سامانه پشتیبانی خدمات اطلاعات

  اخبار و اعلانات

 آمار

تعداد نشریات161
تعداد شماره‌ها6,573
تعداد مقالات71,036
تعداد مشاهده مقاله125,508,925
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله98,772,213
نصرنیا, فاطمه, شکوهی, زینب. (1401). بررسی اثر اسکان بر تاب‌آوری معیشتی خانوارهای عشایری شهرستان فسا. , 53(3), 773-785. doi: 10.22059/ijaedr.2021.328863.669075
فاطمه نصرنیا; زینب شکوهی. "بررسی اثر اسکان بر تاب‌آوری معیشتی خانوارهای عشایری شهرستان فسا". , 53, 3, 1401, 773-785. doi: 10.22059/ijaedr.2021.328863.669075
نصرنیا, فاطمه, شکوهی, زینب. (1401). 'بررسی اثر اسکان بر تاب‌آوری معیشتی خانوارهای عشایری شهرستان فسا', , 53(3), pp. 773-785. doi: 10.22059/ijaedr.2021.328863.669075
نصرنیا, فاطمه, شکوهی, زینب. بررسی اثر اسکان بر تاب‌آوری معیشتی خانوارهای عشایری شهرستان فسا. , 1401; 53(3): 773-785. doi: 10.22059/ijaedr.2021.328863.669075

