تعداد نشریات | 161 |
تعداد شمارهها | 6,479 |
تعداد مقالات | 70,032 |
تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 122,999,833 |
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 96,231,186 |
نوعشناسی اخبار جعلیِ شبکههای اجتماعی در بافت مصرف ایران، الگوی مفهومی مردمنگارانه | ||
مدیریت بازرگانی | ||
دوره 13، شماره 3، 1400، صفحه 814-844 اصل مقاله (859.87 K) | ||
نوع مقاله: مقاله علمی پژوهشی | ||
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22059/jibm.2021.319197.4066 | ||
نویسنده | ||
عماد رحمانیان* | ||
دکتری، گروه مدیریت بازاریابی، دانشکده مدیریت، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران. | ||
چکیده | ||
هدف: خبر جعلی مفهومی قدیمی است که در دنیای امروز بار دیگر در کانون توجه قرار گرفته است؛ اما در ادبیات بازاریابی و رفتار مصرفکننده ایران، کمتر به این موضوع پرداخته شده است. خبر جعلی در بازاریابی و رفتار مصرفکننده به پدیده زیانباری بدل شده و ممکن است به برندها و شرکتها آسیب برساند. هدف این پژوهش شناسایی و ارائه انواع خبر جعلی موجود در بافت مصرف ایران و ابعاد آن است. روش: در این پژوهش کیفی و بنیادین، دادهها با مصاحبههای نیمهساختار یافته بهصورت میدانی جمعآوری شدند. جامعه هدف، کاربران شبکههای اجتماعی در ایران بودند. روش نمونهگیری قضاوتی، غیراحتمالی و گلوله برفی بود و با توجه به اشباع تئوریک، ۱۶ مصاحبه انجام شد. تحلیل دادهها با استفاده از نسخه 8 نرمافزار اطلس تیآی انجام شد. یافتهها: در پژوهش حاضر برای نخستین بار، ۵ نوع خبر جعلی در بافت مصرف ایران شناسایی شد. پیش از این دو نوع شبهعلم و تئوری توطئه در ادبیات سیاسی خارج از ایران مشاهده شده بود؛ اما خبر جعلی سلامت، ضدیت با علم و نزدیکی به نظام سیاسی حاکم برای نخستین بار در ادبیات بازاریابی معرفی شده است. نتیجهگیری: با توجه به نوآورانهبودن یافتهها، این یافتهها میواند برای بازاریابان و پژوهشگران حائز اهمیت باشد. پذیرش خبر جعلی بهعنوان اطلاعات موجود در بافت مصرف کشور، نوعشناسی آن و اتخاذ گامهای مناسب برای ارائه اطلاعات به مصرفکننده، به حفظ وجهه و تصویر برند و محصول کمک میکند. | ||
کلیدواژهها | ||
خبر جعلی؛ نوعشناسی؛ شبکههای اجتماعی؛ تحلیل تم؛ مردمنگاری | ||
عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
Typology of Fake Social Media News in the Context of Iran: An Ethnographic Approach | ||
نویسندگان [English] | ||
Emad Rahmanian | ||
PhD., Department of Business Management, Faculty of Management, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran. | ||
چکیده [English] | ||
Objective Fake news has become a serious ploy in marketing and consumers’ behavior, which may harm brands and companies. Although fake news is an old concept, its nature and form have been changing and are spreading online. In some cases, such fake news is accompanied by a video or an image, which is being reproduced at a very large scale with the maximum speed. On the other hand, the general popularity of social networks and online information has made it a critical issue in Iran. Thus, it is essential to address this issue. In general, this study aims to identify and present different types of fake news and respective dimensions in the context of Iran. Methodology This study is based on the constructivist-interpretive and postmodern paradigms, and the ontology of the present study is idealistic. In this qualitative and fundamental study, the data were collected through semi-structured in-field interviews. The statistical population included social media users in Iran. The judgmental, non-probability, and snowball sampling methods were used, and theoretical saturation was obtained after conducting 16 interviews. The theoretical thematic analysis was used to examine the data. In addition, data analysis was performed using Atlas.ti 8 software. Findings Five fake news were identified for the first time in Iranian context. However, two of them (pseudoscience and fake political news) have already been mentioned in the political literature. Fake health news, fake denial news, and fake governmental news are presented for the first time in this article. These findings are based on the meaning map extracted from the interviewees and indicate how they relate to the minds of consumers. Moreover, different dimensions of fake news have been discussed, and their definitions and characteristics have been provided. Conclusion Marketers should be aware that official sources of information may be detrimental to their brands. Besides, any close relationships with the Iranian government may negatively affect their brand image. Consumers prefer informal information channels. In addition, lack of awareness and illusion of knowledge are two critical issues that should be taken into account in the interpretation of fake news on social networks in the context of Iran. Accepting fake news as the expiating information in the country's consumption context, its typology, and taking appropriate steps to provide information to the consumers can help maintain the reputation and image of the brand and product. | ||
کلیدواژهها [English] | ||
Fake news, Typology, Social media, Thematic analysis, Ethnography | ||
مراجع | ||
آذرشین، سید امیر؛ تاجیک اسماعیلی، سمیه (۱۳۹۶). بررسی میزان باورپذیری پدیده «شایعه» در پیام رسانهای موبایلی بین مردم شهرستان اهواز با تأکید بر نقش «رسانة ملی». مطالعات فرهنگ ارتباطات، 18(40)، 65- 94.
