سامانه پشتیبانی خدمات اطلاعات

  اخبار و اعلانات

 آمار

تعداد نشریات161
تعداد شماره‌ها6,486
تعداد مقالات70,051
تعداد مشاهده مقاله123,041,416
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله96,276,047
اکبری, حامد, حاج نجاری, حسن. (1401). سازوکارهای دفاعی مورفولوژیک، رشدی و بیوشیمیایی تحمل به خشکی در ارقام انتخابی تجاری سیب. , 53(3), 629-646. doi: 10.22059/ijhs.2022.319911.1903
حامد اکبری; حسن حاج نجاری. "سازوکارهای دفاعی مورفولوژیک، رشدی و بیوشیمیایی تحمل به خشکی در ارقام انتخابی تجاری سیب". , 53, 3, 1401, 629-646. doi: 10.22059/ijhs.2022.319911.1903
اکبری, حامد, حاج نجاری, حسن. (1401). 'سازوکارهای دفاعی مورفولوژیک، رشدی و بیوشیمیایی تحمل به خشکی در ارقام انتخابی تجاری سیب', , 53(3), pp. 629-646. doi: 10.22059/ijhs.2022.319911.1903
اکبری, حامد, حاج نجاری, حسن. سازوکارهای دفاعی مورفولوژیک، رشدی و بیوشیمیایی تحمل به خشکی در ارقام انتخابی تجاری سیب. , 1401; 53(3): 629-646. doi: 10.22059/ijhs.2022.319911.1903

سازوکارهای دفاعی مورفولوژیک، رشدی و بیوشیمیایی تحمل به خشکی در ارقام انتخابی تجاری سیب

علوم باغبانی ایران
دوره 53، شماره 3، آذر 1401، صفحه 629-646    اصل مقاله (2.29 M)
نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22059/ijhs.2022.319911.1903
نویسندگان
حامد اکبری1؛ حسن حاج نجاری* 2
1دانش‌آموخته کارشناسی ارشد، گروه باغیانی، واحد علوم و تحقیقات، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران
2دانشیار، پژوهشکده میوه‌های معتدله و سردسیری، گروه ژنتیک و به نژادی، موسسه تحقیقات علوم باغبانی ، سازمان تحقیقات ‏آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی، کرج ، ایران
چکیده
بررسی­های فنوتیپی و عملکردی 93 رقم و نژادگان سیب پس از وقوع تنش خشکی شدید منجر به شناسایی 14 رقم تجاری و دو نژادگان گردید که از توانایی حفظ محصول تا زمان رسیدن برخوردار بودند. مطالعات تکمیلی پساتنش با ارزیابی 14 مولفه مورفولوژیک و ویژگی­های رشدی مانند ارتفاع درخت، سطح سایه­گستر، محیط تنه و شدت تظاهر صفات عادت رشد با هدف شناسایی ساز­و­کارهای دفاعی ثابت تکوینی انجام شد. میزان پرولین و کربوهیدرات محلول کل نمونه­های برگی ارقام و دو نژادگان متحمل در مقایسه با دو شاهد حساس 'گلدن دلیشز' و 'عسلی' مورد اندازه­گیری قرار گرفت. بین کاهش سطح کل فتوسنتز­کننده و تحمل به خشکی همبستگی مثبتی وجود داشت. قدرت رشد در 12 رقم و نژادگان کم، 2 رقم متوسط و تنها 2 رقم در سطح بالا بود. در ارقام و نژادگان‌های متحمل ارتفاع، سطح سایه گستر، محیط تنه، سطح پهنک، طول و عرض برگ کم­تر و طول میانگره کوتاه­تر بود و شاخه­های یک­ساله دارای طول و قطر دمبرگ، ضخامت شاخه، کرک سطح پایینی پهنک و کرک نیمه انتهایی شاخه بیشتر بود. ارقام متحمل با میانگین طول میانگره 91/9 میلی­متر رشد کمتری نسبت به ارقام حساس با 31/19 میلی­متر داشتند. میزان پرولین و کلروفیل کل نمونه‌های برگی در ارقام متحمل با 55/1 میلی­گرم در لیتر و 48/27 بیشتر از ارقام حساس با 35/1 میلی‌گرم در لیتر و 56/22 بود. میزان کربوهیدرات محلول کل برگ در ارقام حساس با 57/162 میلی‌گرم در لیتر نسبت به ارقام مقاوم با 7/125 میلی‌گرم در لیتر بیشتر بود.
