پیوندهای مفید
اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 158 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 6,228 |
| تعداد مقالات | 67,746 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 115,075,409 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 89,809,543 |
ارائه چارچوب کمیاب‌سازی محصول در بازاریابی: مرور نظام‌مند مبانی نظری | ||
| مدیریت بازرگانی | ||
| دوره 14، شماره 3، 1401، صفحه 418-444 اصل مقاله (691.98 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله علمی پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22059/jibm.2022.338352.4310 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| علی عبدالهی* 1؛ سجاد مزارعی2؛ سید محمود حسینی3؛ مریم اخوان خرازیان1 | ||
| 1استادیار، گروه مدیریت بازرگانی، دانشکده مدیریت و حسابداری، دانشگاه شهید بهشتی، تهران، ایران. | ||
| 2دانشجوی دکتری، مدیریت بازرگانی، دانشکده مدیریت و حسابداری، دانشگاه شهید بهشتی، تهران، ایران. | ||
| 3دانشیار، گروه مدیریت بازرگانی، دانشکده مدیریت و حسابداری، دانشگاه شهید بهشتی، تهران، ایران. | ||
| چکیده | ||
| هدف: پژوهش در زمینه بازاریابی اغلب با دو پیش‌فرض آغاز می‌شود: یکی اینکه مصرف‌کنندگان بتوانند از بین محصولات مطلوب انتخاب کنند و دوم اینکه منابع کافی برای خرید آن‌ها داشته باشند. با این حال، به‌دلیل کمبود محصولات، بسیاری از تصمیم‌گیری‌های مصرف‌کننده محدود می‌شود. بر این اساس، پژوهش‌های متعددی در زمینه کمیاب‌سازی محصول انجام شده و ادبیات این حوزه، طیفی وسیعی از موضوعات را مبتنی بر نظریه‌های مختلف، با استفاده از روش‌های متفاوت تحقیق و در شرایط و زمینه‌های مختلف، پوشش داده است؛ هرچند تنوع پژوهش‌ها باعث شده است که دریافت مطالب و یافته‌های اصلی آن‌ها و همچنین درک شکاف‌های پژوهشی دشوار شود. هدف مقاله حاضر، بررسی مطالعات قبلی در خصوص استفاده از کمیاب‌سازی محصول در بازاریابی و شناسایی مسیرهای جدید برای پژوهش‌های آتی است. روش: برای دستیابی به این هدف، با استفاده از روش مرور نظام‌مند، پس از استخراج و پالایش پژوهش‌ها، در نهایت، 66 مقاله و پژوهش به شکل عمیق بررسی شد. یافته‌ها: تحلیل مقاله‌های مربوطه نشان می‌دهد که شاکله اصلی ادبیات کمیاب‌سازی محصول روی روابط علّی، میان چهار شاخه از عوامل متمرکز است که عبارت‌اند از: مشخصه‌های مصرف‌کننده در خصوص کمیاب‌سازی محصول، انواع مختلف کمیاب‌سازی، محصولات متفاوت و اثرگذاری‌های کمیاب‌سازی محصول. نتیجه‌گیری: در این پژوهش بر اساس تحلیل و ترکیب عوامل شناسایی، چارچوب مفهومی کمیاب‌سازی محصول در بازاریابی ارائه شد که در آن، چگونگی اثرگذاری هر یک از این عوامل بر مصرف‌کنندگان و بازار در آن مشخص شده است. همچنین، بر اساس شکاف‌های نظری شناسایی‌شده، مسیرهای جدید برای پژوهش‌های آتی مشخص شده است. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| کمیاب‌سازی محصول؛ مرور نظام‌مند؛ نسخه‌های محدود | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Developing a Product Scarcity Framework in Marketing: A Systematic Review of Theoretical Foundations | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Ali Abdollahi1؛ Sajad Mazarei2؛ Seyed Mahmoud Hosseini3؛ Maryam Akhavan Kharazian1 | ||
| 1Assistant Prof., Department of Business Management, Faculty of Management and Accounting, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran. | ||
| 2Ph.D. Candidate, Department of Business Management, Faculty of Management and Accounting, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran. | ||
| 3Associate Prof., Department of Business Management, Faculty of Management and Accounting, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran. | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| Objective Market research often begins with two assumptions; first, consumers are able to choose among desirable products, and second, they have sufficient resources to buy them. However, many consumer decisions are constrained by the scarcity of products. In recent years, product scarcity has been used in marketing as a business phenomenon and the issue has received increasing attention from both academics and practitioners. The available academic literature discusses a wide variety of subjects investigated based on various theories, using different research methods in a diverse range of settings. However, this diversity makes it difficult to obtain the core themes and findings and also to recognize the outstanding knowledge gaps. The purpose of this article is to review previous studies on the use of product scarcity in marketing and also to identify new directions for future research. The