: What are preservice teachers’ TPACK patterns of integrating technology in practice? Journal of Educational Computing Research, 55(3), 346-373.
Talbert, R. (2012). Inverted classroom. Colleagues, 9(1), 7.
Tucker, B. (2012). The flipped classroom. Education Next, 12(1), 82-83.
Wagner, M., & Urhahne, D. (2021). Disentangling the effects of flipped classroom instruction in EFL secondary education: When is it effective and for whom?. Learning and Instruction, 75, 101490.
Wen, Q. F. (2008). On the output-driven hypothesis and reform of English-skill courses for English majors. Foreign Language World, 2, 2-9.
Wu, W. C. V., Hsieh, J. S. C., & Yang, J. C. (2017). Creating an online learning community in a flipped classroom to enhance EFL learners’ oral proficiency. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 20(2), 142-157.
Zhu, G. (2021). Is flipping effective? A meta-analysis of the effect of flipped instruction on K-12 students’ academic achievement. Educational Technology Research and Development, 69(2), 733-761. | ||
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 854 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 1,052 |