خلیلی مقدم، مریم؛ سلطانی، مرتضی؛ یزدانی، حمید رضا؛ خنیفر، حسین (۱۳۹۷). فهم تجربۀ خرید احساسی کالای بادوام: مطالعۀ پدیدارشناختی در خرید لوازم خانگی جهیزیه. مدیریت بازرگانی، ۱۰(۲)، ۳۲۵-۳۴۸.
دهقان شاد، حوری (۱۳۹۰). چگونگی گردش شایعات سیاسی در فضای اینترنت. مطالعات رسانهای، 6(3)، 41- 49.
زمانی کسبی، سمیه (۱۳۹۵). ارائه رویکردی برای تشخیص شایعه در شبکههای اجتماعی. پایان نامه کارشناسی ارشد. دانشگاه تهران.
شجاع، علی؛ صادق وزیری، فراز؛ ابراهیمی، الهام (۱۳۹۹). ارائه الگویی از علل و پیامدهای تنفر از برند کالاهای ایرانی. مدیریت بازرگانی، ۱۲(۱)، ۳-۲۳.
کیانی، رسول (۱۳۸۵). شایعه و امنیت عمومی. دانش انتظامی. 8(3)، 131- 157.
گلکاری حق، سینا؛ طباطبایی نسب، سیدمحمد؛ رجبی پور، علیرضا (۱۳۹۹). بررسی مفهوم مالکیت روانشناختی از دیدگاه خریداران. مدیریت بازرگانی، ۱۲(۲)، ۳۹۹-۴۲۱.
References Allcott, H. and Gentzkow, M. (2017). Social Media and Fake News in the 2016 Election. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 31(2), 211–236. Azarshin, A. and Tajik Esmaeili, S. (2018). An investigation into the believability of the phenomenon of rumor in mobile messenger in city of Ahvaz with regard to the role of national media. Culture-Communication Studies, 18 (40), 65-94. (in Persian) Beattie, G., Marselle, M., McGuire, L., & Litchfield, D. (2017). Staying over-optimistic about the future: Uncovering attentional biases to climate change. Semiotica, 2017(218). Beatty, S.E. & Smith, S. M. (1987). External search effort: an investigation across several productcategories. Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research, 14(1), 83–95. Bell, E.J., Owen, T., Brown, P.D., Hauka, C. and Rashidian, N. (2017). The Platform Press: How Silicon Valley Reengineered Journalism. Tow Center, Columbia Journalism School. DOI:10.7916/D8R216ZZ Bounegru, L., Gray, J., Venturini, T. and Mauri, M. (2017). A Field Guide to Fake News. Public Data Lab. Boyd, D. (2004). Friendster and publicly articulated social networks. Proceedings of ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1279–1282). New York: ACM Press. Braun, V. & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. Bryman, A. (2008). Social Research Methods. Oxford University Press, London. Culture, Media and Sport Committee (2017). Fake News Inquiry. UK Parliament. https://www.parliament.uk/business/committees/committees-a-z/commons-select/culturemedia-and-sport-committee/inquiries/parliament-2015/inquiry2/ Dehghan Shad, H. (2012). How political rumors spread on Internet. Media Studies, 6 (3), 41-49. (in Persian) Dentith, M. R. X. (2018). What is fake news? University of Bucharest Review, (2), 24-34. Denzin, N. K. (1989). Interpretive Interactionism, Vol. 16, Applied Social Research Method Series. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications. Dewey, C. (2016). Facebook Fake-News Writer: ‘I Think Donald Trump is in the White House because of Me. Washington Post, November, 17. https://www.washingtonpost. com/news/the-intersect/wp/2016/11/17/ facebook-fake-news-writer-i-think-donald-trump-isin-the-white-house-because-of-me/. Ferrara, E., Varol, O., Davis, C., Menczer, F., and Flammini, A. (2016). The Rise of Social Bots. Communications of the ACM, 59(7), 96–104. Gillin, J. (2017). Fact-Checking Fake News Reveals How Hard It is to Kill Pervasive. Nasty Weed Online. Punditfact. Golkari, S., Tabatabaeenasab, S.M., &Rajabipour, A. (2020). Investigating the Concept of Psychological Ownership from the Buyers’ Perspective. Journal of Business Management, 12(2), 399-421. (in Persian) Guest, G., Bunce, A., & Johnson, L. (2006). How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field methods, 18(1), 59-82. Hansson, S. O. (2017). Science denial as a form of pseudoscience. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 63, 39-47. Hotez, P. J. (2016). Texas and its measles epidemics. PLoS medicine, 13(10), e1002153. Howell, L. (2013). Digital wildfires in a hyperconnected world. WEF report, 3, 15-94. Jacob, S.A., and Furgerson, S.P. (2012). Writing Interview Protocols and Conducting InterviewsTips for Students New to the Field of Qualitative Research. The Qualitative Report, 17:6, 110. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ990034.pdf Jaster, R. and Lanius, D. (2018). What is fake news? _Versus_ 2 (127):207-227. Khaldarova, I. and Pantti, M. (2016): Fake News. Journalism Practice, DOI: 10.1080/17512786.2016.1163237 Khalilimoghadam, M., Soltani, M., Yazdani, H. and Khanifar, H. (2018).Understanding the Experience of Emotional Purchase of Durable Goods: A Phenomenological Study of Purchasing Home Appliance as Dowry. Business Management, 10(2), 325-348. Kiani, R. (2006). Epistemology of rumer and public securit. Journal of Research Police Science, 8(3), 131-157. (in Persian) Klockars, A., & Williams, M. J. (2012). Scientific yellow journalism. Small GTPases, 3(4), 201. Krippendorff, K. (2004). Reliability in content analysis. Human Communication Research, 30(3), 411-433. https://doi.org/ 10.1111/j.1468-2958.2004.tb00738.x Krippendorff, K. (2017). Computing Krippendorff’s alpha reliability. Working paper, Available from: https://repository. upenn.edu/asc_papers/43/. Cited 4 Jan 2018. Ladd, J. M. )2012(. Why Americans Hate the Media and How It Matters. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Levy, M. (2009). Web 2.0 implications on knowledge management. Journal of Knowledge Management, 13(1), 120-134. Madison, D. S. (2005). Critical ethnography: Method, ethics, and performance. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Marshall, B., Cardon, P., Poddar, A., & Fontenot, R. (2013). Does sample size matter in qualitative research? A review of qualitative interviews in IS research. Journal of computer information systems, 54(1), 11-22. McGonagle, T. (2017). “Fake news” False fears or real concerns? Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights, 35(4), 203-209. Meel, P., & Vishwakarma, D. K. (2019). Fake News, Rumor, Information Pollution in Social Media and Web: A Contemporary Survey of State-of-the-arts, Challenges and Opportunities. Expert Systems with Applications, 153, 112986. Miles, M.B. and Huberman, A.M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: an expanded sourcebook, second edition. Sage. Nielsen, R. K. )2016(. The Many Crises of Western Journalism: A Comparative Analysis of Economic Crises, Professional Crises, and Crises of Confidence.” In The Crisis of Journalism Reconsidered: Democratic Culture, Professional Codes, Digital Future, edited by Jeffrey C. Alexander, Elizabeth Butler Breese, and María Luengo, 77–97. Cambridge ; New York: Cambridge University Press. Nielsen, R. K., & Graves, L. (2017). News you don’t believe: Audience perspectives on fake news. Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism. Retrieved from https://reutersinstitute. politics. ox. ac. uk/ourresearch/news-you-dont-believe-audience-perspectives-fake-news. Nielsen, R.K., and Ganter, S.A. )2017(. Dealing with Digital Intermediaries: A Case Study of the Relations between Publishers and Platforms. New Media & Society, April, DOI: 10.1177/1461444817701318. Norris, P. )2011(. Democratic Deficit: Critical Citizens Revisited. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Parkinson, H.J. (2016). Click and Elect: How Fake News Helped Donald Trump Win a Real Election. Guardian, November 14. Patton, M.Q. (2015). Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods: Integrating Theory and Practice (4th ed.). USA: Sage Publications, Inc Pesonen, T. (2018). The effects of fake news on consumer trust in social media marketing, A quantitative study on consumer mindset. Metropolia University of Applied Sciences Qiu, X., Oliveira, D. F., Shirazi, A. S., Flammini, A., & Menczer, F. (2017). Limited individual attention and online virality of low-quality information. Nature Human Behaviour, 1(7), 0132. Read, M. (2016). Donald Trump won because of Facebook., New York Magazine, November 9, available at: http://nymag.com/selectall/2016/11/donald-trump-won-because-of-facebook.html (accessed February 1, 2017). Rochlin, N. (2017). Fake news: belief in post-truth. Library hi tech, 35(3), 386-392. Romano Jr, N. C., Donovan, C., Chen, H., & Nunamaker Jr, J. F. (2003). A methodology for analyzing web-based qualitative data. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19(4), 213-246. Shao, C., Ciampaglia, G. L., Varol, O., Flammini, A., & Menczer, F. (2017). The spread of fake news by social bots. arXiv preprint arXiv:1707.07592 , 96-104. Shoja, A., Sadegh Vaziri, F., & Ebrahimi, E. (2020). Developing a Framework of Causes and Consequences of Hatred for Iranian Product Brands. Journal of Business Management, 12(1), 3-23. (in Persian) Silverman, D. (2000). Doing qualitative research. A practical handbook. Sage. Sommariva, S., Vamos, C., Mantzarlis, A., Đào, L. U. L., & Martinez Tyson, D. (2018). Spreading the (fake) news: exploring health messages on social media and the implications for health professionals using a case study. American journal of health education, 49(4), 246-255. Speed, E., & Mannion, R. (2017). The rise of post-truth populism in pluralist liberal democracies: challenges for health policy. International journal of health policy and management, 6(5), 249. Stokes, P. (2012). No, You’re Not Entitled to Your Opinion. The Conversation. https:// theconversation.com/no-youre-not-entitled-to-your-opinion-9978 (accessed 31 August, 2020) Tandoc Jr, E. C., Lim, Z. W., & Ling, R. (2018). Defining “fake news” A typology of scholarly definitions. Digital journalism, 6(2), 137-153. Tsfati, Y., & Cappella, J. N. (2003). Do people watch what they do not trust? Exploring the association between news media skepticism and exposure. Communication Research, 30(5), 504-529. Tuckett, A.G. (2005). Applying thematic analysis theory to practice: a researcher’s experience. Contemporary Nurse, 19, 75/87. Wardle, C. (2017). “Fake News.” It’s Complicated. https://medium.com/1st-draft/fake-newsits-complicated-d0f773766c79. Wardle, C., & Derakhshan, H. (2017). Information Disorder: Toward an interdisciplinary framework for research and policy making. Council of Europe Report, 27. Waszak, P. M., Kasprzycka-Waszak, W., & Kubanek, A. (2018). The spread of medical fake news in social media–the pilot quantitative study. Health Policy and Technology, 7(2), 115-118. Wessel, M., Thies, F. and Benlian, A. (2015). A Lie Never Lives to be Old: The Effects of Fake Social Information on Consumer Decision-Making in Crowdfunding. ECIS 2015 Completed Research Papers. Paper 201. http://aisel.aisnet.org/ecis2015_cr/201 Zamani Kasbi, S. (2017). An approach to rumor detection on social media. Master Thesis, University of Tehran. (in Persian) Zuckerman, E. (2017). Stop Saying Fake News, It’s not Helping. My Heart is in Accra. Available in: https://mediawell.ssrc.org/citation/stop-saying-fake-news-its-not-helping/ | ||
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 1,011 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 729 |