پیوندهای مفید
اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 161 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 6,533 |
| تعداد مقالات | 70,504 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 124,124,744 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 97,233,322 |
تاثیر نگرش سرمایه‌گذار بر قصد سرمایه‌گذاری در پروژه‌های کارآفرینی: نقش تعدیل‌گر نوع زبان، تجربه و جنسیت | ||
| فصلنامه علمی پژوهشی توسعه کارآفرینی | ||
| مقاله 2، دوره 15، شماره 1 - شماره پیاپی 55، خرداد 1401، صفحه 21-40 اصل مقاله (907.35 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی - کمی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22059/jed.2022.330475.653766 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| امیر امامی* 1؛ فائزه شیبانی2؛ حمزه خواستار3 | ||
| 1استادیار گروه کسب و کار و منابع انسانی دانشکده مدیریت، دانشگاه خوارزمی | ||
| 2کارشناسی ارشد MBA مالی، دانشکده مدیریت، دانشگاه خوارزمی | ||
| 3استادیار گروه کسب و کار و منابع انسانی دانشکده مدیریت، دانشگاه خوارزمی | ||
| چکیده | ||
| هدف این پژوهش بررسی تاثیر نگرش سرمایه‌گذاران خطرپذیر به طرح پیشنهادی کارآفرین، بر قصد سرمایه‌گذاری آنها در آن طرح با در نظر گرفتن نقش تعدیل‌گر نوع زبان طرح (انتزاعی و عینی)، تجربه مستقیم سرمایه‌گذار خطرپذیر و جنسیت سرمایه‌گذاران است. ازآنجایی‌که این تحقیق با هدف کمک به کارآفرینان در شناخت بهتر و موثرتر تصمیم گیری سرمایه‌گذاران خطرپذیر صورت گرفته، یک تحقیق کاربردی، و برحسب روش گردآوری اطلاعات، کمی و از نوع آزمایشی (میدانی) است. جامعه تحقیق، سرمایه‌گذاران و کارآفرینان آشنا به حوزه سرمایه‌گذاری خطرپذیر هستند که در دو گروه مشتمل بر هر دو، مورد بررسی قرار گرفتند. گروه اول 110 نفر و گروه دوم 74 نفر می‌باشند. داده‌های پژوهش از طریق سناریوهای تحقیق و پرسشنامه‌های مرتبط با آن، با رعایت اصول استاندارد طرح آزمایشی، در بهمن و اسفند ماه 1399 گردآوری شد. برای آزمون مدل مفهومی تحقیق از روش معادلات ساختاری نرم افزارSmart PLS (نسخه3.3.3) استفاده شد. بررسی نتایج در گروه اول نشان می‌دهد که نوع زبان و جنسیت رابطه بین نگرش و قصد سرمایه‌گذاران خطرپذیر را تعدیل نمی‌کند اما تجربه مستقیم سرمایه‌گذار قصد سرمایه‌گذاری را افزایش می‌دهد. درگروه دوم نیز نوع زبان، رابطه بین نگرش و قصد سرمایه‌گذاری را تعدیل می‌کند. همچنین، در طرح انتزاعی، تجربه به طور مستقیم قصد را افزایش می‌دهد در حالیکه در طرح عینی چنین نیست. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| تجربه؛ زبان انتزاعی؛ زبان ملموس؛ قصد سرمایه‌گذاری؛ نگرش سرمایه گذار خطرپذیر | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Investor attitude and investment intention in entrepreneurship projects: The moderating role of language, experience, and gender | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Amir Emami1؛ Faezeh Sheybani2؛ Hamza Khastar3 | ||
| 1Assistant Professor, Faculty of Management, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran | ||
| 2Faculty of Management, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran | ||
| 3. Assistant Professor, Faculty of Management, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| The purpose of this study is to investigate the relationship between the attitudes of investors to the entrepreneurial projects and their intention through incorporating the moderating roles of the project language type (Abstract vs. Concrete) and the investor’s experience and gender. This research is applied because it aims to help entrepreneurs better and more effectively understand venture capitalists’ investment decisions. Also, in terms of the data collection method, it is experimental-quantitative. The research sample pertains to investors and entrepreneurs familiar with venture capital that were assigned to two distinct groups. This research data has been collected through online distribution of the research scenarios and their questionnaire. The hypothesized model of the research is tested through structural equation modeling (SEM). Analyzing results in the first group shows that; although the type of language and gender do not moderate the relationship between attitudes and intentions of investors, the direct experience of investors increases the intention for investment. In the second group, the type of language moderates the relationship between attitude and investment intent. Also, in the Abstract language, experience increases the intention while the Concrete language does not. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| Abstract language, Attitude, Concrete language, Intention, Venture capitalist | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
امامی، امیر (1398)، علل تأثیرگذار در انتقال قصد به عمل در خلق ارزش کارآفرینانه. توسعه کارآفرینی، 12(3): 339-321.