review was conducted for two purposes: initially, to describe the current state of research on the use of product scarcity in marketing, and second, to identify the present gaps in the current literature to highlight opportunities for future research. In particular, this review sought to answer the following: How can different types of product scarcity help firms improve their marketing performance, and what factors need to be considered in the process? Methodology The present research is conducted based on the systematic literature review method. In the first step, while determining and specifying the subject of study, the research questions were developed in accordance with the research design. In the next step, the research protocol was designed and an appropriate mental model was designed, accordingly. Subsequently, inclusion and exclusion criteria were determined. Accordingly, the comprehensive and systematic search began within the literature and 914 studies were selected. After classifying, screening, and evaluating their quality, 66 studies were finally examined in depth and the required data were collected. Findings The analysis of the identified papers led to the development of a conceptual framework to describe the key factors of product scarcity and how these factors influence both consumers and the market. The established framework indicated that the use of product scarcity in marketing depends on consumer characteristics, types of scarcity, and types of products. The use has different impacts on consumers. By purchasing scarce products, consumers satisfy their needs for uniqueness, conformity, behavioral freedom, and/or avoiding future regret. All of the above can increase consumers’ perception of the value of products and consequently boost their willingness to purchase. Conclusion This paper systematically reviewed a sample of previous studies on product scarcity, with a focus on the use of product scarcity as an effective marketing strategy to improve market as well as firm performance. The analysis of the identified literature highlighted the main findings obtained so far, summarised the underlying theories for product scarcity in marketing, and developed a framework based on the key factors and causal relationships. The analysis of the identified papers proves substantial gaps in our knowledge of this field, opening up new paths for future research. Based on the current review, we see a key limitation resulting from the lack of research uncovering the process black box between product scarcity and performance improvement. This is also largely caused by the lack of high-quality case studies on this issue in the existing literature. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| Product scarcity, Systematic review, Scarcity framework | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
References Abendroth, L.J. & Diehl, K. (2006). Now or Never: Effects of Limited Purchase Opportunities on Patterns of Regret over Time. Journal of Consumer Research, 33(3):342–51. Aggarwal, P., Jun, S. Y., & Huh, J. H. (2011). Scarcity Messages: A Consumer Competition Perspective. Journal of Advertising, 40(3), 19–30. Aguirre-Rodriguez, A. (2013). The Effect of Consumer Persuasion Knowledge on Scarcity Appeal Persuasiveness. Journal of Advertising, 42(4), 371–79. Amaldoss, W. & Jain, S. (2010). Reference Groups and Product Line Decisions: An Experimental Investigation of Limited Editions and Product Proliferation. Management Science, 56(4), 621–44. Balachander, S., Liu, Y. & Stock, A. (2009). An Empirical Analysis of Scarcity Strategies in the Automobile Industry. Management Science, 55(10), 1623–37. Balachander, S., Liu, Y. & Stock, A. (2009). Limited Edition Products: When and When Not to Offer Them. Marketing Science, 28(2), 336–55. Bernheim, B. D. (1994). A Theory of Conformity. Journal of Political Economy 102(5), 841–877. Bozzolo, A.M. & Brock, T.C. (1992). Unavailability Effects on Message Processing: A Theoretical Analysis and an Empirical Test. