پیوندهای مفید
اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 158 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 6,225 |
| تعداد مقالات | 67,685 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 114,990,816 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 89,660,204 |
سیاست خارجی مستقل و برون‌گرای روسیۀ سفید و تنش با روسیه در دورۀ پوتین | ||
| مطالعات اوراسیای مرکزی | ||
| دوره 14، شماره 2، اسفند 1400، صفحه 271-296 اصل مقاله (332.63 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22059/jcep.2021.295791.449891 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| الهه کولایی* 1؛ سامان فاضلی2 | ||
| 1استاد، گروه مطالعات منطقه‌ای، دانشکدة حقوق و علوم سیاسی، دانشگاه تهران | ||
| 2دانشجوی دکتری، روابط بین‌الملل، دانشکدة حقوق و علوم سیاسی، دانشگاه علامه طباطبایی | ||
| چکیده | ||
| روسیۀ سفید همیشه نزدیک‌ترین متحد روسیه برآورد شده است. روسیه پس از فروپاشی اتحاد شوروی با همۀ همسایه‌های خود تنش‌های جدی و حتی جنگ داشته است، اما روسیۀ سفید در میان آن‌ها استثنا بوده است و همیشه به‌عنوان دولتی طرفدار روسیه شناخته می‌شد. روسیۀ سفید نه‌تنها در بسیاری از طرح‌ها و نهادهای منطقه‌ای روسیه شرکت کرده است، بلکه دو کشور در سال ۱۹۹۹ پیمان دولت متحد را امضا کردند تا بر اساس آن روسیه و روسیۀ سفید یکپارچه و تبدیل به یک کشور شوند. اما نه‌تنها این پیمان اجرایی نشد، بلکه اختلاف‌های دو کشور به‌تدریج افزایش یافت تا جایی که مقام‌های دو کشور با تندترین واژه‌ها یکدیگر را متهم کرده‌اند. بر این اساس این پرسش مطرح می‌شود که با وجود پیوندهای دو کشور و روابط گستردۀ فرهنگی، تاریخی، اقتصادی، سیاسی و امنیتی آن‌ها، علت تنش‌های پایدار روسیه و روسیۀ سفید به‌ویژه در دورۀ پوتین چیست؟ در این نوشتار با توجه به چارچوب مدل تحلیلی اولاف نودسن، نشان می‌دهیم که شدت‌‌یافتن تنش میان روسیه و قدرت‌های جهانی، رویکرد مستقل و گاه خصمانۀ روسیۀ سفید نسبت به روسیه و گرایش آن به همکاری با قدرت‌های بیرونی مانند اتحادیۀ اروپا، سبب افزایش فشارهای روسیه بر روسیۀ سفید برای همگرایی بیشتر و سپس تنش بین این دو کشور شده است. مؤلفه‌هایی مانند راهبرد مشارکت شرقی اتحادیۀ اروپا، بحران اوکراین، اختلاف‌های مربوط به انرژی، روس‌ستیزی فرهنگی در روسیۀ سفید، منطقه‌گرایی اجباری روسیه و گسترش روابط روسیۀ سفید با سازمان‌ها و کشورهای غربی سبب افزایش تنش در میان دو کشور شده است. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| اتحادیۀ اروپا؛ انرژی؛ روسیه؛ روسیۀ سفید؛ منطقه‌گرایی | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Independent and Extroverted Foreign Policy of Belarus and Tension with Russia during the Putin Era | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Elaheh Koolaee1؛ Saman Fazeli2 | ||
| 1Professor, Regional Studies Department, Faculty of Law & Political Science, University of Tehran | ||
| 2Ph.D. International Relations, Department of International Relations, Faculty of Law and Political Sciences, Allameh Tabatabaei University | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| Abstract Introduction: Ever Since Putin rose to power in Russia, Belarus has pursued more independent foreign policy toward Russia's regionalism. Based on the two countries that had signed the Union Treaty in 1999, Russia called for Belarus to be more cooperative and integrative in economic, political, security, and institutional dimensions. But Belarus not only has not implemented many of the provisions of the Union State and refused Russia's multifaceted demands on more convergent policies within Eurasian institutions and has strived to expand relations with members of the European Union and other trans-regional powers. This issue has caused tensions between Russia and Belarus. Belarus has always been considered Russia's closest ally. Russia has had serious tensions with all of its neighbors since the collapse of the Soviet Union, but Belarus has been an exception and recognized as a pro-Russian state. Russia has long been the main and exclusive guarantor of Belarus' security and economy. In terms of trade, Russia has by far been Belarus' largest trading partner and on the cultural aspects, linguistic closeness and common religion, ethnicity, and history have been the reasons for Belarus' alignment with Russia. Tensions between the two countries have risen severely, especially since Putin. In terms of energy, Putin has put Belarus in a tight spot and has repeatedly cut off gas supplies to Belarus, which is dependent exclusively on Russian energy. On the other hand, Lukashenko has repeatedly condemned Russia and Putin with unprecedented and blunt statements. In addition, the government has begun significant cooperation