کلیدواژه‌ها
تنش خشکی؛ تحمل؛ گزینش؛ صفات پایدار؛ تکوین؛ سازوکار دفاعی
عنوان مقاله [English]
Defensive mechanisms of the selected drought tolerant apple commercial cultivars ‎crossed by morphologies, growth and biochemical traits
نویسندگان [English]
Hamed Akbari1؛ Hassan Hajnajari2
1M. Sc. Gratuate, Department of Horticultural Science, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran‎
2Associate Professor, Temperate Cold Fruit Research Center, Genetic improvement Group, Horticulture Science Research Institude, ‎‎(AREEO), Karaj, Iran‎
چکیده [English]
Post-drought stress phenotyping and cropping assessments of 93 apple cultivars and genotypes led to individuation of 14 commercials and two drought tolerant genotypes, capable to keep the crop til ripening. Further studies were achieved at post-stress stage. Scion tree vigor components as tree height, shading area, trunk diameter, internode length and thickness, leaf length and width, stock length and diameter, leaf page hair fitness, leaf area index, leaf axis angle, cortex color, stomata number of annual shoots, hair fitness on annual shoot apex to distinct the defense mechanisms of the evolved stable traits were invetigated. The proline and total carbohydrates contents of the leaf samples were measured as well as fruit biochemical traits of pH, TSS and TA of the tolerant and susceptible 'Golden Delicious' and 'Assali'. Positive correlation was found between reduced total photosynthetic area and drought tolerance so that tree vigor was ranked as weak in 12 Cvs, middle in 2 Cvs and only high in 2 Cvs. The tolerant CVs tree height, shading area, trunk diameter, leaf area index, leaf length and width, internode length demonstrated lower values but the annual shoots presented higher rates of leaf stalck length and diameter shoot diameter, and higher hair density of leaf and shoot apex. The mean if internode length, 9/91 mm, was lower in tolerant Cvs than controls as 19.31 mm. The leaf samples of tolerant Cvs had higher proline 1.55 mg/l, total chlorophyll contents of 27.48 than 1.35 and 22.56 related to the controls. The control Cvs showed increased leaf carbohydrates 162.57 mg/l than tolerant Cvs 125.7 mg/l.
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
Drought stress, tolerance, selection, stable traits, evolution, defense mechanism‎
مراجع
  1. Abbaszadeh, B., Sharifi ashourabadi, E., Lebaschi, M.H., Naderi hajibagher Kandy, M. & Moghadami, F. (2008). The effect of drought stress on proline contents, soluble sugars, chlorophyll and relative water contents of balm (Melissa officinalis). Iranian Journal of Medicinal and Aromatic Plants, 23, 504-513. (In Farsi).
  2. Association of Official Analytical Chemists. (1995). Official methods of analysis of AOAC International (16th). Arlington, VA., USA: AOAC.
  3. Aras, S. & Keles, H. (2019). Responses of apple plants to drought stress. Journal of Agricultural Studies, 7 (3), 154-160.
  4. Arji, I. & Arzani, K. (2003). Evaluation of the growth responses and proline accumulation in three Iranian native olive cultivars under drought stress. Journal of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, 2, 10 (2), 91-101. (In Farsi).
  5. Atashkar, D., Ershadi, A., Taheri, M. & Abdollahi, H. (2018). Screening for drought tolerance in some hybrid apple rootstocks based on photosynthesis characteristics. Iranian Journal of Horticultural Sciences, 49, 1013-1024. (In Farsi).
  6. Atashkar, D. (2009). Assessment of growth habit, genetic stability and commercial use of some spur type apples. 10th Iranian Genetic Congress. 21 May. 2008. Tehran-Iran, P. 238, (In Farsi).
  7. Bai, T., Li, Z., Song, C., Song, S., Jiao, J., Liu, Y., Dong, Z. & Zheng, X. (2019). Contrasting drought tolerance in two apple cultivars associated with difference in leaf morphology and anatomy. American Journal of Plant Sciences, 10, 709-722.
  8. Bassett, C., Vahdati, K. & Leslie, C. (2013). Water use and drought response in cultivated and wild In: Abiotic Stress. 249-275. Ch. 8. Publisher: IntechOpen.
  9. Bates, L. S., Waldren, R. P. & Teare, I. D. )1973(. Rapid determination of free proline for water-stress studies. Plant and Soil, 39, 205-207.
  10. Bhusal, N., Han, S., Tae-Myung, G. & Yoon, T.M. (2019). Impact of drought stress on photosynthetic response, leaf water potential, and stem sap flow in two cultivars of bi-leader apple trees (Malus × domestica ). Scientia Horticulturae, 246, 543-535.
  11. Coupel-Ledru, A., Pallas, B. & Delalande, M. (2019). Multi-scale high-throughput phenotyping of apple architectural and functional traits in orchard reveals genotypic variability under contrasted watering regimes. Horticultural Research, 6, 52.
  12. Dichio, B., Xiloyannis, C., Sofo, A. & Montanaro, G. (2005). Osmotic regulation in leaves and roots of olive trees during a water deficit and rewatering. Tree Physiology, 26, 179-185.