بررسی اثر اسکان بر تاب‌آوری معیشتی خانوارهای عشایری شهرستان فسا

تحقیقات اقتصاد و توسعه کشاورزی ایران
دوره 53، شماره 3، مهر 1401، صفحه 773-785    اصل مقاله (874.44 K)
نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22059/ijaedr.2021.328863.669075
نویسندگان
فاطمه نصرنیا* 1؛ زینب شکوهی2
1استادیار گروه اقتصاد کشاورزی، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه شیراز، شیراز، ایران.
2استادیار گروه اقتصاد کشاورزی، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه شیراز، شیراز، ایران
چکیده
اسکان عشایر از جمله سیاست­هایی است که شروع آن به سال‌های قبل از انقلاب باز می­گردد و اجرای آن همواره با حساسیت­هایی روبه‌رو بوده است. هرچند اسکان عشایر می­تواند موجب بهره­مندی بهتر این خانوارها از برخی از خدمات گردد، اما از آنجایی که شغل اصلی این گروه دامداری است چگونگی تأثیرپذیری معیشت این خانوارها از این تصمیم همواره مورد تردید بوده است. بنابراین، هدف از مطالعه حاضر بررسی اثر اسکان بر تاب‌آوری معیشتی خانوارهای عشایری در نظر گرفته شد. برای این منظور اطلاعات مورد نیاز با تکمیل 287 پرسشنامه در شهرستان فسا تهیه و میزان تاب‌آوری معیشتی آنان محاسبه گردید. سپس با استفاده از روش رگرسیون سویچینگ درونزا اثر اسکان بر شاخص تاب‌آوری خانوارها بررسی شد. نتایج حاصله نشان می­دهد که اسکان خانوارهای کوچ‌رو موجب کاهش تاب‏آوری معیشتی آنان به میزان 75/13 درصد خواهد شد. بنابراین، پیشنهاد می‌گردد که در صورت تشویق و حمایت از اسکان عشایر، توجه به ایجاد یک معیشت پایدار برای این خانوارها در اولویت قرار گیرد. همچنین، پیشنهاد می­شود که با توسعه پایدار مناطق عشایری و با استفاده از سیاست­هایی همچون تنوع بخشی به الگوی معیشتی از منافع عشایر حمایت گردد.
کلیدواژه‌ها
تاب‌آوری معیشتی؛ اسکان عشایر؛ رگرسیون سویچینگ درونزا؛ الگوی معیشتی
عنوان مقاله [English]
Investigating The Effect of C Settlement on Livelihood Resilience of Nomadic Families in Fasa City
نویسندگان [English]
Fatemeh Nasrnia1؛ Zeinab Shokoohi2
1Assistant Professor of Department of Agricultural Economics, Faculty of Agriculture, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran.
2Assistant Professor of Department of Agricultural Economics, Faculty of Agriculture, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran.
چکیده [English]
Nomadic settlement is one of the policies that dates back to the years before the revolution and its implementation has always faced -challenges. Although nomadic settlement can make these households better able to benefit from some services, since the main occupation of them, is animal husbandry, how the livelihood of these households will be affected by this decision has always been questionable. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of housing on livelihood resilience of nomadic families. For this purpose, the required information was prepared by completing 287 questionnaires in Fasa city and their livelihood resilience was calculated. Then, the effect of housing on household resilience index was investigated using endogenous switching regression method. The results show that the settlement of nomadic households will reduce their livelihood resilience by 13.75%. Consequently, it is suggested that in case of encouraging and supporting nomadic settlement, paying attention to creating a sustainable livelihood for these households should be given priority. It is also suggested that the interests of nomadic households be supported by the sustainable development of nomadic areas and by using policies such as diversification of the subsistence model.
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
Livelihood resilience, Nomadic settlement, Endogenous switching regression, livelihood pattern
مراجع
  1. Aazami, M., Bakhtiari, A., & Shanazi, K. (2018). Livelihood effects of the aquaclture fish farm on occupier household (the case of hamedan province). Iranian Agricultural Economics and Development Research, 49-2 (4), 735-747. In farsi.
  2. Abdullahzadeh, G.H., Gharghani, T., Sharifzadeh, Sharif, M., Khaksar Moghadam, G. (2017). Investigating the factors affecting the tendency to settle among nomadic families in Semirom city. Journal of Geographical Space, 57, 213-234, In farsi.
  3. Adato, M., Meinzen-Dick, R. S., 2002. Assessing the impact of agricultural research on poverty using the sustainable livelihoods framework. IFPRI, No. 581-2016-39396.
  4. Ashok, K. R., Sasikala, C., 2012. Farmers Vulnerability to Rainfall Variability and Technology Adoption in Rain-fed Tank Irrigated Agriculture. Agric. Econ. Res. Rev. 25(2), 267-278. 22004/ag.econ.137371
  5. Campbell, B., Sayer, J. A., Frost, P., Vermeulen, S., Ruiz Pérez, M., Cunningham, A., Prabhu. R., 2001. Assessing the performance of natural resource systems. Conserv. Ecol. 5(2), 22. http://www.consecol.org/vol5/iss2/art22/
  6. Danso-Abbeam, G., & Baiyegunhi, L. J. S., (2018). Welfare impact of pesticides management practices among smallholder cocoa farmers in Ghana. Technology in Society,52(1), 1-10.
  7. Drikvand, M. (2007). Investigating the socio-economic consequences of nomadic settlement: Cheshmeh Homian Center in Kuhdasht. Master Thesis, University of Tehran, Iran, In farsi.
  8. Erenstein, O., Hellin, J., Chandna, P. (2010). Poverty mapping based on livelihood assets: A meso-level application in the Indo-Gangetic Plains, India. Appl. Geogr. 30(1), 112-125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2009.05.001
  9. Fars Province Nomadic Affairs Organization. (2020). Information and Statistics Office of the General Office of the Nomadic Affairs Organization of Fars Province, Statistical reports. In farsi.