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 13(1), 93–101. Castro, I., Morales, A.C. & Nowlis, S.M. (2013). The Influence of Disorganized Shelf Displays and Limited Product Quantity on Consumer Purchase. Journal of Marketing, 77(4), 118–33. Chen, S. & Jia, J. (2020). Pricing and Introductory Scarcity Strategies Based on Consumers’ Response. International Transactions in Operational Research 27(4), 2081–2111. Chung, N., Song, H.G. & Lee, H. (2017). Consumers’ Impulsive Buying Behavior of Restaurant Products in Social Commerce. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 29(2), 709–31. Clee, M.A. & Wicklund, R.A. (1980). Consumer Behavior and Psychological Reactance. Journal of Consumer Research, 6(4), 389. DeSousa, M., Reeve, C.L. & Peterman, A.H. (2020). Development and Initial Validation of the Perceived Scarcity Scale. Stress and Health, 36(2), 131–146. Dhar, R. & Nowlis, S.M. (1999). The Effect of Time Pressure on Consumer Choice Deferral. Journal of Consumer Research, 25(4), 369–384. Donnelly, G.E., Wilson, A.V., Whillans, A.V. & Norton, M.I. (2021). Communicating Resource Scarcity and Interpersonal Connection. Journal of Consumer Psychology. Dörnyei, K.R. (2020). Limited Edition Packaging: Objectives, Implementations and Related Marketing Mix Decisions of a Scarcity Product Tactic. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 37(6), 617–27. Eisend, M. (2008). Explaining the Impact of Scarcity Appeals in Advertising. The Mediating Role of Perceptions of Susceptibility. Journal of Advertising, 37(3), 33–40. Gabler, C. B., Landers, V.M. & Reynolds, K.E. (2017). Purchase Decision Regret: Negative Consequences of the Steadily Increasing Discount Strategy. Journal of Business Research, 76, 201–208. Gierl, H. & Huettl, V. (2010). Are Scarce Products Always More Attractive? The Interaction of Different Types of Scarcity Signals with Products’ Suitability for Conspicuous Consumption. International Journal of Research in Marketing 27(3), 225–35. Hwang, Y., Ko, E. & Megehee, C.M. (2014). When Higher Prices Increase Sales: How Chronic and Manipulated Desires for Conspicuousness and Rarity Moderate Price’s Impact on Choice of Luxury Brands. Journal of Business Research, 67(9), 1912–20. John, M.A., Melis, P., Read, D., Rossano, F. & Tomasello, M. (2018). The Preference for Scarcity: A Developmental and Comparative Perspective. Psychology and Marketing 35(8), 603–15. Koch, O.F. & Benlian, A. (2015). Promotional Tactics for Online Viral Marketing Campaigns: How Scarcity and Personalization Affect Seed Stage Referrals. Journal of Interactive Marketing 32, 37–52. Kristofferson, K., Mcferran, B., Morales, A.C. & Dahl, D.W. (2017). The Dark Side of Scarcity Promotions: How Exposure to Limited-Quantity Promotions Can Induce Aggression. Journal of Consumer Research, 43(5), 683–706. Ku, H.H., Kuo, Ch. C., Ting Yang, T. & Shao Chung, T. (2013). Decision-Contextual and Individual Influences on Scarcity Effects. European Journal of Marketing 47(8), 1314–1332. Lessne, G.J. & Notarantonio, E.M. (1988). The Effect of Limits in Retail Advertisements: A Reactance Theory Perspective. Psychology & Marketing 5(1), 33–44. Li, H., Xu, Y. & Huang, L. (2021). When Less Is More? The Contingent Effect of Product Supply Limitation in the Release of New Electronic Products. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services 60(June 2020), 102433. Loomes, G. & Sugden, R. (1982). Regret Theory: An Alternative Theory of Rational Choice Under Uncertainty Published by: Wiley on Behalf of the Royal Economic Society Stable URL: Http://Www.Jstor.Org/Stable/2232669 Accessed : 06-04-2016 00. The Economic Journal 92(368), 805–24. Lynn, M. (1991). Scarcity Effects on Value: A Quantitative Review of the Commodity Theory Literature. Psychology & Marketing, 8(1), 43–57. Mazis, M. B., Settle, R.B., Leslie, D.C., Mazis, B. & Settle, B. (1973). Reactance Psychological Of. Journal of Marketing Research 10(4), 390–95. Mittone, L. & Savadori, L. (2009). The Scarcity Bias. Applied Psychology 58(3), 453–68. Mukherjee, A. & Yun Lee, S. (2016). Scarcity Appeals in Advertising: The Moderating Role of Expectation of Scarcity. Journal of Advertising, 45(2), 256–68. Park, H., Lalwani, A. K. & Silvera, D.H. (2020). The Impact of Resource Scarcity on Price-Quality Judgments. Journal of Consumer Research, 46(6), 1110–24. Park, S., Rabinovich, E., Tang, C.S. & Yin, R. (2020). The Impact of Disclosing Inventory-Scarcity Messages on Sales in Online Retailing. Journal of