with the European Union. Research Question: what is the cause of the tensions between Russia and Belarus, especially during the Putin era? Research Hypothesis: Three factors of (a) rising tensions between Russia and world powers, (b) Belarus' independent approach to Russia, and (c) Belarus's tendency to cooperate with "outside powers" such as the European Union, has led Russia to push pressure on Belarus for more integration and this pressure has increased tensions between the two countries. Methodology (and Theoretical Framework if there are): The theoretical framework of this research is based on Olaf Knudsen's analytical model, which is used to evaluate the relationships of small powers with opposing poles of global power. In this paper the research methodology for studying the hypothesis is explanatory. Data collection tools are libraries and internet resources. Results and discussion: The factors that increase tensions between the two countries are the EU's Eastern Partnership strategy, the Ukraine crisis, Russia's forced regionalism, energy disputes, and the expansion of Belarus' relations US. The first concerns the Eastern Partnership strategy. The EU Eastern Partnership Strategy was adopted in 2009 for six Eastern European countries, including Belarus. Russia saw the strategy as a geopolitical conspiracy by the West and the European Union to weaken RussiaIn this regard, Belarus has taken several measures, including the release of political prisoners, electoral law reform, lowering restrictions on NGOs, making laws to increase media freedom, increasing freedoms in the 2008 parliamentary elections, dialogue with political opponents, and allowing the sale of some from their newspapers, propaganda in favor of the European Union and inviting senior members of the EU. Lukashenko traveled to Western countries such as Italy in 2009 after 13 years, and then Berlusconi became the first high-ranking leader to visit Belarus in 14 years. The second is the Ukraine crisis, which has two important effects. First, Belarus resembles itself and Ukraine, thinking that Belarus might be Russia's next target. Second, since the Ukraine crisis and the annexation of Crimea to Russia, tensions between Russia and the European Union escalated unprecedentedly. As tensions between Russia and the West increased, Russia's pressure on Belarus to develop integration has increased. So the third is Russian regionalism. Russia's efforts to create a cohesive and integrated region have failed. Because of their collective memory, Russia's neighbors in Eurasia fear that Russia will violate their national sovereignty. Belarus is also one country that is very skeptical about Russia's regional goals. Russia has officially stated that Belarus' integration into Russia is possible and desirable and that six Belarussian provinces could be added to 89 Russian regions. The fourth is energy. Russia has repeatedly used energy tools to pursue political interests in Belarus. The first case was in 2002 and the last case was in January 2020. Belarus is heavily dependent on Russian oil and gas to meet its domestic needs and to generate revenue from the processing and sale of energy. In the most recent case, the cessation of energy exports to Belarus in 2020, Russia explicitly stated that sustainable re-export of energy to Belarus was conditional on Belarus complying with the provisions of the Union State Treaty. Belarus met with US officials such as Bolton and Pompeo in 2019 and 2020, and the United States delivered its first oil shipment to Belarus in May 2020, promising to supply energy to Belarus. Russia considers the presence of NATO and the United States in Eastern Europe to be the most important security problem, and strongly opposes the development of relations between Belarus and the United States Conclusion: All of these factors have led to unprecedented tensions between Russia and Belarus. Despite the protests of the Belarusian people against Lukashenko in 2020 and 2021 and the escalation of tensions between Belarus and the European Union and the rapprochement of Belarus and Russia, tensions between the two countries have temporarily eased However, it should be noted that the reason for the conflict between the two countries is fundamental and will continue with or without Lukashenko. Belarus seeks partnership and alliance but Russia seeks integration and unification. The threats of the European Union are limited to criticizing issues such as human rights. But Russia's threats go far beyond the disintegration of Belarus and the annexation of part of its territory to Russia, as in the case of Georgia and Ukraine, rather, Russia, as its politicians have repeatedly stated publicly and officially, claims to dominate the whole of the independent nation-state of Belarus, based on its specific interpretation of the Union State. So the realization of scenarios such as the Ukraine crisis over Belarus is not far-fetched. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| Russia, Belarus, foreign policy, European Union, regionalism, energy | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Archer, C. and N. Nugent (2006), “Introduction: Does the Size of Member States Matter in the European Union? Special Issue: The European Union’s Member States: The Importance of Size”, Journal of European Integration, Vol. 1 No. 28, pp. 3-6. Attar, Saeed M. and Tajmiri (2020), “Game Theory and the Ups and Downs of Russian-European Relations in the New Millennium”, Central Eurasia Studies, Vol. 12, No. 2, pp. 399-417 [in Persian]. Casier, Tom (2016), “From Logic of Competition to Conflict: Understanding the Dynamics of EU–Russia Relations”, Contemporary Politics, Vol. 22, No. 3, pp. 376-394. Cheskin, Ammon (2018), “The Russian-Speaking Populations in the Post-Soviet Space: Language, Politics and Identity”, Europe-Asia Studies, Vol. 71, No. 1, pp.1-25. Dias, Vanda Amaro (2013), “The EU and Russia: Competing Discourses, Practices and Interests in the Shared Neighbourhood”, Perspectives on European Politics and Society, Vol. 14, No. 2, pp. 256-271. Elman, Miriam Fendius (1995), “The Foreign Policies of Small States: Challenging Neorealism in Its Own Backyard”, British Journal of Political Science, Vol. 25, No. 2, pp. 171-217. Eng.belta (2019), “Lukashenko: Sovereignty is Sacred”, Available at: https://eng.belta.by/president/view/lukashenko-sovereignty-is-sacred-118753-2019/, (Accessed on: 16/7/2020). Eurasianet (2015), “Worried about Moscow, Belarus’s Lukashenka Drifts toward Brussels”, Available at: http://www.valuewalk.com/2015/01/belarus-russia-relations, (Accessed on: 17/4/2017). Francis, Diane (2020), “Is Belarus Putin’s Next Target?”, Available at: https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/blogs/ukrainealert/is-belarus-putins-next-target/, (Accessed on: 16/7/2020). Friedman, Johsh (2017), “Belarus Opens to Tourists as Tensions with Russia Rise”, Available at: http://www.freemanpost.com/belarus-opens-tourists-tensions-russia-rise, (Accessed on: 20/7/2018). Goetschel, L. (1998), Small States Inside and Outside the European Union, Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers. Hobson, Peter (2017), “Belarus Says Russia Made Oil Threat, Calls Border Plan a Political Attack”, Available at: http://www.reuters.com/article/us-russia-belarus-border-idUSKBN15I1K8, (Accessed on: 13/12/2017). Ioffe, Grigory (2016), “Belarus and Russia Experience New Bout of Tensions”, Available at: https://jamestown.org/program/belarus-and-russia-experience-new-bout-of-tensions, (Accessed on: 13/3/2017). Izotov, Alexander (2019), “Studying EU–Russia Policies in the Shared Neighbourhood in Russia and in the West”, Journal of Contemporary European Studies, Vol. 27, No. 2, pp. 208-223. Karacsonyi, David, Karoly Kocsis, Katalin Kovaly, Jozsef Molnar and Laszlo Poti (2014), “East-West Dichotomy and Political Conflict in Ukraine - Was Huntington Right?”, Hungarian Geographical Bulletin, Vol. 63, No. 2, pp. 99-134. Kassimeris, Christos (2009), “The Foreign Policy of Small Powers”, International Politics, Vol. 46, No. 1, pp. 84-101. Kłysinski, Kamil (2017), “The Risk of Escalating Tensions in Minsk-Moscow Relations”, Available at: https://www.osw.waw.pl/en/publikacje/analyses/2017-01-04/risk-escalating-tensions-minsk-moscow-relations, (Accessed on: 18/5/2017). Knudsen, Olav (1988), “Of Lambs and Lions: Relations between Great Powers and their Smaller Neighbors”, Cooperation and Conflict, Vol. 23, No. 4, pp. 111-122. Knudsen, O. (2002), “Small States, Latent and Extant: towards a General Perspective”, Journal of International Relations and Development, Vol. 5, No. 2, pp. 182-198. Koolaee, Elaheh (2015), Politics and Government in Central Eurasia, Tehran: Samt [in Persian]. Koolaee, Elaheh (2019), Politics and Government in the Russian Federation, Tehran: IPIS [in Persian]. Kramer, Mark (2008), “Russian Policy