  13. Dimitrova, S., Sotirov, D. & Liu, M. (2020). Reaction of apple cultivars to abiotic and biotic stress factors. Acta Horticulturae, 1281, 67-72.
  14. Ebel, R. C., Proebsting, E. L. & Evans, R. G. (2001). Apple tree and fruit responses to early termination of irrigation in a semi-arid environment. HortSience, 36(7), 1197-1201.
  15. Ennajeh, M., Vadel, A.M., Cochard, H., & Khemira, H. (2010). Comparative impacts of water stress on the leaf anatomy of a drought-resistant and a drought-sensitive olive cultivar. Journal of Horticultural Science & Biotechnology, 85 (4), 289-294.
  16. Flore, J. A., Lakso, A. N. & Moon, J. W. (1985). The effect of water stress and vapor pressure gradient on stomatal conductance, water use efficiency, and photosynthesis of fruit crops. Acta Horticulturae, 171, 207-218.
  17. Galindo, A., Collado-González, J. & Griñán, I. (2018). Deficit irrigation and emerging fruit crops as a strategy to save water in Mediterranean semiarid agrosystems. Agricultural Water Management, 202, 311-324.
  18. Gharaghani, A., Zamani, Z., Talaie, A., Oraguzie, N.C., Fattahi, R., Hajnajari, H., Wiedow, C. & Gardiner, S.E. (2009). The role of Iran (Persia) in apple domestication, evolution and migration via the silk trade route. Acta Horticulturae, 859, 229-236.
  19. Hajnajari, H. & Eccher, T. (2006). Natural selection of spring cold resistant cultivars and mechanisms of biological resistance among 108 apple genotypes. In: Abstracts and contents of 27th International Horticulture Congress. August 13-19, P. 371, Seul. Korea.
  20. Hajnajari, H. (2010). Cultivar evaluation program of the national Iranian apple collection in the last decade. Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference of Fruit Growing Intensification in Belarus: Traditions, Progress, Prospects, 31 September - 1 October, pp 33-39, Belarus.
  21. Hajnajari, H. (2021). 33 half-sib apple clonal rootstocks tolerant to crown rot produced in a 14 years patho-breeding program. Acta Horticulturae, 1315, 227-236.
  22. Hajnajari, , Akbari, H. & Abdossi, V. (2019). Genesis of ultra-specialized histology with stable traits in mesophyll of drought tolerant apple cultivars. Scientia Horticulturae, 249, 168-176.
  23. Hassani, Gh., Mahmudzadeh, H. & Dolati Baneh, H. (2013). Fruit yield efficiency and some vegetative characteristics of commercial and spur type apple cultivars. Seed and Plant, 3 (28-2), 373-376. (In Farsi).
  24. Heidari Sharif Abad, H. (2001). Plant, drought and aridity. Research Institute of Forest and Rangelands. Tehran edition. (In Farsi).
  25. Iranian Meteorological Organization. (2012). Retrieved September 2019. http://www.weather.ir/s7.pdf. (In Farsi).
  26. Irigoyen, J.J., Einerich, D.W. & Sánchez-Díaz, M. (1992). Water stress induced changes in concentrations of proline and total soluble sugars in nodulated alfalfa (Medicago sativa) plants Physiologia Plantarum, 84(1), 55 – 60.
  27. Ishihara, K. (1981). Control of photosynthesis by various factors. Water content in soil and leaf, p.88-101. In: S. Miyachi (ed.). Plant physiology, Asakura Press. Tokyo.
  28. Jie, Z., Yuncong, Y., Streeter, J. G. & Ferree, D. C. (2010). Influence of soil drought stress on photosynthesis, carbohydrates and the nitrogen and phophorus absorb in different section of leaves and stem of Fugi/M.9EML, a young apple seedling. African Journal of Biotechnology, 9 (33), 16,
  29. 5320-5325.
  30. Kellerhals, M., Spuhler, M., Duffy, B., Patocchi, A. & Frey, J.E. (2009). Selection efficiency in apple breeding. Acta Horticulturae, 814, 177-184.
  31. Kuznetsov, V. I. & Shevykova, N.I. (1999) Proline under stress: Biological role, metabolism, and regulation. Russian Journal of Plant Physiology, 46, 274-287.
  32. Laajimi, N.O., Boussadia, O., Skahiri, F.H., Silva, J.A.T., Rezgui, S. & Hellali, R.(2011) Anatomical adaptations in vegetative structures of apricot tree (Prunus armeniaca) cv. 'Amor El Euch' grown under water stress. Fruit, Vegetable and Cereal Science and Biotechnology, 5, 46-51.
