سامانه پشتیبانی خدمات اطلاعات

  اخبار و اعلانات

 آمار

تعداد نشریات161
تعداد شماره‌ها6,572
تعداد مقالات71,031
تعداد مشاهده مقاله125,501,271
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله98,764,653
مسائلی, حوریه, گوهری, سید علیرضا, شایان نژاد, محمد. (1401). ارزیابی روش‌های مختلف آبیاری با استفاده از رویکرد همبست آب، انرژی، غذا و کربن. , 12(3), 511-525. doi: 10.22059/jwim.2022.339054.965
حوریه مسائلی; سید علیرضا گوهری; محمد شایان نژاد. "ارزیابی روش‌های مختلف آبیاری با استفاده از رویکرد همبست آب، انرژی، غذا و کربن". , 12, 3, 1401, 511-525. doi: 10.22059/jwim.2022.339054.965
مسائلی, حوریه, گوهری, سید علیرضا, شایان نژاد, محمد. (1401). 'ارزیابی روش‌های مختلف آبیاری با استفاده از رویکرد همبست آب، انرژی، غذا و کربن', , 12(3), pp. 511-525. doi: 10.22059/jwim.2022.339054.965
مسائلی, حوریه, گوهری, سید علیرضا, شایان نژاد, محمد. ارزیابی روش‌های مختلف آبیاری با استفاده از رویکرد همبست آب، انرژی، غذا و کربن. , 1401; 12(3): 511-525. doi: 10.22059/jwim.2022.339054.965