toward the Commonwealth of Independent States: Recent Trends and Future Prospects”, Problems of Post-Communism, Vol. 55, No. 6, pp. 3-19. Magnette, P. and K. Nikolaidis (2005), “Coping with the Lilliput Syndrome: Large vs Small Member States in the European Convention”, European Public Law, Vol. 11, No. 1, pp. 83-102. Manaev, Oleg, Natalie Manayeva and Dzmitry Yuran (2011), “More State than Nation: Lukashenko’s Belarus”, Journal of International Affairs, Vol. 65, No. 1, pp. 93-113. Marples, David (2008), “Is the Russia-Belarus Union Obsolet?", Problems of Post-Communism, Vol. 55, No. 1, pp. 25-35. Martinsen, Kaaredahl (2002), “The Russian Takeover of Belarus”, The Norwegian Institute for Defence Studies, Vol. 21, No. 5, pp. 401- 416. Moosung, L. (2004), “The Small State Enlargement of the EU: Dangers and Benefits”, Perspectives on European Politics and Society, Vol. 5, No. 2, pp. 331-355. Pace, R. (2002), “A Small State and the European Union: Malta’s EU Accession Experience”, South European Society & Politics, Vol. 7, No. 1, pp. 24-42. Peters, Andrea (2020), “Russia Seeks to Ease Tensions with Belarus over Energy Dispute”, Available at: https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2020/02/25/bela-f25.html, (Accessed on: 15/7/2020). Preiherman, Yauheni (2019), “Belarus and Russia Dispute the Fundamentals of Their Relationship”, Available at: https://jamestown.org/program/belarus-and-russia-dispute-the-fundamentals-of-their-relationship/, (Accessed on: 15/7/2020). Raik, Kristi (2016), “Liberalism and Geopolitics in EU-Russia Relations: Rereading the Baltic Factor”, European Security, Vol. 25, No. 2, pp. 237-255. Ramani, Samuel (2016), “Belarus’s Anti-Kremlin Tilt: Why Europe’s Last Dictatorship is Drifting away from Russia”, Available at: http://www. huffingtonpost.com/samuel-ramani/belaruss-antikremlin-tilt_b_9052152.html, (Accessed on: 17/1/2018). Reynolds, Maura (2002), “Merger Outline Calls for Belarus to Be Swallowed Up by Russia”, Available at: http://articles.latimes.com/2002/aug/15/world/fg-belarus15, (Accessed on: 3/6/2018). Romanova, Tatiana (2016), “Sanctions and the Future of EU-Russian Economic Relations”, Europe-Asia Studies, Vol. 68, No. 4, pp. 774-796. Rotman, David and Natalia Veremeeva (2011), “Belarus in the Context of the Neighbourhood Policy: between the EU and Russia”, Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics, Vol. 27, No. 1, pp. 73-98. Sahakyan, Armine (2016), “Belarus is Latest Target of Russia’s Use of Oil and Gas as Geopolitical Weapons”, Available at: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/armine-sahakyan/belarus-is-latest-target_b_10875636.html, (Accessed on: 3/3/2018). Shuburovich, A. V. (2016), “Development of Belarus’s Foreign Economic Ties in the Context of CIS Integration Processes”, Journal Problems of Economic Transition, Vol. 58, No. 6, pp. 499-511. TASS (2020), “First Lot of US Oil to Be Shipped to Belarus This Week, Says US Secretary of State”, Available at: https://tass.com/economy/1157065, (Accessed on: 16/7/2020). The Moscow Times (2019), “Russia, Belarus Decry Loss of ‘Brotherly Trust’ Ahead of Summit”, Available at: https://www.themoscowtimes.com/2018/12/ 25/russia-belarus-decry-loss-of-brotherly-trust-ahead-of-summit-a63959, (Accessed on: 15/7/2020). Thorhallsson, Baldur and Sverrir Steinsson (2017), “Small State Foreign Policy”, Available at: http://politics.oxfordre.com/view/10.1093, (Accessed on: 18/6/2018). Valizadeh, Akbar and Siva Alizadeh (2019), “Exploring the Roots of Continuity in the Foreign Policy of the Russian Federation during Putin’s Rule”, Central Eurasia Studies, Vol. 11, No. 2, pp. 513-529 [in Persian]. Vieira, Alena (2014), “The Politico-Military Alliance of Russia and Belarus: Re-Examining the Role of NATO and the EU in Light of the Intra Alliance Security Dilemma”, Europe-Asia Studies, Vol. 66, No. 4, pp. 557-577. Vieira, Alena (2018), “Armenia and Belarus: Caught between the EU’s and Russia’s Conditionalities?”, Journal European Politics and Society, Vol. 19, No. 4, pp. 471- 489. White, Stephen, Tania Biletskaya and Ian McAllister (2014), “Belarusians between East and West”, Post-Soviet Affairs, Vol. 32, No. 1, pp. 1-27. Zulys, Audrius (2005), “Towards a Union State of Russia and Belarus”, Lithuanian Foreign Policy Review, Vol. 149, No. 1, pp. 15-16. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 1,657 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 439 |
||