Operations Management 66(5), 534–52. Parker, J. R. & Lehmann, D.R. (2011). When Shelf-Based Scarcity Impacts Consumer Preferences. Journal of Retailing 87(2), 142–55. Robinson, S. G., Brady, M.K., Lemon, K.N. & Giebelhausen, M. (2016). Less of This One? I’ll Take It: New Insights on the Influence of Shelf-Based Scarcity. International Journal of Research in Marketing 33(4), 961–65. Roux, C., Goldsmith, K. & Bonezzi, A. (2015). On the Psychology of Scarcity: When Reminders of Resource Scarcity Promote Selfish (and Generous) Behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, 42(4), 615–31. Roy, R. & Sharma, P. (2015). Scarcity Appeal in Advertising: Exploring the Moderating Roles of Need for Uniqueness and Message Framing. Journal of Advertising 44(4), 349–59. Sevilla, J. & Redden, J.P. (2014). Limited Availability Reduces the Rate of Satiation. Journal of Marketing Research, 51(2), 205–17. Shah, A.K., Shafir, E. & Mullainathan, S. (2015). Scarcity Frames Value. Psychological Science 26(4), 402–12. Sharma, E. & Alter, A.L. (2012). Financial Deprivation Prompts Consumers to Seek Scarce Goods. Journal of Consumer Research, 39(3), 545–60. Sharma, P. & Roy, R. (2016). Looking beyond First-Person Effects (FPEs) in the Influence of Scarcity Appeals in Advertising: A Replication and Extension of Eisend (2008). Journal of Advertising 45(1), 78–84. Shi, X., Li, F. & Chumnumpan, P. (2020). The Use of Product Scarcity in Marketing. European Journal of Marketing 54(2), 380–418. Shin, H., Eastman, J.K. & Mothersbaugh, D. (2017). The Effect of a Limited-Edition Offer Following Brand Dilution on Consumer Attitudes toward a Luxury Brand. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services 38(January), 59–70. Snyder, C. R. & Fromkin, H.L. (1977). Abnormality as a Positive Characteristic: The Development and Validation of a Scale Measuring Need for Uniqueness. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 86(5), 518–527. Song, T., Yi, C. & Huang, J. (2017). Whose Recommendations Do You Follow? An Investigation of Tie Strength, Shopping Stage, and Deal Scarcity. Information and Management 54(8), 1072–1083. Steinhart, Y., Mazursky, D. & Kamins, M.A. (2013). The Process by Which Product Availability Triggers Purchase. Marketing Letters 24(3), 217–28. Stock, A. & Subramanian, B. (2005). The Making of a ‘Hot Product’: A Signaling Explanation of Marketers’ Scarcity Strategy. Management Science, 51(8), 1181–1192. Sun, Q., Rajamma, R.K. Heisley, D.D. & Soliman, M.A. (2021). Examining Scarcity in Mobile Promotion and Purchase Intention: The Role of Location. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice 00(00), 1–19. Suri, R., Kohli, C. & Monroe, K.B. (2007). The Effects of Perceived Scarcity on Consumers’ Processing of Price Information. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 35(1), 89–100. Teubner, T. & Graul, A. (2020). Only One Room Left! How Scarcity Cues Affect Booking Intentions on Hospitality Platforms. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications 39(November 2019), 100910. Tseng, T.H., Huang, H.H. & Liu, M.T. (2021). Limited-Edition Advertising Does Not Always Work for Luxury Brands: The Influence of Consumption Contexts. Journal of Consumer Behaviour (January):1–12. van Herpen, E., Pieters, R. & Zeelenberg, M. (2009). When Demand Accelerates Demand: Trailing the Bandwagon. Journal of Consumer Psychology 19(3), 302–12. Wirtz, B. W., Pistoia, A., Ullrich, S. & Göttel, V. (2016). Business Models: Origin, Development and Future Research Perspectives. Long Range Planning 49(1), 36–54. Wu, L. & Lee, C. (2016). Limited Edition for Me and Best Seller for You: The Impact of Scarcity versus Popularity Cues on Self versus Other-Purchase Behavior. Journal of Retailing, 92(4), 486–99. Wu, W.Y., Lu, H.Y., Wu, Y.Y. & Fu, C.S. (2012). The Effects of Product Scarcity and Consumers’ Need for Uniqueness on Purchase Intention. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 36(3), 263–74. Zhu, M. & Ratner, R.K. (2015). Scarcity Polarizes Preferences: The Impact on Choice among Multiple Items in a Product Class. Journal of Marketing Research 52(1), 13–26. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 589 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 506 |
||