ارزیابی روش‌های مختلف آبیاری با استفاده از رویکرد همبست آب، انرژی، غذا و کربن

مدیریت آب و آبیاری
دوره 12، شماره 3، شهریور 1401، صفحه 511-525    اصل مقاله (605.93 K)
نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22059/jwim.2022.339054.965
نویسندگان
حوریه مسائلی1؛ سید علیرضا گوهری* 2؛ محمد شایان نژاد3
1کارشناس ارشد، گروه مهندسی آب، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه صنعتی اصفهان، اصفهان، ایران.
2استادیار، گروه مهندسی آب، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه صنعتی اصفهان، اصفهان، ایران.
3دانشیار،گروه مهندسی آب، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه صنعتی اصفهان، اصفهان، ایران.
چکیده
هدف از مطالعه حاضر بررسی تاثیر استفاده هر یک از روش‌های آبیاری سطحی، بارانی و قطره‌ای بر وضعیت حوضه زاینده رود است. به این منظور از رویکرد همبست آب، انرژی، غذا و کربن برای بررسی جامع استفاده شد. در رویکرد همبست با توجه به آثار متقابل آن‌ها، در جهت افزایش بهره‌وری و تامین امنیت منطقه تلاش می‌گردد. در این مطالعه این رویکرد در قالب یک شاخص توسعه داده شده جدید با عنوان شاخص همبست آب، انرژی، غذا و گازهای گلخانه‌ای (WEFGN) ظاهر شده است و با در نظر گرفتن ده شاخص شامل نهاده‌های مصرف تولید محصول، انرژی مصرفی برای آبیاری، خودکفایی غذایی، بهره‌وری اقتصادی و انتشار کربن به بررسی روش‌های آبیاری پرداخته شد که می‌تواند دیدگاهی جامع به مدیران و تصمیم گیران ارائه ‌دهد. نتایج بررسی روش‌های آبیاری در سال 1399 نشان داد که با تغییر روش آبیاری کنونی به آبیاری قطره‌ای و بارانی در اثر کاهش آب مصرفی (به ترتیب 17 و 4.84 درصد (483.7 و 138.5 میلیون مترمکعب در سال)) وضعیت حوضه بهبود می‌یابد اما در روش بارانی انرژی بیشتری جهت آبیاری نیاز است (280.5 درصد (112415.8 هزار کیلو کالری در سال)) و کربن منتشر شده در اثر افزایش انرژی آبیاری نیز 87432.5 تن در سال (73.7 درصد) افزایش می‌یابد. بنابراین امتیاز شاخص WEFGN به ترتیب برای هریک از روش‌‌های آبیاری قطره‌‌ای، بارانی و وضعیت کنونی برابر 0.86، 0.31 و 0.47 محاسبه گردید و بهترین روش آبیاری در حوضه زاینده رود از منظر رویکرد همبست، آبیاری قطره‌ای شناخته شد.
کلیدواژه‌ها
آبیاری بارانی؛ آبیاری سطحی؛ آبیاری قطره‌ای؛ همبست آب غذا انرژی
عنوان مقاله [English]
Evaluation of different irrigation methods using water, energy, food and carbon nexus approach
نویسندگان [English]
Hourieh Masaeli1؛ Alireza Gohari2؛ Mohammad Shayannejad3
1M. Sc, Department of Water Engineering, College of Agriculture, Isfahan University of Technology, Isfahan 8415683111, Iran.
2Assistant Professor, Department of Water Engineering, College of Agriculture, Isfahan University of Technology, Isfahan 8415683111, Iran.
3Associate Professor, Department of Water Engineering, College of Agriculture, Isfahan University of Technology, Isfahan 8415683111, Iran..
چکیده [English]
The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of using each of the surface, sprinkler and drip irrigation methods on the condition of Zayandehrud basin. For this purpose, water, energy, food and carbon nexus approach was used for a comprehensive study. In the nexus approach, considering their interactions, efforts are made to increase productivity and ensure the security of the region. In this study, this approach has appeared in the form of a newly developed index called water, energy, food and greenhouse gases nexus (WEFGN) and considering ten indicators including inputs of crop production, energy consumption for irrigation, food self-sufficiency, economic efficiency and carbon emissions were studied for irrigation methods that could provide a comprehensive view of managers and decision makers. The results of the study of irrigation methods in 2020 showed that by changing the current irrigation method to drip and sprinkler irrigation due to reduced water consumption (17 and 4.84 percent (483.7 and 138.5 million cubic meters per year, respectively)) the condition of the basin improves, but in the sprinkler method more energy is needed for irrigation (280.5 percent (112415.8 thousand kcal per year)) and the carbon released due to the increase in irrigation energy also increases to 87432.5 tons per year (73.7 percent). Therefore, the WEFGN index score for each of the drip irrigation, sprinkler and current status methods was 0.86, 0.31 and 0.47, respectively, and the best irrigation method in Zayandehrud basin in terms of nexus approach was drip irrigation.
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
Drip irrigation, Sprinkler irrigation, Surface irrigation, Water Energy Food Nexus
مراجع
  1. Abbasi, F., Sohrab, F., & Abbasi, N. (2015). Irrigation efficiencies (changes in time and place in Iran). Research project of Agricultural Education and Extension Research Organization. Tehran. (In Persian).
  2. Arvandi, S., Zare, A., & Afshar asl, M. (2022). Water, food and energy nexus in modern irrigation systems. Iranian Quarterly Journal of Water Engineering, Islamic Azad University of Shushtar. (In Persian).
  3. Barjesteh, H., Qureshi, S.Z., &Mianabadi, H. (2020). Explain the function of correlation approach in transboundary water hydropolitics. Iranian Journal of EcoHydrology, 7, 757-773. (In Persian).
  4. Bayat, F., Roozbahani, A., & Hashemy Shahdany, M. (2022). Improving the Performance of Agricultural Water Distribution Systems in Irrigation Networks Using Water-Food-Energy Nexus. Journal of Water and Irrigation Management, 11, 949-965.
  5. Benson, D., Gain, A. K., & Rouillard, J. J. (2015). Water governance in a comparative perspective: From IWRM to a “nexus” approach?. Water alternatives, 8, 756-773.
  6. El-Gafy, I. (2017). Water–food–energy nexus index: analysis of water–energy–food nexus of crop’s production system applying the indicators approach. Applied Water Science, 7, 2857-2868. doi: 10.1007/s13201-017-0551-3.
  7. Esmaeili, M.M. (2020). Water Supply Crisis in Zayandehrud Watershed; Social Issues and Solutions to Manage it (Demonstrations of 2011 to 2014). Quarterly of Social Studies and Research in Iran, 9(3), 567-585. (In Persian).
  8. García, I.F., García, A.M., Díaz, J.A.R., Barrios, P.M., & Poyato, E.C. (2018). Water energy nexus in irrigated areas. lessons from real case studies. London: Academic Press.