Ahmad, F. S. & Baharun, R. (2010). A crucial role of entrepreneur in B2B branding: A case from Malaysia. Faculty of Management and Human Resource Development, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia. Ajzen, I. (1971). Attitudinal vs. normative messages: An investigation of the differential effects of persuasive communications on behavior. Sociometry, 34, 263-280. Ajzen, I. (1985). From intentions to actions: A theory of planned behavior. In Action control (pp. 11-39). Ajzen, I. (1991). Theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50,179–211. Ajzen, I. & Fishbein, M. (1972). Attitudes and normative beliefs as factors influencing behavioral intentions. Journal of personality and social psychology, 21(1), 1-9. Ajzen, I. & Fishbein, M. (2005). The influence of attitudes on behavior. In D. Albarracin, B. Johnson, & M. Zanna (Eds.), the handbook of attitudes (pp. 173–221). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Ali, A. (2011). Predicting individual investors’ intention to invest: an experimental analysis of attitude as a mediator. International Journal of Human and Social Sciences, 6(1), 57-73. Bottazzi, L. Da Rin, M. & Hellmann, T. (2016). The importance of trust for investment: Evidence from venture capital. The Review of Financial Studies, 29(9), 2283-2318. Briñol, P., Rucker, D. D., & Petty, R. E. (2015). Naïve theories about persuasion: Implications for information processing and consumer attitude change. International Journal of Advertising, 34(1), 85-106. Daim, T. Dabic, M. & Bayraktaroglu, E. (2016). Students’ entrepreneurial behavior: international and gender differences. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 5(1), 1-22. Dimov, D. (2007). From opportunity insight to opportunity intention: The importance of person-situation learning match. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 31(4), 561–583. Dimov, D. (2010). nascent entrepreneurs and venture emergence: Opportunity confidence, human capital, and early planning. Journal of Management Studies, 47(6), 1123–1153. Doest LT, Semin GR, Sherman SJ. (2002). Linguistic context and social perception: does stimulus abstraction moderate processing style? Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 21(3), 195–229. Elliott, W. B. Rennekamp, K. M. & White, B. J. (2014). Does Concrete Language in Disclosures Increase Willingness to Invest? Available at SSRN 2430504. Emami, A., & Dimov, D. (2017). Degree of innovation and the entrepreneurs’ intention to create value: a comparative study of experienced and novice entrepreneurs. Eurasian Business Review, 7(2), 161-182. Emami, A., & Naderi, N. (2018). Impact of Situation in the Study of Gender Entrepreneurship and Opportunity Evaluation: An Analysis of Risk Disposition. In Competitiveness in Emerging Markets (pp. 427-445). Springer, Cham. Fazio, R. H. Chen, J. M. McDonel, E. C. & Sherman, S. J. (1982). Attitude accessibility, attitude-behavior consistency, and the strength of the object-evaluation association. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 18(4), 339-357. Fishbein, M. & Ajzen, 1. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison—Wesley. Hair, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Pieper, T.M., & C. M. Ringle (2012). The use of partial least squares structural equation modeling in strategic management research: a review of past practices and recommendations for future applications, Long Range Planning, 45(5–6), 320–340. Howe, L. C. & Krosnick, J. A. (2017). Attitude strength. Annual review of psychology, 68(1), 327-351. Janney, J. J. & Folta, T. B. (2006). Moderating effects of investor experience on the signaling value of private equity placements. Journal of Business Venturing. 