  33. Marconi, G., Ferradini, N., Russi, L., Concezzi, L., Veronesi, F., Albertini, E. (2018). Apple genetic characterization of the germplasm collection in central Italy: the value of local varieties. Froniers in Plant Science, 1460, 1-17.
  34. Mark, G., Connell, O. & Goodwin, I. (2007). Responses of 'Pink Lady' to low irrigation and partial root zone drying: physiology, growth, yield, and fruit quality. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research, 58, 1068-1076.
  35. Michelakis, N., Vouyoukalou, E. & Clapaki, G. (1995). Plant growth and yield response of the olive tree cv. Kalamon for different of soil water potential and methods of irrigation. Advances in Horticulture Sciences, 3, 136-139.
  36. Mostofi, Y. & Najafi, F. (2016). Analytical laboratory methods on horticultural science. Tehran University Publication. 136 pages. (In Farsi).
  37. Mratinić, E. & Akšić, M. F. (2012). Phenotypic diversity of apple (Malus sp.) germplasm in south Serbia. Brazilian Archives of Biology and Technology, 55(3), 349-358.
  38. Naschitz, S., Naor, A. & Wolf, S. (2014). The effects of temperature and drought on autumnal senescence and leaf shed in apple under warm, east mediterranean climate. Trees, 28, 879–890.
  39. Nayyar, H. & Walia, D. W. (2003). Stress induced proline accumulation in contrasting wheat genotypes as affected by calcium and abscisic acid. Biologia Plantarum, 46, 275–279.
  40. Nenko, N.I., Kisileva, G.K., Ulianovskaya, E.V., Yablonskaya, E.K. & Karavaeva, A.V. (2018). Physiological-biochemical criteria of the apple-tree resistance to the summer period abiotic stresses. Eurasian Jiournal of BioScience. 12, 55-61.
  41. Peng, X., Guo, Z. & Zhang, Y. (2017). Simulation of long-term yield and soil water consumption in apple orchards on the Loess Plateau, China, in response to fertilization. Scientific Reports, 7,
  42. Sato, Y., Kawabuchi, Sh., Irimoto, Y. & Miyawaki, O. (2004). Effect of water activity and solvent-ordering on intermolecular interaction of high-methoxyl pectins in various sugar solutions. Food Hydrocolloids, 18, 527-534.
  43. Serraj, R. & Sinclair, T. R. (2002). Osmolyte accumulation: can it really help increase crop yield under drought conditions? Plant, Cell and Environment, 25, 333–341.
  44. Sircelj, H., Tausz, M., Grill, D. & Batic. F. (2007). Detecting different levels of drought stress in apple trees by selected biochemical and physiological parameters. Scientia Horticulturae, 113, 362-369.
  45. Soroori, S., Hajnajari, H., Rezaei, S. & Zamani Zadeh, H. (2010). Primary evaluation of apple powdery mildew in 5 populations of half sib progenies obtained from selective dwarf apple cultivars. Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference of Fruit Growing Intensification in Belarus: Traditions, Progress, Prospects, 31 September-1 October, 48-52, Samokhvalovichi, Belarus.
  46. Treder, W., Konopacki, P. & Mika, A. (1997). Duration of water stress and its influence on the growth of nursery apple trees planted in containers under plastic tunnel conditions. Acta Horticulturae, 499 (2), 541-544.
  47. Walsh, C.S. and Miller, A.N. (1984). Observations of the growth and vigor of spur and non-spur-type apple trees. Acta Horticulturae, 146, 211-214.
  48. Wang, N., Guo, T., Wang, P., Sun, X., Shao, Y., Jia, X., Liang, B., Gong, X. & Ma, F. (2017). MhYTP1 and MhYTP2 from apple confer tolerance to multiple abiotic stresses in Arabidopsis thaliana. Froniers in Plant Science, 8, 1367.
  49. Wang, H., Zhao, S., Mao, K. (2018). Mapping QTLs for water-use efficiency reveals the potential candidate genes involved in regulating the trait in apple under drought stress. BMC Plant Biology, 18, 136.
  50. Wei, L., Dondini, L., De Franceschi Paris, R., Sansavini, S. & Tartarini, S. (2014). Genetic diversity, population structure and construction of a core collection of apple cultivars from Italian germplasm. Plant Molecular Biology Reporter, 33, 1-16.
  51. Wünsche, J.N., Greer, D., Laing, A.W. Palmer J.W. (2005). Physiological and biochemical leaf and tree responses to crop load in apple. Tree Physiology, 25, 1253-1263.
  52. Yuanji, W., Li, L., Ying, W., Hongxia, T., Junliang, F., Zhengyang, Z. & Yanping, G. (2019). Effects of soil water stress on fruit yield, quality and their relationship with sugar metabolism in ‘Gala’ apple. Scientia Horticulturae, 258, 108753.
آمار
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 229
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 173


سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. قدرت گرفته از سیناوب