  9. Gohari, A. (2013). Providing adaptation solutions with different possible levels of the impact of climate change on water resources of Zayandehrud basin with a systems dynamics approach. Doctoral dissertation, Isfahan University of Technology, Isfahan. (In Persian).
  10. Gohari, A., Eslamian, S., Mirchi, A., Abedi-Koupaei, J., Massah Bavani, A., & Madani, K. (2013). Water transfer as a solution to water shortage: A fix that can Backfire. Journal of Hydrology, 491, 23-39. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.03.021.
  11. Goodarzi, M., Piriaei, R., & Mousavi, M. (2019). Climate change and exploitation of the WEF Nexus urban approach to utilizing the resources available in Boroujerd. Iranian Journal of EcoHydrology, 3, 569-584. (In Persian).
  12. Haddad, R., Banihabib, M.E., Hashemy Shahany, M., Javadi, S., & Najafi, S. (2021). Supplying Environmental Water of Gavkhoni Wetland by Improving Agricultural Water Demand Management. Journal of EcoHydrology, 8, 345-355. doi: 10.22059/IJE.2021.316459.1446. (In Persian).
  13. Hajian, N., & Hajian, P. (2015). Zayandehrud Database: Along with Graphic Data Analysis. Isfahan: Elm Afarin Publications. (In Persian).
  14. Hosseini Jolfan, M., & Yasi, M. (2021). Enhancing the integrated management of agricultural water in an irrigation network with the aim of balancing the aquifer (Case study: Qazvin irrigation District). Journal of Water and Irrigation Management, 11, 575-591.
  15. Independent Statistics Analysis U.S Energy Information Administration. (2021). Carbon Dioxide Emissions Coefficients. Retrieved from https://www.eia.gov/environment/emissions/co2_vol_mass.php.
  16. Institute for Strategic Studies-Center for Industry, Mining and Trade Information Analysis (Mata). (2013). One hundred practical points regarding the ranking of provinces in per capita consumption, diet welfare. Retrieved from Institute of Studies and Business Research. (In Persian).
  17. Jobbins, G., Kalpakian, J., Chriyaa, A., Legrouri, A., & El Mzouri, E.H. (2015). To what end? Drip irrigation and the water–energy–food nexus in Morocco. International Journal of Water Resources Development, 31(3), 393-406.
  18. Keesstra, S., Nunes, J., Novara, A., Finger, D., Avelar, D., Kalantari, Z., & Cerdà, A. (2018). The superior effect of nature based solutions in land management for enhancing ecosystem services. Science of the Total Environment, 610, 997-1009.
  19. Khoram del, S., & Amin ghafouri, A. (2015). Investigating the consumption of chemical inputs in the environment of agricultural systems in Quchan city and strategies to reduce their consumption. In: Quchan city development conference, opportunities and challenges,13 May, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Khorasan Razavi, Iran. (In Persian).
  20. Nikbakht, J., & Najib, Z. (2015). Effect of irrigation efficiency increasing on groundwater level fluctuations (Cast study: Ajab-Shir Plain, East Azarbaijan). Journal of Water and Irrigation Management, 5, 115-127.
  21. Ravar, Z., Zahraie, B., Sharifinejad, A., Gozini, H., & Jafari, S. (2020). System dynamics modeling for assessment of water–food–energy resources security and nexus in Gavkhuni basin in Iran. Indic. 108. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.105682.
  22. Sadeghi, S.H., Moghadam, E.S., Delavar, M., & Zarghami, M. )2020(. Application of water-energy-food nexus approach for designating optimal agricultural management pattern at a watershed scale. Agricultural Water Management, 233, 106071.
  23. Schlör, H., Venghaus, S., & Hake, J. F. (2018). The FEW-Nexus city index – Measuring urban resilience. Applied energy 210: 382–392. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.02.026.
  24. Soflae shahr babak, A., Mousavi, H., & Mortazavi, A. (2018). Consequences of eliminating bread subsidies on changing dependence on imports and food security, Iranian Journal of Agricultural Economics Research, 3, 82-55. (In Persian).
  25. Soltani, A. (2019). Analysis of the country's food security by 2050 with modeling of water, land, food and environment nexus: Perspectives and necessary policies. Research project report of college of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources of Gorgan University and Agricultural Research, Agricultural Education and Extension Organization (in Persian).
  26. General Statistics Office of Iran. (2017). Statistical Yearbook of Iran, Chapter 5: Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries. Tehran. Website: https://www.amar.org.ir/. (In Persian).
  27. General Statistics Office of Iran. (2019) (A). Statistical Yearbook of Iran, Chapter 4: Manpower. Tehran. Website: https://www.amar.org.ir/. (In Persian).
  28. General Statistics Office of Iran. (2019) (B). Statistical Yearbook of Iran, Chapter 23: Provincial Accounts. Tehran. Website: https://www.amar.org.ir/. (In Persian).
  29. Tayebi, M. (2020). Evaluation of adaptation policies to water scarcity in grain production based on the correlation of water, energy and food. Master Thesis, Isfahan University of Technology, Isfahan (in Persian).
  30. Vafabakhsh, J., & Mohammadzadeh, A. (2019). Investigation and study of energy flow and emission of greenhouse gases in crop and horticultural production systems (Case study: Sharifabad plain). Iranian Journal of Agricultural Ecology, 11, 382-365. (In Persian).
  31. Velaiatzade, M. (2018). Estimation of carbon emissions from fossil fuel consumption in the period 1306-94 in Iran. Iranian Quarterly Journal of Environmental Health Research, 4, 246-237. (In Persian).
  32. Zamani, A., Mortazavi, A., & Balali, H. (2014). Investigation of water economic efficiency in different crops in Bahar plain. Iranian Journal of Water Research in Agriculture, 28, 61-52. (In Persian).
  33. Zare Abyaneh, H., Aazam, D., Akhavan, S., & Jovzi, M. (2021). Performance evaluation of new irrigation systems in Hamedan. Journal of Water and Irrigation Management, 10, 381-395.
آمار
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 779
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 611





سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. قدرت گرفته از سیناوب