21(1): 27-44. Kirsch, D., Goldfarb, B., & Gera, A. (2009). Form or substance: the role of business plans in venture capital decision making. Strategic Management Journal, 30(5), 487-515. Krueger, N. F. & Carsrud, A. L. (1993). Entrepreneurial intentions: Applying the theory of planned behavior. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 5(4), 315–330. Krueger, N. F. Reilly, M. D. & Carsrud, A. L. (2000). Competing models of entrepreneurial intentions. Journal of BusinessVenturing, 15(5–6), 411–432. Laura Huang, Jone L. Pearce (2015). Managing the Unknowable: The Effectiveness of Earlystage Investor Gut Feel in Entrepreneurial Investment Decisions. Administrative Science Quarterly, 60(4), 634-670. Laura Larrimore, Li Jiang, Jeff Larrimore, David Markowitz & Scott Gorski (2011). Peer to Peer Lending: The Relationship between language Features, Trustworthiness, and Persuasion Success. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 39 (1), 19-37. Lawrenson, J., & Dickason-Koekemoer, Z. (2020). A model for female South African investors’ financial risk tolerance. Cogent Economics & Finance, 8(1794493), 1-14. Luo, Y., & Salterio, S. E. (2021). The Effect of Gender on Investors’ Judgments and Decision-Making. Journal of Business Ethics, 1-22. https://doi. org/10.1007/s10551-021-04806-3. Luttrell, A., & Sawicki, V. (2020). Attitude strength: Distinguishing predictors versus defining features. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 14(8). https://doi/10.1111/spc3.125. Miller CH, Lane LT, Deatrick LM, Young AM, Potts KA. (2007). Psychological reactance and promotional health messages: the effects of controlling language, lexical concreteness, and the restoration of freedom. Human Communication Research, 33(2), 219–240. Miralles, F., Giones, F., & Riverola, C. (2015). Evaluating the impact of prior experience in entrepreneurial intention. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 12(3), 791–813. Moritz, A., Diegel, W., Block, J., & Fisch, C. (2022). VC investors’ venture screening: the role of the decision maker’s education and experience. Journal of Business Economics, 92(1), 27-63. Orús, C. Gurrea, R. & Flavián, C. (2017). Facilitating imaginations through online product presentation videos: effects on imagery fluency, product attitude and purchase intention. Electronic Commerce Research, 17(4), 661-700. Paivio, A. (1991). Dual coding theory: Retrospect and current status. Canadian Journal of Psychology/Revue canadienne de psychologie, 45(3), 255-287. Pan, L. McNamara, G. Lee, J. J. Haleblian, J. & Devers, C. E. (2018). Give it to us straight (most of the time): Top managers’ use of concrete language and its effect on investor reactions. Strategic Management Journal, 39(8), 2204-2225. Rennekamp, K. (2012). Processing fluency and investors’ reactions to disclosure readability. Journal of Accounting Research, 50(5), 1319-1354. Robert Baum, J. & Wally, S. (2003). Strategic decision speed and firm performance. Strategic Management Journal, 24(11), 1107-1129. Rosch, E. (1975). Cognitive representations of semantic categories. Journal of experimental psychology, 104(3), 192-233. Semin GR. (2008). Language puzzles a prospective retrospective on the linguistic category model. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 27(2): 197-209. Semin, G. and K. Fiedler. (1988). The Cognitive Functions of Linguistic Categories in Describing Persons: Social Cognition and Language. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 558-568. Taber, J. M. & Klein, W. M. (2016). The role of conviction in personal disease risk perceptions: What can we learn from compass, Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 10(4), 202-218. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 999 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 660 |
||