  10. Hayati, E. (2001). A perspective on the tomorrow of nomadic life. Proceedings of the nomadic life development strategy conference, the role of expression, Nomadic affairs organization of Iran, Tehran, In farsi.
  11. Heckman, J. J., Tobias, J. L., & Vytlacil, E. J. (2001). Four parameters of interest in the evaluation of social programs. Southern Economic Journal, 68, 210–233.
  12. Lokshin, M., & Sajaia, Z. (2004). Maximum likelihood estimation of endogenous
    switching regression models. Stata Journal, 4(12), 282-289.
  13. Mirzaei, N., & and Zibaei, M. (2013). Evaluation of Government Drought Coping Policies in Support of Nomadic Communities in Fars Province. Journal of Agricultural Economics and Development, 27 (2), 84-94, In farsi.
  14. Najafi, B. (2004). The role of nomads in Iran's economic development. Proceedings of the national conference on organizing the nomads of Iran. Tehran, In farsi.
  15. Omerkhil, , Chand, T., Valente, D., Alatalo, J. M., Pandey, R., 2020. Climate change vulnerability and adaptation strategies for smallholder farmers in Yangi Qala district, Takhar, Afghanistan. Ecological Indicators, 110,105-163. 
  16. Pandey, R., Jha, S.K., Alatalo, J.M., Archie, K.M., Gupta, A.k., 2017. Sustainable livelihood framework-based indicators for assessing climate change vulnerability and adaptation for Himalayan communities. Ecological Indicators, 79, 338–346.
  17. Pandey, R., Maithani, N., Aretano, R., Zurlini, G., Archie, K., Gupta, A., Panndey V. P., 2016. Empirical Assessment of Adaptation to Climate Change Impact of Mountainous Households: Development and Application of Adaptation Capability Index. Journal of Mountain Science, 13(8), 1503-1514. 5
  18. Popzan, A. H., & and Heydari, H. (2014). Investigating the acceptance of solar cooker technology by the guest nomads of Sangroukliai city. Iranian Agricultural Economics and Development Research, 45 (1), 49-56, In farsi.
  19. Quandt, A. (2018). Measuring livelihood resilience: The household livelihood resilience approach (HLRA). World Development, 107, 253-263.
  20. Rashed Nasab, K., & Ahmadvand, M. (2017). Explaining Strategies to Improve Nomadic Livelihoods in Gachsaran County. Quarterly Journal of Rural Development Strategies, 1, 67-85, In farsi.
  21. Rezvani, M.R., & and Drikund, M. (2007). Investigation and evaluation of nomadic organization and settlement center (effects and consequences) Case study of Azna city lumbar center. Jihad, 279, 131-151, In farsi.
  22. Riahi, V., Ahmadi, R., Azmi, A. (2013). Investigating the role of housing projects in the economic and social development of nomads, Case study: Kohkiluyeh and Boyer-Ahmad housing centers. Journal of Applied Research in Geographical Sciences, 13(28), 95-112, In farsi.
  23. Salem, J. (2008). The effect of drought on the nomadic life process of Taheri clan in Tabas city. Rural and Development Quarterly, 11(4), 89-124, In farsi.
  24. Sekhri, S., Kumar, P., Furst, C., Pandey, R., 2020. Mountain Specific Multi-Hazard Risk Management Framework (MSMRMF): Assessment and Mitigation of Multi-hazard and Climate Change Risk in the Indian Himalayan Region. Ecological indicators, 11, 1-13.
  25. Shakur, A., & Rezaei, M. R. (2010). A study and comparison of economic patterns of production in the Qashqai nomadic tribe of Firoozabad and their measurement and tendency to change the way of life. Quarterly Journal of New Attitudes in Human Geography, 5, 123-134, In farsi.
  26. Shateri, M., & Hajipour, M. (2011). Socio-economic effects of housing projects on nomadic communities (Case study of Nazdasht Sarbisheh town in South Khorasan province). New attitudes in human geography, 3 (2), 17-29.
  27. Shaterian, M., Ganjipour, M., &Ashnavi, Amir. (1390). Explaining the spatial consequences of the construction of nomadic settlements for the surrounding villages (Case study of the central part of Koohrang city). Quarterly Journal of Rural and Development, 3: 133-150, In farsi.
  28. Shukla, R., Sachdeva, K., Joshi, P. K. (2016). India. Applied Geography, 74, 182-198.
  29. Speranza, C.L., Wiesmann, U., & Stephan, R. (2014). An indicator framework for assessing livelihood resilience in the context of social–ecological dynamic. Global Environmental Change، 28, 109-119.
  30. Statistical Center of Iran. (2008). Results of socio-economi c census of nomadic tribes in the country. Reviewed in June 2017. From the website of the Statistics Center of Iran, In farsi.
  31. Tacoli, C. (1999). Understanding the opportunities and constraints for low-income groups in the peri-urban interface: the contribution of livelihood frameworks. Strategic Environmental Planning and Management for the Peri-urban Interface Research Project. Development Planning Unit, University College London.
  32. Tavakoli, J., Zia-Tavana, M.H. (2009). Spatial consequences of nomadic settlement in Chaharmahal and Bakhtiari province. Quarterly Journal of Rural and Development, 12 (1), 53-86, In farsi.
  33. Yeylagh Choghakhor, H., & Mahmoudi, M. M. (2012). Development strategies of nomadic community in Khuzestan province. Iranian Agricultural Economics and Development Research, 43-2 (4), 637-646, In farsi.
  34. Ziaei, M., Faghihi, A., Jomehpour, M., & Shekari, F. (2017). Developing a framework for the resilience of nomadic nomads (Case study: Qashqai tribe). Iranian Journal of Management Sciences, 12 (47), 31-56, In farsi.
آمار
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 356
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 213





سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. قدرت گرفته از سیناوب